Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País/Região como assunto
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 78(15): 5143-52, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22610433

RESUMO

The relevance of three host-associated Bacteroidales markers (HF183, Rum2Bac, and Pig2Bac) and four F-specific RNA bacteriophage genogroups (FRNAPH I to IV) as microbial source tracking markers was assessed at the level of a catchment (Daoulas, France). They were monitored together with fecal indicators (Escherichia coli and enterococci) and chemophysical parameters (rainfall, temperature, salinity, pH, and turbidity) by monthly sampling over 2 years (n = 240 water samples) and one specific sampling following an accidental pig manure spillage (n = 5 samples). During the 2-year regular monitoring, levels of E. coli, enterococci, total F-specific RNA bacteriophages, and the general Bacteroidales marker AllBac were strongly correlated with one another and with Rum2Bac (r = 0.37 to 0.50, P < 0.0001). Their correlations with HF183 and FRNAPH I and II were lower (r = 0.21 to 0.29, P < 0.001 to P < 0.0001), and HF183 and enterococci were associated rather than correlated (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.01). Rum2Bac and HF183 enabled 73% of water samples that had ≥ 2.7 log(10) most probably number (MPN) of E. coli/100 ml to be classified. FRNAPH I and II enabled 33% of samples at this contamination level to be classified. FRNAPH I and II complemented the water sample classification obtained with the two Bacteroidales markers by an additional 8%. Pig2Bac and FRNAPH III and IV were observed in a small number of samples (n = 0 to 4 of 245). The present study validates Rum2Bac and HF183 as relevant tools to trace fecal contamination originating from ruminant or human waste, respectively, at the level of a whole catchment.


Assuntos
Bacteroidetes/genética , Fezes/microbiologia , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Fagos RNA/genética , Rios/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Poluentes da Água/análise , Animais , França , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Análise de Componente Principal , Chuva , Salinidade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Temperatura , Qualidade da Água/normas
2.
J Environ Qual ; 40(3): 959-68, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21546682

RESUMO

Fecal contamination of water resources is evaluated by the enumeration of the fecal coliforms and Enterococci. However, the enumeration of these indicators does not allow us to differentiate between the sources of fecal contamination. Therefore, it is important to use alternative indicators of fecal contamination to identify livestock contamination in surface waters. The concentration of fecal indicators (, enteroccoci, and F-specific bacteriophages), microbiological markers (Rum-2-bac, Pig-2-bac, and ), and chemical fingerprints (sterols and stanols and other chemical compounds analyzed by 3D-fluorescence excitation-matrix spectroscopy) were determined in runoff waters generated by an artificial rainfall simulator. Three replicate plot experiments were conducted with swine slurry and cattle manure at agronomic nitrogen application rates. Low amounts of bacterial indicators (1.9-4.7%) are released in runoff water from swine-slurry-amended soils, whereas greater amounts (1.1-28.3%) of these indicators are released in runoff water from cattle-manure-amended soils. Microbial and chemical markers from animal manure were transferred to runoff water, allowing discrimination between swine and cattle fecal contamination in the environment via runoff after manure spreading. Host-specific bacterial and chemical markers were quantified for the first time in runoff waters samples after the experimental spreading of swine slurry or cattle manure.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bacteroidetes/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Lactobacillus acidophilus/isolamento & purificação , Esteróis/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Criação de Animais Domésticos , Animais , Biomarcadores/análise , Bovinos/microbiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , França , Esterco , RNA Ribossômico 16S/isolamento & purificação , Poluentes do Solo/análise , Sus scrofa/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Movimentos da Água
3.
Water Res ; 47(18): 6929-43, 2013 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23886543

RESUMO

An inter-laboratory study of the accuracy of microbial source tracking (MST) methods was conducted using challenge fecal and sewage samples that were spiked into artificial freshwater and provided as unknowns (blind test samples) to the laboratories. The results of the Source Identification Protocol Project (SIPP) are presented in a series of papers that cover 41 MST methods. This contribution details the results of the virus and bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal or sewage contamination. Human viruses used as source identifiers included adenoviruses (HAdV), enteroviruses (EV), norovirus Groups I and II (NoVI and NoVII), and polyomaviruses (HPyVs). Bacteriophages were also employed, including somatic coliphages and F-specific RNA bacteriophages (FRNAPH) as general indicators of fecal contamination. Bacteriophage methods targeting human fecal sources included genotyping of FRNAPH isolates and plaque formation on bacterial hosts Enterococcus faecium MB-55, Bacteroides HB-73 and Bacteroides GB-124. The use of small sample volumes (≤50 ml) resulted in relatively insensitive theoretical limits of detection (10-50 gene copies or plaques × 50 ml(-1)) which, coupled with low virus concentrations in samples, resulted in high false-negative rates, low sensitivity, and low negative predictive values. On the other hand, the specificity of the human virus methods was generally close to 100% and positive predictive values were ∼40-70% with the exception of NoVs, which were not detected. The bacteriophage methods were generally much less specific toward human sewage than virus methods, although FRNAPH II genotyping was relatively successful, with 18% sensitivity and 85% specificity. While the specificity of the human virus methods engenders great confidence in a positive result, better concentration methods and larger sample volumes must be utilized for greater accuracy of negative results, i.e. the prediction that a human contamination source is absent.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Vírus/classificação , Microbiologia da Água , Poluição da Água/análise , Bacteriófagos/classificação , Bacteriófagos/genética , Bacteriófagos/isolamento & purificação , Bacteriófagos/metabolismo , Fezes/virologia , Humanos , Esgotos/virologia , Vírus/genética , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Vírus/metabolismo
4.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 73(15): 4857-66, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17557850

RESUMO

In order to identify the origin of the fecal contamination observed in French estuaries, two library-independent microbial source tracking (MST) methods were selected: (i) Bacteroidales host-specific 16S rRNA gene markers and (ii) F-specific RNA bacteriophage genotyping. The specificity of the Bacteroidales markers was evaluated on human and animal (bovine, pig, sheep, and bird) feces. Two human-specific markers (HF183 and HF134), one ruminant-specific marker (CF193'), and one pig-specific marker (PF163) showed a high level of specificity (>90%). However, the data suggest that the proposed ruminant-specific CF128 marker would be better described as an animal marker, as it was observed in all bovine and sheep feces and 96% of pig feces. F RNA bacteriophages were detected in only 21% of individual fecal samples tested, in 60% of pig slurries, but in all sewage samples. Most detected F RNA bacteriophages were from genotypes II and III in sewage samples and from genotypes I and IV in bovine, pig, and bird feces and from pig slurries. Both MST methods were applied to 28 water samples collected from three watersheds at different times. Classification of water samples as subject to human, animal, or mixed fecal contamination was more frequent when using Bacteroidales markers (82.1% of water samples) than by bacteriophage genotyping (50%). The ability to classify a water sample increased with increasing Escherichia coli or enterococcus concentration. For the samples that could be classified by bacteriophage genotyping, 78% agreed with the classification obtained from Bacteroidales markers.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Bacteroidetes/genética , Fezes/microbiologia , Biblioteca Gênica , Fagos RNA/genética , Rios/microbiologia , Poluição da Água/análise , Adulto , Animais , Tipagem de Bacteriófagos , Aves/microbiologia , Bovinos , Criança , Fator F/genética , França , Marcadores Genéticos , Genótipo , Humanos , Esterco/microbiologia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Esgotos/microbiologia , Ovinos/microbiologia , Suínos/microbiologia
5.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 71(10): 6049-53, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16204520

RESUMO

Rotavirus virus-like particles (VLPs) and MS2 bacteriophages were bioaccumulated in bivalve mollusks to evaluate viral persistence in shellfish during depuration and relaying under natural conditions. Using this nonpathogenic surrogate virus, we were able to demonstrate that about 1 log10 of VLPs was depurated after 1 week in warm seawater (22 degrees C). Phage MS2 was depurated more rapidly (about 2 log10 in 1 week) than were VLPs, as determined using a single-compartment model and linear regression analysis. After being relayed in the estuary under the influence of the tides, VLPs were detected in oysters for up to 82 days following seeding with high levels of VLPs (concentration range between 10(10) and 10(9) particles per g of pancreatic tissue) and for 37 days for lower contamination levels (10(5) particles per g of pancreatic tissue). These data suggest that viral particles may persist in shellfish tissues for several weeks.


Assuntos
Levivirus/isolamento & purificação , Ostreidae/virologia , Rotavirus/isolamento & purificação , Frutos do Mar/virologia , Vírion/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Antígenos Virais/metabolismo , Proteínas do Capsídeo/metabolismo , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Levivirus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Ostreidae/fisiologia , Pâncreas/virologia , Rotavirus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Vírion/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Vírion/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA