Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of colorectal surgery among older adults is expected to rise due to the aging population. Geriatric conditions (e.g., frailty) are risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. The goal of this systematic review is to examine how current literature describes geriatric assessment interventions in colorectal surgery and associated outcomes. METHODS: Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were completed. Review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care. All cohort studies and randomized trials of adult colorectal surgery patients where geriatric assessment was performed were included. Geriatric assessment with/without management interventions were identified and described. RESULTS: Seven-hundred ninety-three studies were identified. Duplicates (197) were removed. An additional 525 were excluded after title/abstract review. After full-text review, 20 studies met the criteria. Reference list review increased final total to 25 studies. All 25 studies were cohort studies. No randomized clinical trials were identified. Heterogeneous assessments were organized into geriatrics domains (mind, mobility, medications, matters most, and multi-complexity). Incomplete evaluations across geriatric domains were performed with few studies describing the use of assessments to impact management decisions. CONCLUSIONS: There are no randomized trials assessing the impact of geriatric assessment to tailor management strategies and improve outcomes in colorectal surgery. Few studies performed assessments to evaluate the geriatric domain matters most. These findings represent a gap in evidence for the efficacy of geriatric assessment and management strategies in colorectal surgical care.

Mobile health in the aging surgical patient.

Mobile health includes the use of mobile devices, patient monitoring devices, and digital assistants to improve the delivery of healthcare. Aging surgical patients (ie, 65 years and older) represent a unique patient population that demands increased resources to prepare for surgery and optimize recovery. Mobile health has the potential to improve surgical patient outcomes by increasing the accessibility of personalized care and reducing costs. However, there are some challenges to consider when using mobile health in older surgical patients, such as technological literacy, visual and hearing impairment, and cognitive changes before or after anesthesia. Despite the rapid uptake of mobile health in medical specialties, its application in the surgical field is gradual. The complexity of aging surgical patients requires surgical care teams, surgical leaders, and healthcare policymakers to consider unique solutions, such as mobile health, to address this growing population's needs before and after surgery. This article will discuss the potential benefits and challenges of mobile health among aging surgical patients, as well as opportunities to support these patients and families with customizable tools to meet their preferences and needs.

Implementing mobile health in your surgical practice: Results of a multidisciplinary convening.

The perioperative journey remains complex and difficult to navigate for patients and caregivers. Poor communication and lack of care coordination lead to diminished patient satisfaction, outcomes, and system performance. Mobile health platforms have the potential to overcome some of these issues by improving care delivery through timely individualized assessments, improved patient education, and care coordination. Yet mobile health implementation in surgical practice remains limited. Based on a convening of experts using human-centered design techniques, an implementation guide for the integration of mobile health in perioperative care was created to assist with (1) identification of the use of mobile health within a specific surgical practice, (2) identification of the pathway to mobile health implementation, and (3) measurement of successful implementation including patient and surgical system impact. This article reviews those recommendations and provides references to additional literature, including the full implementation guide, to aid those seeking to implement mobile health in a surgical practice or system.

An evaluation of patient experience before and after elective colectomy for diverticulitis between patients older and younger than 65 years: A pilot feasibility study in mobile health use.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) platforms are being used to understand patient-reported experiences before and after surgery. Currently, there is limited literature describing the feasibility of using mHealth to evaluate patient experience among older adults. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using mHealth to evaluate patient-reported outcomes among patients older and younger than 65 years undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was performed between June 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021, enrolling patients aged > 18 years undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis at a single academic center (n = 62). A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant mHealth platform was used to deliver patient-reported quality-of-life surveys at 3 time points: preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the feasibility of using mHealth in patients older and younger than 65 years to collect outcomes using recruitment, engagement, and survey completion rates. Preliminary findings of patient experiences were evaluated for patients older and younger than 65 years as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 33.9% of participants were older than 65 years with a median age of 59.8 years (IQR, 53.3-67.9). mHealth enrollment was high (100%) with survey response rates of 79% preoperatively, 64.5% at 3 months postoperatively, and 17.7% at 6 months postoperatively. Response rates were similar among patients older and younger than 65 years (P = .79 preoperatively and P = .39 at 3 months postoperatively). CONCLUSION: Utilization of mHealth to evaluate patient-reported outcomes is feasible in the preoperative and early postoperative settings, including older adults undergoing elective surgery for diverticulitis. Future work will focus on improving long-term outcomes to better examine potential differences when considering patient-centered outcomes among older adult patients.

Causes of death in patients operated for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. This study evaluates the causes of death in patients operated on for colorectal cancer and their determinants. METHODS: An Instructional Review Board-approved database containing patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2018 (last followed up in December 2020) in a tertiary care institution. Data on the underlying cause of death was extracted from the Registry of Vital Records and Statistics in Massachusetts. RESULTS: A total of 576 deaths were recorded in the database, of which 290 (50.35%) patients died of colorectal cancer. Deaths from colorectal cancer gradually decreased over time, whereas deaths from other cancers increased, and deaths from cardiovascular diseases remained stable. Patients who died from colorectal cancer were younger, died earlier in the disease course, had fewer comorbidities, higher rates of stage IV disease, rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, extramural vascular invasion, perineural invasion, R0 resection, and preserved mismatch repair protein status. On multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio for 10-year increase = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.95), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (adjusted odds ratio = 0.64, confidence interval 0.42-0.98), stage IV disease (adjusted odds ratio = 3.02, confidence interval 1.59-5.9), neoadjuvant therapy (adjusted odds ratio = 7.91, confidence interval 2.64-28.13), extramural vascular invasion (adjusted odds ratio = 2.3, confidence interval 1.36-3.91) & time from diagnosis to death (adjusted odds ratio = 0.76, confidence interval 0.68-0.83) predicted death due to colorectal cancer versus other causes, whereas tumor location, perineural invasion, R0 resection, and mismatch repair protein status did not. CONCLUSION: There is a declining trend of deaths from colorectal cancer, presumably reflecting advances in colorectal cancer management strategies and better screening over time. However, younger patients disproportionately contribute to death due to colorectal cancer and need aggressive screening and management strategies.