Acute splenic pathology on CT in patients with babesiosis.

PURPOSE: To better understand the occurrence of splenic disease as a potential manifestation of babesiosis by retrospectively estimating the frequency of acute splenic injury on abdominal and pelvic CT in a cohort of patients with active babesia infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a search of our single institution, suburban teaching community hospital database, 57 patients were found to have positive babesia infection between the years 2021-2023. 29 of these patients underwent abdominal and pelvic CT (22 with and 7 without intravenous contrast), and 3 underwent abdominal ultrasound without any CT. The imaging was reviewed for the presence or absence of splenic abnormalities, and for follow-up imaging. Parasitemia levels at the time of imaging were also reviewed; parasitemia levels < 4% are associated with mild to moderate disease, whereas parasitemia levels > 4% are associated with severe disease. RESULTS: 21/32 (66%) patients who underwent any type of abdominal imaging (ultrasound, MRI, and CT) had splenomegaly. Of the 22 patients who had IV contrast-enhanced CT scans, 6 were found to have splenic infarction (27%). One of these 22 patients had multiple rounded non-peripheral hypoenhancing foci on both CT and MRI which did not meet criteria for infarction, in association with splenomegaly, and which resolved after treatment. 0/6 patients in the splenic infarction group had parasitemia levels greater than 4%, while 4 of the 16 patients (4/16) without infarction had parasitemia levels of greater than 4%. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that splenic disease in patients with babesiosis mostly took the form of splenomegaly, and in a substantial minority of patients as splenic infarction. There were no cases of splenic rupture and perisplenic hematoma in our case series, likely reflecting a limitation of the relatively small study size. Concordant with prior studies, we found no identifiable association between parasitemia levels and the presence of splenic infarction.

Anterior Chamber Depth and Lens Thickness Measurements in Pediatric Eyes: Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Versus Immersion A-Scan Ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT) measurements by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), A-scan cross vector (CV) overlay with UBM, and immersion A-scan technique in pediatric eyes. METHODS: This prospective comparative cohort study comprised 43 eyes of 25 pediatric participants (mean age: 2.3±2.2 y). UBM and immersion A-scan biometry were performed prior to dilation and intraocular surgery. ACD and LT were measured by UBM image analysis, A-scan CV UBM overlay, and immersion A-scan technique. RESULTS: ACD and LT measurements obtained using immersion A-scan were significantly greater than with UBM image analysis with mean differences of 0.52 mm and 0.62 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Immersion A-scan and UBM measurements were moderately correlated (r = 0.70 and 0.64, p < 0.001). ACD and LT measurements obtained using CV overlay were not significantly different than UBM measurements and the values were strongly positively correlated (r = 0.95 and 0.93, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Immersion A-scan may overestimate ACD and LT compared to UBM in pediatric patients due to oblique placement of the A-scan probe relative to the optical axis. Supplemental use of UBM and/or CV overlay is indicated to improve measurement accuracy in pediatric patients who cannot reliably fixate due to the ability to confirm proper alignment of the probe with the pupil by visualizing the anterior segment.

Lens Thickness in Infants and Children with Cataracts.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between lens thickness and cataract in participants aged 0 to 5 years. Design: This was a prospective, multicenter, case-control study. Participants: We enrolled 118 participants (171 eyes) aged 0 to 5 years, mean age 14.6 ± 17.0 months, range 0 to 60 months. Methods: Lens thickness was measured on 342 ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images. Main Outcome Measures: Lens thickness; feasibility of lens thickness measurement from UBM images. Results: The mean lens thickness among noncataracts was 3.60 ± 0.17 mm, compared with 3.16 ± 0.61 mm among cataracts (P < 0.0001). Lens thickness <3.5 mm was significantly associated with increased odds of cataract; adjusted odds ratio = 5.99 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-14.88; P < 0.0003) among participants age 0 to 7 months. Lens thickness was significantly associated with cataract laterality among participants age 0 to 7 months (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Quantitative UBM can be used to evaluate lens thickness in infants and children with congenital cataracts. The lens in congenital cataract eyes was thinner than that of controls among infants. Abnormal lens thickness was significantly associated with cataract. Future longitudinal studies will examine the association between lens thickness and postcataract surgery outcomes. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.