"This is real", "this is hard" and "I'm not making it up": Experience of diagnosis and living with non-epileptic attack disorder.

PURPOSE: To use a qualitative research approach to explore adults' experience of living with non-epileptic attack disorder. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore the experience of adults (18 years+) with a confirmed diagnosis of non-epileptic attack disorder (NEAD) across the trajectory of the disorder. The topics investigated included the onset of symptoms, the experience of non-epileptic attacks, the diagnostic process and living with NEAD. METHOD: Twelve people diagnosed with NEAD who attended a tertiary hospital neurology department took part in semi-structured interviews. The data generated were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eleven women and one man with median age of 25 years took part. Three themes were developed: mind-body (dis)connect, a stigmatised diagnosis and a role for containment. Adults spoke about their experience of nonepileptic attacks, the diagnostic and management process and the impact of both nonepileptic attacks and the NEAD diagnosis on their lives. CONCLUSIONS: Adults' experience's within the healthcare system across the trajectory of NEAD influenced their own understanding and trust in their NEAD experience, how they shared this with others in their social and work lives and how they managed their NEAD symptoms on a daily basis. The research suggests the need for a consistent, timely implementation of a rule-in diagnostic approach and multi-disciplinary management of NEAD. It is recommended that lessons be taken from theoretical models including the common-sense model and a modified version of the reattribution model to support the de-stigmatisation of this diagnosis to inform psychoeducation and professionally facilitated peer-support groups.

Neuropsychological outcomes following HSCT in MS: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is considered an effective treatment for highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, most research has focused primarily on disease outcome measures, despite the significant impact of neuropsychological symptoms on MS patients' quality of life. The current systematic review aimed to examine whether HSCT for MS impacts neuropsychological outcome measures such as cognition, fatigue, mood, and quality of life. METHODS: The review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023474214). Systematic searches were carried out in six databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science) based on the following inclusion criteria: (i) published in peer-reviewed journals in English; (ii) longitudinal studies of adults with MS (iii) at least one neuropsychological outcome was assessed pre- and post-HSCT using standardised measures. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) quality assessment tools. A narrative synthesis was used to present results. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the review. Long-term improvements in quality of life post-HSCT were identified. In terms of cognition and fatigue, the evidence was mixed, with some post-HSCT improvements identified. Decline in cognitive performance in the short-term post-HSCT was observed. No changes in mood were identified post-HSCT. Arguments for interpreting these results with caution are presented based on risk of bias. Arguments for interpreting these results with caution are presented based on risk of bias. Limitations of the evidence are discussed, such confounding variables and lack of statistical power. CONCLUSION: The evidence base for the impact of HSCT for MS on neuropsychological outcomes is limited. Further research is required to progress understanding to facilitate clinician and patient understanding of HSCT treatment for MS.