Closing the hepatitis C treatment gap: United States strategies to improve retention in care.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment landscape is shifting given the advent of direct-acting antivirals and a global call to action by the World Health Organization. Eliminating HCV is now an issue of healthcare delivery. Treatment is limited by the complexity of the HCV care continuum, expensive therapy and competing health burdens experienced by an underserved HCV population. The objective of this literature review was to assess strategies to improve retention in HCV care, with particular focus on those implemented in the United States. We identified barriers in HCV care retention and propose solutions to increase HCV treatment delivery. The following recommendations are herein described: improving the cohesion of health services through localized care and integrated case management, expanding the supply of non-specialist HCV treatment providers, leveraging patient navigators and care coordinators, improving adherence through directly observed therapy and reducing cost barriers through value-based payment and pharmaceutical subscription models.

Emergency department versus community screening on hepatitis C follow-up care.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening programs are proliferating, and it is unknown whether EDs are more effective than traditional community screening at promoting HCV follow-up care. The objective of this study was to investigate whether patients screened HCV seropositive (HCV+) in the ED are linked to care and retained in treatment more successfully than patients screened HCV+ in the community. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients screened HCV+ at twelve screening facilities in New Orleans, LA from March 1, 2015 to July 31, 2017. Treatment outcomes, including retention and time to follow-up care, were assessed using the HCV continuum of care model. RESULTS: ED patients (n = 3008) were significantly more likely to achieve RNA confirmation (aRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.54-2.37), initiate HCV therapy (aRR = 2.23 [1.76-2.83]), complete HCV therapy (aRR = 1.77 [1.40-2.24]), and achieve HCV functional cure (aRR = 2.80 [1.09-7.23]) compared to community-screened patients (n = 322). ED screening was associated with decreased likelihood of fibrosis staging (aRR = 0.65 [0.51-0.82]) and no difference in linkage to specialty care (aRR = 1.03 [0.69-1.53]). In time to follow up, RNA confirmation occurred at faster rates in the ED (aHR = 2.26 [1.86-2.72]), although these patients completed fibrosis staging at slower rates (aHR = 0.49 [0.38-0.63]) than community patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to community screening, HCV screening in the ED was associated with higher rates of disease confirmation, treatment initiation/completion, and cure. Our findings provide new evidence that EDs may be the most effective setting to screen patients for HCV to promote follow-up care.

Delays in fibrosis staging reduce the likelihood of achieving hepatitis C treatment and cure.

BACKGROUND: Updated 2021 hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment guidelines no longer recommend fibrosis staging for treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis; however, numerous US state Medicaid plans continue to restrict initiation of HCV therapy by fibrosis stage. The study objective was to determine whether delays from HCV diagnosis to fibrosis staging impact the likelihood of initiating/completing HCV treatment and achieving sustained virologic response (SVR). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among patients diagnosed with chronic HCV by an urban US emergency department who subsequently underwent fibrosis staging. Time elapsed from HCV diagnosis to hepatic fibrosis staging was evaluated on the likelihood of treatment initiation, treatment completion and SVR. RESULTS: Among fibrosis staging modalities, hepatic ultrasounds occurred more quickly following HCV diagnosis (3.5 months, IQR = 12.4 months), compared to FibroSure (8.5 months, IQR = 20.4 months) and FibroScan (9.9 months, IQR = 18.0 months) (p<.001). Each six-month delay in fibrosis staging decreased the likelihood of initiating treatment by 5% (adjusted relative risk (aRR)=0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.91-0.998; p=.04) and the likelihood of SVR by 7% (aRR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.87-0.995; p=.04) after adjusting for insurance, race/ethnicity and history of HIV testing. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in hepatitis fibrosis staging were significantly associated with decreased likelihood of HCV treatment initiation and SVR.