Hemodialysis and iopamidol clearance after subclavian venography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The dialyzability of iopamidol is unknown and was investigated in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis for chronic renal failure. METHODS: Ten patients received 30 ml Niopam 300 (Bracco SpA, Milan, Italy) (identical to 18372 mg iopamidol) intravenously into a forearm vein to investigate for occult subclavian stenosis. RESULTS: The elimination half-life of iopamidol before hemodialysis was 69.6 hours and during 4 hours of hemodialysis was 3.5 hours. A single 4-hour hemodialysis cleared 55.7% (95% Ci 51-5-59.8) of the administered dose, while second and third dialyses cleared 25.3% (95% Ci 21.4-29.1) and 10.1% (95% Ci 7.7-12.6) of the administered dose, respectively. Two patients with significant residual urine excretion excreted more than 10% of the administered dose in the urine. For anuric patients, extrarenal clearance provided total body clearance of up to 0.266 L/hr. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis is a rapid and efficient means of clearing iopamidol provided it is performed soon after the contrast study.

Clearance of iopamidol, a non-ionic contrast medium, by CAPD in patients with end-stage renal failure.

In normal healthy subjects radiographic contrast media are cleared by the kidneys with a half-life of approximately 2 h and a total body clearance of 8 l/h. The mechanism of contrast clearance has not been previously investigated in chronic renal failure patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). A study was undertaken to investigate the pharmacokinetics of a non-ionic water soluble radiographic contrast medium (iopamidol) in 10 patients stabilized on CAPD. All patients (eight male, two female) aged 22-68 years (median 53 years) had injection of 30 ml of iopamidol 300 via a forearm vein to investigate subclavian vein patency following previous cannulation for haemodialysis. Venous blood samples, CAPD dialysate and urine were collected for seven days post injection. The mean plasma half-life was 37.9 h (SD 10.6) (range 24.1-57.2 h) for the CAPD patients and was greatly prolonged in comparison to healthy subjects. The total body clearance of iopamidol was also greatly reduced (0.377 l/h). CAPD removed an average of 53.6% of the administered dose (range 36.3-80.8%) whilst an average of 26.9% was excreted in the urine (range 1.3-56.3%). The combined renal and dialysate clearance was up to 93% of the administered dose over the period of the study. There is therefore some evidence for a small extra renal clearance of iopamidol in end-stage renal failure patients. This study has shown for the first time that patients with end-stage renal failure undergoing CAPD have significantly delayed elimination of contrast medium. This should be taken into consideration when extensive or prolonged investigations using contrast medium are proposed.