Bispectral Index asymmetry and COMFORT score in paediatric intensive care patients.

BACKGROUND: The Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor has been suggested as a potential tool to measure depth of sedation in paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. The primary aim of our observational study was to assess the difference in BIS values between the left and right sides of the brain. Secondary aims were to compare BIS and COMFORT score and to assess change in BIS with tracheal suctioning. METHODS: Nineteen ventilated and sedated PICU patients had paediatric BIS sensors applied to either side of their forehead. Each patient underwent physiotherapy involving tracheal suctioning. Their BIS data and corresponding COMFORT score, assessment as by their respective nurses, were recorded before, during, and after physiotherapy. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent more than one physiotherapy session; therefore, 28 sets of data were collected. The mean BIS difference values (and 95% CI) between left BIS and right BIS for pre-, during, and post-physiotherapy periods were 9.2 (5.9-12.5), 15.8 (11.9-19.7), and 7.5 (5.2-9.7), respectively. Correlation between mean BIS, left brain BIS, and right brain BIS to COMFORT score was highly significant (P<0.001 for all three) during the pre- and post-physiotherapy period, but less so during the stimulated physiotherapy period (P=0.044, P=0.014, and P=0.253, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between left and right brain BIS exists, especially when the patient is stimulated. COMFORT score and BIS correlate well between light and moderate sedation.

Detection of epidural catheters with ultrasound in children.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether a noninvasive imaging technique such as ultrasound could visualize an epidural catheter in the epidural space in children. METHODS: Following local ethics committee approval and informed parental consent a pilot study of 12 cases was performed. Children undergoing major surgery requiring epidural analgesia were recruited. All catheters were introduced via the lumbar region. All children were scanned within 24 h of epidural insertion by consultant paediatric radiologists. If the catheter was identified in the epidural space then an attempt was made to visualize the entire length of the catheter. RESULTS: The epidural catheter was detected in nine of 12 patients. All of these were less than 6 months old. The entire length of the catheter was visualized in five of the nine patients. It was possible to estimate the most cephalad level of the catheter in seven of the nine patients. This was in the thoracic region in all cases and an appropriate level for the intended surgical procedure. It was not possible to precisely identify the tip of the catheter as a distinct entity using ultrasound. CONCLUSION: This study shows that it is possible to visualize an epidural catheter in the epidural space in children under 6 months of age using ultrasound.

The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.

The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade is a single blade that has been designed for use in children from birth to adolescence. This open, randomised, crossover study compared the Cardiff blade with the straight, size 1, Miller laryngoscope blade in 39 infants under 1 years of age and the curved, size 2, Macintosh blade in 39 children aged 1-16 years. The same laryngoscopic view was obtained with the Cardiff and Miller blades in 26 patients; the view was better with the Cardiff blade in seven patients and better with the Miller blade in six (median (IQR [range]) grade of laryngoscopy 1 (1-2 [1-3]) vs. 1 (1-2 [1-3]), respectively; p = 0.405). The Cardiff blade was faster at gaining a view than the Miller blade (mean (SD) time 8.5 (2.9) s vs. 10.2 (3.5) s, respectively; 95% CI for difference -2.8 to -0.4; p = 0.009). The Cardiff and Macintosh blades produced the same view in 32 patients; the view was better with the Cardiff blade in seven patients (median (IQR [range]) grade of laryngoscopy 1 (1-1 [1-3]) vs. 1 (1-2 [1-3]), respectively; p = 0.008). There was no difference in time to gain these views: mean (SD) 8.7 (3.0) s vs. 9.3 (2.7) s, respectively (95% CI for difference -1.58 to 0.40; p = 0.237). The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade compares favourably with these two established laryngoscope blades in children.