Consensus statement addressing controversies and guidelines on pediatric urolithiasis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate controversial pediatric urolithiasis issues systematically, integrating expert consensus and comprehensive guidelines reviews. METHODS: Two semi-structured online focus group meetings were conducted to discuss the study's need and content, review current literature, and prepare the initial survey. Data were collected through surveys and focus group discussions. Existing guidelines were reviewed, and a second survey was conducted using the Delphi method to validate findings and facilitate consensus. The primary outcome measures investigated controversial issues, integrating expert consensus and guideline reviews. RESULTS: Experts from 15 countries participated, including 20 with 16+ years of experience, 2 with 11-15 years, and 4 with 6-10 years. The initial survey identified nine main themes, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols and tailored treatments. Inter-rater reliability was high, with controversies in treatment approaches (score 4.6, 92% agreement), follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement), and diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement). The second survey underscored the critical need for consensus on identification, diagnostic criteria (score 4.6, 92% agreement), and standardized follow-up protocols (score 4.8, 100% agreement). CONCLUSION: The importance of personalized treatment in pediatric urolithiasis is clear. Prioritizing low-radiation diagnostic tools, effectively managing residual stone fragments, and standardized follow-up protocols are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Integrating new technologies while ensuring safety and reliability is also essential. Harmonizing guidelines across regions can provide consistent and effective management. Future efforts should focus on collaborative research, specialized training, and the integration of new technologies in treatment protocols.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of pediatric cystine stones.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of pediatric cystine stones. STUDY DESIGN: Data of the pediatric patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones were retrospectively evaluated. A total of 14 children with cystine stones managed with RIRS were identified. In addition to the patient demographics and stone characteristics, all retrospectively obtained operative data were evaluated and discussed in detail, with an emphasis on the success and complication rates. RESULTS: Mean age of the 14 cases was 10.9 ± 2.2 years (range: 7-15). Mean stone size was 13.6 ± 2.4 mm (range: 10-18) (Summary table). Of these stones, four were located in the renal pelvis, three were in the lower, three were in the middle and the remaining four were located in upper calyx. Ureteral access sheath was used in 12 (85.7%) patients. The double-J ureteral stent was placed pre-operatively in one case and was inserted postoperatively in 12 cases. Mean operation time was 38.2 ± 7.2 min (range: 30-50). Complications were observed in two cases: mild ureteral laceration in the first and fever on the second postoperative day in the second patient. All of the patients were stone free on sonographic evaluation at the 4-week follow-up evaluation. Although potassium citrate treatment was initiated in 11 patients, tiopronin treatment was initiated in four patients for recurrence prophylaxis during long-term follow-up. During a mean follow-up period of 25.7 ± 5.2 months, stone recurrence was noted in one patient. DISCUSSION: Treatment of patients with cystine stones is challenging, due to high risk of rapid recurrence in the presence of residual fragments. Besides allowing complete stone clearance in all cases in the current series, RIRS is a highly reproducible method that can be safely performed, even in recurrences. The major limitations of the current study were low number of patients and short follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The results clearly indicated that RIRS is a safe treatment modality in the management of pediatric cystine stones.

The effects of four different suture materials on penile tissue of rats.

Several types of suture materials are being used for the correction of penile curvature and this study was designed to compare histopathological changes on penile tissue among different suture materials. A total of 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups and right cavernosal body was sutured with 5/0 sutures (ETB: polyethylene terephthalate; PRL: polypropylene; VCR: polyglactine; and PDS: polydioxanone). An identical needle (3/8-13 mm cutting) was passed through the cavernosal bodies in the sham group (SHAM). After 3 weeks, all rats were killed and penile tissues were examined to assess the level (0-3) of inflammation, granuloma formation and fibrosis. There was a statistically significant difference among five groups regarding inflammation, granuloma formation and fibrosis levels (P<0.01 for all). The histological changes in the PRL group were not different from the SHAM group. Although the levels of granulation and fibrosis in the PDS group were also similar to the SHAM group, inflammation level was significantly higher. The inflammation, granulation and fibrosis levels were the highest in the ETB group. VCR caused similar levels of granulation and fibrosis to ETB. In conclusion, PRL suture is associated with the least histopathological change in the penile tissue. PDS can theoretically be a reasonable alternative to PRL as it causes similar levels of granulation and fibrosis.