Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug "allergy" labeling is associated with increased postpartum opioid utilization.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to postpartum pain management, beginning with acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with opioids added only if needed. Report of a prior NSAID-induced adverse drug reaction (ADR) may preclude use of first-line analgesics, despite evidence that many patients with this allergy label may safely tolerate NSAIDs. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the association between reported NSAID ADRs and postpartum opioid utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of birthing people who delivered within an integrated health system (January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020). Study outcomes were postpartum inpatient opioid administrations and opioid prescriptions at discharge. Statistical analysis was performed on a propensity score-matched sample, which was generated with the goal of matching to the covariate distributions from individuals with NSAID ADRs. RESULTS: Of 38,927 eligible participants, there were 883 (2.3%) with an NSAID ADR. Among individuals with reported NSAID ADRs, 49.5% received inpatient opioids in the postpartum period, compared to 34.5% of those with no NSAID ADRs (difference = 15.0%, 95% confidence interval 11.4-18.6%). For patients who received postpartum inpatient opioids, those with NSAID ADRs received a higher total cumulative dose between delivery and hospital discharge (median 30.0 vs 22.5 morphine milligram equivalents [MME] for vaginal deliveries; median 104.4 vs 75.0 MME for cesarean deliveries). The overall proportion of patients receiving an opioid prescription at the time of hospital discharge was higher for patients with NSAID ADRs compared to patients with no NSAID ADRs (39.3% vs 27.2%; difference = 12.1%, 95% confidence interval 8.6-15.6%). CONCLUSION: Patients with reported NSAID ADRs had higher postpartum inpatient opioid utilization and more frequently received opioid prescriptions at hospital discharge compared to those without NSAID ADRs, regardless of mode of delivery.

Effectiveness of a Population Health Intervention on Disparities in Hypertension Control: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in hypertension control across race, ethnicity, and language have been a long-standing problem in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a multi-pronged intervention can improve hypertension control for a target population and reduce disparities. DESIGN: This stepped wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted at 15 adult primary care clinics affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital. PCPs were randomized to receive the intervention in twelve groups. PARTICIPANTS: The target population was patients who met one of the following criteria based on self-identification: (1) Asian, Black, Indigenous, multi-racial, or other race; (2) Hispanic ethnicity; or (3) preferred language other than English. Reference population was White, English-speaking patients. INTERVENTIONS: PCPs were given access to an online equity dashboard that displays disparities in chronic disease management and completed an equity huddle with population health coordinators (PHCs), which involved reviewing target patients whose hypertension was not well controlled. In addition, community health workers (CHWs) were available in some practices to offer additional support. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in the proportion of target patients meeting the hypertension control goal when comparing intervention and control periods. KEY RESULTS: Of the 365 PCPs who were randomized, 311 PCPs and their 10,865 target patients were included in the analysis. The intervention led to an increase in hypertension control in the target population (RD 0.9%; 95% CI [0.3,1.5]) and there was a higher intervention effect in the target population compared to the reference population (DiD 2.1%; 95% CI [1.1, 3.1]). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing data on disparities in quality outcome measures in routine clinical practice augmented by clinical support provided by PHCs and CHWs led to modest, but statistically significant, improvement in hypertension control among BIPOC, Hispanic, and LEP patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05278806.

Outpatient-Based Opioid Treatment Engagement and Attendance: A Prospective Cohort Study of Homeless-Experienced Adults.

BACKGROUND: The opioid overdose epidemic disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness. Outpatient-based opioid treatment (OBOT) programs have been established in homeless health care settings across the USA, but little is known about the success of these programs in engaging and retaining this highly marginalized patient population in addiction care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of initial engagement and subsequent attendance in a homeless-tailored OBOT program. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 4 months of follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 148 homeless-experienced adults (≥18 years) who newly enrolled in the Boston Healthcare for the Homeless Program (BHCHP) OBOT program over a 1-year period (1/6/2022-1/5/2023). MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcomes were (1) initial OBOT program engagement, defined as having ≥2 additional OBOT visits within 1 month of OBOT enrollment, and (2) subsequent OBOT program attendance, measured monthly from months 2 to 4 of follow-up. KEY RESULTS: The average age was 41.7 years (SD 10.2); 23.6% were female, 35.8% were Hispanic, 12.8% were non-Hispanic Black, and 43.9% were non-Hispanic White. Over one-half (57.4%) were initially engaged. OBOT program attendances during months 2, 3, and 4 were 60.8%, 50.0%, and 41.2%, respectively. One-quarter (24.3%) were initially engaged and then attended the OBOT program every month during the follow-up period. Participants in housing or residential treatment programs (vs. unhoused; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.17-5.44) and those who were already on or initiated a medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) (aOR = 6.53; 95% CI = 1.62-26.25) at the time of OBOT enrollment had higher odds of engagement. Older age (aOR = 1.74 per 10-year increment; 95% CI = 1.28-2.38) and initial engagement (aOR = 3.50; 95% CI = 1.86-6.59) conferred higher odds of attendance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, over half initially engaged with the OBOT program, with initial engagement emerging as a strong predictor of subsequent OBOT program attendance. Interventions aimed at enhancing initial OBOT program engagement, including those focused on housing and buprenorphine initiation, may improve longer-term outcomes in this marginalized population.

Accuracy of Patient-Collected Vital Signs.

Introduction: Telehealth has emerged as an important clinical setting for managing acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs), potentially reducing emergency department and urgent care overcrowding, and reducing nosocomial transmission. Many current algorithms for ARI management incorporate information on patient vital signs. However, the accuracy of vital signs collected by patients using readily available home devices and techniques has not been studied. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of patients seen for urgent conditions at a hospital emergency and urgent care center were given instructions and low-cost, readily available devices to collect their vital signs. A trained research coordinator collected a parallel set of vital signs using standard hospital equipment, serving as the gold standard. We analyzed the performance of patient-collected vital signs compared with vital signs collected by a trained research coordinator. Results: A total of 300 patients completed the study. Patient-collected vital signs were highly specific for traditional levels of abnormalities (HR >100 beats per min, RR >24 breaths per min, temperature >100.4 degrees Fahrenheit, oxygen saturation <94 percent); however, sensitivity was poor for elevated heart rate by pulse estimation (25%) and elevated respiratory rate (60%). Heart rate and oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter and oral temperature had higher sensitivity. Conclusions: Vital signs measured and provided by patients are not uniformly accurate, particularly when using manual techniques rather than automated devices. Telehealth algorithms that rely on these values could provide incorrect triage and management advice.

Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) may cause preventable strokes. Guidelines differ regarding AF screening recommendations. We tested whether point-of-care screening with a handheld single-lead ECG at primary care practice visits increases diagnoses of AF. METHODS: We randomized 16 primary care clinics 1:1 to AF screening using a handheld single-lead ECG (AliveCor KardiaMobile) during vital sign assessments, or usual care. Patients included were ages ≥65 years. Screening results were provided to primary care clinicians at the encounter. All confirmatory diagnostic testing and treatment decisions were made by the primary care clinician. New AF diagnoses during the 1-year follow-up were ascertained electronically and manually adjudicated. Proportions and incidence rates were calculated. Effect heterogeneity was assessed. RESULTS: Of 30 715 patients without prevalent AF (n=15 393 screening [91% screened], n=15 322 control), 1.72% of individuals in the screening group had new AF diagnosed at 1 year versus 1.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.13% [95% CI, -0.16 to 0.42]; P=0.38). In prespecified subgroup analyses, new AF diagnoses in the screening and control groups were greater among those aged ≥85 years (5.56% versus 3.76%, respectively; risk difference, 1.80% [95% CI, 0.18 to 3.30]). The difference in newly diagnosed AF between the screening period and the previous year was marginally greater in the screening versus control group (0.32% versus -0.12%; risk difference, 0.43% [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.84]). The proportion of individuals with newly diagnosed AF who were initiated on oral anticoagulants was not different in the screening (n=194, 73.5%) and control (n=172, 70.8%) arms (risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, -5.5 to 10.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for AF using a single-lead ECG at primary care visits did not affect new AF diagnoses among all individuals aged 65 years or older compared with usual care. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03515057.

Accuracy and variability of cardiologist interpretation of single lead electrocardiograms for atrial fibrillation: The VITAL-AF trial.

BACKGROUND: Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) using consumer-based devices capable of producing a single lead electrocardiogram (1L ECG) is increasing. There are limited data on the accuracy of physician interpretation of these tracings. The goal of this study is to assess the sensitivity, specificity, confidence, and variability of cardiologist interpretation of point-of-care 1L ECGs. METHODS: Fifteen cardiologists reviewed point-of-care handheld 1L ECGs collected from patients aged 65 years or older enrolled in the VITAL-AF clinical trial [NCT035115057] who underwent cardiac rhythm assessments with a 1L ECG using an AliveCor KardiaMobile device. Random sampling of 1L ECGs for cardiologist review was stratified by the AliveCor algorithm interpretation. A 12L ECG performed on the same day for clinical purposes was used as the gold standard. Cardiologists each reviewed a common sample of 200 1L ECG tracings and completed a survey associated with each tracing. Cardiologists were blinded to both the AliveCor algorithm and same day 12L ECG interpretation. For each tracing, study cardiologists were asked to assess the rhythm (sinus rhythm, AF, unclassifiable), report their assessment of the quality of the tracing, and rate their confidence in rhythm interpretation. The outcomes included the sensitivity, specificity, variability, and confidence in physician interpretation. Variables associated with each measure were identified using multivariable regression. RESULTS: The average sensitivity for AF was 77.4% (range 50%-90.6%, standard deviation [SD]=11.4%) and the average specificity was 73.0% (range 41.3%-94.6%, SD = 15.4%). The mean variability was 30.8% (range 0%-76.2%, SD = 23.2%). The average reviewer confidence of 1L ECG rhythm assessment was 3.6 out of 5 (range 2.5-4.2, SD = 0.6). Patient and tracing factors associated with sensitivity, specificity, variability, and confidence were identified and included age, body mass index, and presence of artifact. CONCLUSION: Cardiologist interpretation of point-of-care handheld 1L ECGs has modest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with substantial variability for AF classification despite high confidence. Variability in cardiologist interpretation of 1L ECGs highlights the importance of confirmatory testing for diagnosing AF.

Promoting Informed Decisions About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults (PRIMED Study): a Physician Cluster Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: For adults aged 76-85, guidelines recommend individualizing decision-making about whether to continue colorectal cancer (CRC) testing. These conversations can be challenging as they need to consider a patient's CRC risk, life expectancy, and preferences. OBJECTIVE: To promote shared decision-making (SDM) for CRC testing decisions for older adults. DESIGN: Two-arm, multi-site cluster randomized trial, assigning physicians to Intervention and Comparator arms. Patients were surveyed shortly after the visit to assess outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Primary care physicians affiliated with 5 academic and community hospital networks and their patients aged 76-85 who were due for CRC testing and had a visit during the study period. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention arm physicians completed a 2-h online course in SDM communication skills and received an electronic reminder of patients eligible for CRC testing shortly before the visit. Comparator arm received reminders only. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process score (range 0-4 with higher scores indicating more SDM); secondary outcomes included patient-reported discussion of CRC screening, knowledge, intention, and satisfaction with the visit. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-seven physicians (Intervention n=34 and Comparator n=33) enrolled. Patient participants (n=466) were on average 79 years old, 50% with excellent or very good self-rated overall health, and 66% had one or more prior colonoscopies. Patients in the Intervention arm had higher SDM Process scores (adjusted mean difference 0.36 (95%CI (0.08, 0.64), p=0.01) than in the Comparator arm. More patients in the Intervention arm reported discussing CRC screening during the visit (72% vs. 60%, p=0.03) and had higher intention to follow through with their preferred approach (58.0% vs. 47.1, p=0.03). Knowledge scores and visit satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms. CONCLUSION: Physician training plus reminders were effective in increasing SDM and frequency of CRC testing discussions in an age group where SDM is essential. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03959696).

A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Support Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer often receive intensive end-of-life care, yet it is unclear if this is goal-concordant. Advance care planning (ACP) video tools may promote identification and communication of AYA preferences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a dual-site, 1:1 pilot randomized controlled trial of a novel video-based ACP tool in 50 dyads of AYA patients aged 18 to 39 years with advanced cancer and their caregivers. ACP readiness and knowledge, preferences for future care, and decisional conflict were obtained pre, post, and 3 months after the intervention and compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 50 AYA/caregiver dyads enrolled, 25 (50%) were randomized to the intervention. Participants primarily identified as female, white, and non-Hispanic. Most AYAs (76%) and caregivers (86%) identified their overall goal as life-prolonging preintervention; less identified this goal postintervention (42% AYAs; 52% caregivers). There was no significant difference in change in proportion of AYAs or caregivers choosing life-prolonging care, CPR, or ventilation between arms postintervention or at 3 months. The change in participant scores for ACP knowledge (AYAs and caregivers) and ACP readiness (AYAs) from preintervention to postintervention was greater in the video arm compared with the control arm; the difference in caregivers' scores for decisional conflict from preintervention to postintervention in the video arm was statistically significant (15 vs 7; P=.005). Feedback from the video participants was overwhelmingly positive; of the 45 intervention participants who provided video feedback, 43 (96%) found the video helpful, 40 (89%) were comfortable viewing the video, and 42 (93%) indicated they would recommend the video to other patients facing similar decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Most AYAs with advanced cancer and their caregivers preferred life-prolonging care in advanced illness, with fewer preferring this type of care postintervention. A brief video-based ACP tool was well-liked by participants and improved caregiver decisional certainty. Videos may be a useful tool to inform AYAs and caregivers about end-of-life care options and promote ACP discussions.

Can Treatment Support Mitigate Nicotine Metabolism-Based Disparities in Smoking Abstinence? Secondary Analysis of the Helping HAND 4 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR), a biomarker of CYP2A6-mediated nicotine metabolism, predicts the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), with fast metabolizers benefiting less than slow metabolizers. Whether treatment support to optimize NRT use (henceforth "treatment support") modifies this pharmacogenetic relationship is unknown. METHODS: Hospitalized adult daily smokers were assigned to one of two post-discharge smoking cessation interventions offering NRT and counseling: (1) Transitional Tobacco Care Management, which delivered enhanced treatment support via free combination NRT at discharge and automated counseling, and (2) a quitline-based approach representing usual care (UC). The primary outcome was biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence 6 months after discharge. Secondary outcomes were the use of NRT and counseling during the 3-month intervention period. Logistic regression models tested for interactions between NMR and intervention, controlling for sex, race, alcohol use, and BMI. RESULTS: Participants (N = 321) were classified as slow (n = 80) or fast (n = 241) metabolizers relative to the first quartile of NMR (0.012-0.219 vs. 0.221-3.455, respectively). Under UC, fast (vs. slow) metabolizers had lower odds of abstinence at 6 months (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.95) and similar odds of NRT and counseling use. Compared to UC, enhanced treatment support increased abstinence (aOR 2.13, 95% CI 0.98-4.64) and use of combination NRT (aOR 4.62, 95% CI 2.57-8.31) in fast metabolizers, while reducing abstinence in slow metabolizers (aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.87; NMR-by-intervention interaction p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment support increased abstinence and optimal use of NRT among fast nicotine metabolizers, thereby mitigating the gap in abstinence between fast and slow metabolizers. IMPLICATIONS: In this secondary analysis of two smoking cessation interventions for recently hospitalized smokers, fast nicotine metabolizers quit at lower rates than slow metabolizers, but providing fast metabolizers with enhanced treatment support doubled the odds of quitting in this group and mitigated the disparity in abstinence between fast and slow metabolizers. If validated, these findings could lead to personalized approaches to smoking cessation treatment that improve outcomes by targeting treatment support to those who need it most.

Patient decisions regarding cancer gene panel testing: An exploratory study.

This study examined factors associated with the selection of a specific multi-gene panel test by patients in a cancer genetic counseling clinic. We surveyed patients who received pre-test genetic counseling at the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Risk Assessment (CCRA) in 2019 and their genetic counselors to assess demographic and clinical characteristics, patient concerns, and session outcome. Ultimately, 228 eligible participants completed the survey, of whom 85.1% consented to genetic testing. Of those who chose testing, 56.2% selected the largest panel type available, a pan-cancer panel that included both actionable and inactionable genes. White patients were more likely than non-white patients to pursue testing. Among testers, number of testing options offered, participant educational attainment, age, and NCCN Guidelines status were associated with patient choice between four panel options. Some patient concerns, including impact of results on future cancer screening and family dynamics, were also linked to test choice. Several other participant characteristics including income, cancer diagnosis, and family structure did not appear to be predictive of testing choice. Our results confirmed the patient preference for large gene panels and identified a limited number of associations between patient characteristics and concerns and testing choice. We noted however that a significant number of participants did not choose the most commonly selected test, and that test choice is difficult to predict based on clinical and demographic factors. Our results also provide further evidence of well-documented disparities in cancer genetic testing. Study limitations do not allow our findings to be generalized to all cancer genetic counseling patients. Further research is needed to examine how and why patients choose between multiple genetic test options in the cancer setting. This study was one of the first to examine patient choice between a full spectrum of multi-gene panel options.

Grinding, Clicking, and Pivot Pain Resolve in Most Patients After Knee Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether knee arthroscopy alleviates the symptom constellation of knee grinding/clicking, catching/locking, and pivot pain. METHODS: One-year follow-up data from 584 consecutive subjects who underwent knee arthroscopy from August 2012 to December 2019 were collected prospectively. Subjects reported frequency of knee grinding/clicking, catching/locking, and/or pivot pain preoperatively and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. A single surgeon performed each procedure and documented all intraoperative pathology. We measured the postoperative resolution or persistence of these symptoms and used multivariable regression models to identify preoperative demographic and clinical variables that predicted symptom persistence. We also assessed changes in the Pain, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS: Postoperative symptom resolution was more likely for grinding/clicking (65.6%) and pivot pain (67.8%) than for catching/locking (44.1%). Smoking status, overweight/obesity, absence of meniscal tear, and number of compartments with focal cartilage lesions predicted persistence of 1 or more patient-reported knee symptoms. KOOS subscale scores consistently improved by at least one standard deviation. Individuals who had resolution of patient-reported knee symptoms exhibited roughly 2-fold improvements in KOOS Pain, ADL and Quality of Life scores compared with those whose symptoms persisted. Persistence of pivot pain was associated with the least improvement of the 3 KOOS subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Two in three patients with grinding/clicking or pivot pain experience symptom resolution after knee arthroscopy, although catching/locking is more likely to persist. Smoking status, overweight/obesity, absence of meniscal tear, and number of compartments with focal cartilage lesions predict symptom persistence after knee arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV, retrospective cohort analysis of prospective data.

Health Care Utilization among Homeless-Experienced Adults Who Were Seen by a Mobile Addiction Health Clinic in Boston, Massachusetts: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Background: Mobile health clinics improve access to care for marginalized individuals who are disengaged from the healthcare system. This study evaluated the association between a mobile addiction health clinic and health care utilization among people experiencing homelessness. Methods: Using Medicaid claims data, we evaluated adults who were seen by a mobile addiction health clinic in Boston, Massachusetts from 1/16/18-1/15/19 relative to a propensity score matched control cohort. We evaluated both cohorts from four years before to one year after the index visit date with the mobile clinic. The primary outcome was the number of outpatient visits; secondary outcomes were the number of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. We used Poisson regression to compare changes in outcomes from before to after the index date in a quasi-experimental design. Results: 138 adults were seen by the mobile clinic during the observation period; 29.7% were female, 16.7% were Black, 8.0% Hispanic, 68.1% White, and the mean age was 40.4 years. The mean number of mobile clinic encounters was 3.1. The yearly mean number of outpatient visits increased from 11.5 to 12.1 (p = 0.43; pdiff-in-diff = 0.15), the number of hospitalizations increased from 2.2 to 3.0 (p = 0.04; pdiff-in-diff = 0.87), and the number of ED visits increased from 5.4 to 6.5 (p = 0.04; pdiff-in-diff = 0.40). Conclusions: The mobile addiction health clinic was not associated with statistically significant changes in health care utilization in the first year. Further research in larger samples using a broader set of outcomes is needed to quantify the benefits of this innovative care delivery model.

HbA1c-Triggered Endocrinology Electronic Consultation for Type 2 Diabetes Management.

BACKGROUND: Electronic consultation (eConsultation) offers a potential mechanism to increase access to specialty care, address knowledge gaps, and overcome therapeutic inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) being managed by primary care physicians (PCPs). OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a system to provide unsolicited endocrinology eConsult for T2DM patients with HbA1c 8.5-10.5% managed by PCPs. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized matched cohort study with implementation evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: PCPs affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). INTERVENTIONS: Unsolicited endocrinology eConsultation. MAIN MEASURES: The primary clinical outcome was mean change in HbA1c at 6 months. Secondary process outcomes included referral completion rate, prescription rates of glucose-lowering medications, differences in rate of other management recommendations, change in all glucose-lowering medications, and number of face-to-face endocrinology visits. KEY RESULTS: 161 PCPs were randomly assigned to intervention (n=81) and control (n=80) arms. eConsultations were triggered on 130 patients from intervention arm PCPs. Intervention arm patients had a 0.89 (SD 1.45) decrease in HbA1c compared to 0.69 (SD 1.32) decrease in the control arm (p=0.28). There were significant differences in prescribing of glucose-lowering medications between arms. There was a 19.3% increase in patients prescribed GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i in the intervention arm compared to a 6.9% increase in control (p=0.003). There were also significant increases in prescription rates of metformin (3.1% vs -3.1%, p=0.03) and sulfonylureas (1.5% vs -6.9%, p=0.03). At 6-month follow-up, the intervention arm had 13 in-person endocrinology visits compared to 29 (p=0.012) in the control arm. PCPs were more likely to accept recommendations regarding adherence to or dose adjustment of current medications than initiation of new medications. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an unsolicited endocrinology eConsult system for patients with poorly controlled T2DM is feasible. Unsolicited eConsultation was associated with increased prescribing of glucose-lowering medications without significant difference in HbA1c. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03542084.

Who Benefits Most? A Multisite Study of Coaching and Resident Well-being.

BACKGROUND: Coaching has been shown to improve resident well-being; however, not all benefit equally. OBJECTIVE: Assess predictors of changes in resident physician well-being and burnout in a multisite implementation of a Professional Development Coaching Program. DESIGN: Pre- and post-implementation surveys administered to participant cohorts at implementation sites in their intern year. Effect size was calculated comparing pre- and post-intervention paired data. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 272 residents in their intern year at five internal medicine residency programs (Boston Medical Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Duke University, Emory University, Massachusetts General Hospital). Analyses included 129 residents with paired data. INTERVENTIONS: Interns were paired with a faculty coach trained in positive psychology and coaching skills and asked to meet quarterly with coaches. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes included Maslach Burnout Inventory depersonalization (DP) and emotional exhaustion (EE) subscales, and the PERMA well-being scale. Key predictors included site, demographics, intolerance of uncertainty, hardiness-resilience, gratitude, and coping. Program moderators included were reflection, goal setting, and feedback. KEY RESULTS: Well-being (PERMA) changed from baseline to follow-up in all participants; females showed a decline and males an increase (-1.41 vs. .83, p = 0.04). Self-reflection was associated with positive change in PERMA (mean positive change 1.93, p = 0.009). Burnout (EE) declined in non-Hispanic white residents vs. Black/Asian/Hispanic/other residents (-1.86, p = 0.021). Burnout improved with increased goal setting. CONCLUSION: Coaching programs should consider tailored approaches to support residents whose well-being is impacted by gender and/or race, and who have higher intolerance of uncertainty and lower resilience at baseline. Coaching skills of goal setting and reflection may positively affect interns and teach coping skills.

Impact of reported NSAID "allergies" on opioid use disorder in back pain.

BACKGROUND: It is crucial to identify patients at highest risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) and to address challenges in reducing opioid use. Reported nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) allergies may predispose to use of stronger pain medications and potentially to OUD. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the clinical impact of reported NSAID allergy on OUD in patients with chronic back pain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adults receiving care at a tertiary health care system from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. Back pain and OUD were identified using administrative data algorithms. We used propensity score matching and logistic regression to estimate the impact of self-reported NSAID adverse drug reactions (ADRs) on risk of OUD, adjusting for other relevant clinical information. RESULTS: Of 47,114 patients with chronic back pain, 3,620 (7.7%) had a reported NSAID ADR. In an adjusted propensity score-matched analysis, patients with NSAID ADRs had higher odds (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.67) of developing OUD as compared with those without NSAID ADRs. Additional risk factors for OUD included younger age, male sex, Medicaid insurance, Medicare insurance, higher number of inpatient and outpatient visits in the previous year, and comorbid anxiety and depression. Patients with listed NSAID ADRs also had higher odds of a documented opioid prescription during the study period (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with chronic back pain and reported NSAID ADRs are at a higher risk of developing OUD and receiving opioid analgesics, even after accounting for comorbidities and health care utilization. Allergy evaluation is critical for potential delabeling of patients with reported NSAID allergies and chronic pain.

Who wants to work in geriatrics: Findings from a national survey of physicians and nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND: As the United States population is aging, there is a chronic shortage of geriatrics- and gerontology- trained clinicians despite a variety of incentives. With primary care clinicians also in short supply, health systems are trying to cope with the increasing demand for care for older adults PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine respondents' willingness to recommend their career to others and beliefs about changes necessary to enhance the supply of appropriately prepared clinicians METHODS: This study used a national survey of a stratified sample of 276 physicians and 134 nurse practitioners working in primary care and geriatric practices. FINDINGS: Among nurse practitioner respondents, 29% would "definitely" recommend a career as a geriatrician vs. seventeen percent of physicians; thirteen percent of physicians would "definitely" recommend a career as a nurse practitioner specializing in adult/gerontology vs. 42% for nurse practitioners. Those trained in geriatrics were more likely to recommend a career in the field. DISCUSSION: Nurse practitioners and physicians differ in their willingness to recommend careers in in gerontology and geriatrics, but less than a majority would strongly recommend careers in either specialty. Based on clinical reports, substantial reforms in payment and reimbursement for services may be necessary to bolster the geriatric field's attractiveness, and better prepare the workforce to care for older adults.

Evaluating the SPIKES Model for Improving Peer-to-Peer Feedback Among Internal Medicine Residents: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Feedback improves trainee clinical performance, but the optimal way to provide it remains unclear. Peer feedback offers unique advantages but comes with significant challenges including a lack of rigorously studied methods. The SPIKES framework is a communication tool adapted from the oncology and palliative care literature for teaching trainees how to lead difficult conversations. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a brief educational intervention focused on the SPIKES framework improves peer feedback between internal medicine trainees on inpatient medicine services as compared to usual practice. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial at an academic medical center during academic year 2017-2018. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five PGY1 and 49 PGY2 internal medicine trainees were enrolled. PGY2s were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group. INTERVENTION: The intervention entailed a 30-min, case-based didactic on the SPIKES framework followed by a refresher email on SPIKES sent to PGY2s before each inpatient medicine rotation. PGY1s were blinded as to which PGY2s underwent the training. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was PGY1 evaluation of the extent of feedback provided by PGY2s. Secondary outcomes included PGY1 report of feedback quality and PGY2 self-report of feedback quantity and quality. Outcomes were obtained via anonymous online survey and reported using a Likert scale with a range of one to four. KEY RESULTS: PGY1s completed 207 surveys (51% response rate) and PGY2s completed 61 surveys (42% response rate). PGY1s reported a higher extent of feedback (2.5 vs 2.2; p = 0.02; Cohen's d = 0.31), more specific feedback (2.3 vs 2.0; p < 0.01; d = 0.33), and higher satisfaction with feedback (2.6 vs 2.2; p < 0.01; d = 0.47) from intervention PGY2s. There were no significant differences in PGY2 self-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: With modest implementation requirements and notable limitations, a brief educational intervention focused on SPIKES increased PGY1 perception of the extent, specificity, and satisfaction with feedback from PGY2s.

Cigarette Smoking and Risk Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Reported by Recently Hospitalized Participants in a Smoking Cessation Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease. Understanding smokers' responses to the pandemic will help assess its public health impact and inform future public health and provider messages to smokers. OBJECTIVE: To assess risk perceptions and change in tobacco use among current and former smokers during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey conducted in May-July 2020 (55% response rate) PARTICIPANTS: 694 current and former daily smokers (mean age 53, 40% male, 78% white) who had been hospitalized pre-COVID-19 and enrolled into a smoking cessation clinical trial at hospitals in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. MAIN MEASURES: Perceived risk of COVID-19 due to tobacco use; changes in tobacco consumption and interest in quitting tobacco use; self-reported quitting and relapse since January 2020. KEY RESULTS: 68% (95% CI, 65-72%) of respondents believed that smoking increases the risk of contracting COVID-19 or having a more severe case. In adjusted analyses, perceived risk was higher in Massachusetts where COVID-19 had already surged than in Pennsylvania and Tennessee which were pre-surge during survey administration (AOR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.07-2.28). Higher perceived COVID-19 risk was associated with increased interest in quitting smoking (AOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01-2.92). During the pandemic, 32% (95% CI, 27-37%) of smokers increased, 37% (95% CI, 33-42%) decreased, and 31% (95% CI, 26-35%) did not change their cigarette consumption. Increased smoking was associated with higher perceived stress (AOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.16-1.91). Overall, 11% (95% CI, 8-14%) of respondents who smoked in January 2020 (pre-COVID-19) had quit smoking at survey (mean, 6 months later) while 28% (95% CI, 22-34%) of former smokers relapsed. Higher perceived COVID-19 risk was associated with higher odds of quitting and lower odds of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Most smokers believed that smoking increased COVID-19 risk. Smokers' responses to the pandemic varied, with increased smoking related to stress and increased quitting associated with perceived COVID-19 vulnerability.

The effectiveness of post-discharge navigation added to an inpatient addiction consultation for patients with substance use disorder; a randomized controlled trial.

Background: It is unknown whether post-discharge navigation enhances the impact of hospital-initiated addiction care. This study tested the incremental benefit of telephonic linkage to a post-discharge navigator for patients who received an addiction consultation during hospitalization. Methods: A two-arm, randomized controlled trial of 395 hospitalized adults with substance use disorder who received an addiction consultation. The intervention group received post-discharge phone calls from a navigator to review the recommended treatment plan and address barriers to engagement on days 3, 7, 14, and 21. The primary outcome was days of alcohol or drug use in the past 30 assessed by Timeline Follow-back at 1 month. Results: Follow-up assessment completion rates were 46% at 1 month, and 41%, at 2 months. At baseline, intervention and control groups did not differ in substance use patterns; 45% reported primary alcohol use, 43% drugs, and 12% both. Heroin was the most common drug. At baseline, mean days of past 30-day alcohol or drug use were 13.6 in the intervention and 14.9 in the control group. The median number of navigation calls completed was 3 out of 4. At 1 month, both groups reported less use (decrease of 4.8 in intervention vs. 4.2 days in control group, p = 0.49). There were no differences between groups at 2 months. Compared to controls, participants who received all four calls had a greater decrease in use with a mean 8.6 days decrease from baseline (difference of 4.4 days, p = 0.0009). Conclusion: Post-discharge telephonic patient navigation did not further improve substance use outcomes following addiction consultation.

The roles and clinical activities of registered nurses and nurse practitioners in practices caring for older adults.

BACKGROUND: Population aging and physician shortages have motivated recommendations of increased use of registered nurses in care provision; little is known about RN and NP employment in primary care and geriatric practices or service types each provide. PURPOSE: Determine current RN and NP employment frequency in practices in the U.S., identify services provided by RNs, and whether NP presence in practice is associated with the types and frequency of services provided by RNs. METHODS: National survey of 410 primary care and geriatric clinicians. FINDINGS: Only half of practices employed RNs. RNs most frequently provide teaching or education for chronic disease management. RNs provide significantly more primary care and geriatric services when practices employed a NP. DISCUSSION: Reasons for RN underuse in practices should be identified, clinical placements in such practices should increase, and NP education programs should include care models using RNs to their full scope of practice.