Predictors of new and severe vertebral fractures: results from the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial.

UNLABELLED: We examined prevalent and recent vertebral fractures in 1 year as predictors of new vertebral fractures over subsequent 2 years using data from RCT placebo patients. We found that prevalent and recent vertebral fractures strongly and independently predicted subsequent vertebral fractures including those which were severe. INTRODUCTION: While several studies have shown that prevalent vertebral fractures (pVFx) increase the risk of new vertebral fractures (VFx), the impact of recent vertebral fractures on future fractures is less studied. METHODS: Data from the placebo arm of the HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial, an international trial of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal, osteoporotic women between 65 and 85 years, were used. We included the subset of 2677 women with annual spinal radiographs to study the impact of vertebral fractures in year 1 (Y1 VF) on those occurring in years 2 and 3 using morphometric and semiquantitative (SQ) criteria. In addition, a subset of severe VFx was defined using SQ criteria. Logistic regression examined the impact of pVFx and Y1 VF on all incident VFx and on severe incident VFx. RESULTS: Two hundred fourty-five (9.1%) women sustained a new VFx in years 2-3. VFx risk in years 2-3 was 3.9% in those without pVFx or VFy1 and 29.8% in those with both risk factors. Both pVF and VFy1 remained independent predictors for future VF when they were both entered into a logistic regression model (odds ratio (OR) = 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3-4.7; OR = 3.7, 95% CI, 2.3, 5.8, respectively). ORs were similar after adjustment. Of the total number of women, 4.1% had severe VFx. PVFx and Y1 VF were also significant predictors of severe VFx; however, Y1 VF appeared more strongly predictive of severe VFx. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are highly predictive of subsequent new and severe vertebral fractures. Women with both of these risk factors are likely to benefit from anti-osteoporosis treatment.

Post hoc analysis of a single IV infusion of zoledronic acid versus daily oral risedronate on lumbar spine bone mineral density in different subgroups with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

This study summarizes the treatment effect of zoledronic acid infusion on lumbar spine bone mineral density in different subgroups with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Zoledronic acid is significantly more effective than risedronate in increasing lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) in both prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Introduction In patients on glucocorticoids, a single zoledronic acid infusion significantly increased BMD versus daily oral risedronate. We assessed treatment effect on LS BMD in different patient subgroups at month 12 that contributed to the risk of osteoporosis in addition to glucocorticoids. Methods Patients randomized to a single IV infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg or risedronate (5 mg/day) and stratified based on glucocorticoids duration [treatment (>3 months) and prevention (≤ 3 months) subpopulations]were subgrouped by age; gender; menopausal status in women; dose and duration of prednisone during the trial; and baseline serum 25-OH vitamin D, LS BMD T-score, creatinine clearance, and concomitant medication use. Results At month 12, zoledronic acid significantly increased LS BMD versus risedronate in patients ≤ 74 years (P<0.05) in the treatment and 65-74 years (P = 0.0008) in the prevention subpopulation. At month 12, zoledronic acid significantly increased LS BMD versus risedronate in both subpopulations irrespective of gender (all P<0.05), cumulative prednisone dose (all P<0.01), and postmenopausal status (all P<0.05). In premenopausal women, in both subpopulations, zoledronic acid significantly increased total hip BMD (all P<0.05) versus risedronate at month 12 but not LS BMD. Osteoporotic patients in the prevention (P=0.0189) and osteopenic patients in the treatment subpopulation (P=0.0305) showed significant LS BMD increases with zoledronic acid versus risedronate at month 12. Conclusions This post hoc analysis suggests that zoledronic acid is significantly more effective than risedronate in increasing LS BMD in prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis across a wide range of patients.

Association between timing of zoledronic acid infusion and hip fracture healing.

UNLABELLED: Patients in the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly (HORIZON) Recurrent Fracture Trial were assessed for evidence of delayed hip fracture healing. No association was observed between zoledronic acid (ZOL) and delayed healing. We conclude that ZOL has no clinically evident effect on fracture healing, even when the drug is infused in the immediate postoperative period. INTRODUCTION: Intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg (ZOL) given after a hip fracture reduces secondary fracture rates and mortality. It has been postulated that bisphosphonates may affect healing if given soon after a fracture. We sought to determine whether the timing of ZOL infusion affected the risk of delayed hip fracture healing. METHODS: In the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial, patients were randomized within 90 days of a low-trauma hip fracture to receive either once-yearly ZOL (n = 1,065) or placebo (n = 1,062). Clinical symptoms of delayed hip fracture healing were sought at randomization, 6 months and 12 months after fracture; if present, a central adjudication committee blinded to treatment assignment reviewed radiographs and clinical records. Median follow-up was 1.9 years. RESULTS: The overall incidence of delayed healing was 3.2% (ZOL) and 2.7% (placebo; odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.90; p = 0.61). Logistic regression models revealed no association between ZOL and delayed healing even after adjusting for other risk factors (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.74-1.99; p = 0.44). There was no interaction by timing of infusion, and nonunion rates were similar even when ZOL was given within 2 weeks of hip fracture repair. NSAID use was significantly associated with delayed fracture healing (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.49-4.39; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ZOL has no clinically evident effect on fracture healing, even when the drug is infused in the immediate postoperative period.

Zoledronic acid results in better health-related quality of life following hip fracture: the HORIZON-Recurrent Fracture Trial.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the benefits of ZOL versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients from HORIZON-RFT. At month 24 and end of the study visit, ZOL significantly improved patients' overall health state compared to placebo as assessed by the EQ-5D VAS. INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the benefits of zoledronic acid (ZOL) versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients from The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly Recurrent Fracture Trial (HORIZON-RFT). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 2,127 patients were randomized to receive annual infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n = 1,065) or placebo (n = 1,062) within 90 days after surgical repair of low-trauma hip fracture. HRQoL was measured using EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and utility scores (EuroQol instrument) at months 6, 12, 24, 36, and end of the study visit. Analysis of covariance model included baseline EQ-5D value, region, and treatment as explanatory variables. RESULTS: At baseline, patients (mean age 75 years; 24% men and 76% women) were well matched between treatment groups with mean EQ-5D VAS of 65.82 in ZOL and 65.70 in placebo group. At the end of the study, mean change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS was greater for ZOL vs. placebo in all patients (7.67 ± 0.56 vs. 5.42 ± 0.56), and in subgroups of patients experiencing clinical vertebral fractures (8.86 ± 4.91 vs. -1.69 ± 3.42), non-vertebral fractures (5.03 ± 2.48 vs. -1.07 ± 2.16), and clinical fractures (5.19 ± 2.25 vs. -0.72 ± 1.82) with treatment difference significantly in favor of ZOL. EQ-5D utility scores were comparable for ZOL and placebo groups, but more patients on placebo consistently had extreme difficulty in mobility (1.74% for ZOL vs. 2.13% for placebo; p = 0.6238), self-care (4.92% vs. 6.69%; p = 0.1013), and usual activities (10.28% vs. 12.91%; p = 0.0775). CONCLUSION: ZOL significantly improves HRQoL in patients with low-trauma hip fracture.

Evaluation of the Safety of Drugs and Biological Products Used During Lactation: Workshop Summary.

This report serves as a summary of a 2-day public workshop sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the safety of drugs and biological products used during lactation. The aim of the workshop was to provide a forum to discuss the collection of data to inform the potential risks to breastfed infants with maternal use of medications during lactation. Discussions included the review of current approaches to collect data on medications used during lactation, and the considerations for future approaches to design and guide clinical lactation studies. This workshop is part of continuing efforts to raise the awareness of the public for women who choose to breastfeed their infants.

Reduction in the risk of clinical fractures after a single dose of zoledronic Acid 5 milligrams.

CONTEXT: Annual infusions of zoledronic acid 5 mg over 3 years have been shown to reduce fracture incidence. There is now evidence that the effects of a single dose of zoledronic acid on bone mineral density and bone turnover last for much more than a year. Whether this is associated with sustained fracture prevention is not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess fracture incidence after only 1 infusion of zoledronic acid. DESIGN: The design of the study included post hoc analysis of subgroups of subjects from 2 trials, who received only 1 study infusion. SETTING: The study included multicenter, randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1367 subjects from HORIZON-PFT and HORIZON-RFT studies who received only 1 of the planned annual infusions participated in the study. INTERVENTION: The intervention of the study consisted of 1 infusion of zoledronic acid or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical fracture was the main outcome measure of the study. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 1.5 years. In patients who received only a single infusion, there was a 32% reduction in clinical fracture comparing zoledronic acid with placebo over 3 years of follow-up (95% confidence interval 2-53%, P = .04), comparable with the fracture reduction seen in those who had 3 or more annual infusions (34%; 95% confidence interval, 23-43%, P < .0001). New morphometric vertebral fractures were reduced by 68% in the single-infusion group (P = .004). The between-group differences in total hip bone mineral density at 3 years were 3.8% in those receiving 1 infusion and 6.2% in those receiving 3 infusions. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis based on postrandomization subgroups, fracture risk appears to be reduced for more than 1 year after a single infusion of zoledronic acid. Prospective studies designed to assess this possibility are now warranted.