Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Vet Res ; 8: 109, 2012 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22776779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Contagious agalactia (CA) of sheep and goats caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae is a widely occurring economically important disease that is difficult to control. The ELISA is commonly used for the serological detection of CA but it has some limitations and the performance of the available tests have not been properly evaluated.Two commercial ELISA kits are widely used, one involving a fusion protein as target antigen and the other a total antigen. The objectives were to compare these tests by evaluating:i. Their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, the relevance of the recommended cut-off points, the correlation between the two tests, and, the correlation between serology data and the milk shedding of M. agalatiae;ii. The influence of extrinsic factors such as the targeted animal species, geographical origin of the samples, intra-specific variability of M. agalactiae and concurrent mycoplasma infections.A sample of 5900 animals from 211 farms with continuous CA monitoring for 20 years and no prior vaccination history was used. The infection status was known from prior bacteriological, epidemiological and serological monitoring with a complementary immunoblotting test. RESULTS: The average diagnostic sensitivity was 56% [51.8-59.8] for the fusion protein ELISA and 84% [81.3-87.2] for the total antigen ELISA, with noteworthy flock-related variations. The average diagnostic specificity for the fusion protein ELISA was 100% [99.9-100], and for the total antigen ELISA differed significantly between goats and sheep: 99.3% [97.4-99.9] and 95.7% [93.8-97.2] respectively.Experimental inoculations with different M. agalactiae strains revealed that the ELISA kits poorly detected the antibody response to certain strains. Furthermore, test performances varied according to the host species or geographical origin of the samples.Finally, the correlation between milk shedding of M. agalactiae and the presence of detectable antibodies in the blood was poor. CONCLUSIONS: These serological tests are not interchangeable. The choice of a test will depend on the objectives (early detection of infection or disease control program), on the prevalence of infection and the control protocol used. Given the variety of factors that may influence performance, a preliminary assessment of the test in a given situation is recommended prior to widespread use.


Assuntos
Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Doenças das Cabras/microbiologia , Infecções por Mycoplasma/veterinária , Mycoplasma agalactiae/isolamento & purificação , Testes Sorológicos/veterinária , Doenças dos Ovinos/microbiologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Feminino , Doenças das Cabras/diagnóstico , Cabras , Leite/microbiologia , Infecções por Mycoplasma/sangue , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ovinos , Doenças dos Ovinos/diagnóstico
2.
BMC Vet Res ; 6: 32, 2010 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20525406

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ruminant mycoplasmoses are important diseases worldwide and several are listed by the World Organization for Animal Health to be of major economic significance. In France the distribution of mycoplasmal species isolated from clinical samples collected from diseased animals upon veterinary request, is monitored by a network known as VIGIMYC (for VIGIlance to MYCoplasmoses of ruminants). The veterinary diagnostic laboratories collaborating with VIGIMYC are responsible for isolating the mycoplasmas while identification of the isolates is centralized by the French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA) in Lyon. The VIGIMYC framework can also be used for specific surveys and one example, on the prevalence of M. bovis in bovine respiratory diseases, is presented here. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2008, 34 laboratories were involved in the network and 1904 mycoplasma isolates, originating from the main ruminant-breeding areas, were identified. For cattle, the high prevalence of M. bovis in bronchopneumonia, notably in young animals, was confirmed by VIGIMYC and an associated specific survey, whereas the non-emergence of species such as M. alkalescens and M. canis was also demonstrated. The etiological agent of bovine contagious pleuropneumonia was never isolated. The principal mycoplasmosis in goats was contagious agalactia with M. mycoides subsp. capri as main agent. Ovine mycoplasmoses, most of which were associated with pneumonia in lambs, were infrequently reported. One exception was ovine contagious agalactia (due to M. agalactiae) that has recently re-emerged in the Pyrénées where it had been endemic for years and was also reported in Corsica, which was previously considered free. CONCLUSIONS: Although VIGIMYC is a passive network and somewhat biased as regards sample collection and processing, it has provided, in this study, an overview of the main mycoplasmoses of ruminants in France. The French epidemiological situation is compared to those existing elsewhere in the world.


Assuntos
Infecções por Mycoplasma/veterinária , Mycoplasma/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Bovinos , França/epidemiologia , Cabras , Mycoplasma/classificação , Infecções por Mycoplasma/epidemiologia , Infecções por Mycoplasma/microbiologia , Vigilância da População , Ovinos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA