Divergent effects of emm types 1 and 12 on invasive group A streptococcal infections-results of a retrospective cohort study, Germany 2023.

As a potential side effect of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 pandemic, invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) infections in Europe have increased dramatically in both children and adults in the end of 2022. This epidemiological and molecular study describes the distributions of streptococcal genes encoding the M antigen (emm types) and superantigens in patients with invasive and non-invasive GAS infections. From December 2022 to December 2023, a total of 163 GAS isolates were collected from sterile and non-sterile sites of patients at five hospitals in Germany including two tertiary care centers. Genes encoding M protein and superantigens were determined following the guidelines of CDC Streptococcus laboratory. Patients' characteristics were reviewed retrospectively. Correlations of clinical factors, emm types, and superantigens with rates of invasive infections were analyzed. Of the 163 included GAS cases, 112 (69%) were considered as invasive. In total, 33 different emm types were observed, of which emm1.0 (n = 49; 30%), emm89.0 (n = 15; 9%), and emm12.0 (n = 14; 9%) were most prevalent. In total, 70% of emm1.0 isolates belonged to M1UK lineage. No difference in invasive infections was observed for the M1UK lineage compared with other emm1.0 isolates. However, the emm1.0 type, presence of speA1-3, speG, or speJ, as well as adulthood were significantly associated with invasive infections. In contrast, emm12.0 isolates were significantly less associated with invasive infections. Multivariable analysis confirmed a significant influence of speJ and adulthood on iGAS infections. This study underlines the importance of continuous monitoring of genomic trends and identification of emerging GAS variants. This may aid in delineating pathogenicity factors of Streptococcus pyogenes that propel invasive infections.

Feasibility of a virtual reality course on adult tracheostomy safety skills.

The National Tracheostomy Safety Project has run high-quality, face-to-face skills courses since 2009. The aim of this project was to produce a virtual reality version of the established course and evaluate its impact on participant learning, and participant and faculty satisfaction. Healthcare staff and students were recruited and randomised to attend one of (1) a face-to-face traditional course (control); (2) a virtual reality course at a conference centre with on-site technical support; (3) a fully remote virtual reality course; the virtual reality groups were combined for the analysis of learning outcomes and satisfaction. The primary outcome was the difference in pre/post-course knowledge scores on a 30-item questionnaire; secondary outcomes included knowledge retention, usability, comfort/side effects and participant performance in a simulated tracheostomy emergency. Thirty-seven participants and 15 faculty participated in this study. There was no significant difference between mean pre/post-course scores from the face-to-face (from 21.1 to 23.1; +2) and combined virtual reality (from 17.1 to 21.1; +4) groups, with both showing improvement (p = 0.21). The mean System Usability Scale score for virtual reality was 76.8 (SD 12.6), which is above average; the median Simulator Sickness Questionnaire score was 7.5 (IQR 3.7-22.4), indicating minimal symptoms. All participants resolved the primary clinical problem in the simulated emergency, but the virtual reality (VR) group was slower overall (mean difference 61.8 s, p = 0.003). This technical feasibility study demonstrated that there was no difference in participant knowledge immediately after and 4 weeks following face-to-face and virtual reality courses. Virtual reality offers an immersive experience that can be delivered remotely and offers potential benefits of reducing travel and venue costs for attendees, therefore increasing the flexibility of training opportunities.