Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery.

Inaccurate assessment of the fetal head position and station might increase the risk for difficult or failed assisted vaginal delivery. Compared with digital vaginal examination, an ultrasound examination is objective and more accurate. The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology has issued practical guidelines on intrapartum ultrasound in 2018 and recommended that an ultrasound assessment should be conducted when there is suspected delay or arrest of the first or second stage of labor or before considering assisted vaginal delivery. Fetal head position is assessed transabdominally by identifying the fetal occiput, orbit, or midline cerebral echo. Studies have shown that ultrasound assessment improved the correct diagnosis of fetal head position and accuracy of instrument placement, however, it did not reduce morbidity. Studies on ultrasound assessment of asynclitism are limited but show promising results. Fetal head station is assessed transperineally in the midsagittal or axial plane. Of the various ultrasound parameters, angle of progression and head-perineum distance are the most widely studied and found to be highly correlated with the clinical fetal head station. An angle of progression of 120° correlates with a clinical head station of 0 and is an important landmark for engagement of successful vaginal delivery, whereas an angle of progression of 145° correlates with a clinical head station of ≥+2 and has been associated with successful assisted vaginal delivery. In contrast, a head perineum distance of ≥40 mm has been associated with an increased risk for difficult assisted vaginal delivery. A "head-up" direction of descent assessed transperineally in sagittal plane is also a favorable factor for successful vaginal delivery. Current evidence seems to suggest that a prediction model with >1 sonographic parameter performed better than a model that only used 1 parameter. We suggest that an algorithm model incorporating both clinical and sonographic parameters would be useful in guiding clinicians on their decision for assisted vaginal delivery.

Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Fetal head asynclitism may affect labor progress, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and even be associated with difficult or failed instrumental delivery. However, there is limited evidence on the true prevalence and associations of asynclitism when diagnosed by transperineal ultrasound in the second stage of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prevalence and outcome of asynclitism in the second stage of labor in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study involving 92 term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in the second stage of labor, recruited from December 2019 to December 2020. Transperineal ultrasound was performed and asynclitism was diagnosed if there was asymmetry of intracranial structures on the transverse plane. To assess the fetal head station, the head perineum distance was measured at rest and on pushing, and the mode of delivery was recorded. Relationship between asynclitism and fetal head position, and between head perineum distance and the mode of delivery, were evaluated with chi-squared tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The prevalence of asynclitism was 15% (14 of 92), of which 12 were anterior asynclitism and 2 were posterior asynclitism. The prevalence of asynclitism was less common in occiput anterior compared with nonocciput anterior position (6.7% vs 53%, P<.01). Women with asynclitism were associated with smaller delta head perineum distance (head perineum distance at rest minus that at pushing) than women without asynclitism (median [interquartile range], 0.68 cm [0.85 cm] vs 0.91 cm [0.71 cm]; P=.01). Eventually, there was a trend of more operative deliveries in women with asynclitism (43%, or 6 of 14 women) than in women without asynclitism (27%, or 21 of 78 women), although this difference was not statistically significant (P=.22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of asynclitism at transperineal ultrasound was rather common in nulliparous women at second stage of labor and seemed more commonly associated with nonocciput anterior position.

Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the angle of progression (AoP) measured by transperineal ultrasonography before indicating an instrumental delivery or cesarean delivery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among women with singleton term pregnancies with prolonged second stage of labor at Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China, between May 16, 2011, and May 25, 2016. Transabdominal and transperineal ultrasonography were performed to determine fetal head position and AoP, respectively, both at rest and during uterine contraction with pushing. Mode of delivery was decided after vaginal examination without relying on ultrasonography. RESULTS: Of 143 women, 116 underwent successful instrumental delivery and 27 underwent cesarean delivery. Median AoP was 153.0° in the instrumental group versus 139.0° in the cesarean group at rest (P<0.001), and 182.5° in the instrumental group versus 156.5° in the cesarean group during contraction (P<0.001). The best predictive cutoff AoP for successful instrumental delivery was 138.7° at rest (sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 51.9%) and 160.9° during contraction (sensitivity 87.1%, specificity 74.1%). No between-group differences in AoP were found for ease of vacuum extraction at rest (P=0.457) or during contraction with pushing (P=0.095). CONCLUSION: The AoP predicted approximately 80% of successful instrumental deliveries performed for prolonged second stage of labor.

Prevention of early onset group B streptococcal disease by universal antenatal culture-based screening in all public hospitals in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of maternal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS), and early onset GBS disease (EOGBSD) after implementation of universal screening. METHODS: This was a three-year retrospective cohort study on universal antenatal rectovaginal culture-based screening and intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) to colonized women in the public sector in Hong Kong. Routinely collected data including maternal colonization and EOGBSD were retrieved. RESULTS: Of 113,989 GBS screening performed, 21.8% were positive. The colonization rate was higher in the public hospitals (higher risk) than in the Maternal and Child Health Centers (lower risk) (23.7% vs 18.1%, p < .001), while their false negative rates were not greater than expected. Majority of eligible women opted for screening, and colonized women received IAP. There were 29 cases of EOGBSD with clinical signs and a positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture. Compared to clinical risk-based screening, EOGBSD incidence decreased after universal screening (1 vs 0.24 per 1000 births, p < .001). Although EOGBSD occurred at a higher rate in preterm than term infants, 86.7% occurred in the latter, and were associated with a false negative screening result (41.3%), lack of screening (20.7%) or unavailability of a colonization result at labour (13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal GBS colonization rate was higher than previously reported, and varied with different risk populations. EOGBSD reduced after universal screening.