The impact of myasthenia gravis severity on work and daily activities.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: People with myasthenia gravis (MG) experience impaired quality of life. However, the impact of MG symptoms on work productivity has not been well-studied. We aimed to evaluate this impact and to examine associations between disease severity and the degree of impairment. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi MG Disease-Specific Programme™, a multinational (USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) survey completed by physicians and their patients with MG in 2020. Patient-reported measures included the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Specific Health Problem questionnaire. RESULTS: The WPAI questionnaire was completed by 330 patients. Among those currently employed, the mean percentage of work time missed (absenteeism) was 13.3% (N = 116), percentage impairment of productivity at work (presenteeism) was 26.7% (N = 121), and overall work impairment was 30.0% (N = 110). Across all patients, impairment of non-work-related activities due to health problems (ADL impairment) was 39.2% (N = 330). Regression analysis indicated that impairment differed according to MG Foundation of America (MGFA) class (p = .0147, p < .0001, p < .0001 and p < .0001 for absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment and ADL impairment, respectively). Being MGFA class III/IV was a predictor of presenteeism, overall work impairment and ADL impairment in a predictor model. DISCUSSION: Patients with MG experience substantial work impairment particularly those with more severe symptoms, highlighting an important way in which patient quality of life is negatively affected. More effective treatment strategies would enable patients to lead more productive lives and could impact decisions relating to work and career.

Clinical characteristics and impairment of activities of daily living among patients with myasthenia gravis with differing degrees of muscle weakness: a real-world study of patients in the US and five European countries.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data were employed to determine clinical characteristics of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) with differing degrees of muscle weakness, as defined using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification system. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi MG Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a multinational (United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom) survey completed by physicians and their patients with MG in 2020. The association between MGFA class and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) was tested using linear regression adjusting for sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Bivariate comparisons were performed for each individual item. A range of other clinical characteristics were also explored according to MGFA class. RESULTS: Among 1232 patients, those in MGFA class I had significantly lower ADL impairment versus class II or III/IV (adjusted for sex and Charlson Comorbidity Index) (p < 0.01). However, heterogeneity occurred within each MGFA class. Bulbar symptoms (impaired speech, difficulty swallowing, and/or difficulty chewing/choking on food) were reported in some class I patients (mild in 1.1-1.9% and moderate in 0.3-1.1% of patients) and class II patients (mild in 8.5-16.4%, moderate in 4.7-7.4%, and severe in 0.3-0.9% of patients), and shortness of breath was reported in some class I (mild in 0.5% of patients) and class II patients (mild in 9.8%, moderate in 4.8%, and severe in 0.3% of patients). Conversely, in 11.2-19.2% of class III/IV patients, bulbar symptoms and shortness of breath reported were only mild in severity. In line with this finding, despite significant correlations between MGFA class and several clinical characteristics, patients across every class were at risk of experiencing myasthenic crisis or hospitalization, experiencing comorbidities including anxiety and depression, and not being in remission. CONCLUSIONS: Although MGFA class correlates with greater ADL impairment and presence of other clinical characteristics, there is variability between patients in each class in terms of symptoms experienced, overall disease burden, and the precise nature of ADL impairment.