Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Coils and Non-Flow-Diverting Stents for Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Location-Specific Outcomes Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between the anatomical location of an unruptured saccular aneurysm, the efficacy, and the potential complications associated with coil and non-flow-diverting stents remains poorly documented. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment based on the anatomical position of the unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an anonymized database of patients who underwent endovascular therapy for UIAs between 2014 and 2021. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients with 147 UIAs were included. Immediate Raymond-Roy occlusion class I or II was achieved in 99.2% of patients in all anatomical locations, with a 96.2% occlusion rate at the 12-month follow-up. Complications occurred more frequently in the anterior cerebral artery (35%) and internal carotid artery in its ophthalmic segment (25%). However, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that endovascular treatment with stents and coils is effective and safe for managing UIAs in various anatomical locations. The incidence of thromboembolic complications was significantly higher for UIAs located in the anterior cerebral artery.

Clinical perspective in relation to age in patients treated with thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke in a stroke center in Colombia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endovascular treatment for cerebrovascular disease is accepted as a first-line option with level I evidence in patients with an early and late time of window of onset symptoms, and an additional option in patients who do not respond or with contraindications to systemic thrombolysis; nevertheless the efficacy and outcomes of some groups were not clear, one of them are patients aged 80 years and older, because they were excluded of the trials, so the evidence is controversial with significant heterogeneity, for that reason in our study, we decided to analyze the age in the patients treated in our stroke center, as a predictor of prognosis, and to provide a baseline for the establishment of personalized treatment plans. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study of patients that received endovascular treatment for cerebrovascular disease in a Colombian stroke center between 2016 and 2020, continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Student's t test and Chi-Square. To determine cut-off points in the variable against death and Rankin score variable on 90th day. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were recruited, 35 of them were of 80 or more years, and the mean age was 72.7 years, we found age as a significant variable to predict the risk in the population over 80 years of age [RR 3.37 CI (95% 1.14-103) p = 0.029]. CONCLUSIONS: Age younger than 80 is a significant predictor for results and long-term outcomes in patients suffering from stroke, and in patients older than 80 years old a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3 is a predictor of good outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between intrahospital complications and long-term outcomes.