Preoperative planning of breast implants using the breast implant planning device (BIPD).

Interstitial implantation of the tumor excision site is an important component of the treatment program of breast-conserving surgery and irradiation. The currently accepted method of designing and performing the implant in the operating room does not assure adequate coverage of the volume of tissue at risk, i.e., the tissue immediately adjacent to the walls of the original tumor excision cavity. This communication describes a technique of preoperative implant planning that consistently and reliably ensures adequate coverage of the volume of tissue at risk. An integral part of this technique is the use of a new device called the Breast Implant Planning Device. This device is a modification of previously described implant template devices.

Breast conserving surgery and irradiation: the importance of demarcating the excision cavity with surgical clips.

PURPOSE: To determine whether or not the surgical scar and surgical induration are suitable landmarks for localizing the boost field in the treatment of patients undergoing breast conservation surgery and irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients had surgical clips placed in the excision cavity at the time of tumor excision. The boost field locations for these patients were determined by encompassing the surgical induration with a minimum 2 cm margin or, when there was no induration, by encompassing the incision scar with a 3 cm margin. Simulator radiographs were taken with the boost field margins marked with solder wire. RESULTS: The simulator radiographs showed that the excision cavity clips were at or outside the boost field margins in 19 patients, 54% of the entire group. An unexpected finding was that, in six of the 23 patients with the surgical scar 2 cm medial or lateral to the areola, the excision cavity clips were inadequately covered by tangential fields even though the fields appeared to be adequate based on external landmarks. CONCLUSION: (a) This study suggests that the skin incision and surgical induration are not reliable landmarks for boost field localization. (b) Without surgical clips, part of the excision cavity would have underdosed by the tangential fields in 23% of patients with medial or lateral surgical scars.

Failure patterns in gynecologic cancer.

In reviewing the literature on the patterns of failure in gynecologic malignancies, it is essential to define the type of recurrence resulting from the treatment program pursued. Categorizing them into local recurrences, marginal recurrences, parametrial recurrences, periaortic lymph node recurrences, abdominal recurrences, and distant metastatic disease become an important part in the design of new treatment programs in management. Most recurrences are actually the result of persistent disease. Therefore, the full extent of disease at the time of initial presentation should be determined. Pre-treatment surgical exploration obviously defines more precisely the tumor extent than does clinical stage alone. Samples of retroperitoneal abdominal lymph nodes in cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer have shown more frequent involvement than previously suspected.

The use of high dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy to palliate symptomatic endobronchial recurrence of previously irradiated bronchogenic carcinoma.

Thirty-eight patients were treated with high dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy to palliate symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, fever, and/or shortness of breath) caused by endobronchial of previously irradiated (greater than or equal to 5000 cGy) bronchogenic carcinoma. The dose per fraction was 600 cGy at a radius of 1 cm from the center of the linear path of the source, and each patient received three fraction, each fraction separated by a 1-week interval. Twenty-nine patients (76%) had symptomatic improvement, 16 with complete and 13 with partial relief of symptoms. The likelihood of symptom relief was greater in those patients who had extra-bronchial tumor measuring less than 5 cm (15/15) compared to those with extra-bronchial tumor measuring greater than or equal to 5 cm (2/8). The median duration of symptom relief was 7.5 months. Repeat bronchoscopy done 3 months after brachytherapy revealed that 41% (11/27) had complete tumor regression and another 41% (11/27) had partial regression. Nine of 14 patients with post-obstructive atelectasis/pneumonitis had radiographic improvement. Twelve patients (32%) died from massive hemoptysis occurring 2-56 weeks (median 10 weeks) after brachytherapy. Location of the recurrence was the most important predictor of pulmonary hemorrhage. It occurred only in patients with recurrence in the right upper lobe, right mainstem, or left upper lobe bronchus. Whether this high rate of fatal pulmonary hemorrhage was a real phenomenon or a statistical fluke of small numbers remains an unanswered question.

Stage III and localized stage IV breast cancer: irradiation alone vs irradiation plus surgery.

One hundred forty-seven patients with non-inflammatory, Stage III and IV cancer were treated with irradiation alone (54 patients) or with a combination of irradiation and mastectomy (93 patients). In the T3 category, the local failure rate was 45% (5/11) for the irradiation alone patients vs 12% (3/25 for the irradiation plus surgery patients; in the T4 category these figures were 65% (28/43) vs 13% (9/68), respectively. Corresponding local failure rates by size of primary tumor were 50% (2/4) vs 15% (5/29 for tumors 0-5 cm, 43% (9/21) vs 14% (6/45) for 5-8 cm tumors, and 75% (22/29) vs 5% (1/20 for tumors greater than or equal to 8 cm. The rates of regional failure for the two treatment methods were compared according to N stage; they were 9% (2/23) for irradiation alone vs 11% (8/76) for irradiation plus surgery in the N0-1 category, and 58% (18/31) vs 18% (3/17), respectively, for the N2-3 category. A dose response analysis for patients with tumors greater than 5 cm treated with irradiation alone did not show a decrease in local failure rate with increasing total tumor dose over a range of 4000 to 7000 rad, suggesting that doses in this range are too low for these large tumors. Since a significant late complication rate has been reported with doses higher than this, patients with non-inflammatory, but large (greater than 5 cm) tumors, should be treated with a combination of surgery and irradiation whenever possible to achieve maximum local-regional control with a minimum probability of complications. In 36 patients with inflammatory carcinoma, the rates of local and regional failure were 52% (15/29) and 38% (11/29), respectively, for patients treated with irradiation alone, and 14% (1/7) and 29% (2/7), respectively, for patients receiving irradiation plus surgery. Since none of these differences were statistically significant, one cannot conclude that surgery should necessarily play a role in the treatment of inflammatory carcinoma.

Hysterectomy and adjuvant irradiation for pathologic stage III adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Three hundred and four evaluable patients with FIGO clinical Stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium were treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant irradiation. At surgery, 15 patients (5%) were found to have disease outside the uterus, but within the pelvis Pathologic Stage III (PSIII). A higher grade of tumor was not associated with an increase in the frequency of PSIII, being 7/158 (4%), 5/89 (6%), and 3/57 (5%) for Grades 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Depth of myometrial invasion correlated with PSIII disease in 5/69 (7%) for less than 1/3 myometrial invasion versus 7/33 (21%) for greater than 1/3 invasion (p = .05). One patient died of intercurrent disease at 4 months with 6/14 (43%) of the remaining patients developing recurrent disease. The site of initial failure was pelvis 1/15 (7%), pelvis and distant metastasis 3/15 (20%), and distant metastasis alone 2/15 (13%). Of seven patients who received external pelvic irradiation, there was one local failure (14%), which is not statistically significant from the 3/8 (38%) local failure rate among patients not receiving external pelvic irradiation (p = .569). None of the seven patients experienced a treatment related complication as a result of adjuvant irradiation.

Treatment of stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium by hysterectomy and adjuvant irradiation: a retrospective analysis of 304 patients.

Three hundred and four evaluable patients with FIGO Stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium were treated with hysterectomy and irradiation. Irradiation was preoperative in 250 and postoperative in 44 patients. Ten patients had a preoperative implant and postoperative external irradiation. The 5 year actuarial survival was 94%, 80% and 76% for grades 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Within each grade and for all patients there was no difference in survival for Stage IA versus IB. The initial failure rate was 26/304 (9%) with 2% of patients having only a pelvic failure, 2% pelvic and distal failure and 4% a distal failure only. There were four distal vaginal failures and no isolated cuff recurrences. The upper abdomen was the most frequent site of extra-pelvic failure for grade 3, while the periaortic nodes and lung constituted the most common sites of distal failure for grades 1 and 2 tumors. Timing of the hysterectomy following the irradiation was of importance when evaluating the prognostic significance of residual disease or depth of myometrial invasion. The presence of residual disease or greater than 1/3 myometrial invasion had a significantly worse prognosis only among patients who received no preoperative irradiation or who underwent their hysterectomy immediately following a preoperative implant. There was no difference in survival among patients with an initial local failure only as compared to those with an initial distal metastases, as the majority of patients with an initial local failure subsequently developed distant metastases.

Treatment of stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium by hysterectomy and irradiation: analysis of complications.

Twelve of 304 patients (4%) treated with surgery and adjuvant irradiation for endometrial carcinoma experienced a serious complication. The complication rate for patients whose irradiation consisted of an implant alone was only 1% (two of 199), if the implant was preoperative, but was 12% (three of 26) if the implant was postoperative. For patients who received external pelvic irradiation as part of their adjuvant therapy, the incidence of complications was 8.8% (seven of 79) and the timing (preoperative versus postoperative) had no effect. There was, however, a significant correlation of the complication rate with an increasing dose of external irradiation to the whole pelvis: For doses of 3000 rad or less, it was 2% (five of 264) but was 18% (seven of 40) for doses in excess of 3000 rad. These data suggest that the safest form of adjuvant irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is a preoperative implant, and that adding external pelvic irradiation to the preoperative implant will significantly increase the complication rate if the external dose to the central pelvis exceeds 3000 rad.

Gestational carcinoma of the female breast.

Few neoplastic diseases can equal the amazing complexity and sheer perversity of carcinoma of the breast. No doubt as many decades of research lie ahead in its study as already have passed. Clinicians have long appreciated the special relationship of the disease to gestation. Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy represent only a small part of this fascinating relationship. Although indispensable as research tools, animal models pertain to the human disease only in limited, ill-defined ways. The etiology of human breast cancer remains unclear; chemical, viral, hormonal, genetic, and immunologic theories have all been put forward as possibilities. Although gestation clearly alters both the initiation and growth of mammary tumors, its exact role in the various theoretical considerations remains a mystery. The obstetrician-gynecologist holds an important front-line position in the war against breast cancer, as does any provider of primary care to women, and, indeed, as do women themselves. Rather than decrease vigilance during pregnancy, the physician should pursue with extra vigor any breast mass discovered in the gravid patient, when the clinical examination is even less reliable than usual. The finding of a breast mass usually necessitates biopsy. Except for the inclusion of specific pregnancy-related problems, such as galactocele, the diagnostic spectrum of breast masses removed during pregnancy does not differ from that in nonpregnant women. The discovery of a highly suspicious breast mass, or the confirmed biopsy diagnosis of malignancy, in a pregnant patient should indicate the need for referral to a surgical oncologist versed in this unusual problem. The best approach to gestational breast cancer continues to be the team approach, with consultation from specialists in obstetrics, surgical oncology, anesthesiology, nuclear medicine, radiology, radiation oncology, pathology, and medical oncology. The age and general condition of the patient, the extent of the tumor, the stage of gestation, and the informed opinions of the patient and her spouse help to determine the therapeutic strategy. Careful staging not only guides present therapy but also the therapy of future victims through continued investigation. Most surgeons favor operation without delay if cure seems within reach. Mastectomy, with or without cesarean section, can be accomplished without detriment in the hands of a knowledgeable surgeon-anesthesiologist team. By following certain guidelines, the search for metastasis can be conducted safely and appropriately. The clinical situation occasionally may require the initiation of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy during pregnancy, by experienced consultants. Ongoing studies of tissue hormone receptors and cell kinetics will continue to give insight into the effects of gestational hormones on breast cancer and can aid in the selection of treatment options for the individual patient...

Local-regional treatment of patients with simultaneous local-regional recurrence and distant metastases following mastectomy.

High-dose, large volume local-regional irradiation has been shown to be necessary in patients with local-regional recurrence of breast cancer without coexisting distant metastases; however, no studies exist that deal with the dose and volume of local-regional irradiation required for patients with both local-regional recurrence and distant metastases. This report is an analysis of 68 patients who presented with previously untreated local-regional recurrence and coexisting distant metastases. Thirty-five of these patients were treated with local-regional irradiation and systemic therapy; the remaining 33 patients received systemic therapy only. An analysis of the dose and volume in the 35 irradiated patients showed that if the irradiation was inadequate (dose less than 4500 rad and volume not large enough to encompass the entire involved site), the incidence of uncontrolled local-regional disease for the duration of life was 79%, similar to the 64% rate of uncontrolled local-regional disease in the 33 patients not receiving local-regional irradiation. On the other hand, if the dose to the recurrence was at least 4500 rad and if the field was large enough to encompass the entire site containing the recurrence, the incidence of uncontrolled local-regional disease for the duration of life was only 27%. The present study also suggests that local-regional irradiation may be indicated in patients with asymptomatic as well as symptomatic local-regional disease. In patients with distant metastases and initially asymptomatic local-regional disease, adequate irradiation resulted in a lower incidence of ultimate local-regional symptoms when compared to similar patients who were treated with inadequate or no local-regional irradiation. This difference was not quite statistically significant because of the small number of patients in each group.

Alternative approaches to evaluating the impact of local control on survival.

An important aspect of evaluating treatments aimed at local tumor control is to assess the effect of local control on survival. A common approach to this problem is to compare all patients who have failed locally with those who have not using a logrank test. However, this method of analysis does not take into account the effect of time on a patient's local disease status. Since patients in the local failure group must survive long enough to fail, this group may be biased in favor of longer survival times. The Mantel-Byar extension of the logrank test avoids this source of bias by utilizing the data on time to local failure in defining the local control and local failure groups. In this paper, the application of this technique is illustrated using data from recurrent breast cancer patients and contrasted with the results obtained using the standard logrank test.

Adjuvant irradiation for early breast cancer. An on-going controversy.

Adjuvant irradiation has been used in the treatment of breast cancer for over 80 years, but its use has always been, and remains, controversial. It is extremely valuable in the treatment of Stage III and IV breast cancer because of its ability to reduce the local recurrence rate in these late stages down to acceptably low levels; however, to have a significant benefit in Stages I and II, in which the local recurrence rate is only 10% to 20% with mastectomy alone, it should be able to improve survival as well as prevent local recurrence. All of the early trials indicated that adjuvant irradiation neither increased nor decreased survival; however, these trials were flawed by poorly executed randomization processes and/or by the use of radiotherapy that would be considered inadequate by today's standards. The two recent trials, Oslo and Stockholm, which were more stringently randomized and which employed more modern radiotherapy techniques, showed an improved disease-free survival with adjuvant irradiation. Overall, survival, however, was unaffected, save for the small subset of patients with medial tumors and histologically positive axillary nodes. For these patients there was a trend toward survival enhancement by internal mammary node irradiation. All of the trials testing irradiation and surgery against surgery alone have very little relevance in today's adjuvant chemotherapy era; thus, the entire question of survival enhancement by irradiation must be reassessed within the context of adjuvant chemotherapy. Will the combination of adjuvant chemotherapy and irradiation yield a better survival than either adjuvant modality alone? The results of the few prospective trials that have addressed this question are still preliminary, and longer follow-up is necessary before any conclusions can be reached. Also, future studies must be undertaken to address two issues that may be very important when combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy: the sequencing of these two modalities, and the optimum radiotherapy technique for minimizing hematologic suppression.

Natural History and Management of Isolated Local-Regional Recurrence Following Mastectomy.

The average incidence of isolated local-regional recurrence following modified radical mastectomy is 10% to 20%, but it can be as low as 5% or as high as 40%, depending on the presence or absence of various risk factors. One of the objectives of this article is to discuss how to evaluate the risk of locoregional failure. In addition, although the average overall survival rate following recurrence is approximately 40% at 5 years and 25% at 10 years, individual patient survival varies considerably and depends on a number of fairly well-documented prognostic features that are also discussed here. The unfortunate reality is that control of an isolated local-regional recurrence for the duration of life is not frequently achieved. Even with optimal irradiation, 50% of all patients will die with uncontrolled local-regional disease. The quality of life for patients with uncontrolled disease is often very poor, and some examples are shown here. For this reason, local-regional recurrence should be avoided. The way to avoid (or at least minimize) local-regional recurrence is to give postoperative irradiation to those who are at high risk for local-regional recurrence following mastectomy. This author considers the risk to be "high" when it reaches 25% to 30%.

Prognostic indicators in patients with isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer.

A retrospective review was undertaken of 129 patients with isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer following radical or modified radical mastectomy. The overall survival and disease-free survival for these patients five years from the time of local-regional recurrence was 36 and 13%, respectively. The clinical stage at initial diagnosis, the number of histologically positive nodes at mastectomy, menopausal status, and the location of the recurrence (chest wall vs. nodal) were all found to have no significant effect on survival or disease-free survival. On the other hand, the number of recurrences, the size of the largest recurrence, and the time interval between mastectomy and recurrence (disease-free interval) had definite prognostic significance. A single recurrence, the size of the largest recurrence being less than or equal to 1 cm, and a disease-free interval of longer than 24 months predicted a good prognosis; on the other hand, multiple recurrences, the size of the largest recurrence being greater than 1 cm, and a disease-free interval of less than 24 months predicted a bad prognosis. Eighty-one percent of the patients ultimately developed distant metastases; the incidence of distant metastases was the same for patients with factors predicting a good prognosis as it was for those with factors predicting a bad prognosis. The time to appearance of distant metastases, however, was significantly longer in the former group of patients than in the latter. The information from this analysis should be useful in designing future clinical trials involving patients with isolated local-regional recurrence of breast cancer.

Lung dose in electron beam therapy of chest wall.

The dose to lung tissue in patients whose chest walls are irradiated with 6 and 9 MeV electron beams was estimated. Thermoluminescent dosimetry measurements in thoracic Section 18 of Rando phantom were compared with calculations by two different methods, the effective depth method and the average absorption equivalent thickness (AET) method. The calculations were based on a density of 0.45 (relative to water) for lung tissue in the Rando phantom which was determined from CT scan. The measurements agreed with calculations by the effective depth method within 7 per cent for 9 MeV electron beam at locations where lung tissue thickness was less than 4.5 cm. Larger discrepancy between measurement and calculations was found at greater depths. The effective depth method gave better agreement with measurements (within 14 per cent) compared with the average AET method. The effective depth method was used, to calculate the lung tissue dose at different depths beneath the chest wall. A lung density of 0.25 was assumed to conform to real irradiation situation. The calculations show that for a 9 MeV electron beam dose to lung at 5 cm depth beyond a 2 cm thick chest wall could be as high as 72 per cent of the dose at the maximum buildup depth. It is recommended that post-mastectomy patients with chest wall thickness less than 2 cm should be irradiated with an electron energy of less than 9 MeV or that the chest wall thickness be artificially increased with tissue equivalent bolus.