Leukoaraiosis Predicts Short-term Cognitive But not Motor Recovery in Ischemic Stroke Patients During Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Leukoaraiosis has been shown to impact functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. However, its association with domain specific recovery after ischemic stroke is uncertain. We sought to determine whether pre-existing leukoaraiosis is associated with short-term motor and cognitive recovery after stroke. METHODS: We retrospectively studied ischemic stroke patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation (AIR) between January 2013 and September 2015. Patient baseline characteristics, infarct volume, prestroke modified Rankin Scale, stroke cause, rehabilitation length of stay, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were recorded. Leukoaraiosis severity was graded on brain magnetic resonance imaging using the Fazekas scale. Multiple linear regression was used to determine factors independently associated with the total, cognitive, and motor FIM scores at AIR discharge, respectively. RESULTS: Of 1600 ischemic stroke patients screened, 109 patients were included in the final analysis. After adjustment, the initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (ß -0.541, confidence interval [CI] -0.993 to -0.888; P = 0.020) and pre-existing leukoaraiosis severity (ß -1.448, CI -2.861 to -0.034; P = 0.045) independently predicted the total FIM score. Domain specific analysis showed that infarct volume (ß -0.012, CI -0.019 to -0.005; P = 0.002) and leukoaraiosis severity (ß -0.822, CI -1.223 to -0.410; P = 0.0001) independently predicted FIM cognitive scores at discharge from AIR. Leukoaraiosis did not predict FIM motor score (P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Leukoaraiosis severity is an independent predictor of total and cognitive, but not motor FIM scores after AIR for acute ischemic stroke. This highlights that leukoaraiosis affects poststroke recovery in a domain specific fashion, information that may aid counseling of patients and families as well as tailor rehabilitative efforts.

Reducing the number of unnecessary routine laboratory tests through education of internal medicine residents.

INTRODUCTION: The Choosing Wisely guidelines advise against ordering routine blood tests for hospitalised patients unless they change management. Unnecessary testing can lead to adverse effects (eg, iatrogenic anaemia, poor sleep quality, risk for infections and increased cost of care). METHODS: An 8-week quality initiative aimed at reducing unnecessary blood tests was implemented in three internal medicine resident inpatient services. The initiative included a 30 min educational session, reminders prior to rotation and midrotation and posters in work areas that displayed lab pricing and urged judicious testing. Residents were encouraged to justify the purpose of ordering tests in their daily progress notes. Attending physicians were made aware of the initiative. Preintervention and postintervention time points were used to compare key metrics. A >10% decrease between time periods was used as an evaluation criterion. RESULTS: There were 293 patient records reviewed in the preintervention period and 419 in the postintervention period. The two groups were similar in terms of age and gender. Median blood test count (complete blood count/basic metabolic profile/comprehensive metabolic profile) decreased from 4 to 2 tests per patient per day (50 % decrease) after the intervention. The median length of hospital stay decreased from 4.9 to 3.9 days (21% decrease). A decreased percentage of people requiring transfusions was also noted (2016: 6.1%, 2017: 2.9%). CONCLUSION: The frequency of unnecessary routine blood tests ordered in the hospital can be decreased by educating resident physicians, making them cost conscious and aware of the indications for ordering routine labs. Frequent reminders are needed to sustain the educational benefit.