Fair allocation of cryopreserved donor oocytes: towards an accountable process.

A growing number of people desire ART with cryopreserved donor oocytes. The allocation of these oocytes to couples and mothers to be is a 2-fold process. The first step is to select a pool of recipients. The second step is to decide who should be treated first. Prioritizing recipients is critical in settings where demand outstrips supply. So far, the issue of how to fairly allocate cryopreserved donor oocytes has been poorly addressed. Our ethical analysis aims to support clinics involved in allocation decisions by formulating criteria for recipient selection irrespective of supply (Part I) and recipient prioritization in case supply is limited (Part II). Relevant criteria for recipient selection are: a need for treatment to experience parenthood; a reasonable chance for successful treatment; the ability to safely undergo an oocyte donation pregnancy; and the ability to establish a stable and loving relationship with the child. Recipients eligible for priority include those who: have limited time left for treatment; have not yet experienced parenthood; did not undergo previous treatment with cryopreserved donor oocytes; and contributed to the supply of donor oocytes by bringing a donor to the bank. While selection criteria function as a threshold principle, we argue that the different prioritization criteria should be carefully balanced. Since specifying and balancing the allocation criteria undoubtedly raises a moral dispute, a fair and legitimate allocation process is warranted (Part III). We argue that allocation decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary committee, staffed by relevant experts with a variety of perspectives. Furthermore, the committees' reasoning behind decisions should be transparent and accessible to those affected: clinicians, donors, recipients and children born from treatment. Insight into the reasons that underpin allocation decisions allows these stakeholders to understand, review and challenge decisions, which is also known as accountability for reasonableness.

Fertility-sparing surgery and fertility preservation in cervical cancer: The desire for parenthood, reproductive and obstetric outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the desire for parenthood and reproductive outcomes of young cervical cancer survivors who underwent fertility-sparing surgery or fertility preservation procedures for invasive cervical cancer. METHODS: All women <45 years who underwent fertility-sparing treatment for invasive cervical cancer in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands between January 2009 and January 2020 were identified. Fertility-sparing treatment options included Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy (VRT) for patients with early-stage disease and fertility preservation techniques (FP) when requiring Radical Hysterectomy (RH) or chemoradiotherapy. Data on reproductive intentions - and outcomes were retrieved from medical files and questionnaires. RESULTS: 75 patients were identified of whom 34 underwent VRT, 9 RH and 32 had (chemo)radiotherapy. 26 patients started FP of whom 23 (88.5%) successfully preserved fertility through cryopreservation of embryos, oocytes and ovarian tissue. After a median follow-up of 49 months, 5 patients developed recurrent disease and died. Reproductive outcomes were retrieved in 58 patients. 89.6% maintained their desire for parenthood after cancer treatment. Following VRT, we report a pregnancy rate of 61.9% among the patients attempting conception (n = 24). 15 patients conceived 21 pregnancies which resulted in 15 live-births, yielding a live-birth rate of 75.0%. Following RH or (chemo)radiotherapy, 3 surrogate pregnancies were established (21.4%) using frozen-thawed material with good neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Many cervical cancer survivors maintain the desire to become parents eventually. In early-stage disease, VRT shows good reproductive outcomes without compromising oncological safety. For those requiring gonadotoxic treatment fertility preservation and gestational surrogacy provides a promising alternative for achieving a biological offspring.

The ethics of embryo donation: what are the moral similarities and differences of surplus embryo donation and double gamete donation?

Over the years, the demand for ART with donated embryos has increased. Treatment can be performed using donated 'surplus embryos' from IVF treatment or with embryos intentionally created through so-called 'double gamete donation'. Embryo donation is particularly sensitive because treatment results in the absence of a genetic link between the parent(s) and the child, creating complex family structures, including full genetic siblings living in another family in the case of surplus embryo donation. In this paper, we explore the ethical acceptability of embryo donation in light of the similarities and differences between surplus embryo donation and double gamete donation. We will argue that no overriding objections to either form of embryo donation exist. First of all, ART with donated embryos respects patients' reproductive autonomy by allowing them to experience gestational parenthood. It also respects IVF patients' reproductive autonomy by providing an additional option to discarding or donating surplus embryos to research. Second, an extensive body of empirical research has shown that a genetic link between parent and child is not a condition for a loving caring relationship between parent(s) and child. Third, the low moral status of a pre-implantation embryo signifies no moral duty for clinics to first use available surplus embryos or to prevent the development of (more) surplus embryos through double gamete donation. Fourth, there is no reason to assume that knowledge of having (full or half) genetically related persons living elsewhere provides an unacceptable impact on the welfare of donor-conceived offspring, existing children of the donors, and their respective families. Thus, patients and clinicians should discuss which form of ART would be suitable in their specific situation. To guarantee ethically sound ART with donated embryos certain conditions have to be met. Counselling of IVF patients should involve a discussion on the destination of potential surplus embryos. When counselling donors and recipient(s) a discussion of the significance of early disclosure of the child's mode of conception, the implications of having children raised in families with whom they share no genetic ties, expectations around information-exchange and contact between donor and recipient families or genetically related siblings is warranted. Importantly, conclusions are mainly drawn from results of empirical studies on single gamete donation families. To evaluate the welfare of families created through surplus embryo donation or double gamete donation additional empirical research on these particular families is warranted.

Stakeholders views on the ethical aspects of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a qualitative interview study with donors, recipients and professionals.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the moral considerations held by donors, recipients and professionals towards the ethical aspects of the intake and distribution of donor bank oocytes for third-party assisted reproduction? SUMMARY ANSWER: Interviews with oocyte donors, oocyte recipients and professionals demonstrate a protective attitude towards the welfare of the donor and the future child. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The scarcity of donor oocytes challenges the approach towards the many ethical aspects that arise in establishing and operating an oocyte bank for third-party assisted reproduction. Including experiences and moral considerations originating from practice provides useful insight on how to overcome these challenges. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The project was set-up as a qualitative interview study and took place between October 2016 and August 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with professionals engaged in the practice of oocyte banking (n = 10), recipients of donor oocytes (n = 7) and oocyte donors (n = 8). Key themes were formulated by means of a thematic analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Based on the interviews, we formulated four main themes describing stakeholders' views regarding the ethical aspects of the intake and distribution of donor bank oocytes. First, respondents articulated that when selecting donors and recipients, healthcare workers should prevent donors from making a wrong decision and safeguard the future child's well-being by minimizing health risks and selecting recipients based on their parental capabilities. Second, they proposed to provide a reasonable compensation and to increase societal awareness on the scarcity of donor oocytes to diminish barriers for donors. Third, respondents considered the prioritization of recipients in case of scarcity a difficult choice, because they are all dependent on donor oocytes to fulfil their wish for a child. They emphasized that treatment attempts should be limited, but at least include one embryo transfer. Fourth and finally, the importance of good governance of oocyte banks was mentioned, including a homogenous policy and the facilitation of exchange of experiences between oocyte banks. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The possibility of selection bias exists, because we interviewed donors and recipients who were selected according to the criteria currently employed in the clinics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Respondents' moral considerations regarding the ethical aspects of the intake and distribution of donor oocytes demonstrate a protective attitude towards the welfare of the donor and the future child. At the same time, respondents also questioned whether such a (highly) protective attitude was justified. This finding may indicate there is room for reconsidering strategies for the collection and distribution of donor bank oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by ZonMw: The Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (Grant number 70-73000-98-200). A.M.E.B. and B.C.J.M.F. are the initiators of the UMC Utrecht oocyte bank. J.J.P.M.P. is the director of the MCK Fertility Centre. IMC is working as a gynaecologist at the AMC Amsterdam oocyte bank. During the most recent 5-year period, BCJM Fauser has received fees or grant support from the following organizations (in alphabetic order): Actavis/Watson/Uteron, Controversies in Obstetrics & Gynaecologist (COGI), Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Medical Research Counsel (ZonMW), Euroscreen/Ogeda, Ferring, London Womens Clinic (LWC), Merck Serono (GFI), Myovant, Netherland Genomic Initiative (NGI), OvaScience, Pantharei Bioscience, PregLem/Gedeon Richter/Finox, Reproductive Biomedicine Online (RBMO), Roche, Teva and World Health Organization (WHO). The authors have no further competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

An unconventional path to conventional motherhood: A qualitative study of women's motivations and experiences regarding social egg freezing in the Netherlands.

STUDY QUESTION: What are women's motivations for social egg freezing and what are their experience regarding the egg freezing process in the Netherlands? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women who engage in social egg freezing are driven by feelings of fear, including the fear of not finding the suitable partner and fear of declining fecundity. They aim to fulfil their desire for having children with a partner. Alternative ways to achieve parenthood are considered if the conventional way of motherhood cannot be achieved. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: The reasons for social egg freezing are multi-fold, including amongst others economic, social, health, educational and career factors. The lack of a (stable) partnership, and a strong desire for a genetically related child with a committed partner are considered main reasons. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A qualitative interview study, including 20 women, was conducted in the Netherlands between October 2018 and August 2019. MATERIAL & METHODS: Women between 32 and 42 years of age, who had completed the egg freezing trajectory for social reasons at three different medical centres in the Netherlands participated in the study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted face-to-face or via a teleconference tool and were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interviews lasted between 30 and 90 minutes. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: This study identified one overall theme: "an unconventional path to conventional motherhood" and five interpretive theme's: "fear of not becoming a mother, peace of mind, an unconventional path to motherhood, conventional perspectives, and financial discrimination". Women were afraid of not becoming a mother in the future. Despite the fact that all kinds of alternatives were available, conventional motherhood was preferred. Women chose a non-conventional path to reach this goal and they had to let go of traditional perspectives. Although they had the feeling of being discriminated financially, it gave them 'peace of mind'. The preserved oocytes gave them the sense of a fertility insurance for the future. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The demographic profile displays a high degree of homogeneity, which may impact generalisability. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study contributes to a better understanding of women who cryopreserve their oocytes for social reasons. Healthcare professionals need to be aware of these motivations and perspectives. Understanding the underlying factors and emotional considerations in the decision-making process is crucial to provide proper counselling and optimal patient-centered infertility care. Furthermore, it is important to raise awareness about the possibilities of pursuing (alternative) motherhood to support effective policy making. However, social egg freezing remains closest to women's preferences of conventional motherhood, even in a country like the Netherlands, which is known for its progressiveness and focus on gender equality. Last, policy makers need to stimulate cost-effectivity and prevent younger women of pursuing social egg freezing as kind of a prevention method.

The experiences of women with breast cancer who undergo fertility preservation.

STUDY QUESTION: How do women, who have just been diagnosed with breast cancer, experience oocyte or embryo banking? SUMMARY ANSWER: Fertility preservation was a challenging yet welcome way to take action when confronted with breast cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer is a way to safeguard future chances of having children. Women who have just been diagnosed with breast cancer report stress, as do women who have to undergo IVF treatment. How women experience the collision of these two stressfull events, has not yet been studied. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: We performed a multicenter qualitative study with a phenomenological approach including 21 women between March and July 2014. Women were recruited from two university-based fertility clinics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Women with breast cancer who banked oocytes or embryos 1-15 months before study participation were eligible. We conducted in-depth, face-to-face interviews with 21 women, which was sufficient to reach data saturation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The 21 women interviewed had a mean age of 32 years. Analysis of the 21 interviews revealed three main experiences: the burden of fertility preservation, the new identity of a fertility patient and coping with breast cancer through fertility preservation. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Interviewing women after, rather than during, fertility preservation might have induced recall bias. Translation of quotes was not carried out by a certified translator. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The insights gained from this study of the experiences of women undergoing fertility preservation while being newly diagnosed with breast cancer could be used as a starting point for adapting the routine psychosocial care provided by fertility clinic staff. Future studies are necessary to investigate whether adapting routine psychosocial care improves women's wellbeing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None of the authors in this study declare potential conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the Center of Reproductive Medicine of the Academic Medical Center.

Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The demand for donor oocytes has increased dramatically over the years. Today people in need of ART with the use of donor oocytes can appeal to commercial or public donor oocyte banks. The introduction of oocyte banks has shed a new light on the practice of ART using donor oocytes. The establishment and maintenance of oocyte banks should be sensitive to the ethical considerations. However, it is currently unclear which ethical aspects have to be taken into account. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim of this article is to identify the ethical aspects of establishing and maintaining oocyte banks for third-party ART. SEARCH METHODS: A systematic search was performed in July 2016 and February 2017 in both PubMed and Embase using a search string that combined synonyms for oocytes, donation or banking, reproductive care and ethics. We included a wide variety of English-language articles with a reasoned description of ethical aspects or moral considerations on oocyte donation or banking for third-party ART. OUTCOMES: The practice of oocyte banking consists of three components, namely, the intake, storage and distribution of donor oocytes, and each is associated with multiple ethical challenges. The majority of the literature discusses ethical aspects with regard to the intake of donor oocytes, taking into account both the interests of the donor and those of the potential child. Ethical aspects related to the donor are the risks and psychosocial impact of donation, motivations and compensation in donor recruitment, and requirements for informed consent. Ethical aspects related to the potential child are 2-fold: first, the welfare standard and the selection of donors, and second, anonymity and disclosure. Ethical aspects of storing donor oocytes for ART are quality standards, confidentiality, issues of ownership and control, and international transport of donor oocytes. Ethical aspects of the distribution of donor oocytes concern the selection of recipients and the acceptability of treatment of 'non-traditional' families in particular, prioritization of recipients in case of scarcity, cross-border reproductive care, matching of recipients and donor oocytes, informed consent and counselling for recipients. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Our review demonstrates that multiple ethical aspects have to be taken into account when establishing and maintaining an oocyte bank. Yet, for many of these aspects there is no consensus regarding what approach should be employed. Remarkably, the existing literature focuses mainly on ethical aspects related to the intake of donor oocytes, while aspects related to storage and distribution of donor oocytes are less often addressed. An important gap in the existing literature should therefore be acknowledged. To conclude, our findings can serve as a starting point for clinicians in the field of ART, to conceptualize what challenges arise when establishing and maintaining oocyte banks for third-party ART. The review may also stimulate policy makers to set up a trustworthy and adaptive governance structure for the intake, storage and distribution of donor oocytes.

Stimulation of the ovaries in women with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation: Alternative versus standard stimulation protocols; the study protocol of the STIM-trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy for breast cancer may have a negative impact on reproductive function due to gonadotoxicity. Fertility preservation via banking of oocytes or embryos after ovarian stimulation with FSH can increase the likelihood of a future live birth. It has been hypothesized that elevated serum estrogen levels during ovarian stimulation may induce breast tumour growth. This has led to the use of alternative stimulation protocols with addition of tamoxifen or letrozole. The effectiveness of these stimulation protocols in terms of oocyte yield is unknown. METHODS/DESIGN: Randomized open-label trial comparing ovarian stimulation plus tamoxifen and ovarian stimulation plus letrozole with standard ovarian stimulation in the course of fertility preservation. The study population consists of women with breast cancer who opt for banking of oocytes or embryos, aged 18-43years at randomisation. Primary outcome is the number of oocytes retrieved at follicle aspiration. Secondary outcomes are number of mature oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes or embryos banked and peak E2 levels during ovarian stimulation. DISCUSSION: Concerning the lack of evidence on which stimulation protocol should be used in women with breast cancer and the growing demand for fertility preservation, there is an urgent need to undertake this study. By performing this study, we will be able to closely monitor the effects of various stimulation protocols in women with breast cancer and pave the way for long term follow up on the safety of this procedure in terms of breast cancer prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR4108.

A phase I study of intraperitoneal topotecan in combination with intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal (i.p.) topotecan combined with standard doses of intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin and paclitaxel and to investigate its pharmacokinetics. Women with primary ovarian cancer stage IIb - IV received six cycles of i.v. carboplatin and paclitaxel with escalating topotecan doses i.p. of 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg/m(2). Twenty-one patients entered this trial. Febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion and fatigue grade 3 were dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) at 25 mg/m(2) i.p. and 20 mg/m(2) i.p. of topotecan was considered to be the MTD. The mean plasma t(1/2) was 3.8 +/- 2.3 h for total topotecan and 4.4 +/- 3.9 h for active lactone. The area under the curve (AUC) was proportional with dose, R = 0.54, p < 0.05 for total topotecan and the peritoneal / plasma AUC ratio was 46 +/- 30. Fifteen patients who completed treatment had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 27 months. In this setting the MTD of topotecan is 20 mg/m(2) i.p. The efficacy of this regimen should be explored further in a formal phase III study.

Development of an optimal sampling strategy for clinical pharmacokinetic studies of the novel anthracycline disaccharide analogue MEN-10755.

AIM: MEN-10755 is a novel anthracycline analogue that has shown an improved therapeutic efficacy over doxorubicin in animal models, especially in gynaecological and lung cancers and is currently under clinical development for the treatment of solid tumours. The aim of the project was to develop an optimal sampling strategy for MEN-10755 to provide an efficient basis for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigations. METHODS: Data from 24 patients who participated in a phase I clinical pharmacokinetic study of MEN-10755 administered as a short i.v. infusion were included. Individual pharmacokinetic values were calculated by fitting the plasma concentration data to a two-compartment model using nonlinear least-squared regression (KINFIT, Ed 3.5). Population pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out using (a) the traditional standard two-stage method (STS) based on all data (KINFIT-ALL), (b) the iterative two-stage Bayesian (IT(2)B) population modelling algorithm (KINPOP), and (c) the STS method using KINFIT and using four optimally timed plasma concentrations (KINFIT-OSS4). Determinant (D) optimal sampling strategy (OSS) was used to evaluate the four most information-rich sampling times. The pharmacokinetic parameters V(c) (l), k(el) (h(-1)), k(12) (h(-1)) and k(21) (h(-1)) calculated using KINPOP served as a model for calculation of four D-optimal sampling times. D-optimal sampling data sets were analysed using KINFIT-OSS4 and compared with the population model obtained by the traditional standard two-stage approach for all data sets (KINFIT-ALL). RESULTS: The optimal sampling times were: the end of the infusion, and 1.5 h, 3.8 h and 24 h after the start of the infusion. The four-point D-optimal sampling design determined in this study gave individual parameter estimates close to the basic standard estimates using the full data set. CONCLUSION: Because accurate estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were achieved, the four-point D-optimal sampling design may be very useful in future studies with MEN-10755.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin concurrent with radiotherapy for primary cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent radiochemotherapy is currently considered the new standard treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight women with cervical cancer stage IB2-IVA were treated with standard radiation therapy in combination with standard carboplatin (AUC=2, once weekly, x 6) and escalating doses of paclitaxel (60 mg/m2, once weekly, x 4, then x 5 and x 6). RESULTS: At the lowest dose level, four weekly paclitaxel cycles in six patients, three developed grade III diarrhoea and one severe radiation enteritis several weeks after radiotherapy. Two patients did not achieve complete remission and underwent additive salvage hysterectomy. All patients remained free of local recurrence, but one patient had distant metastases after 13 months. The median disease-free survival was 25 months with a median follow-up of 26 months. CONCLUSION: Standard pelvic radiotherapy in combination with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel is poorly tolerated due to dose-limiting diarrhoea.

A randomized phase II study of paclitaxel with carboplatin +/- amifostine as first line treatment in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Will amifostine (A) protect against chemotherapy-induced neuro- and myelotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety ovarian cancer patients were randomized to receive standard paclitaxel + carboplatin without (PC) or preceded by amifostine 740 mg/m(2) (PC + A). RESULTS: The mean baseline values of hemoglobin, leukocyte, and platelets were slightly lower in the amifostine group, but the mean percentual decrease of these parameters after each treatment cycle showed no difference between both arms. Symptoms of neurotoxicity remained absent in 40% PC vs. 49% PC + A cycles; sensory neurotoxicity grade I occurred in 45% vs. 48% and grade II in 12% PC vs. 2% of PC + A cycles (overall P < 0.001). Nausea grade II was reported in 2% vs. 6% (P = 0.007) and vomiting grade II in 1% of PC vs. 8% PC + A cycles (P < 0.001). Amifostine was temporarily interrupted in five patients due to hypotension, but no dose reductions were indicated. Quality of life questionnaires showed no difference in neurotoxicity scores between both study arms at treatment completion. The median progression-free survival was 16 vs. 22 months (n.s.) for PC and PC + A patients. In a pooled analysis of four randomized studies, amifostine diminished the risk of developing neurotoxicity grade II-III (Odds Ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.63, P < 0.05), but had no effect on the risk for bone marrow toxicity. CONCLUSION: Amifostine shows only minor but significant activity in diminishing neurotoxicity without preventing paclitaxel + carboplatin-induced bone marrow toxicity.

Phase I study of MEN-10755, a new anthracycline in patients with solid tumours: a report from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Early Clinical Studies Group.

A phase I study was performed with MEN-10755, a novel anthracycline with promising preclinical antitumour activity, in patients with solid tumours to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs); to document antitumour activity; and to propose a safe dose for phase II evaluation. MEN-10755 at a starting dose of 15 mg/m2/week was given by short intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks and cycles were repeated every 28 days. Twenty-four patients received 55 cycles. Doses of MEN-10755 were 15, 30, 40 and 45 mg/m2. At a dose of MEN-10755 45 mg/m2, treatment could not be given as planned due to neutropenia and one patient developed a decrease in cardiac function. This dose level was considered to be the MTD. Chemotherapy-naive patients could be treated with 40 mg/m2/week, and only one DLT (grade 4 neutropenia) was observed. At that dose, three of six chemotherapy pretreated patients developed a DLT during their first treatment cycle: one patient developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia, one patient a grade 4 neutropenia and one patient developed a grade 3 acute hypersensitivity reaction resulting in discontinuation of treatment. At this dose level, one other patient did not receive treatment on day 15 as planned due to grade 3 neutropenia. No responses were observed. MEN-107555 at a dose of 30 mg/m2/week in pretreated patients and 40 mg/m2/week in chemotherapy-naive patients for three consecutive weeks followed by 1 week rest is recommended for phase II testing.

Kinetic modeling and efficacy of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with intravenous cyclophosphamide and carboplatin as first-line treatment in ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal (ip) paclitaxel combined with intravenous (iv) carboplatin and cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five newly diagnosed patients with Stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer received ip paclitaxel with iv carboplatin and cyclophosphamide as a first-line treatment. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics was determined during the first cycle on day 1 or 8. RESULTS: This regimen was well tolerated, as abdominal pain and hematological toxicities were minor, while neurotoxicity grade I/II was reported in only 20% and myalgia in 24% of patients and were fully reversible. After treatment 13 of 18 (72%) of the patients had no evidence of disease. At a median follow-up of 30 months patients with residual disease after surgery (n = 10) had a median progression-free survival (PSF) of 13 months; for the optimally debulked group (n = 15) the actuarial PFS was 60% at 48 months. The elimination of paclitaxel from the peritoneal cavity and plasma followed first-order kinetics and was not influenced by adding carboplatin with cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSION: This regimen was well tolerated, with minimal hematologic or neurotoxicity, and allowed the application of a triple-drug schedule without compromising dose intensity. To judge its efficacy, comparison with a standard iv paclitaxel-based schedule should be performed in a formal phase III study.