RESUMO
The term 'stimulant' refers to a class of drugs that increase psychophysiological arousal. From the viewpoint of prevention, it is more useful to look primarily at the social consequences and functions of stimulants. Every society has a documented use of stimulants. When planning interventions the dynamics of use must be placed in the foreground. Stimulant epidemics, like problematic stimulant users, have a natural tendency to burn themselves out. Different types of stimulants may differ in their origins, but their epidemiological consequences and use functions tend to be similar. Implications for prevention can be drawn from the characteristics of stimulant use epidemics. Users at risk for socially unacceptable patterns should be targeted for prevention efforts. Mass media campaigns that single out stimulants should be avoided. Much of the harm associated with stimulants is a consequence of life-styles characterized by polydrug use and unhealthy practices. Prevention should be timed to the appropriate period of the epidemic. Interventions useful at period 1 will not work at period 2. The recommendations of the WHO Advisory Group on the Adverse Effects of Cocaine and Coca provide a good model for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention for all forms of stimulant misuse. Stimulant prevention must be creative in finding ways of encouraging the movements of the drug to the periphery of users' lives.
Assuntos
Anfetaminas , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Cocaína , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Anfetaminas/efeitos adversos , Nível de Alerta/efeitos dos fármacos , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cocaína/efeitos adversos , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologiaAssuntos
Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Trabalho Sexual , Silicones/administração & dosagem , Transexualidade , Travestilidade , Preservativos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Soroprevalência de HIV , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Abuso de Substâncias por Via IntravenosaRESUMO
In Leek, a small town in the north of the Netherlands, 428 men aged between 30-33 years were invited to take part in a screening test for cardiovascular risk factors. Questionnaires were sent to the 267 men who had participated in the screening test as well as to the 161 non-participants, in order to gain an insight into the participatory behaviour and the experience of those involved. The non-participants gave a diversity of motives for not taking part but did not admit to anxiety about finding abnormal results. More than half of the participants who replied (51%, n = 107) were found to have an 'abnormality'--that is they scored on one or more of cigarette smoking, overweight, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinaemia, albuminuna or glucosuria. The supplementary information provided on nutrition and smoking caused a large proportion of them to claim they had changed to a more healthy life-style after the screening test. Those who were under the impression that they had led healthy lives but were still found to have an 'abnormality' were often very astonished and sometimes worried about the result. The men without 'abnormalities' did not lead significantly healthier lives than the rest in terms of exercise, smoking, diet and so on; for them the result might have a 'certificate of health' effect justifying their not always healthy behaviour.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Humanos , Hipertensão/prevenção & controle , Hipertensão/psicologia , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Motivação , Países Baixos , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Obesidade/psicologia , Fatores de Risco , FumarRESUMO
Medical and public opinion about cocaine use have shifted dramatically over the past decade. New research methodologies and definitions to evaluate the impact of cocaine are needed. This paper presents a theoretical definition and empirical analysis of the 'casual user' of cocaine. Data have been drawn from a subsample of 58 cocaine users and their cocaine-using contacts in Rotterdam. The methodology of the study presents a novel approach to patterns of cocaine use involving the integration of social network variables with 'snowball' sampling data collection techniques. The theoretical definition is systematically related to two social context variables: (1) the scope of settings where contacts use cocaine; (2) the degree of involvement in social network relations of actual cocaine use. Scope of settings has been defined in terms of the number of cocaine-using social circuits contacts are drawn from: i.e. 'narrow' setting where all contacts originate from one circuit while a 'wide' setting indicates contacts come from two or more circuits. Involvement has been defined in terms of the percentage of contacts where the relation with study participants is characterized by cocaine use most or all of the time. Additional social network variables measuring the mean duration (in years) of contacts' cocaine use and the use of cocaine with contacts in the last six months are subsequently related to the scope and involvement variables. The implications of the analysis for a new cross-classification of cocaine use patterns are discussed with special reference to public health policy issues.