All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, failure rates, risk factors for failure, and complications in patients with bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMTs) undergoing repair with inside-out (IO) versus all-inside (AI) techniques. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception to August 2023 according to the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of Level I to IV clinical studies published in the past 10 years with greater than 2 years of follow-up that evaluated patient-reported outcome scores and/or the incidence of failure after IO or AI repairs for BHMTs. Clinical studies not reporting outcomes or failure rates, older studies using outdated implants, animal studies, reviews, letters to the editor, case reports, cadaveric studies, and articles not written in the English language or with English-language translation were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Outcomes were reported as ranges and qualitatively compared. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies published from 2013 to 2023, consisting of 1,062 patients with BHMTs, were identified. Thirteen studies (14 cohorts, 649 patients) reported on AI repair (mean age range, 23.7-32 years) and 7 studies (7 cohorts, 413 patients) reported on IO repair (mean age range, 16.7-34.6 years). Both groups had improved postoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. Decreased range of motion was the most commonly reported complication in the AI group (range, 2.6%-4%), whereas adhesions for arthrofibrosis were the most commonly reported complication in the IO group (n = 12; range, 6%-7.9%). The overall reported failure rate ranged from 6.9% to 20.5% within the AI group and from 0% to 20% within the IO group. CONCLUSIONS: AI and IO repair techniques for BHMTs both result in improved Lysholm and Tegner scores. However, broad ranges of failure are reported in the literature, with overall failure rates ranging from 6.9% to 20.5% after AI repair and from 0% to 20% after IO repair. Younger age and isolated medial BHMT repair are the most frequently reported risk factors for the AI technique, whereas postoperative stiffness is the most frequently reported complication after both repair techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Meniscal ramp lesion classification systems: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To describe the proposed classification systems for meniscal ramp lesions (RLs) in the literature and evaluate their accuracy and reliability. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines utilising PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Level I-IV studies referencing RLs along with either an arthroscopic- or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system used to describe RL subtypes were included. RESULTS: In total, 21 clinical studies were included. Twenty-seven (79%) of the included studies were published in 2020 or later. There were four main classification systems proposed within the literature (two arthroscopic-, two MRI-based), describing tear patterns, mediolateral extent, associated ligament disruption and stability of the lesion. The first classification was proposed in 2015 by Thaunat et al. and is referenced in 22 (64.7%) of the included studies. The application of the Thaunat et al. criteria to MRI showed variable sensitivity (31.70%-93.8%) and interobserver agreement (k = 0.55-0.80). The Greif et al. modification to the Thaunat et al. system was referenced in 32.4% of the included studies and had a substantial interobserver agreement (k = 0.8). Stability to probing and specific tear location were each used to classify RLs in 28.6% and 23.8% of the included clinical studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although there has been a recent increase in the recognition and treatment of meniscal RLs, there is limited consistency in descriptive classifications used for this pathology. Current RL classification systems based on preoperative MRI have variable reliability, and arthroscopic examination remains the gold standard for diagnosis and classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

How Fellowship Training Affects Complication Rate After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty is performed by orthopedic surgeons with various fellowship training backgrounds. Whether surgeons performing shoulder arthroplasty with different types of fellowship training have differing rates of complications and reoperation remains unknown. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner database was retrospectively queried from the years 2010-2022. Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty were selected using the CPT code 23472. Those undergoing revision arthroplasty and those with a history of fracture, infection, or malignancy were excluded. Fellowship was determined and verified via online search. Only surgeons who performed a minimum of 10 cases were selected; and PearlDiver was queried using their provider ID codes. Primary outcome measures included 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year rates of complication and reoperation. A Bonferroni correction was utilized in which the significance threshold was set at p≤0.00023 RESULTS: In total, 150,385 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Analysis of surgical trends revealed that Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow fellowship- trained surgeons are performing an increasing percentage of all shoulder arthroplasty over time, with each cohort exhibiting am 11.3% and 4.2% increase from 2010 to 2022, respectively. The geographic region with the highest proportion of cases performed by Sports Medicine surgeons was the West, while the Northeast has the highest proportion of cases performed by Shoulder and Elbow surgeons. Shoulder and Elbow surgeons operated on patients that were significantly younger and had fewer comorbidities. Both Shoulder and Elbow and Sports Medicine surgeons had lower rates of postoperative complications at 90 days, 1 year and 5 years in comparison to surgeons who completed another type of fellowship or no fellowship. Across each time point, the rates of individual complications between Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow were comparable, but the pooled complication rate was lowest in the Shoulder and Elbow cohort. CONCLUSION: Surgeons who have completed either a Sports Medicine or Shoulder and Elbow fellowship are performing an increasing proportion of shoulder arthroplasty over time. Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow-trained surgeons have significantly lower complication rates at 90 days, 1 year and 5 years postoperatively. The individual complication rates between Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow are comparable, but Shoulder and Elbow has the lowest pooled complication rates overall.

Impact of COVID-19 on maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients and providers: A review.

The COVID-19 pandemic exerted complex pressures on the nephrology community. Despite multiple prior reviews on acute peritoneal dialysis during the pandemic, the effects of COVID-19 on maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients remain underexamined. This review synthesizes and reports findings from 29 total cases of chronic peritoneal dialysis patients with COVID-19, encompassing 3 case reports, 13 case series, and 13 cohort studies. When available, data for patients with COVID-19 on maintenance hemodialysis are also discussed. Finally, we present a chronological timeline of evidence regarding the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in spent peritoneal dialysate and explore trends in telehealth as they relate to peritoneal dialysis patients during the pandemic. We conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the efficacy, flexibility, and utility of peritoneal dialysis.

Three-Column Osteotomy for Frail Versus Nonfrail Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity: Assessment of Medical and Surgical Complications, Revision Surgery Rates, and Cost.

BACKGROUND: Three-column osteotomy (3-CO) is a powerful tool for spinal deformity correction but has been associated with substantial risk and surgical invasiveness. It is incompletely understood how frailty might affect patients undergoing 3-CO. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was used to examine spinal deformity patients with a diagnosis of frailty who had undergone 3-CO. Frail and nonfrail patients were matched, and the revision surgery rates, complications, and hospitalization costs were calculated. Logistic regression was used to account for possible confounding variables. Of the 2871 included patients, 1460 had had frailty and 1411 had had no frailty. RESULTS: The frail patients were older, had had more comorbidities (P < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone posterior interbody fusion (P < 0.05), without differences in the anterior interbody fusion rates. No differences were found in the reoperation rates for ≤5 years. At 30 days, the frail patients were more likely to have experienced acute kidney injury (P = 0.018), bowel/bladder dysfunction (P = 0.014), cardiac complications (P = 0.006), and pneumonia (P = 0.039). At 2 years, the frail patients were also more likely to have experienced bowel/bladder dysfunction (P = 0.028), cardiac complications (P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.027), and sepsis (P = 0.033). The cost for the procedures was also higher for the frail patients than for the nonfrail patients ($24,544.79 vs. $21,565.63; P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: We found that frail patients undergoing 3-CO were more likely to experience certain medical complications and had had higher associated costs but similar reoperation rates compared with nonfrail patients. Careful patient selection and surgical strategy modification might alter the risks of medical and surgical complications after 3-CO for frail patients.

Adult Spinal Deformity Correction in Patients with Parkinson Disease: Assessment of Surgical Complications, Reoperation, and Cost.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that manifests with postural instability and gait imbalance. Correction of spinal deformity in patients with PD presents unique challenges. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was queried between 2010 and 2020 to identify adult patients with spinal deformity before undergoing deformity correction with posterior spinal fusion. Two cohorts were created representing patients with and without a preoperative diagnosis of PD. Outcome measures included reoperation rates, surgical technique, cost, surgical complications, and medical complications. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, gender, 3-column osteotomy, pelvic fixation, and number of levels fused was used to assess rates of reoperation and complications. RESULTS: In total, 26,984 patients met the inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Of these patients, 725 had a diagnosis of PD before deformity correction. Patients with PD underwent higher rates of pelvic fixation (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; P < 0.001) and 3-column osteotomies (OR, 1.53; P < 0.001). On adjusted regression, patients with PD showed increased rates of reoperation at 1 year (OR, 1.37; P < 0.001), 5 years (OR, 1.32; P < 0.001), and overall (OR, 1.33; P < 0.001). Patients with PD also experienced an increased rate of medical complications within 30 days after deformity correction including deep venous thrombosis (OR, 1.60; P = 0.021), pneumonia (OR, 1.44; P = 0.039), and urinary tract infections (OR, 1.54; P < 0.001). Deformity correction in patients with PD was associated with higher 90-day cost (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PD undergoing long fusion for deformity correction are at significantly increased risk of 30-day medical complications and revision procedures after 1 year, controlling for comorbidities, age, and invasiveness. Surgeons should consider the risk of complications, subsequent revision procedures, and increased cost.

Malnutrition, Body Mass Index, and Associated Risk of Complications After Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion: A 3:1 Matched Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of malnutrition on outcomes after posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) remains understudied. This study analyzes the effect of malnutrition across a comprehensive range of body mass index (BMI) on complications after PLF. METHODS: The Pearldiver Mariner database was queried between 2010 and 2020 using International Classification of Diseases (Ninth and Tenth Revisions) codes for malnutrition and Current Procedural Terminology codes for PLF. Patients were identified with preoperative BMI diagnosis codes and partitioned into one of the following BMI cohorts: underweight (BMI <20), normal (BMI 19-30), obese (BMI 30-40), and morbidly obese (BMI >40). An additional all-BMI cohort was created using patients with any BMI code. All cohorts were matched 1:3 to control patients within the same BMI group without malnutrition based on age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index. Complication rates were calculated using the Pearson χ2 method with statistical significance set to P < 0.05. RESULTS: The number of patients in each cohort were 1106 (all-BMI), 227 (underweight), 808 (normal), 667 (obese), and 449 (morbidly obese). Statistical analysis showed that the all-BMI cohort had greater odds of complications related to instrumentation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.28; P < 0.001), need for revision fusion (OR: 2.04; P < 0.001), pulmonary complications (OR: 1.45; P < 0.001), sepsis (OR: 2.89; P < 0.001), surgical site complications (OR: 1.87; P < 0.001), and urinary complications (OR: 1.41; P < 0.001). No difference was noted between the BMI-specific cohorts for complication risk. CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that malnutrition may independently increase PLF complication risk. Surgeons may consider preoperative optimization for malnutrition patients to reduce complication risk.

Nosocomial COVID-19 infection mortality following surgery for severe progressive cervical myelopathy: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: We present the unique case of a nosocomial COVID infection acquired after urgent surgical intervention for cervical myelopathy, as well as the sequelae that followed in the postoperative period. CASE PRESENTATION: An initially COVID-negative patient underwent urgent surgical intervention for cervical myelopathy with significant neurological deterioration. She underwent an uncomplicated staged anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with corpectomy, as well as a subsequent posterior cervical instrumented fusion within the same hospitalization. The patient would refuse to adhere to standard COVID precautions during her admission and demonstrated rapid decompensation following her particularly uneventful surgeries, ultimately leading to her expiration. A laboratory test confirmed that she had contracted COVID at the time of the patient's death. DISCUSSION: This report highlights the repercussions of COVID-19 infection during the perioperative period and its implications on surgical outcomes. The stresses of surgery and the body's immunosuppressive responses during this time place patients at particular risk for the contraction of this virus. The standard precautions should be followed and vaccination should be considered for surgical candidates prior to their operations, as they become more readily accessible.