A Comparison of State-Specific Pediatric Emergency Medical Facility Recognition Programs, 2020.

OBJECTIVES: Prior research suggests that the presence of state-specific pediatric emergency medical facility recognition programs (PFRPs) is associated with high emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness. The PFRPs aim to improve the quality of pediatric emergency care, but individual state programs differ. We aimed to describe the variation in PFRP characteristics and verification requirements and to describe the availability of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in states with PFRPs. METHODS: In mid-2020, we collected information about each PFRP from 3 sources: the state Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) website, the EMSC Innovation and Improvement Center website, or via communication with the state's EMSC program manager. For each state with a PFRP, we documented program characteristics, including program start date, number of tiers, whether participation was required/optional, and requirements for verification. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 17 states with active PFRPs. Five states had only 1 tier or level of recognition whereas the others had multiple. All programs did require presence of a PECC for verification. However, some PRFPs with multiple verification tiers did not require presence of a PECC to achieve each level of verification. In states with PFRPs, EDs with higher total visit volumes, a separate pediatric ED area, located in the Northeast, and earlier program start date were all more likely to have a PECC. CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in state PFRPs, although all prioritize the presence of a PECC. We encourage further research on the effect of different aspects of PFRPs on patient outcomes.

Emergency Department and Health Care System Factors Associated with Telehealth Innovation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: Telehealth capacity may be an important component of pandemic response infrastructure. We aimed to examine changes in the telehealth use by the US emergency departments (EDs) during COVID-19, and to determine whether existing telehealth infrastructure or increased system integration were associated with increased likelihood of use. Methods: We analyzed 2016-2020 National ED Inventory (NEDI)-USA data, including ED characteristics and nature of telehealth use for all US EDs. American Hospital Association data characterized EDs' system integration. An ordinary least-squares regression model obtained one-step-ahead forecast of the expected proportion of EDs using telehealth in 2020 based on growth observed from 2016 to 2019. Among EDs without telehealth in 2019, we used logistic regression models to examine whether system membership or existing telehealth infrastructure were associated with odds of innovation in telehealth use in 2020, accounting for ED characteristics. Results: Of 4,038 EDs responding to telehealth questions in 2019 and 2020 (73% response rate), 3,015 used telehealth in 2020. Telehealth use by US EDs increased more than expected in 2020 (2016: 58%, 2017: 61%, 2018: 65%, 2019: 67%, 2020: 74%, greater than predicted 71%, p = 0.004). Existing telehealth infrastructure was associated with increased telehealth innovation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.49-2.36), whereas hospital system membership was not (odds ratio [OR] = 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-1.25). Conclusions: Telehealth use by US EDs in 2020 grew more than expected and preexisting telehealth infrastructure was associated with increased innovation in its use. Preparation for future pandemic responses may benefit from considering strategies to invest in local infrastructure to facilitate technology adoption and innovation.

Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services-Attended out-of-Hospital Deliveries and Complications in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital obstetric events, including out-of-hospital deliveries and their complications, are a rare but high-risk event encountered by emergency medical services (EMS). Understanding the epidemiology of these encounters would help identify strategies to improve prehospital obstetric care. Our objective was to determine the characteristics of out-of-hospital deliveries and high-risk complications treated by EMS clinicians in the U.S. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of EMS patient care records in the 2018 and 2019 National EMS Information System Public Release Version 3.4 datasets. We included EMS activations after a 9-1-1 scene response for patients aged 12-50 years with evidence of an out-of-hospital delivery or delivery complication, or where the patient was a newborn aged 0-<6 h. We examined patient, community, emergency response, and clinical characteristics using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 56,735,977 EMS activations included in the 2018 and 2019 datasets, there were 8,614 out-of-hospital deliveries, 1,712 delivery complications, and 5,749 records for newborns. Most maternal (76%) out-of-hospital deliveries involved patients between the ages of 20-34 years, occurred on a weekday (73%), were treated by an advanced life support crew (85%), and occurred in a home or residence (73%). EMS-assisted field delivery was documented in 3,515 (34%) of all maternal activations but only 2% of activations with a delivery complication. Few patients received an EMS-administered medication (e.g., 0.4% received oxytocin). Supplemental oxygen was administered in 870 (15%) of newborn activations. Activations from counties with the most racial/ethnic diversity were more often treated by a BLS-level unit (16% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), and activations from rural areas had significantly longer transport times (19.7 min [IQR 8.7, 32.8] vs. urban, 13.1 min [IQR 8.7, 19.7], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this large, national repository of EMS patient care records from across the U.S., most activations for out-of-hospital delivery, delivery complication, or a newborn included only routine EMS care. There were potential disparities in level of care, clinical care provided, and measures of access to definitive care based on maternal and community factors. We also identified gaps in current practice, such as for postpartum hemorrhage, that could be addressed with changes in EMS clinical protocols and regulations.

Trends in female first-author abstracts at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, 1990-2020.

OBJECTIVES: To describe first author gender differences and characteristics in 1) Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Annual Meeting abstracts and 2) resulting manuscript publications. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional evaluation of SAEM abstracts from 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, compiling and reviewing a random sample of 100 abstracts for each year (total n = 700 abstracts). We documented abstract characteristics, including first author gender, and used the 2020 SAEM scoring rubric. We then searched PubMed to identify manuscript publications resulting from abstracts from 1990 to 2015 (n = 600). Finally, among abstracts that resulted in manuscript publication, we identified first and last author gender on both the abstracts and the resulting publication. RESULTS: Overall, 29% (202/695; n = 5 missing gender) of abstracts had female first authors. Female first authors increased over time (e.g., 17% in 1990 to 35% in 2020). Abstract quality scores were similar (both median [interquartile range] of 11 ([9-12]). Overall, 42% (n = 254/600) of abstracts resulted in a manuscript publication, 39% (n = 65/202) with female and 44% (n = 189/493) with male first authors (p = 0.26). The median time (IQR) from abstract to manuscript publication was longer for abstracts with female first authors vs. those with male first authors (2 [1-3] years and 1 [1, 2] years, p < 0.02); 77% and 78% of publications resulting from abstracts with female and male first authors, respectively, had the same first author. Female first author abstracts more often converted to a male first author manuscript publication (18%, n = 12/65) compared to male first author abstracts converting to female first author publications (7%, n = 14/189). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of SAEM abstracts, and manuscript publications resulting from them, had female first authors. Abstracts with female first authors took longer to achieve manuscript publication, and almost a fifth of female first author abstracts resulted in male first author manuscript publication.

Pediatric Patient Insurance Status and Regionalization of Admissions.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric hospital care is becoming increasingly regionalized, and previous data have suggested that insurance may be associated with transfer. The aims of the study are to describe regionalization of pediatric care and density of the interhospital transfer network and to determine whether these varied by insurance status. METHODS: Using the New York State ED Database and State Inpatient Database from 2016, we identified all pediatric patients and calculated regionalization indices (RI) and network density, overall and stratified by insurance. Regionalization indices are based on the likelihood of a patient completing care at the initial hospital. Network density is the proportion of actual transfers compared with the number of potential hospital transfer connections. Both were calculated using the standard State ED Database/State Inpatient Database transfer definition and in a sensitivity analysis, excluding the disposition code requirement. RESULTS: We identified 1,595,566 pediatric visits (emergency department [ED] or inpatient) in New York in 2016; 7548 (0.5%) were transferred and 7374 transferred visits had eligible insurance status (Medicaid, private, uninsured). Of the transfers, 24% were from ED to ED with discharge, 28% from ED to ED with admission, 31% from ED to inpatient, 16% from inpatient to inpatient, and 1.2% from inpatient to ED. The overall RI was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.20-0.31). The overall weighted RI was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.12) and was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.13) for Medicaid-insured patients, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.11) for privately insured patients, and 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.11) for patients without insurance. The overall network density was 0.018 (95% CI, 0.017-0.020). Network density was higher, and transfer rates were lower, for patients with Medicaid insurance as compared with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant regionalization of pediatric emergency care. Although there was not material variation by insurance in regionalization, there was variation in network density and transfer rates. Additional work is needed to understand factors affecting transfer decisions and how these patterns might vary by state.

Availability of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators in US Emergency Departments in 2018.

OBJECTIVES: In 2007, the US Institute of Medicine recommended that every emergency department (ED) appoint pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs). Despite this recommendation, our national surveys showed that few (17%) US EDs reported at least 1 PECC in 2015. This number increased slightly to 19% in 2016 and 20% in 2017. The current study objectives were to determine the following: percent of US EDs with at least 1 PECC in 2018, factors associated with availability of at least 1 PECC in 2018, and factors associated with addition of at least 1 PECC between 2015 and 2018. METHODS: In 2019, we conducted a survey of all US EDs to characterize emergency care in 2018. Using the National ED Inventory-USA database, we identified 5514 EDs open in 2018. This survey collected availability of at least 1 PECC in 2018. A similar survey was administered in 2016 and identified availability of at least 1 PECC in 2015. RESULTS: Overall, 4781 (87%) EDs responded to the 2018 survey. Among 4764 EDs with PECC data, 1037 (22%) reported having at least 1 PECC. Three states (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island) had PECCs in 100% of EDs. The EDs in the Northeast and with higher visit volumes were more likely to have at least 1 PECC in 2018 (all P < 0.001). Similarly, EDs in the Northeast and with higher visit volumes were more likely to add a PECC between 2015 and 2018 (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of PECCs in EDs remains low (22%), with a small increase in national prevalence between 2015 and 2018. Northeast states report a high PECC prevalence, but more work is needed to appoint PECCs in all other regions.

U.S. Emergency Department Telepsychiatry Use in 2019.

Introduction: Although many emergency departments (EDs) receive telehealth services for psychiatry, or telepsychiatry, to manage acute psychiatric emergencies, national research on the usage of ED telepsychiatry is limited. To investigate ED telepsychiatry usage in the pre-COVID-19 era, we surveyed a sample of EDs receiving telepsychiatry in 2019, as a follow-up to a survey targeted to similar EDs in 2017. Methods: All U.S. EDs open in 2019 (n = 5,563) were surveyed to characterize emergency care. A more in-depth second survey on telepsychiatry use (2019 ED Telepsychiatry Survey) was then sent to 235 EDs. Of these EDs, 130 were randomly selected from those that reported telepsychiatry receipt in 2019, and 105 were selected based on their participation in a similar survey in 2017 (2017 ED Telepsychiatry Survey). Results: Of the 235 EDs receiving the 2019 Telepsychiatry Survey, 192 (82%) responded and 172 (90% of responding EDs) confirmed 2019 telepsychiatry receipt. Of these, five were excluded for missing data (analytic samplen = 167). Telepsychiatry was the only form of emergency psychiatric services for 92 (55%) EDs. The most common usage of telepsychiatry was for admission or discharge decisions (82%) and transfer coordination (70%). The most commonly reported telepsychiatry mental health consultants were psychiatrists or other physician-level mental health professionals (74%). Discussion: With telepsychiatry as the only form of psychiatric services for most telepsychiatry-receiving EDs, this innovation fills a critical gap in access to emergency psychiatric care. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on usage of ED telepsychiatry.

Pediatric Telehealth Use in U.S. Emergency Departments in 2019.

Objectives: Little is known about the recent usage of pediatric telehealth across all emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. Building upon our prior work, we aimed to characterize the usage of ED pediatric telehealth in the pre-COVID-19 era. Methods: The 2019 National ED Inventory-USA survey characterized all U.S. EDs open in 2019. Among EDs reporting receipt of pediatric telehealth services, we selected a random sample (n = 130) for a second survey on pediatric telehealth usage (2019 ED Pediatric Telehealth Survey). We also recontacted a random sample of EDs that responded to a prior, similar 2017 ED Pediatric Telehealth Survey (n = 107), for a total of 237 EDs in the 2019 ED Pediatric Telehealth Survey sample. Results: Overall, 193 (81%) of the 237 EDs responded to the 2019 Pediatric Telehealth Survey. There were 149 responding EDs that confirmed pediatric telehealth receipt in 2019. Among these, few reported ever having a pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician (10%) or pediatrician (9%) available for emergency care. Although 96% of EDs reported availability of pediatric telehealth services 24 h per day, 7 days per week, the majority (60%) reported using services less than once per month and 20% reported using services every 3-4 weeks. EDs most frequently used pediatric telehealth to assist with placement and transfer coordination (91%). Conclusions: Most EDs receiving pediatric telehealth in 2019 had no PEM physician or pediatrician available. Most EDs used pediatric telehealth services infrequently. Understanding barriers to assimilation of telehealth once adopted may be important to enable improved access to pediatric emergency care expertise.

Emergency Medical Service Time Intervals for Patients With Suspected Stroke in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Optimal care for patients with stroke relies on timely recognition and rapid transport to appropriate treatment, often by emergency medical services (EMS). Our primary objective was to describe EMS time intervals for patients with suspected stroke in the United States. We also sought to quantify the variation in EMS time intervals by geographic location and urbanicity. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMS 9-1-1 activations (ie, calls for service) included in the 2018 and 2019 National EMS Information System datasets. We included ground or air EMS activations for a 9-1-1 scene response where a patient aged ≥18 years with suspected stroke was treated and transported by EMS. Time intervals for dispatch, response, scene, transport, and total prehospital time (ie, from dispatch to hospital arrival) were calculated, stratified by ground and air transport type. RESULTS: A total of 410 187 activations for suspected stroke were included, of which 98% were a ground transport. The median total prehospital time for ground transports was 35 minutes (interquartile range, 27-45, 90th percentile 58). Median total prehospital time for air transports was substantially longer at 56 minutes (interquartile range, 43-70, 90th percentile 86). Times varied by Census division and urbanicity with the shortest ground total prehospital times in the East North Central division and urban areas and longest times in the East South Central and rural and frontier areas. CONCLUSIONS: Timely EMS response and transport is critical for optimizing care of patients with suspected stroke. Using a large, national dataset of EMS activations, we found variations by geographic location and urbanicity in total prehospital time for ground and air EMS activations for patients with stroke.

Development of a unified national database of primary percutaneous coronary intervention centers with co-located emergency departments, 2020.

BACKGROUND: Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), not all patients are admitted directly to an emergency department (ED) with 24/7/365 pPCI capabilities. This is partly due to a lack of a national system of known pPCI-capable EDs. Our objective was to create a unified, national database of confirmed 24/7/365 pPCI centers co-located in hospitals with EDs. METHODS: We compiled all hospitals designated as Chest Pain Centers with Primary PCI by the American College of Cardiology's (ACC) National Clinical Data Registry (NCDR), all STEMI Receiving Centers designated by the American Heart Association's (AHA) Mission: Lifeline registry, and all state-designated pPCI-capable hospitals and designation criteria from state departments of health. We matched ACC, AHA, and state-designated facilities to those in the 2019 National ED Inventory (NEDI)-USA database to identify all EDs in pPCI-capable hospitals. RESULTS: Overall, 467 hospitals were recognized as Chest Pain Centers with Primary PCI by ACC, 293 hospitals were recognized as being STEMI Receiving Centers by AHA, and 827 hospitals were confirmed to be pPCI-capable by state designations and operated 24/7/365. Together, there were 1,178 EDs (21% of 5,587 total) co-located in pPCI-capable hospitals operating 24/7/365. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial heterogeneity in cardiac systems of care, with large regional systems existing alongside local state-led initiatives. We created a unified national database of confirmed 24/7/365 pPCI centers co-located in hospitals with EDs. This data set will be valuable for future cardiac systems research and improving access to pPCI.

Emergency Departments' Uptake of Telehealth for Stroke Versus Pediatric Care: Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth for emergency stroke care delivery (telestroke) has had widespread adoption, enabling many hospitals to obtain stroke center certification. Telehealth for pediatric emergency care has been less widely adopted. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to determine whether differences in policy or certification requirements contributed to differential uptake of telestroke versus pediatric telehealth. We hypothesized that differences in financial incentives, based on differences in patient volume, prehospital routing policy, and certification requirements, contributed to differential emergency department (ED) adoption of telestroke versus pediatric telehealth. METHODS: We used the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA to identify EDs that were using telestroke and pediatric telehealth services. We surveyed all EDs using pediatric telehealth services (n=339) and a convenience sample of the 1758 EDs with telestroke services (n=366). The surveys characterized ED staffing, transfer patterns, reasons for adoption, and frequency of use. We used bivariate comparisons to examine differences in reasons for adoption and use between EDs with only telestroke services, only pediatric telehealth services, or both. RESULTS: Of the 442 EDs surveyed, 378 (85.5%) indicated use of telestroke, pediatric telehealth, or both. EDs with both services were smaller in bed size, volume, and ED attending coverage than those with only telestroke services or only pediatric telehealth services. EDs with telestroke services reported more frequent use, overall, than EDs with pediatric telehealth services: 14.1% (45/320) of EDs with telestroke services reported weekly use versus 2.9% (8/272) of EDs with pediatric telehealth services (P<.001). In addition, 37 out of 272 (13.6%) EDs with pediatric telehealth services reported no consults in the past year. Across applications, the most frequently selected reason for adoption was "improving level of clinical care." Policy-related reasons (ie, for compliance with outside certification or standards or for improving ED performance on quality metrics) were rarely indicated as the most important, but these reasons were indicated slightly more often for telestroke adoption (12/320, 3.8%) than for pediatric telehealth adoption (1/272, 0.4%; P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: In 2016, more US EDs had telestroke services than pediatric telehealth services; among EDs with the technology, consults were more frequently made for stroke than for pediatric patients. The most frequently indicated reason for adoption among all EDs was related to clinical care.

A Multistate Survey of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinator Activities.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) are associated with pediatric readiness of emergency departments (EDs). National organizations have called for PECCs in all EDs. Although the National Pediatric Readiness Program provides a list of suggested tasks for each PECC, little is known about implementation. Our objective was to describe the role of PECCs in EDs. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2019 National ED Inventory-USA to identify EDs with PECCs in 8 states (Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, Nebraska, New York, Vermont, and Wisconsin). We called each ED that reported having a PECC to administer a standardized survey assessing NRPP tasks, specifically quality improvement (QI), education provision, skill verification, equipment responsibilities, and how many hours the PECC devoted to the role. RESULTS: Of the 201 of 830 EDs (24%) that reported a PECC, 167 (83%) completed the survey, with >80% response rate in each state. Of these, 153 EDs (92%) confirmed a PECC, and during the past year, 81% participated in QI initiatives, 93% provided pediatric education, 90% verified staff skills, and 90% were responsible for ensuring medications, equipment, supplies, and resources for children. The median number of hours per week that PECCs devoted to this role was 12 (interquartile range, 5-40). There was wide variation between states (eg, 50% of PECCs in Vermont participating in QI activities, as compared with 100% in Nebraska). CONCLUSIONS: Most PECCs report participating in the suggested National Pediatric Readiness Program tasks, although there was variation by state. Future directions for this work include assessing the association between PECC tasks and patient outcomes.

A Regional Intervention to Appoint Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators in New England Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe our expansion of a Massachusetts grassroots initiative-to increase the appointment of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in emergency departments (EDs)-to all 6 New England states. METHODS: We conducted annual surveys of all EDs in New England from 2015 to 2020 regarding 2014 to 2019, respectively. Data collection included ED characteristics. The intervention from 2018 to 2019 relied on principles of self-organization and collaboration with local stakeholders including state Emergency Medical Services for Children agencies, American College of Emergency Physician state chapters, and Emergency Nursing Association state chapters to help encourage appointment of at least 1 PECC to every ED. Most ED leadership were contacted in person at regional meetings, by e-mail and/or telephone. We reached out to each individual ED to both educate and encourage action. RESULTS: Survey response rates were greater than 85% in all years. From 2014 to 2016, less than 30% of New England EDs reported a PECC. In 2017, 51% of EDs in New England reported a PECC, whereas in 2019, 91% of New England EDs reported a PECC. All other ED characteristics remained relatively consistent from 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully expanded a Massachusetts grassroots initiative to appoint PECCs to all of New England. Through individual outreach, and using principles of self-organization and creating collaborations with local stakeholders, we were able to increase the prevalence of PECCs in New England EDs from less than 30% to greater than 90%. This framework also led to the creation of a New England-wide PECC network and has fostered ongoing collaboration and communication throughout the region.

Availability of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators in United States Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in US emergency departments (EDs) in 2015, and to determine the change in availability of PECCs in US EDs from 2015 to 2017. STUDY DESIGN: As part of the National Emergency Department Inventory-USA, we administered a survey to all 5326 US EDs open in 2015; all 5431 in 2016; and all 5489 in 2017. Through these surveys, we assessed the availability of PECCs. Descriptive statistics characterized EDs with and without PECCs; multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics independently associated with PECC availability. RESULTS: Among the 4443 (83%) EDs with 2015 data, 763 (17.2%) reported the availability of at least 1 PECC. The states with the largest proportion of EDs with PECCs were Delaware (78%, 7/9 EDs) and Maryland (48%, 20/42 EDs), and no PECCs were reported in Mississippi, North Dakota, or Wyoming. Availability of a PECC was associated (P < .001) with larger annual total ED visit volume and a dedicated pediatric ED area. Compared with the 17.2% of EDs reporting a PECC in 2015, 833 (18.6%) reported 1 in 2016, and 917 (19.8%) reported 1 in 2017 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Availability of at least 1 PECC increased slightly (2.6%) between 2015 and 2017, but ∼80% of EDs continue without one.

Distance From Freestanding Emergency Departments to Nearby Emergency Care.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The number of freestanding emergency departments (EDs) has increased rapidly in the United States, and there is concern that such entities are located near existing EDs rather than in areas lacking emergency care. In 2018, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission recommended a reduction in Medicare reimbursement rates to freestanding EDs located within 6 miles of the nearest hospital-based ED. We aim to assess the potential effect of this proposal. METHODS: Using the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA database, we identified the locations and visit volumes of all US freestanding EDs. Using QGIS, we mapped the distances from all freestanding EDs to both the nearest hospital-based ED and to the nearest ED (either hospital-based or freestanding ED). RESULTS: We collected location information for all 5,375 EDs open in 2016. Of these EDs, 609 (11%) were freestanding. Few freestanding EDs (1.4%) were located in rural areas and only 11% were located in areas with a median household income of less than $43,000. Overall, 460 freestanding EDs (76%) were within 6 miles of the nearest hospital-based ED, and these had 5.3 million total patient visits, whereas those greater than 6 miles away had 2.6 million visits. CONCLUSION: We found that most freestanding EDs (76%) are within 6 miles of the nearest hospital-based ED, and most visits (67%) to freestanding EDs are to those within that proximity, indicating that many freestanding EDs would be affected by this Medicare Payment Advisory Commission proposal, if implemented.

Screening for Health-Related Social Needs of Emergency Department Patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: There has been increasing attention to screening for health-related social needs. However, little is known about the screening practices of emergency departments (EDs). Within New England, we seek to identify the prevalence of ED screening for health-related social needs, understand the factors associated with screening, and understand how screening patterns for health-related social needs differ from those for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2018 National Emergency Department Inventory-New England survey, which was administered to all 194 New England EDs during 2019. We used descriptive statistics to compare ED characteristics by screening practices, and multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with screening. RESULTS: Among the 166 (86%) responding EDs, 64 (39%) reported screening for at least one health-related social need, 160 (96%) for violence (including intimate partner violence or other violent exposures), 148 (89%) for substance use disorder, and 159 (96%) for mental health needs. EDs reported a wide range of social work resources to address identified needs, with 155 (93%) reporting any social worker availability and 41 (27%) reporting continuous availability. CONCLUSION: New England EDs are screening for health-related social needs at a markedly lower rate than for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. EDs have relatively limited resources available to address health-related social needs. We encourage research on the development of scalable solutions for identifying and addressing health-related social needs in the ED.

Occupational use of high-level disinfectants and asthma incidence in early- to mid-career female nurses: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Occupational use of disinfectants among healthcare workers has been associated with asthma. However, most studies are cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies are not entirely consistent. To limit the healthy worker effect, it is important to conduct studies among early- to mid-career workers. We investigated the prospective association between use of disinfectants and asthma incidence in a large cohort of early- to mid-career female nurses. METHODS: The Nurses' Health Study 3 is an ongoing, prospective, internet-based cohort of female nurses in the USA and Canada (2010-present). Analyses included 17 280 participants without a history of asthma at study entry (mean age: 34 years) and who had completed ≥1 follow-up questionnaire (sent every 6 months). Occupational use of high-level disinfectants (HLDs) was evaluated by questionnaire. We examined the association between HLD use and asthma development, adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, smoking status and body mass index. RESULTS: During 67 392 person-years of follow-up, 391 nurses reported incident clinician-diagnosed asthma. Compared with nurses who reported ≤5 years of HLD use (89%), those with >5 years of HLD use (11%) had increased risk of incident asthma (adjusted HR (95% CI), 1.39 (1.04 to 1.86)). The risk of incident asthma was elevated but not statistically significant in those reporting >5 years of HLD use and current use of ≥2 products (1.72 (0.88 to 3.34)); asthma risk was significantly elevated in women with >5 years of HLD use but no current use (1.46 (1.00 to 2.12)). CONCLUSIONS: Occupational use of HLDs was prospectively associated with increased asthma incidence in early- to mid-career nurses.

Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State.

Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing visit dispositions for psychiatric visits in EDs that did (versus did not) receive telepsychiatry services. ED telepsychiatry service status was identified from the 2016 National ED Inventory-USA and then linked to psychiatric visits from the 2016 New York State Emergency Department Databases/State Inpatient Databases. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between an ED's telepsychiatry service status and two clinical outcomes: use of observation services and ED visit disposition. Across all psychiatric ED visits, 712,236 were in EDs without telepsychiatry while 101,025 were in EDs with telepsychiatry. Most (99.8%) visits were in urban EDs. In multivariable logistic regression models, psychiatric visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services had lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.30) of using observation services compared to visits in EDs without telepsychiatry. The receipt of ED telepsychiatry is associated with lower usage of observation services for psychiatric visits, likely reducing the amount of time spent in the ED and mitigating the ongoing problem of ED crowding. An overwhelming majority of visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services were in urban hospitals with existing psychiatric services. Factors affecting the delivery and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services to hospitals lacking in psychiatric resources merit further investigation.

Understanding Barriers to Telemedicine Implementation in Rural Emergency Departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine has potential to add value to the delivery of emergency care in rural emergency departments (EDs); however, previous work suggests that it may be underused. We seek to understand barriers to telemedicine implementation in rural EDs, and to describe characteristics of rural EDs that do and do not use telemedicine. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory survey, identifying rural EDs that did and did not use telemedicine in 2016. All rural EDs that did not use telemedicine were administered a follow-up survey asking about ED staffing, transfer patterns, and perceived barriers to telemedicine use. We used a similar instrument to survey a sample of EDs that did use telemedicine, but we replaced the question about barriers with questions related to telemedicine use. Data are presented with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 977 rural EDs responding to the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA survey; 453 (46%; 95% confidence interval 43% to 50%) did not use telemedicine. Among rural nonusers, 374 EDs (83%; 95% confidence interval 79% to 86%) responded to our second survey. Of the 177 rural EDs using telemedicine that we surveyed, 153 responded (86%; 95% confidence interval 80% to 91%). Among rural EDs not using telemedicine, 235 (67%) reported that their ED, hospital, or health system leadership had considered it. Cost was the most commonly cited reason for lack of adoption (n=86; 37%). CONCLUSION: Among US rural EDs, cost is a commonly reported barrier that may be limiting the extent of telemedicine adoption.

Telemedicine Facilitation of Transfer Coordination From Emergency Departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Interhospital transfers are costly to patients and to the health care system. The use of telemedicine may enable more efficient systems by decreasing transfers or diverting transfers from crowded referral emergency departments (EDs) to alternative appropriate facilities. Our primary objective is to describe the prevalence of telemedicine for transfer coordination among US EDs, the ways in which it is used, and characteristics of EDs that use telemedicine for transfer coordination. METHODS: We used the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA survey to identify telemedicine-using EDs. We then surveyed all EDs using telemedicine for transfer coordination and a sample of EDs using telemedicine for other clinical applications. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify characteristics independently associated with use of telemedicine for transfer coordination. RESULTS: Of the 5,375 EDs open in 2016, 4,507 responded to National Emergency Department Inventory-USA (84%). Only 146 EDs used telemedicine for transfer coordination; of these, 79 (54%) used telemedicine to assist with clinical care for local admission, 117 (80%) to assist with care before transfer, and 92 (63%) for arranging transfer to a different hospital. Among telemedicine-using EDs, lower ED annual visit volume (odds ratio 5.87, 95% CI 2.79 to 12.36) was independently associated with use of telemedicine for transfer coordination. CONCLUSION: Although telemedicine has potential to improve efficiency of regional emergency care systems, it is infrequently used for coordination of transfer between EDs. When used, it is most often to assist with clinical care before transfer.