Skin pharmacokinetics of miltefosine in the treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in South Asia.

INTRODUCTION: Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) arises as a dermal complication following a visceral leishmaniasis (VL) infection. Current treatment options for PKDL are unsatisfactory, and there is a knowledge gap regarding the distribution of antileishmanial compounds within human skin. The present study investigated the skin distribution of miltefosine in PKDL patients, with the aim to improve the understanding of the pharmacokinetics at the skin target site in PKDL. METHODS: Fifty-two PKDL patients underwent treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (20 mg/kg) plus miltefosine (allometric dosing) for 21 days. Plasma concentrations of miltefosine were measured on study days 8, 15, 22 and 30, while a punch skin biopsy was taken on day 22. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to evaluate the distribution of miltefosine into the skin. RESULTS: Following the allometric weight-based dosing regimen, median miltefosine concentrations on day 22 were 43.73 µg/g (IQR: 21.94-60.65 µg/g) in skin and 33.29 µg/mL (IQR: 25.9-42.58 µg/mL) in plasma. The median individual concentration ratio of skin to plasma was 1.19 (IQR: 0.79-1.9). In 87% (45/52) of patients, skin exposure was above the suggested EC90 PK target of 10.6 mg/L associated with in vitro susceptibility. Simulations indicated that the residence time of miltefosine in the skin would be more than 2-fold longer than in plasma, estimated by a mean residence time of 604 versus 266 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first accurate measurements of miltefosine penetration into the skin, demonstrating substantial exposure and prolonged retention of miltefosine within the skin. These findings support the use of miltefosine in cutaneous manifestations of leishmaniasis. In combination with parasitological and clinical data, these results are critical for the future optimization of combination therapies with miltefosine in the treatment of PKDL.

The ABCB1 and ABCG2 efflux transporters limit brain disposition of the SYK inhibitors entospletinib and lanraplenib.

The highly selective Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (SYK) inhibitors entospletinib and lanraplenib disrupt kinase activity and inhibit immune cell functions. They are developed for treatment of B-cell malignancies and autoimmunity diseases. The impact of P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 efflux transporters, OATP1a/1b uptake transporters and CYP3A drug-metabolizing enzymes on the oral pharmacokinetics of these drugs was assessed using mouse models. Entospletinib and lanraplenib were orally administered simultaneously at moderate dosages (10 mg/kg each) to female mice to assess the possibility of examining two structurally and mechanistically similar drugs at the same time, while reducing the number of experimental animals and sample-processing workload. The plasma pharmacokinetics of both drugs were not substantially restricted by Abcb1 or Abcg2. The brain-to-plasma ratios of entospletinib in Abcb1a/b-/-, Abcg2-/- and Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-/- mice were 1.7-, 1.8- and 2.9-fold higher, respectively, compared to those in wild-type mice. For lanraplenib these brain-to-plasma ratios were 3.0-, 1.3- and 10.4-fold higher, respectively. This transporter-mediated restriction of brain penetration for both drugs could be almost fully inhibited by coadministration of the dual ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar, without signs of acute toxicity. Oatp1a/b and human CYP3A4 did not seem to affect the pharmacokinetics of entospletinib and lanraplenib, but mouse Cyp3a may limit lanraplenib plasma exposure. Unexpectedly, entospletinib and lanraplenib increased each other's plasma exposure by 2.6- to 2.9-fold, indicating a significant drug-drug interaction. This interaction was, however, unlikely to be mediated through any of the studied transporters or CYP3A. The obtained insights may perhaps help to further improve the safety and efficacy of entospletinib and lanraplenib.

The role of drug efflux and uptake transporters in the plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition of morphine and its main metabolites.

Morphine is a widely used opioid for the treatment of pain. Differences in drug transporter expression and activity may contribute to variability in morphine pharmacokinetics and response. Using appropriate mouse models, we investigated the impact of the efflux transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2 and the OATP uptake transporters on the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and M6G. Upon subcutaneous administration of morphine, its plasma exposure in Abcb1a/1b-/-;Abcg2-/--, Abcb1a/1b-/-;Abcg2-/-;Oatp1a/1b-/-;Oatp2b1-/- (Bab12), and Oatp1a/1b-/-;Oatp2b1-/- mice was similar to that found in wild-type mice. Forty minutes after dosing, morphine brain accumulation increased by 2-fold when mouse (m)Abcb1 and mAbcg2 were ablated. Relative recovery of morphine in small intestinal content was significantly reduced in all the knockout strains. In the absence of mOatp1a/1b and mOatp2b1, plasma levels of M3G were markedly increased, suggesting a lower elimination rate. Moreover, Oatp-deficient mice displayed reduced hepatic and intestinal M3G accumulation. Mouse Oatps similarly affected plasma and tissue disposition of subcutaneously administered M6G. Human OATP1B1/1B3 transporters modestly contribute to the liver accumulation of M6G. In summary, mAbcb1, in combination with mAbcg2, limits morphine brain penetration and its net intestinal absorption. Variation in ABCB1 activity due to genetic polymorphisms/mutations and/or environmental factors might, therefore, partially affect morphine tissue exposure in patients. The ablation of mOatp1a/1b increases plasma exposure and decreases the liver and small intestinal disposition of M3G and M6G. Since the contribution of human OATP1B1/1B3 to M6G liver uptake was quite modest, the risks of undesirable drug interactions or interindividual variation related to OATP activity are likely negligible.

Interplay of Ritonavir-Boosted Oral Cabazitaxel with the Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptide (OATP) Uptake Transporters and Carboxylesterase 1 in Mice.

Intravenously administered chemotherapeutic cabazitaxel is used for palliative treatment of prostate cancer. An oral formulation would be more patient-friendly and reduce the need for hospitalization. We therefore study determinants of the oral pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel in a ritonavir-boosted setting, which reduces the CYP3A-mediated first-pass metabolism of cabazitaxel. We here assessed the role of organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) in the disposition of orally boosted cabazitaxel and its active metabolites, using the Oatp1a/b-knockout and the OATP1B1/1B3-transgenic mice. These transporters may substantially affect plasma clearance and hepatic and intestinal drug disposition. The pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel and DM2 were not significantly affected by Oatp1a/b and OATP1B1/1B3 activity. In contrast, the plasma AUC0-120 min of DM1 in Oatp1a/b-/- was 1.9-fold (p < 0.05) higher than that in wild-type mice, and that of docetaxel was 2.4-fold (p < 0.05) higher. We further observed impaired hepatic uptake and intestinal disposition for DM1 and docetaxel in the Oatp-ablated strains. None of these parameters showed rescue by the OATP1B1 or -1B3 transporters in the humanized mouse strains, suggesting a minimal role of OATP1B1/1B3. Ritonavir itself was also a potent substrate for mOatp1a/b, showing a 2.9-fold (p < 0.0001) increased plasma AUC0-120 min and 3.5-fold (p < 0.0001) decreased liver-to-plasma ratio in Oatp1a/b-/- compared to those in wild-type mice. Furthermore, we observed the tight binding of cabazitaxel and its active metabolites, including docetaxel, to plasma carboxylesterase (Ces1c) in mice, which may complicate the interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mouse studies. Collectively, these results will help to further optimize (pre)clinical research into the safety and efficacy of orally applied cabazitaxel.

Analytical Validation of a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Oral Targeted Anticancer Agents, Abiraterone, Alectinib, Cabozantinib, Imatinib, Olaparib, and Sunitinib, and Metabolites.

BACKGROUND: Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) is a useful tool for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of oral targeted anticancer agents. VAMS aims to improve safety and efficacy by enabling at-home blood sample collection by patients. This study aimed to develop and validate an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitative determination of abiraterone, alectinib, cabozantinib, imatinib, olaparib, sunitinib, and the metabolites, Δ(4)-abiraterone (D4A), alectinib-M4, imatinib-M1, and N -desethyl sunitinib, in dried whole blood samples using VAMS to support TDM. METHODS: After the collection of 10 µL of whole blood sample using the VAMS device, the analytes were extracted from the tip using methanol with shaking, evaporated, and reconstituted in acetonitrile:0.1 mol/L ammonium hydroxide in water (1:1, vol/vol). The extracts were then analyzed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Validation experiments based on the ICH M10 guideline were carried out, and stability was evaluated under shipping and storage conditions. VAMS specimens were collected in the outpatient clinic to demonstrate the applicability of the assay. RESULTS: The validated range of the method was considered accurate and precise for all analytes. Accordingly, the validation experiments met the relevant requirements, except for cross-analyte interference. Based on the stability data, shipment can be performed at room temperature within 14 days after sample collection and the VAMS specimen can be stored up to 9 months at -20 and -70°C. Samples from 59 patients were collected at the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The developed method could be used to successfully quantify the concentrations of abiraterone, D4A, alectinib, alectinib-M4, cabozantinib, imatinib, imatinib-M1, olaparib, sunitinib, and N -desethyl sunitinib within the validated range using VAMS. Therefore, the method can be used to estimate the dried whole blood-to-plasma ratios for TDM in the clinic.

Ritonavir reverses resistance to docetaxel and cabazitaxel in prostate cancer cells with acquired resistance to docetaxel.

Aim: Docetaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing drug used for the treatment of several cancers, including prostate cancer. Resistance to docetaxel can either occur through intrinsic resistance or develop under therapeutic pressure, i.e., acquired resistance. A possible explanation for the occurrence of acquired resistance to docetaxel is increased drug efflux via P-glycoprotein (P-gp) drug transporters. Methods: We have generated docetaxel-resistant cell lines DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8 by exposing parental cell lines DU-145DOC and 22Rv1 to increasing levels of docetaxel. Gene expression levels between DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8 were compared with those of their respective originator cell lines. Both parental and resistant cell lines were treated with the taxane drugs docetaxel and cabazitaxel in combination with the P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir and the P-gp inhibitor elacridar. Results: In the docetaxel-resistant cell lines DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8, the ABCB1 (P-gp) gene was highly up-regulated. Expression of the P-gp protein was also significantly increased in the docetaxel-resistant cell lines in a Western blotting assay. The addition of ritonavir to docetaxel resulted in a return of the sensitivity to docetaxel in the DU-145DOC10 and 22Rv1DOC8 to a level similar to the sensitivity in the originator cells. We found that these docetaxel-resistant cell lines could also be re-sensitized to cabazitaxel in a similar manner. In a Caco-2 P-gp transporter assay, functional inhibition of P-gp-mediated transport of docetaxel with ritonavir was demonstrated. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that ritonavir restores sensitivity to both docetaxel and cabazitaxel in docetaxel-resistant cell lines, most likely by inhibiting P-gp-mediated drug efflux.

The Use of Microdosing for In vivo Phenotyping of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes: Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play a central role in the elimination of approximately 80% of all clinically used drugs. Differences in CYP enzyme activity between individuals can contribute to interindividual variability in exposure and, therefore, treatment outcome. In vivo CYP enzyme activity could be determined with phenotyping. Currently, (sub)therapeutic doses are used for in vivo phenotyping, which can lead to side effects. The use of microdoses (100 µg) for in vivo phenotyping for CYP enzymes could overcome the limitations associated with the use of (sub)therapeutic doses of substrates. The aim of this review is to provide a critical overview of the application of microdosing for in vivo phenotyping of CYP enzymes. A literature search was performed to find drug-drug interaction studies of CYP enzyme substrates that used microdoses of the respective substrates. A substrate was deemed sensitive to changes in CYP enzyme activity when the pharmacokinetics of the substrate significantly changed during inhibition and induction of the enzyme. On the basis of the currently available evidence, the use of microdosing for in vivo phenotyping for subtypes CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP2E1 is not recommended. Microdosing can be used for the in vivo phenotyping of CYP2C19 and CYP3A. The recommended microdose phenotyping test for CYP2C19 is measuring the omeprazole area-under-the-concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC0-24) after administration of a single 100 µg dose. CYP3A activity could be best determined with a 0.1-75 µg dose of midazolam, and subsequently measuring AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) or clearance. Moreover, there are two metrics available for midazolam using a limited sampling strategy: AUC over 10 h (AUC0-10) and AUC from 2 to 4 h (AUC2-4).

A joint model of longitudinal pharmacokinetic and time-to-event data to study exposure-response relationships: a proof-of-concept study with alectinib.

PURPOSE: In exposure-response analyses of oral targeted anticancer agents, longitudinal plasma trough concentrations are often aggregated into a single value even though plasma trough concentrations can vary over time due to dose adaptations, for example. The aim of this study was to compare joint models to conventional exposure-response analyses methods with the application of alectinib as proof-of-concept. METHODS: Joint models combine longitudinal pharmacokinetic data and progression-free survival data to infer the dependency and association between the two datatypes. The results from the best joint model and the standard and time-dependent cox proportional hazards models were compared. To normalize the data, alectinib trough concentrations were normalized using a sigmoidal transformation to transformed trough concentrations (TTC) before entering the models. RESULTS: No statistically significant exposure-response relationship was observed in the different Cox models. In contrast, the joint model with the current value of TTC in combination with the average TTC over time did show an exposure-response relationship for alectinib. A one unit increase in the average TTC corresponded to an 11% reduction in progression (HR, 0.891; 95% confidence interval, 0.805-0.988). CONCLUSION: Joint models are able to give insights in the association structure between plasma trough concentrations and survival outcomes that would otherwise not be possible using Cox models. Therefore, joint models should be used more often in exposure-response analyses of oral targeted anticancer agents.

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of KRASG12C inhibitor opnurasib in several mouse matrices and its application in a pharmacokinetic mouse study.

Opnurasib (JDQ-443) is a highly potent and promising KRASG12C inhibitor that is currently under clinical investigation. Results of the ongoing clinical research demonstrated the acceptable safety profile and clinical activity of this drug candidate as a single agent for patients with NSCLC harboring KRASG12C mutations. In this early stage of development, a deeper insight into pharmacokinetic properties in both preclinical and clinical investigations of this drug is very important. Thus, a reliable quantification method is required. To date, no quantitative bioanalytical assay of opnurasib was publicly available. In this study we present a validated assay to quantify opnurasib in mouse plasma and eight mouse tissue-related matrices utilizing liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Erlotinib was used as internal standard and acetonitrile was utilized to treat 10 µl of the sample with protein precipitation in a 96-well plate format. Separation and detection were achieved using a BEH C18 column under basic chromatographic conditions and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, respectively. We have fully validated this assay for mouse plasma and partially for eight mouse tissue-related matrices over the range of 2-2000 ng/ml. The accuracy and precision of the assay fulfilled international guidelines (EMA & U.S. FDA) over the validated range. The method was proven selective and sensitive to quantify opnurasib down to 2 ng/ml in all investigated matrices. The recoveries of both analyte and internal standard in mouse plasma were ∼100 % with no significant matrix effect in any of the matrices. Opnurasib in mouse plasma was stable up to 12 h at room temperature, and up to 8 h at room temperature in tissue homogenates (except for kidney up to 4 h). This presented method has been successfully applied to quantify opnurasib in preclinical samples from a mouse study and demonstrated its usability to support preclinical pharmacokinetic studies.

A multiplex UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of three PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab, in human serum.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To support pharmacokinetic studies, a multiplex UPLC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated to quantify PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab in serum. METHODS: A bottom-up sample pre-treatment procedure was developed to determine atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab in serum. This procedure consisted of (1) precipitation of the monoclonal antibody with ammonium sulfate, (2) reduction with dithiothreitol, (3) denaturation with methanol, and (4) tryptic digestion of the protein. The unique signature peptides resulting after sample pre-treatment of the antibodies were measured using UPLC-MS/MS with a total run time of 11 minutes. The clinical application was evaluated by analyzing 114 atezolizumab patient samples. RESULTS: The developed method was found to be accurate and precise for all three analytes over a concentration range of 3.00-150 µg/mL. No endogenous interference was present in serum samples. Cross-interference experiments showed no cross-analyte interference and acceptable cross-internal standard interference. In addition, no substantial carry-over was observed. The stable isotopically labeled signature peptides were most effective in compensating for matrix effects. Recovery based on back-calculated concentrations of calibration standards and quality control samples was found to be high. The analytes were stable for at least three freeze-thaw cycles, for 42 hours at processing conditions, for at least two days at 2-8°C in the final extract, for five days before re-injection analysis at 4°C, and long-term for at least 11 months at -70°C. The assay was tested for its applicability in clinical practice. For this purpose, 114 atezolizumab patient samples were measured. CONCLUSION: A multiplex UPLC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated to quantify atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab in human serum. The applicability of this method was demonstrated by the analysis of clinical atezolizumab samples. The method is suitable to support clinical pharmacokinetic studies involving atezolizumab, avelumab, or durvalumab.

Coadministration of ABCB1/P-glycoprotein inhibitor elacridar improves tissue distribution of ritonavir-boosted oral cabazitaxel in mice.

Developing an oral formulation for the chemotherapeutic cabazitaxel might improve its patient-friendliness, costs, and potentially exposure profile. Cabazitaxel oral availability is restricted by CYP3A-mediated first-pass metabolism, but can be substantially boosted with the CYP3A inhibitor ritonavir. We here tested whether adding the ABCB1/P-glycoprotein inhibitor elacridar to ritonavir-boosted oral cabazitaxel could further improve its tissue exposure using wild-type, CYP3A4-humanized and Abcb1a/b-/- mice. The plasma AUC0-2h of cabazitaxel was increased 2.3- and 1.9-fold in the ritonavir- and ritonavir-plus-elacridar groups of wild-type, and 10.5- and 8.8-fold in CYP3A4-humanized mice. Elacridar coadministration did not influence cabazitaxel plasma exposure. The brain-to-plasma ratio of cabazitaxel was not increased in the ritonavir group, 7.3-fold in the elacridar group and 13.4-fold in the combined booster group in wild-type mice. This was 0.4-, 4.6- and 3.6-fold in CYP3A4-humanized mice, illustrating that Abcb1 limited cabazitaxel brain exposure also during ritonavir boosting. Ritonavir itself was also a potent substrate for the Abcb1 efflux transporter, limiting its oral availability (3.3-fold) and brain penetration (10.6-fold). Both processes were fully reversed by elacridar. The tissue disposition of ritonavir-boosted oral cabazitaxel could thus be markedly enhanced by elacridar coadministration without affecting the plasma exposure. This approach should be verified in selected patient populations.

ELISA assay for the quantification of ipilimumab in human serum, plasma, milk, and cerebrospinal fluid.

Ipilimumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). Ipilimumab has become part of the standard of care for different types of cancer. The efficacy of these treatments is limited due to immune-related toxicity and high economic costs. Dose rationalization studies based on pharmacokinetic data may help to address these limitations. For this purpose, more sensitive analytical methods are needed. We report the development and validation of the first enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for sensitive determination of ipilimumab concentrations in human serum, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and milk. Our assay is based on the specific capture of ipilimumab by immobilized CTLA-4. The lower limit of quantifications of ipilimumab in serum, plasma, and milk are 50 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL in CSF. The ELISA method showed long-term storage stability for at least one year at -80°C and was successfully cross-validated with ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. The ELISA method is reliable, relatively inexpensive, and can be used in serum, plasma, CSF, and milk from patients treated with ipilimumab, as evidenced by the analysis of real clinical samples.

Impact of loperamide on the pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition of ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel therapy; a preclinical assessment.

PURPOSE: An oral docetaxel formulation boosted by the Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A inhibitor ritonavir, ModraDoc006/r, is currently under clinical investigation. Based on clinical data, the incidence of grade 1-2 diarrhea is increased with this oral docetaxel formulation compared to the conventional intravenous administration. Loperamide, a frequently used diarrhea inhibitor, could be added to the regimen as symptomatic treatment. However, loperamide is also a substrate of the CYP3A enzyme, which could result in competition between ritonavir and loperamide for this protein. Therefore, we were interested in the impact of coadministered loperamide on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel. METHODS: We administered loperamide simultaneously or with an 8-hour delay to humanized CYP3A4 mice (with expression in liver and intestine) receiving oral ritonavir and docetaxel. Concentrations of docetaxel, ritonavir, loperamide and two of its active metabolites were measured. RESULTS: The plasma exposure (AUC and Cmax) of docetaxel was not altered during loperamide treatment, nor were the ritonavir plasma pharmacokinetics. However, the hepatic and intestinal dispositions of ritonavir were somewhat changed in the simultaneous, but not 8-hour loperamide treatment groups, possibly due to loperamide-induced delayed drug absorption. The pharmacokinetics of loperamide itself did not seem to be influenced by ritonavir. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that delayed loperamide administration can be added to ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel treatment, without affecting the overall systemic exposure of docetaxel.

ABCB1 attenuates brain exposure to the KRASG12C inhibitor opnurasib whereas binding to mouse carboxylesterase 1c influences its plasma exposure.

Opnurasib (JDQ443) is a newly developed oral KRASG12C inhibitor, with a binding mechanism distinct from the registered KRASG12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib. Phase I and II clinical trials for opnurasib in NSCLC are ongoing. We evaluated the pharmacokinetic roles of the ABCB1 (P-gp/MDR1) and ABCG2 (BCRP) efflux and OATP1 influx transporters, and of the metabolizing enzymes CYP3A and CES1 in plasma and tissue disposition of oral opnurasib, using genetically modified cell lines and mouse models. In vitro, opnurasib was potently transported by human (h)ABCB1 and slightly by mouse (m)Abcg2. In Abcb1a/b- and Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-deficient mice, a significant ∼100-fold increase in brain-to-plasma ratios was observed. Brain penetration was unchanged in Abcg2-/- mice. ABCB1 activity in the blood-brain barrier may therefore potentially limit the efficacy of opnurasib against brain metastases. The Abcb1a/b transporter activity could be almost completely reversed by co-administration of elacridar, a dual ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor, increasing the brain penetration without any behavioral or postural signs of acute CNS-related toxicity. No significant pharmacokinetic roles of the OATP1 transporters were observed. Transgenic human CYP3A4 did not substantially affect the plasma exposure of opnurasib, indicating that opnurasib is likely not a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. Interestingly, Ces1-/- mice showed a 4-fold lower opnurasib plasma exposure compared to wild-type mice, whereas no strong effect was seen on the tissue distribution. Plasma Ces1c therefore likely binds opnurasib, increasing its retention in plasma. The obtained pharmacokinetic insights may be useful for further optimization of the clinical efficacy and safety of opnurasib, and might reveal potential drug-drug interaction risks.

ATP-binding cassette transporter inhibitor potency and substrate drug affinity are critical determinants of successful drug delivery enhancement to the brain.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy for brain diseases is severely compromised by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). ABCB1 and ABCG2 are drug transporters that restrict drug entry into the brain and their inhibition can be used as a strategy to boost drug delivery and pharmacotherapy for brain diseases. METHODS: We employed elacridar and tariquidar in mice to explore the conditions for effective inhibition at the BBB. Abcg2;Abcb1a/b knockout (KO), Abcb1a/b KO, Abcg2 KO and wild-type (WT) mice received a 3 h i.p. infusion of a cocktail of 8 typical substrate drugs in combination with elacridar or tariquidar at a range of doses. Abcg2;Abcb1a/b KO mice were used as the reference for complete inhibition, while single KO mice were used to assess the potency to inhibit the remaining transporter. Brain and plasma drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Complete inhibition of ABCB1 at the BBB is achieved when the elacridar plasma level reaches 1200 nM, whereas tariquidar requires at least 4000 nM. Inhibition of ABCG2 is more difficult. Elacridar inhibits ABCG2-mediated efflux of weak but not strong ABCG2 substrates. Strikingly, tariquidar does not enhance the brain uptake of any ABCG2-subtrate drug. Similarly, elacridar, but not tariquidar, was able to inhibit its own brain efflux in ABCG2-proficient mice. The plasma protein binding of elacridar and tariquidar was very high but similar in mouse and human plasma, facilitating the translation of mouse data to humans. CONCLUSIONS: This work shows that elacridar is an effective pharmacokinetic-enhancer for the brain delivery of ABCB1 and weaker ABCG2 substrate drugs when a plasma concentration of 1200 nM is exceeded.

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit due to immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). In this retrospective study, we determined the incidence, treatment patterns and survival outcomes of this patient population at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: All patients admitted to the ICU due to irAEs from ICI treatment between January 2015 and July 2022 were included. Descriptive statistics were reported on patient characteristics and treatment patterns during hospital admission. Overall survival (OS) from the time of ICU discharge to death was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Over the study period, 5561 patients received at least one ICI administration, of which 32 patients (0.6%) were admitted to the ICU due to irAEs. Twenty patients were treated with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 treatment, whereas 12 patients were treated with ICI monotherapy. The type of irAEs were de novo diabetes-related ketoacidosis (n = 8), immune-related gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 8), myocarditis or myositis (n = 10), nephritis (n = 3), pneumonitis (n = 2), and myelitis (n = 1). The median duration of ICU admission was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-6 days). Three patients died during ICU admission. The median OS of the patients who were discharged from the ICU was 18 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0-NA). CONCLUSION: The incidence of irAEs leading to ICU admission in patients treated with ICI was low in this study. ICU mortality due to irAEs was low and a subset of this patient population even had long-term survival.

Interplay of OATP1A/1B/2B1 uptake transporters and ABCB1 and ABCG2 efflux transporters in the handling of bilirubin and drugs.

Transmembrane drug transporters can be important determinants of the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profiles of drugs. To investigate the potential cooperative and/or counteracting interplay of OATP1A/1B/2B1 uptake transporters and ABCB1 and ABCG2 efflux transporters in physiology and pharmacology, we generated a new mouse model (Bab12), deficient for Slco1a/1b, Slco2b1, Abcb1a/1b and Abcg2. Bab12 mice were viable and fertile. We compared wild-type, Slco1a/1b/2b1-/-, Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2-/- and Bab12 strains. Endogenous plasma conjugated bilirubin levels ranked as follows: wild-type = Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2-/- << Slco1a/1b/2b1-/- < Bab12 mice. Plasma levels of rosuvastatin and fexofenadine were elevated in Slco1a/1b/2b1-/- and Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2-/- mice compared to wild-type, and dramatically increased in Bab12 mice. Although systemic exposure of larotrectinib and repotrectinib was substantially increased in the separate multidrug transporter knockout strains, no additive effects were observed in the combination Bab12 mice. Significantly higher plasma exposure of fluvastatin and pravastatin was only found in Slco1a/1b/2b1-deficient mice. However, noticeable transport by Slco1a/1b/2b1 and Abcb1a/1b and Abcg2 across the BBB was observed for fluvastatin and pravastatin, respectively, by comparing Bab12 mice with Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2-/- or Slco1a/1b/2b1-/- mice. Quite varying behavior in plasma exposure of erlotinib and its metabolites was observed among these strains. Bab12 mice revealed that Abcb1a/1b and/or Abcg2 can contribute to conjugated bilirubin elimination when Slco1a/1b/2b1 are absent. Our results suggest that the interplay of Slco1a/1b/2b1, Abcb1a/1b, and Abcg2 could markedly affect the pharmacokinetics of some, but not all drugs and metabolites. The Bab12 mouse model will represent a useful tool for optimizing drug development and clinical application, including efficacy and safety.

Development and validation of an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of the antimalarial drug pyronaridine in human whole blood.

Malaria remains a major health concern, aggravated by emerging resistance of the parasite to existing treatments. The World Health Organization recently endorsed the use of artesunate-pyronaridine to treat uncomplicated malaria. However, there is a lack of clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data of pyronaridine, particularly in special populations such as children and pregnant women. Existing methods for the quantification of pyronaridine in biological matrices to support PK studies exhibit several drawbacks. These include limited sensitivity, a large sample volume required, and extensive analysis time. To overcome these limitations, an ultra-performance reversed-phase liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry method to determine pyronaridine was developed and validated according to international guidelines. The method enabled fast and accurate quantification of pyronaridine in whole blood across a clinically relevant concentration range of 0.500-500 ng/mL (r2 ≥ 0.9963), with a required sample volume of 50 µL. Pyronaridine was extracted from whole blood using liquid-liquid extraction, effectively eliminating the matrix effect and preventing ion enhancement or suppression. The method achieved a satisfactory reproducible sample preparation recovery of 77%, accuracy (as bias) and precision were within ±8.2% and ≤5.3%, respectively. Stability experiments demonstrated that pyronaridine was stable for up to 315 days when stored at -70°C. Adjustments to the chromatographic system substantially reduced carry-over and improved sensitivity compared to prior methods. The method was successfully applied to quantify pyronaridine in whole blood samples from a selection of pregnant malaria patients participating in the PYRAPREG clinical trial (PACTR202011812241529) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, demonstrating its suitability to support future PK studies. Furthermore, the enhanced sensitivity allows for the determination of pyronaridine up to 42 days post-treatment initiation, enabling assessment of the terminal elimination half-life.

Intradermal Naked DNA Vaccination by DNA Tattooing for Mounting Tumor-Specific Immunity in Stage IV Melanoma Patients: A Phase I Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Naked DNA vaccination could be a powerful and safe strategy to mount antigen-specific cellular immunity. We designed a phase I clinical trial to investigate the toxicity of naked DNA vaccines encoding CD8+ T-cell epitope from tumor-associated antigen MART-1 in patients with advanced melanoma. METHODS: This dose escalating phase Ia clinical trial investigates the toxicity and immunological response upon naked DNA vaccines encoding a CD8+ T-cell epitope from the tumor-associated antigen MART-1, genetically linked to the gene encoding domain 1 of subunit-tetanus toxin fragment C in patients with advanced melanoma (inoperable stage IIIC-IV, AJCC 7th edition). The vaccine was administrated via intradermal application using a permanent make-up or tattoo device. Safety was monitored according to CTCAE v.3.0 and skin biopsies and blood samples were obtained for immunologic monitoring. RESULTS: Nine pretreated, HLA-A*0201-positive patients with advanced melanoma expressing MART-1 and MHC class I, with a good performance status, and adequate organ function, were included. With a median follow-up of 5.9 months, DNA vaccination was safe, without treatment-related deaths. Common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were dermatologic reactions at the vaccination site (100%) and pain (56%). One patient experienced grade 4 toxicity, most likely related to tumor progression. One patient (11%) achieved stable disease, lasting 353 days. Immune analysis showed no increase in vaccine-induced T cell response in peripheral blood of 5 patients, but did show a MART-1 specific CD8+ T cell response at the tattoo administration site. The maximum dose administered was 2 mg due to lack of clinical activity. CONCLUSION: We showed that the developed DNA vaccine, applied using a novel intradermal application strategy, can be administered safely. Further research with improved vaccine formats is required to show possible clinical benefit of DNA vaccination.

A Proof-of-Concept Study of Sequential Treatment with the HDAC Inhibitor Vorinostat following BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in BRAFV600-Mutated Melanoma.

PURPOSE: The development of resistance limits the clinical benefit of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) in BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. It has been shown that short-term treatment (14 days) with vorinostat was able to initiate apoptosis of resistant tumor cells. We aimed to assess the antitumor activity of sequential treatment with vorinostat following BRAFi/MEKi in patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma who progressed after initial response to BRAFi/MEKi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with BRAFi/MEKi-resistant BRAFV600-mutated melanoma were treated with vorinostat 360 mg once daily for 14 days followed by BRAFi/MEKi. The primary endpoint was an objective response rate of progressive lesions of at least 30% according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, and translational molecular analyses using ctDNA and tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients with progressive BRAFi/MEKi-resistant BRAFV600-mutated melanoma receiving treatment with vorinostat, 22 patients were evaluable for response. The objective response rate was 9%, with one complete response for 31.2 months and one partial response for 14.9 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.4 and 5.4 months, respectively. Common adverse events were fatigue (23%) and nausea (19%). ctDNA analysis showed emerging secondary mutations in NRAS and MEK in eight patients at the time of BRAFi/MEKi resistance. Elimination of these mutations by vorinostat treatment was observed in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent treatment with vorinostat in patients with BRAFi/MEKi-resistant BRAFV600-mutated melanoma is well tolerated. Although the primary endpoint of this study was not met, durable antitumor responses were observed in a minority of patients (9%).