[Patterns of antidepressant dispensing among children and adolescents between 2015 and 2017 in the French region of Midi-Pyrenees]. / Profil de délivrance des antidépresseurs chez l'enfant et l'adolescent en Midi-Pyrénées entre 2015 et 2017.

BACKGROUND: In France, consumption of antidepressant drugs by children and teenagers has been on the rise, even though recommendations for use are limited due to their association with serious adverse reactions. The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of antidepressant drug dispensing among children and adolescents in the French region of Midi-Pyrenees. METHOD: The data regarding the Midi-Pyrenees region were extracted from the French Health Insurance Database (SNDS) using their ATC codes. The reimbursements for antidepressants, benzodiazepines and neuroleptics dispensed to patients from 6 to 17 years old between January 2015 and June 2017 were analyzed, after which data on the antidepressants themselves were selected. The population was divided into sub-groups according to age (children : 6 to 11 years old, teenagers: 12 to 17 years old). RESULTS: During the 30 months analyzed, 12,783 antidepressants were dispensed to 3506 patients. The antidepressants were primarily issued (90%) to teenagers. In terms of prevalence, 24.7% of the teenagers had amitriptyline delivered at least once, while 31.2% of them received sertraline at least once. Regarding total amount of antidepressant issuances, sertraline was first in both the child (26.9%) and the teenage (40.7%) populations. Benzodiazepine with an antidepressant was issued to 35.1% of the children and teenagers. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline was the most widely dispensed antidepressant among children, and sertraline among teenagers. However, fluoxetine is recommended as the first-line treatment for depression affecting this population. A psychotropic drug prescription assistance website such as psychotropes.fr addressed to general practitioners might improve the implementation of recommendations and guidelines.

[Management of child and adolescent depression in primary care: A systematic meta-review]. / Prise en charge de la dépression de l'enfant et l'adolescent en soins premiers : une métarevue systématique de la littérature.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a practical guide for the management of child and adolescent depression for general practitioners (GPs), suited to their practice frame, that can be implemented on a website aimed to help GPs to manage the main mental disorders encountered in primary care. METHOD: A systematic meta-review was performed as recommended by the PRISMA statement. Each step, articles' selection, inclusion, methodological assessment and data extraction for the narrative synthesis was independently performed by two researchers. A study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (number CRD42016042710). The databases Pubmed, Cochrane and Web of Science were explored. Each step was performed independently by two researchers following PRISMA. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews (including guidelines based on a systematic review), published between 2002 and 2015, in English or French, dealing with the therapeutic management, in primary care, of patients aged 6 to 18 years old with a major depressive disorder (MDD) were included. Grey literature was explored searching the websites of national and international health agencies, learned societies, and article references. The methodological and report qualities were assessed using the AGREE II, PRISMA checklist and R-AMSTAR grid. A narrative synthesis was performed to produce the practical guide, prioritizing data from the best evaluated articles. An expert group of GPs' and one child psychiatrist validated the guide in its final form. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were included: 12 recommendations, 5 systematic reviews and 21 meta-analyses. The best evaluated guideline had an AGREE-II assessment of 81%, and the best evaluated meta-analysis had an assessment of 86% for R-AMSTAR and 96% for PRISMA. The average scores of the R-AMSTAR and PRISMA assessments were 65% and 72% respectively. The average score of the AGREE II grid assessment was 57%. The data were synthesized into a practical guide for the GPs' practice, corresponding to the different consultation times. MDD diagnosis should be done on the DSM or ICD basis. The Childrens' Depression Rating Scale-revised or the Revised Beck Depression Inventory are useful in primary care for MDD appraisal in children and adolescents. For mild MDD a supportive psychotherapy and surveillance for 4 to 6 weeks is preconized in primary care. In the absence of improvement, a specific and structured psychotherapy is recommended, and the patient should be addressed to a child psychiatrist. For moderate to severe MDD, the young patient should be addressed to a specialist in child psychiatry. A psychotherapy, which can be associated with fluoxetine, especially in adolescents, is indicated with a revaluation of the pharmacological treatment between 4 to 8 weeks. A weekly follow-up by the GP is recommended during the first month, especially after the initiation of an antidepressant to assess the suicidal risk. Beyond the first month, a consultation should be scheduled every two weeks. CONCLUSION: A clinical guide was created from the best evidence-based data to help GPs in the management of child and adolescent MDD. A French-language website, aimed to assist GPs in mental disease management and available during their consultation, will be created based on the compilation of this meta-review with other similar meta-reviews.

[Did the recommendation of the French public health council modify the antipapillomavirus vaccines' prescription level?]. / Impact de la modification d'avis du Haut Conseil de la santé publique (HCSP) sur le taux de prescription des vaccins papillomavirus humains en région Midi-Pyrénées.

BACKGROUND: In France, two vaccines are approved for prevention of papillomavirus infection: Cervarix(®) and Gardasil(®). The 17th of December 2010 the French High Committee of Public Hearth changed its recommendation about Cervarix(®) and decided that no scientific element justified a preference using Gardasil(®). This notification was published the 25th of January 2011. Our study aimed to determine whether this decision changed medical prescriptions. METHODS: An ecological study was performed with reimbursement data for the two vaccines. We performed a Chi(2) test for qualitative variables and Student's t test for quantitative variables. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed between the prescription of Cervarix(®) before and after the 25th January 2011. The difference favored increased prescription, compared to Gardasil(®) (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: This variation can be explained by the impact of recommendations for medical decisions. The strong involvement of pharmaceutical firms in medical education may explain why prescribers reacted so rapidly after the publication of the new recommendations.

[Generic substitution in primary care in 2011: differences according to pharmacological classes?]. / Différences de taux de substitution des médicaments génériques en Midi-Pyrénées en fonction des classes pharmaco-thérapeutiques.

BACKGROUND: Generic substitution has been permitted for several years in France and is promoted in order to reduce health expenditures. However, reluctance concerning use of generic drugs exists for different reasons: suspicions about their efficacy and/or safety, differences in content (excipients) and discussions about bioequivalency. The aim of our study was to determine whether or not the substitution ratio differs according to pharmacological classes used in primary care. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study in the French Health Insurance Database using reimbursement data on drugs prescribed and delivered in the Midi-Pyrénées administrative district between March 2010 and March 2011. We selected different pharmacological classes largely used in primary care. For each class, a substitution ratio was calculated (DDD of generics delivered/DDD of brand name plus generics). A Chi(2) test was used in order to detect a difference between these substitution ratios. RESULTS: The global substitution ratio was 72.32%. Values varied from 28.36% for thyroid hormones to 90.39% for antibiotics, with significant statistical difference (P<0.001). The substitution ratio was less than 50% for thyroid hormones (28.36%) and antiepileptics (45.28%). Higher substitution ratios were observed for protein pump inhibitors (88.81%), statins (87.81%), antidepressors (87.37%) and diuretics (86.1%). CONCLUSION: This study highlights major differences in terms of the generic substitution ratio between different pharmacological classes. This difference can be explained in part by published guidelines. Further studies are needed to ascertain the precise point of view of patients, general practitioners and pharmacists concerning this issue.