Assuntos
Luto , Morte , Relações Familiares , Feminino , Humanos , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , Masculino , Oncologia , Cônjuges , Estresse PsicológicoAssuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Aprovação de Drogas/economia , Descoberta de Drogas/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Financiamento Governamental/economia , Política de Saúde/economia , Oncologia/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Descoberta de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Financiamento Governamental/legislação & jurisprudência , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Nova Zelândia , Formulação de PolíticasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Exisulind is an apoptotic agent with preclinical activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Vinorelbine is safe and effective in older patients with advanced NSCLC. We assessed these agents together as palliative treatment for older patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients >/=70-years-old with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and a performance status (PS) =2 were eligible. Primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose (phase I) and time-to-progression (phase II) of oral exisulind with 25 mg/m/wk of intravenous vinorelbine on a 28-day cycle. Patients with clinical benefit after 6 cycles of this combination received exisulind alone. RESULTS: Fourteen phase I patients (median PS 1; median age 78 years) were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 constipation (one patient), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (one patient) and grade 3 diarrhea (one patient). The maximum tolerated dose of oral exisulind with 25 mg/m/wk of intravenous vinorelbine was 125 mg twice daily. Thirty phase II patients (median PS 1; median age 78 years) were enrolled. Grade >/=3 neutropenia occurred in 14/30 patients. Two patients experienced neutropenic fever. There were no complete responses, one partial response and 12 patients with stable disease as their best response. The objective response rate was 4.0% (95% CI: 0.1-20.4%). Phase II median time-to-progression was 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.1-9.3 months) and median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.6-19.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: This combination is safe, seems to have activity in the elderly with advanced NSCLC and a PS =2, and warrants further investigation.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Sulindaco/administração & dosagem , Sulindaco/análogos & derivados , Taxa de Sobrevida , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem , Vimblastina/análogos & derivados , VinorelbinaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of uracil-tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients > or = 75 years of age with previously untreated colorectal cancer were eligible for this phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter cooperative group clinical trial. UFT 100 mg/m2 plus LV 30 mg orally every 8 hours for 28 days every 35 days was administered until progression. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled between June 2000 and July 2001, and 55 were treated. The median age of treated patients was 81 years (range, 75 to 90 years), 26 patients were (47%) women, and 80% had good performance status (0 to 1). The observed overall response rate was 22% (95% CI, 11.8% to 35.0%). The estimated median overall survival time was 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 17.4 months), and median progression-free survival time was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.7 months). Among the 56 treated patients (including one ineligible patient), 31 (55%) experienced grade 3 to 4 toxicities, most commonly diarrhea (25%) and GI toxicity (36%), with patients older than 85 years of age at highest risk. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial support the efficacy of oral UFT/LV in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. The regimen is tolerated moderately well overall, particularly as compared with other fluoropyrimidine regimens, although there is increased GI toxicity in the most elderly. These results suggest that studies using newer oral fluoropyrimidine analogs should be investigated in this patient population.