Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Radiol Med ; 116(8): 1288-302, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21892714

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this preliminary study was to examine the effects of combined magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography (MR-PET) evaluation in the morphofunctional characterisation of ovarian lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2008 to September 2010, we evaluated 24 patients (mean age 44±10 years; range 24-74) with ovarian lesions incidentally detected on ultrasonography (US) and/or multislice computed tomography (CT). All patients underwent MR imaging of the pelvis and total-body CT-PET. PET and MR images were subsequently fused at postprocessing using specific anatomical criteria. Results were compared with the histological examination. RESULTS: Of the 24 examined lesions, 19 were malignant and five were benign on histological examination. MR, CT-PET and MR-PET sensitivity was 84%, 74% and 94%, respectively and specificity 60%, 80% and 100%, respectively. Positive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) values were 93% and 44% for CT-PET, 89% and 50% for MR and 100% and 83% for MR-PET, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic MR-PET fusion imaging provides advantages in terms of sensitivity and especially specificity compared with MR imaging or CT-PET alone. The added value of this fusion imaging modality lies in combining the benefits of the morphological evaluation provided by MR imaging and the metabolic assessment provided by PET.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Doenças dos Anexos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças dos Anexos/patologia , Doenças dos Anexos/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Radiol Med ; 114(6): 890-906, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19579015

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of our prospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of early, delayed and dual-time-point positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition with contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) within a PET-CT examination in the evaluation of pulmonary solitary nodules (SPNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients underwent a dual-time-point PET-CT examination. Whole-body PET images were acquired at 50 min after fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) administration (early), followed by a chest acquisition (delayed). Lung nodules with maximum standardised uptake value SUVmax > or =2.5 were considered malignant. SUVmax was calculated on early and delayed images; SUV increasing > or =10% (Delta SUVmax) was considered suggestive of malignancy. Absence of significant lung nodule enhancement (<15 Delta HU) at CT was considered strongly predictive of benignity. For the CT morphological assessment, the irregularity of the shape of each lesion was rated. PET-CT results were related to histological assays and clinical records. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by area under the receiveroperarting characteristic (ROC) curves analysis. RESULTS: Early and delayed SUVmax of malignant nodules were significantly higher than those of benign disease. Early SUVmax sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 77%, 91%, 79.5% and 66.7%; delayed SUVmax corresponding values were 77%, 66%, 74% and 66%; dual-time-point SUVmax values were 83%, 67%, 75% and 74%; DeltaHU values were 94%, 34%, 67%, 96%; CT morphologic evaluation values were 61%, 46%, 60%, 47%. Area under the curve (AUC) for early SUVmax was 0.79, for delayed SUVmax 0.80, for dual-time-point SUVmax 0.85, for DeltaHU 0.63 and for CT morphologic assessment 0.58. CONCLUSIONS: In our small series of patients, early and delayed SUVmax showed comparable accuracies, whereas morphological and contrast enhanced CT evaluations showed the lowest accuracies. Dual-time-point SUVmax showed the largest AUC. However, dual-time-point SUVmax was most sensitive, whereas single-time-point SUVmax was most specific.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitário/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Imagem Corporal Total
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA