Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 17(10): e0275101, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260598

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic claimed millions of lives worldwide without clear signs of abating despite several mitigation efforts and vaccination campaigns. There have been tremendous interests in understanding the etiology of the disease particularly in what makes it severe and fatal in certain patients. Studies have shown that COVID-19 patients with kidney injury on admission were more likely to develop severe disease, and acute kidney disease was associated with high mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. METHODS: This study investigated 819 COVID-19 patients admitted between January 2020-April 2021 to the COVID-19 ward at a tertiary care center in Lebanon and evaluated their vital signs and biomarkers while probing for two main outcomes: intubation and fatality. Logistic and Cox regressions were performed to investigate the association between clinical and metabolic variables and disease outcomes, mainly intubation and mortality. Times were defined in terms of admission and discharge/fatality for COVID-19, with no other exclusions. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed that the following are independent risk factors for both intubation and fatality respectively: diabetes (p = 0.021 and p = 0.04), being overweight (p = 0.021 and p = 0.072), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.045 and p = 0.001), and gender (p = 0.016 and p = 0.114). Further, shortness of breath (p<0.001), age (p<0.001) and being overweight (p = 0.014) associated with intubation, while fatality with shortness of breath (p<0.001) in our group of patients. Elevated level of serum creatinine was the highest factor associated with fatality (p = 0.002), while both white blood count (p<0.001) and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase levels (p<0.001) emerged as independent risk factors for intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively our data show that high creatinine levels were significantly associated with fatality in our COVID-19 study patients, underscoring the importance of kidney function as a main modulator of SARS-CoV-2 morbidity and favor a careful and proactive management of patients with elevated creatinine levels on admission.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Aspartato Aminotransferases , Biomarcadores , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Creatinina , Dispneia , Líbano/epidemiologia , Morbidade , Sobrepeso , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Clin Respir J ; 12(4): 1407-1415, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28779544

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: No standardized sedation protocol is available for flexible bronchoscopy (FB). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three regimens used for sedation during FB. METHODS: This randomized double-blind controlled trial assessed patients undergoing bronchoscopy and receiving lidocaine alone (C) or combined with dexmedetomidine (D) or alfentanil (A). Tolerance was assessed using the bronchoscopy score, and level of sedation was assessed using the Nursing Instrument for the Communication of Sedation. Safety was evaluated in terms of pulmonary function and vital signs. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were enrolled. The bronchoscopy score was identical in all groups. Group D subjects were the most sedated (P = .013), whereas group A subjects were the least agitated. Linear regression showed a negative association between bronchoscopy score and age in A (ß = -0.06; P = .001). Positive predictors of bronchoscopy score were female gender (ß = 1.96; P = .003) in D and obesity (ß = 2.41; P = .012), longer procedures (ß = 0.08; P = .009) and female gender (ß = 1.15; P = .038) in C. Longer procedures (ß = -0.12; P = .010) was a negative predictor of bronchoscopy score in D. Desaturation, hypoxia and heart rate changes were most prevalent in group A. Hypotension was mostly observed in D. CONCLUSIONS: No consistent differences were present between the three regimens; however, each was more appropriate in certain patient profiles. We consequently proposed a protocol as a first step towards standardizing sedation practice in FB in a patient-tailored manner. A more comprehensive and detailed protocol including other sedative agents with their corresponding doses should be developed.


Assuntos
Alfentanil/administração & dosagem , Broncoscopia/métodos , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA