A Phase II trial of Belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Belinostat is a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumour and anti-angiogenic properties. An open label, multicentre study was conducted in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who failed ≥1 prior systemic therapy and were treated with belinostat (1000 mg/m(2) intravenously ×5 d of a 21-d cycle). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Patients with PTCL (n = 24) had received a median of three prior systemic therapies (range 1-9) and 40% had stage IV disease. Patients with CTCL (n = 29) had received a median of one prior skin-directed therapy (range 0-4) and four prior systemic therapies (range 1-9); 55% had stage IV disease. The ORRs were 25% (PTCL) and 14% (CTCL). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77% of patients; nausea (43%), vomiting (21%), infusion site pain (13%) and dizziness (11%) had the highest incidence. Treatment-related serious adverse events were Grade 5 ventricular fibrillation; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; Grade 3 peripheral oedema, apraxia, paralytic ileus and pneumonitis; and Grade 2 jugular vein thrombosis. Belinostat monotherapy was well tolerated and efficacious in patients with recurrent/refractory PTCL and CTCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00274651.

Results from a randomized phase III study comparing combined treatment with histamine dihydrochloride plus interleukin-2 versus interleukin-2 alone in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Reactive oxidative species (ROS) produced by phagocytic cells have been ascribed a role in the localized suppression of lymphocyte function within malignant tumors. Histamine has been shown to inhibit ROS formation and possibly synergize with cytokines to permit activation of natural killer cells and T cells. This study was designed to determine whether the addition of histamine to a subcutaneous (SC) regimen of interleukin-2 (IL-2) would improve the survival of metastatic melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase III, multicenter, randomized, parallel group study comparing IL-2 plus histamine with IL-2 alone was conducted in 305 patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. Patients were randomized to IL-2 (9 MIU/m(2) bid SC on days 1 to 2 of weeks 1 and 3, and 2 MIU/m(2) bid SC on days 1 to 5 of weeks 2 and 4) with or without histamine (1.0 mg bid SC days 1 to 5, weeks 1 to 4). The primary end point, survival, was prospectively applied to all randomized patients (intent-to-treat-overall population, ITT-OA) and all patients having liver metastases at randomization (ITT-LM population). Secondary end points included safety of the combined treatment, time to disease progression, and response rate. RESULTS: Combined treatment with histamine plus IL-2 significantly improved overall survival in the ITT-LM population (P =.004) and showed a trend for improved survival in the ITT population (P =.125). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were comparable in the two arms. CONCLUSION: Use of histamine as an adjunct to IL-2 is safe, well tolerated, and associated with a statistically significant prolongation of survival compared with IL-2 alone in metastatic melanoma patients with liver involvement. Further trials to confirm and understand the role of histamine in this combination treatment are underway.

A phase I/II study of LY900003, an antisense inhibitor of protein kinase C-alpha, in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Protein kinase C-alpha has been implicated in malignant transformation and proliferation. Based on in vivo superadditive interaction between the protein kinase C-alpha antisense oligonucleotide LY900003 (Affinitak, ISIS 3521) and cisplatin, we designed this phase I/II trial of LY900003 with cisplatin/gemcitabine. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The safety of the combination, as well as potential pharmacokinetic interactions, was evaluated in the phase I portion of the trial. The phase II portion evaluated the antitumor activity of the combination in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RESULTS: Seven patients received 18 cycles of the combination during the phase I portion. Dose-limiting toxicity was only observed in one of six evaluable patients (grade 3 fatigue). However, due to a relatively high frequency of thrombocytopenia, cisplatin 80 (mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) were recommended for the phase II portion. Antitumor activity was observed in two patients (one with NSCLC and one with pancreatic carcinoma), and prolonged stabilization was observed in two others. No pharmacokinetic interactions occurred. In the phase II portion, 55 NSCLC patients received the combination at two gemcitabine doses [1,000 mg/m2, n=44 (original cohort); 1,250 mg/m2, n=11 (expanded cohort)]. Fourteen of 39 evaluable patients in the original cohort had a response rate (1 complete response and 13 partial responses; response, 36%), whereas 2 of 9 evaluable patients in the expanded cohort experienced partial response (combined response rate, 33%). The median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months, whereas the median time response to progression for the 48 patients with evaluable response was 4.4 months (confidence interval, 3.5-5.5 months). Intent to treat median survival time was 8.9 months. Forty-eight percent of the patients experienced catheter-related events. CONCLUSIONS: LY900003 can be administered safely in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine and is associated with antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC. Better characterization of subsets of patients most likely to benefit from this combination therapy is needed.

Fourteen-day CHOP supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase II study.

The safety and efficacy of compressed-cycle (14-day) standard-dose CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) supported with prophylactic recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) were evaluated in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation groups D-H and J; N = 120), accrued from 25 clinical practices, were given 6 cycles of standard-dose CHOP every 14 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg was given daily subcutaneously in each cycle, starting on day 2 and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count was = 10000/microL. The overall response rate was 89%, with complete responses (CRs) in 52 of 120 patients (43%) and partial responses in 55 (46%). These results are consistent with previously reported outcomes from trials in this population. Of the 720 chemotherapy cycles planned for all patients, 615 (85%) were given on time at full dose. The median relative dose intensity (RDI) of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin was 99%; the RDI of vincristine was 73%. In the 53 patients = 60 years of age, 80% of the chemotherapy cycles were given on time at full dose, with median RDIs similar to those in the entire population. Response rates in the older patients were also similar, with CRs in 24 patients (45%) and partial responses in 21 (40%). Hematologic toxicity was significant but tolerable, with no treatment-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 20.6 months, 77% of patients were still alive. Standard-dose CHOP administered every 14 days with prophylactic G-CSF support was delivered as planned in most patients and produced response rates comparable with those with CHOP given every 3 weeks, without exceptional toxicity.

Serum proteomic profiling and haptoglobin polymorphisms in patients with GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We studied serum proteomic profiling in patients with graft versus host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry analysis. The expression of a group of proteins, haptoglobin (Hp), alpha-1-antitrypsin, apolipoprotein A-IV, serum paraoxonase and Zn-alpha-glycoprotein were increased and the proteins, clusterin precursor, alpha-2-macroglobulin, serum amyloid protein precursor, sex hormone-binding globulin, serotransferrin and complement C4 were decreased in patients with extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Serum haptoglobin (Hp) levels in patients with cGVHD were demonstrated to be statistically higher than in patients without cGVHD and normal controls (p < 0.01). We used immunoblotting and PCR in combination with 2-DE gel image analysis to determine Hp polymorphisms in 25 allo-HCT patients and 16 normal donors. The results demonstrate that patients with cGVHD had a higher incidence of HP 2-2 phenotype (43.8%), in comparison to the patients without cGVHD (0%) and normal donors (18.7%), suggesting the possibility that specific Hp polymorphism may play a role in the development of cGVHD after allo-HCT. In this study, quantitative serum Hp levels were shown to be related to cGVHD development. Further, the data suggest the possibility that specific Hp polymorphisms may be associated with cGVHD development and warrant further investigation.

Multicenter randomized phase II study of weekly or twice-weekly bortezomib plus rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular or marginal-zone B-cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To determine overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and duration of response (DOR) with twice-weekly/weekly bortezomib plus rituximab, and evaluate safety/tolerability, in patients with relapsed or refractory CD20(+) follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal-zone lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (minimization method) to bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, and 11; 21-day cycle, five cycles; arm A) or bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2) weekly (days 1, 8, 15, and 22; 35-day cycle, three cycles; arm B) plus rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks (both arms). Response/progression was determined by International Workshop Response Criteria using oncologist/radiologist-adjudicated data from independent radiology review and investigator assessment. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (arm A, n = 41; arm B, n = 40) were enrolled. Dose-intensity was higher in arm A; mean total bortezomib received was similar between arms (18.5 and 17.1 mg/m(2)). In arm A, ORR was 49% (14% complete response [CR]/CR unconfirmed [CRu]), median TTP was 7.0 months, and median DOR was not reached. In arm B, ORR was 43% (10% CR/CRu), and median TTP/DOR were 10.0/9.3 months. The weekly combination regimen seemed better tolerated. Grade 3 or worse adverse events seemed more common in arm A (54%) versus arm B (35%), including thrombocytopenia (10% v 0%) and peripheral neuropathy (10% v 5%), but diarrhea seemed less frequent (7% v 15%). No grade 4 toxicities were reported in arm B. CONCLUSION: Both bortezomib plus rituximab regimens seem feasible in relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas. The more convenient weekly combination regimen is being compared with single-agent rituximab in an ongoing phase III study in relapsed FL.

Phase 1-2a multicenter dose-ranging study of canfosfamide in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of canfosfamide in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: This was a phase 1-2a, multicenter, dose-ranging trial that enrolled patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer with measurable disease. Patients received canfosfamide in doses ranging from 400 to 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) with carboplatin at area under the curve 6 IV and paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 IV day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate, and the secondary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were treated with canfosfamide at dose levels of 400 (n = 3), 500 (n = 51), 750 (n = 54), and 1000 mg/m2 (n = 21). Objective tumor responses by RECIST were observed in 40 patients [34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26-44)], the median progression-free survival was 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.2) and the median survival 9.9 months (95% CI, 7.7-11.9). The percent of patients alive at 1 year was 43.1%. The overall safety profile of the combination was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents. In an exploratory analysis, patients receiving the optional maintenance canfosfamide therapy had a prolonged median survival of 16.8 months compared with those eligible for but not receiving maintenance therapy at 8.8 months (hazard ratio = 0.38, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of canfosfamide with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy is well tolerated and active. Maintenance canfosfamide may further improve outcomes. This regimen is worthy of additional study.

Acquired pure megakaryocytic aplasia: report of a single case treated with mycophenolate mofetil.

Acquired pure megakaryocytic aplasia (APMA) is a rare disorder in the field of hematological diseases. We report the case of a patient with APMA treated with mycophenolate mofetil and review the literature associated with this. Until today, very few cases of APMA have been reported and the disease etiology still seems to be unclear. There have been no reported cases of treatment of APMA treated with mycophenolate mofetil.

Phase II trial of sunitinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy.

PURPOSE: Sunitinib is an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and multiple other growth factor receptors. We assessed the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled onto this two-stage phase II trial and were stratified by whether they had received prior bevacizumab (n = 43) or not (n = 41). Treatment comprised sunitinib 50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment, in repeated 6-week cycles. RESULTS: By Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, one patient, who was in the prior bevacizumab cohort, achieved a partial response, and 13 patients (two in the prior bevacizumab cohort and 11 in the no prior bevacizumab cohort) achieved stable disease lasting > or = 22 weeks. Median time to progression in the prior bevacizumab and bevacizumab-naïve cohorts was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.3 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 3.1 months), respectively, whereas median overall survival time was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 10.6 months) and 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 15.3 months), respectively. The most common adverse events were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia. Twenty-six patients (32%) required dose reduction to 37.5 mg/d, and one patient required dose reduction to 25 mg/d. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib did not demonstrate a meaningful single-agent objective response rate in colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. However, the mechanisms of action and acceptable safety profile of sunitinib warrant further study in combination with standard regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Randomized phase III study of trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin compared with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in women with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab and paclitaxel with or without carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER-2 overexpression was defined as immunohistochemical staining scores of 2+ or 3+. Between November 1998 and May 2002, 196 women with HER-2-overexpressing MBC were randomly assigned to six cycles of either trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose plus 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (TP), or trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose plus 2 mg/kg weekly thereafter with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the time-concentration curve = 6 every 3 weeks (TPC) followed by weekly trastuzumab alone. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the 196 patients were well balanced between study arms. Objective response rate (ORR) was 52% (95% CI, 42% to 62%) for TPC versus 36% (95% CI, 26% to 46%) for TP (P = .04). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months for TPC and 7.1 months for TP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.73; P = .03). Improved clinical outcomes with TPC were most evident in HER-2 3+ patients, with an ORR of 57% (95% CI, 45% to 70%) v 36% (95% CI, 25% to 48%; P = .03) and median PFS of 13.8 v 7.6 months (P = .005) for TPC and TP, respectively (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.64). Both regimens were well tolerated, and febrile neutropenia and neurotoxicity occurred infrequently; grade 4 neutropenia occurred more frequently with TPC (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The addition of carboplatin to paclitaxel and trastuzumab improved ORR and PFS in women with HER-2-overexpressing MBC. This well-tolerated regimen represents a new therapeutic option.

Randomized phase II study of bortezomib alone and bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib +/- docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 (arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (arm B). A treatment cycle of 21 days comprised four bortezomib doses on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus, in arm B, docetaxel on day 1. Patients could receive unlimited cycles. The primary end point was response rate. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were treated, 75 in arm A and 80 in arm B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Investigator-assessed response rates were 8% in arm A and 9% in arm B. Disease control rates were 29% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Median time to progression was 1.5 months in arm A and 4.0 months in arm B. One-year survival was 39% and 33%, and median survival was 7.4 and 7.8 months in arms A and B, respectively. Adverse effect profiles were as expected in both arms, with no significant additivity. The most common grade > or = 3 adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, and dyspnea (4% and 53%, 19% and 26%, and 17% and 14% of patients in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib has modest single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC using this schedule, with minor enhancement in combination with docetaxel. Additional investigation of bortezomib in NSCLC is warranted in combination with other drugs known to be active, or using different schedules.

Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin compared with conventional doxorubicin in a randomized multicenter trial as first-line therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin, TLC D-99 (Myocet, Elan Pharmaceuticals, Princeton, NJ), and conventional doxorubicin in first-line treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). METHODS: Two hundred twenty-four patients with MBC and no prior therapy for metastatic disease were randomized to receive either TLC D-99 (75 mg/m(2)) or doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks, in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy endpoint was response rate. Responses were assessed using World Health Organization criteria and were required to be of at least 6 weeks' duration. The primary safety endpoint was cardiotoxicity. Cardiac function was monitored by multiple-gated radionuclide cardioangiography scan, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was scored at a central laboratory. Patients were removed from study if LVEF declined 20 or more EF units from baseline to a final value of greater than or equal to 50%, or by 10 or more units to a final value of less than 50%, or onset of clinical congestive heart failure (CHF). RESULTS: Median age was 54 years in both treatment groups. All relevant prognostic factors were balanced, with the exception that there were significantly more progesterone receptor positive patients in the doxorubicin-treated group. Protocol-defined cardiotoxicity was observed in 13% of TLC D-99 patients (including 2 cases of CHF) compared to 29% of doxorubicin patients (including 9 cases of CHF). Median cumulative doxorubicin dose at onset of cardiotoxicity was 785 mg/m(2) for TLC D-99 versus 570 mg/m(2) for doxorubicin (P = 0.0001; hazard ratio, 3.56). The overall response rate was 26% in both treatment groups. The median TTP was 2.9 months on TLC D-99 versus 3.1 months on doxorubicin. Median survival was 16 versus 20 months with a nonsignificant trend in favor of doxorubicin (P = 0.09). Clinical toxicities, commonly associated with doxorubicin, appeared less common with TLC D-99, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was only one report of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (Grade 2) with this liposomal formulation of doxorubicin. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent TLC D-99 produces less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin, while providing comparable antitumor activity.

Correlation of p53 immunostaining in primary and residual ovarian cancer at the time of positive second-look laparotomy and its prognostic role: a Southwest Oncology Group ancillary study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to verify the correlation between p53 immunostaining at initial diagnosis and at positive reassessment after completing platinum-based chemotherapy and to assess prognostic differences between patients whose tumors display positive immunostaining versus those that have negative immunostaining at such reassessment. METHODS: This study made use of samples from patients entered into a prospective randomized study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 8835) that treated patients with minimal residual disease at second-look laparotomy with either intraperitoneal (ip) mitoxantrone or fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR). Unstained slides from tumor obtained at the initial diagnosis and at reassessment were retrospectively requested from individual institutions. The degree of nuclear staining was determined using the anti-p53 mouse monoclonal antibody Pab1801 and previously published techniques, with a cutoff of 10% or more staining of tumor cell nuclei for a positive result. Cox model regression analysis was performed for overall survival and progression-free survival, with p53 status, ip treatment, and baseline CA125 as independent variables. RESULTS: p53 determination was feasible in 22 patients both at diagnosis and at the second-look samples; 9 additional patients had only either sample available. Since concordance between the 10 negative and 12 positive immunostained samples was 100%, all 31 patients were considered in the Cox model. The death hazard ratio of p53-positive versus p53-negative patients was 4.18 (two-sided P value of 0.006). CONCLUSION: p53 immunostaining at second-look laparotomy correlates with the immunostaining at diagnosis. In this series confined to patients with minimal residual disease after initial therapy subjected to second-line intraperitoneal treatment, it appears to identify a poor prognostic (positive) subset for survival.