The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

Neurophysiological studies in primates have found that direction-sensitive neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) generally increase their response rate with increasing speed of object motion across the skin and show little evidence of speed tuning. We employed psychophysics to determine whether human perception of motion direction could be explained by features of such neurons and whether evidence can be found for a speed-tuned process. After adaptation to motion across the skin, a subsequently presented dynamic test stimulus yields an impression of motion in the opposite direction. We measured the strength of this tactile motion aftereffect (tMAE) induced with different combinations of adapting and test speeds. Distal-to-proximal or proximal-to-distal adapting motion was applied to participants' index fingers using a tactile array, after which participants reported the perceived direction of a bidirectional test stimulus. An intensive code for speed, like that observed in SI neurons, predicts greater adaptation (and a stronger tMAE) the faster the adapting speed, regardless of the test speed. In contrast, speed tuning of direction-sensitive neurons predicts the greatest tMAE when the adapting and test stimuli have matching speeds. We found that the strength of the tMAE increased monotonically with adapting speed, regardless of the test speed, showing no evidence of speed tuning. Our data are consistent with neurophysiological findings that suggest an intensive code for speed along the motion processing pathways comprising neurons sensitive both to speed and direction of motion.

Effects of deep and superficial experimentally induced acute pain on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in human subjects.

Human studies conducted more than half a century ago have suggested that superficial pain induces excitatory effects on the sympathetic nervous system, resulting in increases in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), whereas deep pain is believed to cause vasodepression. To date, no studies have addressed whether deep or superficial pain produces such differential effects on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Using microneurography we recorded spontaneous MSNA from the common peroneal nerve in 13 awake subjects. Continuous blood pressure was recorded by radial arterial tonometry. Deep pain was induced by intramuscular injection of 0.5 ml hypertonic saline (5%) into the tibialis anterior muscle, superficial pain by subcutaneous injection of 0.2 ml hypertonic saline into the overlying skin. Muscle pain, with a mean rating of 4.9 +/- 0.8 (S.E.M.) on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) and lasting on average 358 +/- 32 s, caused significant increases in MSNA (43.9 +/- 10.0%), BP (5.4 +/- 1.1%) and HR (7.0 +/- 2.0%) - not the expected decreases. Skin pain, rated at 4.9 +/- 0.6 and lasting 464 +/- 54 s, also caused significant increases in MSNA (38.2 +/- 12.8%), BP (5.1 +/- 2.1%) and HR (5.6 +/- 2.0%). The high-frequency (HF) to low-frequency (LF) ratio of heart rate variability (HRV) increased from 1.54 +/- 0.25 to 2.90 +/- 0.45 for muscle pain and 2.80 +/- 0.52 for skin pain. Despite the different qualities of deep (dull and diffuse) and superficial (burning and well-localized) pain, we conclude that pain originating in muscle and skin does not exert a differential effect on muscle sympathetic nerve activity, both causing an increase in MSNA and an increase in the LF:HF ratio of HRV. Whether this holds true for longer lasting experimental pain remains to be seen.

Effects of deep and superficial experimentally induced acute pain on skin sympathetic nerve activity in human subjects.

There is evidence in experimental animals that deep and superficial pain exert differential effects on cutaneous sympathetic activity. Skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) was recorded from the common peroneal nerve of awake human subjects and injections of 0.5 ml hypertonic saline was made into the tibialis anterior muscle (causing a deep, dull ache) or 0.2 ml into the overlying skin (causing a sharp burning pain) at unexpected times. Both deep and superficial pain caused increases in SSNA immediately on injection and preceding the onset of pain for both muscle and skin pain (10.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 15.3 +/- 5.3 s; muscle versus skin, respectively). SSNA increases were short lasting (104.2 +/- 13.4 vs. 81.8 +/- 11.7 s; muscle versus skin pain) and did not follow muscle and skin pain profiles. Sweat release occurred following both intramuscular and subcutaneous injections of hypertonic saline. While muscle or skin pain invariably caused changes in skin blood flow as well as increases in sweat release, skin blood flow increased in females and decreased in males. We conclude that both acute muscle and skin pain cause an increase in SSNA, sweat release and gender-dependent changes in skin blood flow.

Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents.

In most manipulations, we use our fingertips to apply time-varying forces to the target object in controlled directions. Here we used microneurography to assess how single tactile afferents encode the direction of fingertip forces at magnitudes, rates, and directions comparable to those arising in everyday manipulations. Using a flat stimulus surface, we applied forces to a standard site on the fingertip while recording impulse activity in 196 tactile afferents with receptive fields distributed over the entire terminal phalanx. Forces were applied in one of five directions: normal force and forces at a 20 degrees angle from the normal in the radial, distal, ulnar, or proximal directions. Nearly all afferents responded, and the responses in most slowly adapting (SA)-I, SA-II, and fast adapting (FA)-I afferents were broadly tuned to a preferred direction of force. Among afferents of each type, the preferred directions were distributed in all angular directions with reference to the stimulation site, but not uniformly. The SA-I population was biased for tangential force components in the distal direction, the SA-II population was biased in the proximal direction, and the FA-I population was biased in the proximal and radial directions. Anisotropic mechanical properties of the fingertip and the spatial relationship between the receptive field center of the afferent and the stimulus site appeared to influence the preferred direction in a manner dependent on afferent type. We conclude that tactile afferents from the whole terminal phalanx potentially contribute to the encoding of direction of fingertip forces similar to those that occur when subjects manipulate objects under natural conditions.

Control of forces applied by individual fingers engaged in restraint of an active object.

We investigated the coordination of fingertip forces in subjects who used the tips of two fingers to restrain an instrumented manipulandum with horizontally oriented grip surfaces. The grip surfaces were subjected to tangential pulling forces in the distal direction in relation to the fingers. The subjects used either the right index and middle fingers (unimanual grasp) or both index fingers (bimanual grasp) to restrain the manipulandum. To change the frictional condition at the digit-object interfaces, either both grip surfaces were covered with sandpaper or one was covered with sandpaper and the other with rayon. The forces applied normally and tangentially to the grip surfaces were measured separately at each plate along with the position of the plates. Subjects could have performed the present task successfully with many different force distributions between the digits. However, they partitioned the load in a manner that reflected the frictional condition at the local digit-object interfaces. When both digits contacted sandpaper, they typically partitioned the load symmetrically, but when one digit made contact with rayon and the other with sandpaper, the digit contacting the less slippery material (sandpaper) took up a larger part of the load. The normal forces were also influenced by the frictional condition, but they reflected the average friction at the two contact sites rather than the local friction. That is, when friction was low at one of the digit-object interfaces, only the applied normal forces increased at both digits. Thus sensory information related to the local frictional condition at the respective digit-object interfaces controlled the normal force at both digits. The normal:tangential force ratio at each digit appeared to be a controlled variable. It was adjusted independently at each digit to the minimum ratio required to prevent frictional slippage, keeping an adequate safety margin against slippage. This was accomplished by the scaling of the normal forces to the average friction and by partitioning of the load according to frictional differences between the digit-object interfaces. In conclusion, by adjusting the normal:tangential force ratios to the local frictional condition, subjects avoided excessive normal forces at the individual digit-object interfaces, and by partitioning the load according the frictional difference, subjects avoided high normal forces. Thus the local frictional condition at the separate digit-object interfaces is one factor that can strongly influence the distribution of forces across digits engaged in a manipulative act.

Mechanisms for force adjustments to unpredictable frictional changes at individual digits during two-fingered manipulation.

Previous studies on adaptation of fingertip forces to local friction at individual digit-object interfaces largely focused on static phases of manipulative tasks in which humans could rely on anticipatory control based on the friction in previous trials. Here we instead analyze mechanisms underlying this adaptation after unpredictable changes in local friction between consecutive trials. With the tips of the right index and middle fingers or the right and left index fingers, subjects restrained a manipulandum whose horizontal contact surfaces were located side by side. At unpredictable moments a tangential force was applied to the contact surfaces in the distal direction at 16 N/s to a plateau at 4 N. The subjects were free to use any combination of normal and tangential forces at the two fingers, but the sum of the tangential forces had to counterbalance the imposed load. The contact surface of the right index finger was fine-grained sandpaper, whereas that of the cooperating finger was changed between sandpaper and the more slippery rayon. The load increase automatically triggered normal force responses at both fingers. When a finger contacted rayon, subjects allowed slips to occur at this finger during the load force increase instead of elevating the normal force. These slips accounted for a partitioning of the load force between the digits that resulted in an adequate adjustment of the normal:tangential force ratios to the local friction at each digit. This mechanism required a fine control of the normal forces. Although the normal force at the more slippery surface had to be comparatively low to allow slippage, the normal forces applied by the nonslipping digit at the same time had to be high enough to prevent loss of the manipulandum. The frictional changes influenced the normal forces applied before the load ramp as well as the size of the triggered normal force responses similarly at both fingers, that is, with rayon at one contact surface the normal forces increased at both fingers. Thus to independently adapt fingertip forces to the local friction the normal forces were controlled at an interdigital level by using sensory information from both engaged digits. Furthermore, subjects used both short- and long-term anticipatory mechanisms in a manner consistent with the notion that the central nervous system (CNS) entertains internal models of relevant object and task properties during manipulation.