[New educational approaches to the patient. A scoping review of systematic reviews.] / Gamification: un nuovo approccio educativo al paziente. Una scoping review di revisioni sistematiche.

INTRODUCTION: New educational approaches are emerging to assist healthcare professionals in better personalizing patient's educational pathways. Specifically, "gamification" - the incorporation of game elements into non-game contexts - appears to be a novel and affordable approach. This scoping review aims to explore and map the literature that evaluates the efficacy of gamification in healthcare contexts. METHODS: A scoping review of reviews was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO using the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis guidelines and the PRISMA ScR checklist. RESULTS: A total of four systematic reviews and four meta-analyses were included. It appears that gamification, when used in conjunction with other conventional educational tools, improves physical activity, facilitates better self-management of type 2 diabetes, improves cognitive functions, and improves the quality of life, particularly among specific groups like the elderly. DISCUSSIONS: Gamification is an innovative educational approach that could be useful in patient's educational pathways. However, it seems that gamification is effective only in particular subgroups, and therefore the generalization of the results should also be assessed with caution due to the high risk of bias in the included studies and the small sample sizes considered. CONCLUSION: More randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis studies should be conducted to better understand the role and efficacy of gamification in patient education.

Measuring Nasal Patency and the Sense of Smell in CRSwNP Patients Treated with Dupilumab.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in the most severe forms is associated with a poor quality of life. Dupilumab has been suggested as an add-on treatment option for severe CRSwNP. Severe CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab in different rhinological units were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months from the first administration and were considered for this study. At baseline (T0) and at each follow-up, patients underwent nasal endoscopy and completed the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT)-22, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for smell/nasal obstruction, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and the Sniffin' Sticks identification test (SSIT). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of dupilumab in patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP on recovering nasal obstruction and smell impairment. Moreover, the method between PNIF and SSIT with the highest correlation with patients' response to dupilumab was evaluated. One hundred forty-seven patients were included. All parameters improved during treatment (p < 0.001). At T0, no correlations were found between PNIF and nasal symptoms. Nevertheless, during the following evaluations significant correlations between PNIF changes and both nasal symptoms and NPS were observed (p < 0.05). At T0, SSIT did not correlate with SNOT-22. Similarly to PNIF, during the follow-up SSIT changes significantly correlated with nasal symptom and NPS (p < 0.05). Comparing PNIF and SSIT correlations with SNOT-22 and NPS, PNIF showed a higher correlation with both. Dupilumab improves nasal obstruction and the sense of smell. PNIF and SSIT are effective tools in monitoring patients' response to dupilumab.

Effectiveness of Dupilumab in the Treatment of Patients with Uncontrolled Severe CRSwNP: A "Real-Life" Observational Study in Naïve and Post-Surgical Patients.

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) represents 25−30% of all CRS cases, and in the most severe forms it is associated with a poor quality of life and a high rate of nasal polyps' recurrence after surgery. Dupilumab has been suggested as a treatment option for severe CRSwNP. Methods: Patients with severe CRSwNP receiving dupilumab from January 2021 were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from the first administration and were considered for this study. At baseline and at each follow-up, patients underwent nasal endoscopy and completed the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for smell/nasal obstruction, the Nasal Congestion Score and the Asthma Control Test. Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), a smell test, nasal cytology and blood eosinophilia were also evaluated. Results: Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Of these, 33 patients had a history of previous surgery (ESS) and had recurrent nasal polyps, while 14 patients were naïve to nasal surgery. Both subjective and objective parameters improved after biological treatment and were correlated with each other (p < 0.05), except for the SNOT-22 and the nasal polyp's score. No correlations were found between nasal and blood eosinophilia. No differences were observed when comparing the post-surgical and the naïve groups. Conclusions: Dupilumab improves nasal obstruction and the sense of smell and reduces the level of local inflammation in severe CRSwNP patients in a similar way in both naïve and post-surgical patients.