High-fat feeding disrupts daily eating behavior rhythms in obesity-prone but not in obesity-resistant male inbred mouse strains.

Abnormal meal timing, like skipping breakfast and late-night snacking, is associated with obesity in humans. Disruption of daily eating rhythms also contributes to obesity in mice. When fed a high-fat diet, male C57BL/6J mice have disrupted eating behavior rhythms and they become obese. In contrast to obesity-prone C57BL/6J mice, some inbred strains of mice are resistant to high-fat diet-induced obesity. In this study, we sought to determine whether there are distinct effects of high-fat feeding on daily eating behavior rhythms in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant male mice. Male obesity-prone (C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ) and obesity-resistant (SWR/J and BALB/cJ) mice were fed low-fat diet or high-fat diet for 6 wk. Consistent with previous studies, obesity-prone male mice gained more weight and adiposity during high-fat diet feeding than obesity-resistant male mice. The amplitude of the daily rhythm of eating behavior was markedly attenuated in male obesity-prone mice fed high-fat diet, but not in obesity-resistant males. In contrast, high-fat feeding did not differentially affect locomotor activity rhythms in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant male mice. Together, these data suggest that regulation of the daily rhythm of eating may underlie the propensity to develop diet-induced obesity in male mice.

Comparison of Novel Immunoassay With Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Clozapine.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Although serum clozapine levels can help guide treatment, they are underutilized owing to requirements for frequent venous blood draws and lack of immediate results. METHODS: Clozapine levels measured with a novel immunoassay technology (which enables point-of-care development) were compared with those measured by standard liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Frozen serum aliquots of 117 samples (N = 48 patients with schizophrenia on clozapine; N = 24 patients with schizophrenia not on clozapine; N = 45 healthy controls) were sent to a national reference laboratory (NRL) for clozapine level determination by LC-MS/MS, and matching samples were subjected to novel immunoassay (3 runs). At a later date, another frozen aliquot from the same date was sent to the NRL for repeat testing. RESULTS: The NRL obtained 18 false-positive clozapine results (mean 42.39 ± 32.06, range 21-159 ng/mL) in participants not on clozapine (N = 3) and healthy controls (N = 15). The immunoassay showed no false-positive clozapine results. The clozapine levels were correlated between both assays (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001), despite 16% higher clozapine levels with immunoassay (482.08 ± 270.88 ng/mL immunoassay, 414.98 ± 186.29 ng/mL LC-MS/MS [P = 0.03]). Agreement analysis using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for LC-MS/MS of the 2 aliquots yielded CCC = 0.869; 95% confidence interval = 0.690-0.970, whereas higher agreement results were observed for the 3 runs of immunoassay (CCC = 0.99; 95% confidence interval = 0.979-0.997). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of false positives observed with immunoassay, higher repeat performance agreement, and good correlation with LC-MS/MS may indicate the more robust performance of immunoassay than that of LC-MS/MS clozapine-level determination.