A 16-Year Analysis of Aesthetic Surgery Volume and Its Association With US Economic Performance.

Historically, demand for plastic surgery has been associated with the performance of the US economy. This study evaluates the relationship between economic performance indicators and the popularity and profitability of aesthetic surgery from 2006 to 2022, considering several recessions and the rise of social media. The data were collected from the Aesthetic Society's (AS) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' (ASPS) Plastic Surgery Statistics Report from 2006 to 2022. Procedures analyzed included the most performed cosmetic surgeries, as well as neuromodulator injections and dermal fillers. Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze the strength of association between 8 financial indicators and case volumes and expenditures for each procedure. From 2006 to 2020, ASPS data demonstrated gross domestic product (GDP) per capita year-over-year (YOY) change that was positively correlated with case volume and expenditures across 13 out of the 24 different procedure metrics (54.2%). From 2006 to 2016, AS data were positively correlated with the YOY change of theNational Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ), Standard and Poor's 500, and Dow Jones in 12 of the 24 variables (50%). This was followed by GDP YOY change, with positive correlations to 11 variables (45.8%). YOY changes of consumer-level finances and inflation indicators were less frequently associated among both datasets.In conclusion, our study shows that aesthetic plastic surgery procedures and expenditures correlate with GDP. Although aesthetic surgery demand may be difficult to anticipate, this study elucidates several factors plastic surgeons may use as a bellwether for their practices.

A Day in the Life of a Surgical Instrument: The Cycle of Sterilization.

Surgeons must be confident that the instruments they use do not pose risk of infection to patients due to bioburden or contamination. Despite this importance, surgeons are not necessarily aware of the steps required to ensure that an instrument has been properly sterilized, processed, and prepared for the next operation. At the end of an operation, instruments must be transported to the sterile processing unit. There, instruments are decontaminated before being sterilized by heat, chemical, or radiation-based methods. Following this, they are stored before being brought back into use. This review highlights the intricacies of the processing of surgical instruments at the conclusion of an operation so that they are ready for the next one.

Unmatched. What's Next? Is a Preliminary Year of Residency or Research Fellowship Better for Reapplicants to Plastic Surgery?

Background: Plastic and reconstructive surgery is one of the most competitive residency programs, and given the increased number of applicants for a relatively fixed number of positions, successfully matching is a challenge. Match rates have declined since 2018, with a match rate of ~55% in 2022. Two common options before reapplying are a preliminary year of residency (preliminary year) or a research fellowship. This study investigated which option is more beneficial for reapplicants seeking a successful match. Methods: This retrospective study included all applicants to an integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery residency from 2015 to 2023. Two cohorts based on reapplication strategy (research fellowship or preliminary year) were created. Demographic, applicant, and match data were collected. Pearson chi-squared, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were performed. Results: In total, 125 reapplicants were included. Seventy-one (56.8%) reapplicants pursued a preliminary year, and 29 (23.2%) completed a research fellowship. Research fellowship reapplicants had a greater mean number of first author publications (8.8 versus 3.2, P < 0.001), non-first author publications (11.3 versus 5.9, P = 0.021), poster presentations (9.7 versus 6.0, P = 0.028), and oral presentations (11.8 versus 6.4, P < 0.001). Research fellowship reapplicants were more likely to match into plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) than preliminary year reapplicants, with 72.4% (n = 21) of research fellowship reapplicants matching into PRS compared with 39.4% (n = 28) of preliminary year reapplicants (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Research fellowship reapplicants demonstrated greater research productivity and were almost twice as likely to match into PRS compared with preliminary reapplicants.

Can Electrical Stimulation Prevent Recurrence of Keloid Scars? A Scoping Review.

Objective: Keloids represent a symptomatic, aberrant healing process that is difficult to treat with high recurrence rates spanning from 55% to 100% if treated via excision without adjuvant therapy. Electrical stimulation (ES) has demonstrated findings that suggest it could reduce the recurrence rate of keloids after resection. Therefore, the aim of this study is to conduct a scoping review to investigate ES as an adjuvant therapy for decreasing keloid recurrence after excision. Approach: A scoping review was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases. The search strategy encompassed terms linking keloids and various aspects of electrical stimulation. Results: Our search yielded 2,229 articles, of which 115 articles were analyzed as full text and 1 article met inclusion criteria. Despite this, ES has demonstrated other evidence that suggests its utility. ES has been shown to counter keloidic features by reducing mast cell counts, shifting wound composition from M2 to M1 macrophages, promoting angiogenesis, and controlling fibroblast orientation and location. An alternating current will orient fibroblasts perpendicular to the current without unintended migration. Innovation: Our study indicates that, based on a compilation of clinical and preclinical in vitro data, the optimal scenario for ES in the role of keloid treatment is after excision with a biphasic pulsed application and square waveform. Conclusions: ES could serve as a multifaceted, adjuvant treatment after keloid excision, steering the healing process away from keloid-associated characteristics. Its cost-effectiveness means it could be adopted globally, providing a strategy to mitigate the burden of keloids irrespective of other available treatments or economic conditions.

Robotic Rectus Abdominis Harvest for Pelvic Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection.

The use of robotic surgical systems to perform abdominoperineal resection (APR) has recently become more prevalent. This minimally invasive approach produces fewer scars and potentially less morbidity for the patient. The rectus abdominis muscle is often used for reconstruction after APR if primary closure is not feasible or the surgical site is at high risk of wound complications. Since the traditional open harvest of this flap creates large incisions that negate the advantages of minimally invasive APR, there has been growing interest in harvesting the rectus abdominis in a similarly robotic fashion. This article reviews the technique, benefits, and limitations of this robotic technique. Compared to the traditional open harvest, robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis leaves smaller scars, provides technical benefits for the surgeon, and offers possible morbidity benefits for the patient. These advantages should be weighed against the added expense and learning curve inherent to robotic surgery.