The Triangular Dart Flap: A Reconstructive Option for Soft Tissue Defects.

INTRODUCTION: Reconstruction of soft tissue defects after skin cancer excision remains a challenge. Options for reconstruction are numerous, including primary repair, local tissue rearrangement, and skin grafts, among others. In this series, the authors present a novel technique: The triangular dart flap. This is a single-stage tissue rearrangement that uses the redundant tissue of the dog-ear to aid in the closure of these wounds. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing local tissue rearrangements by the senior author from 2009 to 2018. Factors were collected and analyzed, including age, size and cause of defect, comorbidities, smoking history, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent reconstruction with a triangular dart flap for repair of malignant defects. Mean defect size was 7.3 cm2 (0.8-20 cm2), and mean repair size was 29.7 cm2 (6-80 cm2). Initial pathology included basal cell carcinoma (45.8%), melanoma in situ (29.2%), and squamous cell carcinoma (16.7%), among others. Location varied widely among face and extremities. Anesthesia was predominantly local only (79.1%). There were no major complications, and 5 (20.8%) minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: The triangular dart flap is a novel single-stage procedure, generally performed under local anesthesia only, for correction of Mohs defects. By using the redundant tissue of dog-ears to better approximate the wound edges, a tension-free primary closure can be achieved in sensitive areas, such as the nasal tip.

Intraoperative Botulinum Toxin Chemodenervation and Analgesia in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Purpose. To analyze the impact of botulinum toxin chemodenervation on postoperative opiate consumption through a novel intraoperative injection protocol. Methods. A retrospective review of the implementation of a novel intraoperative botulinum toxin injection into both rectus and oblique musculature. Patients undergoing open retrorectus release, with and without intraoperative chemodenervation with Botox, were retrospectively collected between 2015 and 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, and opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were retrospectively captured. Basic descriptive statistics and linear regression analysis were performed. Results. 19 patients in the Botox and 22 in the no Botox group were analyzed. Basic demographics were similar with female preponderance in the Botox group, 58% vs 27%, P = .05. Median hernia length was 15 cm for both groups (P = .57), median hernia width was 8 vs 9 cm (P = .39), epidural catheter used in 0 vs 4 (P = .11), transverse abdominal plane blocks in 3 vs 4 (P = 1), median MME usage was 191 vs 230 (P = .37) in the inpatient setting, 225 vs 300 (P = .17) in the outpatient setting, and 405 vs 568 (P = .07) in total for Botox vs no Botox groups. Stepwise linear regression analysis identified Botox as the only predictor for MME usage, P = .048. Conclusions. Chemodenervation was the only factor associated with reduced opioid usage compared to a standard group using multimodality analgesia. The role of muscular pain in laparotomy is likely underappreciated and understudied. Intraoperative selective muscular chemodenervation may play a significant role in recovery from abdominal surgery and requires further study.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Spring Assisted Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Spring-assisted surgery (SAS) has been shown to be an effective technique for correction of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis in patients less than 6 months of age. At their institution, the authors adopted a minimally invasive technique in 2010, using a shorter incision and an endoscope. A retrospective chart review of 101 patients with isolated, nonsyndromic, sagittal craniosynostosis, who underwent SAS, was performed in order to compare perioperative and clinical outcomes of the open (n = 51) and minimally-invasive (n = 50) approaches. Surgeries were performed by 2 neurosurgeons and 3 plastic surgeons, between 2005 and 2018. The pre and postoperative cephalic indices were not significantly different in both groups. Minimally-invasive spring placement required a longer operative time than the open approach, with the mean minimally-invasive operative time at 65 minutes, compared to 53 minutes (P < 0.0001). Spring removal operative time was not significantly different, with the minimally-invasive operative time at 31 minutes versus 29 minutes (P = 0.48). There were no significant differences in major or minor complications when comparing the open and minimally-invasive approaches. In conclusion, both the open and the minimally-invasive SAS techniques are effective for early correction of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis, although the minimally-invasive approach requires a longer operative time for spring placement.