Is perioperative COVID-19 really associated with worse surgical outcomes among vaccinated patients?

INTRODUCTION: During the surge of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, studies revealed high complication and morbidity rates following surgical procedures in COVID-19 positive patients. Anesthetic and surgical societies swiftly developed strategies to mitigate these risks, including a recommended postponement of elective surgeries for a minimum of 7 weeks post-COVID infection. Nowadays, with a predominantly vaccinated population, it has become crucial to discern the influencing factors on post-COVID morbidity and mortality and a reevaluation of the existing recommendations pertaining to elective surgery. METHODS: A single-center case-control study was conducted, including patients who underwent surgery between November 2021 and March 2022 and met the inclusion criteria. Eighty COVID-19 positive patients were matched 1:1 with 80 controls, each undergoing an identical intervention within a 2-week time frame. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality and secondary outcome postoperative complications (respiratory and thromboembolic). RESULTS: At the time of surgery, 88.8% of patients in the case group and 92.5% in the control group had received at least one vaccine dose. Mortality and morbidity did not show a significant difference when comparing the case and control groups (7.5% vs 6.2%, p = 0.755; 11.3% vs 8.9%, p = 0.541 respectively). In the COVID-positive group, mortality was significantly associated with age over 70 years, ASA score over III, RCRI over 1, emergency procedures, and absence of thromboembolic prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previously reported findings, we did not observe an increased morbi-mortality in patients with perioperative COVID-19 infection. It may not be necessary to delay elective interventions, except in cases with a high-risk.

Impact of novel histopathological factors on the outcomes of liver surgery for colorectal cancer metastases.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the impacts of a series of novel histopathological factors on clinical-surgical outcomes and survival of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database including 150 consecutive patients who underwent 183 hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer was evaluated. Among them, 74 (49.3%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. The histopathological factors studied were: a) microsatellitosis, b) type and pattern of tumour growth, c) nuclear grade and the number of mitoses/mm(2), d) perilesional pseudocapsule, e) intratumoural fibrosis, f) lesion cellularity, g) hypoxic-angiogenic perilesional growth pattern, and h) the tumour normal interface. RESULTS: Three or more metastatic lesions, R1 resection margins, and <50% tumour necrosis were prognostic factors for a worse OS, but only the former was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, tumour fibrosis <40% and cellularity >10% were predictive of a worse neoadjuvant therapy response, but these findings were not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. Finally, tumour necrosis <50%, cellularity >10%, and TNI >0.5 mm were prognostic factors for a worse DFS and AS in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors seem to influence the outcomes of surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, especially the number of the lesions, the margins of resection, the percentage of necrosis and fibrosis, as well as the cellularity and the TNI.