Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 113
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(23): 2132-2144, 2023 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37144983

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whether treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks' gestation improves maternal and infant health is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, women between 4 weeks' and 19 weeks 6 days' gestation who had a risk factor for hyperglycemia and a diagnosis of gestational diabetes (World Health Organization 2013 criteria) to receive immediate treatment for gestational diabetes or deferred or no treatment, depending on the results of a repeat oral glucose-tolerance test [OGTT] at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation (control). The trial included three primary outcomes: a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (birth at <37 weeks' gestation, birth trauma, birth weight of ≥4500 g, respiratory distress, phototherapy, stillbirth or neonatal death, or shoulder dystocia), pregnancy-related hypertension (preeclampsia, eclampsia, or gestational hypertension), and neonatal lean body mass. RESULTS: A total of 802 women underwent randomization; 406 were assigned to the immediate-treatment group and 396 to the control group; follow-up data were available for 793 women (98.9%). An initial OGTT was performed at a mean (±SD) gestation of 15.6±2.5 weeks. An adverse neonatal outcome event occurred in 94 of 378 women (24.9%) in the immediate-treatment group and in 113 of 370 women (30.5%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, -5.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.1 to -1.2). Pregnancy-related hypertension occurred in 40 of 378 women (10.6%) in the immediate-treatment group and in 37 of 372 women (9.9%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 2.9). The mean neonatal lean body mass was 2.86 kg in the immediate-treatment group and 2.91 kg in the control group (adjusted mean difference, -0.04 kg; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.02). No between-group differences were observed with respect to serious adverse events associated with screening and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate treatment of gestational diabetes before 20 weeks' gestation led to a modestly lower incidence of a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes than no immediate treatment; no material differences were observed for pregnancy-related hypertension or neonatal lean body mass. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; TOBOGM Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000924459.).


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Austrália , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Hipertensão/etiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/etiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Resultado da Gravidez , Natimorto , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez
2.
Intern Med J ; 54(1): 164-171, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37151178

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Women with a history of gestational diabetes (GD) have a high risk of developing diabetes and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD). AIM: To assess whether diabetes screening and CVD risk screening occurred in general practice (GP) among postpartum women with GD. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of clinical record data of women with GD, under active GP management, from the MedicineInsight programme, run by Australia's National Prescribing Service MedicineWise, with GP sites located in Australia from January 2015 to March 2021. Documentation of screening for diabetes, assessment of lipids and measurement of blood pressure (BP) was assessed using proportions and mixed-effects logistic regression with a log follow-up time offset. RESULTS: There were 10 413 women, with a mean age of 37.9 years (standard deviation, 7.6), from 406 clinics with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (interquartile range, 1.8-6.2 years) A total of 29.41% (3062/10 413; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.53-30.28) had not been assessed for diabetes, 37.40% (3894/10 413; 95% CI, 36.47-38.32) were not assessed for lipids and 2.19% (228/10 413; 95% CI, 1.91-2.47) had no BP documented. In total, 51.82% (5396/10 413; 95% CI, 50.86-52.78) were screened for all three (diabetes + lipids + BP) at least once. Obesity, comorbidities and dyslipidaemia were associated with increased likelihood of screening. New diabetes diagnosis was documented in 5.73% (597/10 413; 95% CI, 5.29-6.18) of the cohort. CONCLUSION: Screening for diabetes and hyperlipidaemia was suboptimal in this high-risk cohort of women with prior GD. Improved messaging that women with a GD diagnosis are at high cardiovascular risk may improve subsequent screening.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Austrália/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Lipídeos
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 341, 2023 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37173638

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had indirect effects on pregnancy outcomes. There is limited data on the impact on gestational diabetes (GDM) in diverse populations and the possible underlying mediators. This study aimed to assess the risk of GDM pre-COVID-19 and in two distinct pandemic exposure periods, and to determine the potential factors contributing to increased risk in a multiethnic population. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was performed of women with singleton pregnancy receiving antenatal care at three hospitals two years pre-COVID-19 (January 2018 - January 2020), first year of COVID-19 with limited pandemic-mitigating restrictions (February 2020 - January 2021) and second year of COVID-19 with stringent restrictions (February 2021 - January 2022). Baseline maternal characteristics and gestational weight gain (GWG) were compared between cohorts. The primary outcome was GDM, assessed using univariate and multivariate generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS: 28,207 pregnancies met the inclusion criteria, 14,663 pregnancies two years pre-COVID-19, 6,890 in COVID-19 Year 1 and 6,654 in COVID-19 Year 2. Maternal age increased across exposure periods (30.7 ± 5.0 years pre-COVID-19 vs 31.0 ± 5.0 years COVID-19 Year 1 vs 31.3 ± 5 years COVID-19 Year 2; p < 0.001). There were increases in pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (25.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2 vs 25.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2 vs 26.1 ± 5.7 kg/m2; p < 0.001), proportion who were obese (17.5% vs 18.1% vs 20.7%; p < 0.001) and proportion with other traditional risk factors for GDM including South Asian ethnicity and prior history of GDM. Rate of GWG and proportion exceeding recommended GWG increased with pandemic exposure (64.3% vs 66.0% vs 66.6%; p = 0.009). GDM diagnosis increased across exposure periods (21.2% vs 22.9% vs 24.8%; p < 0.001). Both pandemic exposure periods were associated with increased risk of GDM on univariate analysis, only COVID-19 Year 2 remaining significantly associated after adjusting for maternal baseline characteristics and GWG (OR 1.17 [1.06, 1.28], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of GDM increased with pandemic exposure. Progressive sociodemographic changes and greater GWG may have contributed to increased risk. However, exposure to the second year of COVID-19 remained independently associated with GDM after adjusting for shifts in maternal characteristics and GWG.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Gestacional , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Massa Corporal
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 429, 2023 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As a COVID-19 risk mitigation measure, Australia closed its international borders for two years with significant socioeconomic disruption including impacting approximately 30% of the Australian population who are migrants. Migrant populations during the peripartum often rely on overseas relatives visiting for social support. High quality social support is known to lead to improved health outcomes with disruption to support a recognised health risk. AIM: To explore women's experience of peripartum social support during the COVID-19 pandemic in a high migrant population. To quantify type and frequency of support to identify characteristics of vulnerable perinatal populations for future pandemic preparedness. METHODS: A mixed methods study with semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey was conducted from October 2020 to April 2021. A thematic approach was used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 24 participants interviewed both antenatally and postnatally (22 antenatal; 18 postnatal). Fourteen women were migrants and 10 Australian born. Main themes included; 'Significant disruption and loss of peripartum support during the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing impact for migrant women'; 'Husbands/partners filling the support gap' and 'Holding on by a virtual thread'. Half of the participants felt unsupported antenatally. For Australian born women, this dissipated postnatally, but migrants continued to feel unsupported. Migrant women discussed partners stepped into traditional roles and duties of absent mothers and mothers-in-law who were only available virtually. CONCLUSION: This study identified disrupted social support for migrant women during the pandemic, providing further evidence that the pandemic has disproportionately impacted migrant populations. However, the benefits identified in this study included high use of virtual support, which could be leveraged for improving clinical care in the present and in future pandemics. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted most women's peripartum social support with migrant families having ongoing disruption. Gains in the pandemic included greater gender equity for domestic work as husbands/partners increased their contribution to domestic work and childcare.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Migrantes , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Pandemias , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Mães
5.
Intern Med J ; 53(2): 194-201, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been recognised as a major risk factor for COVID-19 mortality and hospital complications in earlier studies. AIMS: To examine the characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with diabetes and the impact of diabetes and hyperglycaemia on hospital outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Admission glucose levels, HbA1c, diabetes status and hospital outcomes were determined for subjects admitted from June to November 2021 by matching a pathology data set, a clinical data set and the hospital administrative database. The outcomes of interest were death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: There were 1515 individuals admitted with COVID-19 with 49 deaths (3.2%) and 205 (13.5%) ICU admissions. The median length of hospital stay was 3.7 days. Three hundred and ten patients (20%) had diabetes, with 46 (15%) newly diagnosed. Patients with diabetes had a higher mortality than patients who did not have diabetes (8% vs 2%, P < 0.001), were more likely to be admitted to ICU (20% vs 12%, P = 0.001) and have longer median LOS stay (6.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.9-12.5) vs 2.9 (IQR 0.5-7.1) days, P < 0.001). In multivariate models, neither diabetes nor admission glucose predicted death. Admission glucose level but not diabetes was an independent predictor of ICU admission and LOS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of diabetes among patients hospitalised with COVID-19, with worse outcomes. In contrast to previous studies, the association of diabetes with mortality was not significant when adjusted for other variables. This is possibly related to the benefits of vaccination and current medical and ICU interventions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Hiperglicemia , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Glucose , Mortalidade Hospitalar
6.
Intern Med J ; 51(1): 93-98, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found an increase in mortality among patients with worsening degrees of hyponatraemia. There is limited evidence on the impact of dysnatraemia on outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. AIMS: To investigate the relationship between admission sodium levels at a quaternary referral hospital and outcomes, including mortality, LOS and admission to ICU. METHODS: All patients admitted to hospital over a period of 1 year who had a blood sodium level measured on admission were included. Admission sodium levels and related blood results were obtained. Data linkage was performed. Analyses for associations between admission sodium level and primary hospital outcomes (in-hospital mortality) and secondary hospital outcomes (LOS and admission to ICU) were performed. Case notes of patients with severe hyponatraemia were also reviewed, with a focus on the use of hypertonic saline. RESULTS: A total of 6447 patient admissions had an admission blood sodium level performed. Mean age was 55.8 ± 20.8 years. 49.3% were male. Serum sodium ranged from 110 mmol/L to 175 mmol/L. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality occurred in 190 patients. An abnormal sodium level (Na <135 mmol/L or >145 mmol/L) was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, and an independent predictor of the combined outcome of in-hospital mortality and admission to ICU. Hypertonic saline was infrequently used in patients with severe hyponatraemia. Its use did not worsen outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal serum sodium level is a strong marker of poor outcome in acute hospital illness.


Assuntos
Hiponatremia , Sódio , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais , Humanos , Hiponatremia/epidemiologia , Hiponatremia/terapia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Intern Med J ; 51(10): 1673-1680, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33650231

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aspirin is routinely prescribed in high-risk pregnancies to prevent pre-eclampsia; however, there is a paucity of data in women with pre-existing diabetes. AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of aspirin in women with pre-existing diabetes in preventing pre-eclampsia. METHODS: A retrospective review of women with pre-existing diabetes who attended antenatal clinics in a tertiary referral hospital between 2013 and 2019 was conducted. Cases were those receiving aspirin prior to 16 weeks, with pre-eclampsia as the primary outcome. The relationship between early pregnancy glycaemic control and pre-eclampsia was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 164 women included in the study, 45 received aspirin. There were no differences in pre-eclampsia (odds ratio (OR) 0.9 (0.3-3.0), P = 0.924) or any other measure of placental insufficiency (OR 1.7 (0.7-4.3), P = 0.243) between the aspirin and control groups after adjusting for baseline differences. Aspirin therapy was associated with an increased risk of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (OR 3.1 (1.1-9.1), P = 0.041). The incidence of pre-eclampsia increased stepwise according to early pregnancy HbA1c subgroups of ≤6.0% (n = 47), 6.1-7.5% (n = 57) and > 7.5% (n = 39), with rates of 0, 12.3 and 20.5% (P = 0.007) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The aspirin group had a higher baseline risk of pre-eclampsia and placental insufficiency, therefore the absence of difference between the groups favoured the efficacy of aspirin. PPH was highlighted as a potential complication of therapy, and early pregnancy HbA1c as a novel risk stratification tool for pre-eclampsia in women with pre-existing diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Aspirina , Feminino , Humanos , Placenta , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(1): 103-115, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32981669

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (ED) are challenging environments but critical for early management of patients with stroke. PURPOSE: To identify how context affects the provision of stroke care in 26 Australian EDs. METHOD: Nurses perceptions of ED context was assessed with the Alberta Context Tool. Medical records were audited for quality of stroke care and patient outcomes. FINDINGS: Collectively, emergency nurses (n = 558) rated context positively with several nurse and hospital characteristics impacting these ratings. Despite these positive ratings, regression analysis showed no significant differences in the quality of stroke care (n = 1591 patients) and death or dependency (n = 1165 patients) for patients in EDs with high or low rated context. DISCUSSION: Future assessments of ED context may need to examine contextual factors beyond the scope of the Alberta Context Tool which may play an important role for the understanding of stroke care and patient outcomes in EDs.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cultura Organizacional , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/enfermagem , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Stroke ; 50(6): 1346-1355, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092163

RESUMO

Background and Purpose- We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to improve triage, treatment, and transfer for patients with acute stroke admitted to the emergency department (ED). Methods- A pragmatic, blinded, multicenter, parallel group, cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted between July 2013 and September 2016 in 26 Australian EDs with stroke units and tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) protocols. Hospitals, stratified by state and tPA volume, were randomized 1:1 to intervention or usual care by an independent statistician. Eligible ED patients had acute stroke <48 hours from symptom onset and were admitted to the stroke unit via ED. Our nurse-initiated T3 intervention targeted (1) Triage to Australasian Triage Scale category 1 or 2; (2) Treatment: tPA eligibility screening and appropriate administration; clinical protocols for managing fever, hyperglycemia, and swallowing; (3) prompt (<4 hours) stroke unit Transfer. It was implemented using (1) workshops to identify barriers and solutions; (2) face-to-face, online, and written education; (3) national and local clinical opinion leaders; and (4) email, telephone, and site visit follow-up. Outcomes were assessed at the patient level. Primary outcome: 90-day death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale score of ≥2); secondary outcomes: functional dependency (Barthel Index ≥95), health status (Short Form [36] Health Survey), and ED quality of care (Australasian Triage Scale; monitoring and management of tPA, fever, hyperglycemia, swallowing; prompt transfer). Intention-to-treat analysis adjusted for preintervention outcomes and ED clustering. Patients, outcome assessors, and statisticians were masked to group allocation. Results- Twenty-six EDs (13 intervention and 13 control) recruited 2242 patients (645 preintervention and 1597 postintervention). There were no statistically significant differences at follow-up for 90-day modified Rankin Scale (intervention: n=400 [53.5%]; control n=266 [48.7%]; P=0.24) or secondary outcomes. Conclusions- This evidence-based, theory-informed implementation trial, previously effective in stroke units, did not change patient outcomes or clinician behavior in the complex ED environment. Implementation trials are warranted to evaluate alternative approaches for improving ED stroke care. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12614000939695.

10.
Med J Aust ; 211(10): 454-459, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31680269

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether routine blood glucose assessment of patients admitted to hospital from emergency departments (EDs) results in higher rates of new diagnoses of diabetes and documentation of follow-up plans. DESIGN, SETTING: Cluster randomised trial in 18 New South Wales public district and tertiary hospitals, 31 May 2011 - 31 December 2012; outcomes follow-up to 31 March 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 years or more admitted to hospital from EDs. INTERVENTION: Routine blood glucose assessment at control and intervention hospitals; automatic requests for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) assessment and notification of diabetes services about patients at intervention hospitals with blood glucose levels of 14 mmol/L or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: New diagnoses of diabetes and documented follow-up plans for patients with admission blood glucose levels of 14 mmol/L or more. RESULTS: Blood glucose was measured in 133 837 patients admitted to hospital from an ED. The numbers of new diabetes diagnoses with documented follow-up plans for patients with blood glucose levels of 14 mmol/L or more were similar in intervention (83/506 patients, 16%) and control hospitals (73/278, 26%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.83; 95% CI 0.42-1.7; P = 0.61), as were new diabetes diagnoses with or without plans (intervention, 157/506, 31%; control, 86/278, 31%; aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.83-2.80; P = 0.18). 30-day re-admission (31% v 22%; aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.86-2.09; P = 0.21) and post-hospital mortality rates (24% v 22%; aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74-1.55; P = 0.72) were also similar for patients in intervention and control hospitals. CONCLUSION: Glucose and HbA1c screening of patients admitted to hospital from EDs does not alone increase detection of previously unidentified diabetes. Adequate resourcing and effective management pathways for patients with newly detected hyperglycaemia and diabetes are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611001007921.


Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales
11.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 34(1)2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28843034

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To investigate how a behavioural lifestyle intervention influences psychosocial determinants of physical activity and dietary behaviours in a population at risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: Fifty-nine women with a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 and a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) participated in a randomized controlled study. The intervention group (n = 29) received 2 face-to-face and 5 telephone lifestyle-counselling sessions with a health professional. The control group (n = 30) received care as usual. At baseline and 6 months, psychosocial determinants related to physical activity and diet were measured with a self-administrated questionnaire. Linear regression analyses were applied to test for intervention effects. RESULTS: The intervention was effective in improving social support (ß = 3.5, P < 0.001; ß = 2.1, P = 0.02), modifying self-efficacy (ß = -2.2, P = 0.02; ß = -4.3, P < 0.001), and reducing barriers (ß = -3.5, P = 0.01; ß = -3.8, P = 0.01) for, respectively, physical activity and diet from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the intervention group compared with the control group. The intervention reduced the following barriers to a physically active lifestyle: lack of energy and lack of motivation. Physical activity barriers like lack of time and lack of childcare were unchanged. The intervention reduced the following barriers to a healthy diet: lack of time, costs, having unhealthy snacks at home, and having cravings for sweets. CONCLUSION: This lifestyle intervention influenced psychosocial determinants relevant for overweight women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in prevention of T2DM.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Dieta/psicologia , Exercício Físico/psicologia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Estilo de Vida , Adulto , Áustria/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Gravidez , Prognóstico
13.
Med J Aust ; 209(9): 405-406, 2018 11 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29793404

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) causes adverse pregnancy outcomes that can be averted by treatment from 24-28 weeks' gestation. Assessing and treating women for overt diabetes in pregnancy (ODIP) at the first antenatal clinic booking is now recommended in international guidelines. As a consequence, women with milder hyperglycaemia are being diagnosed and treated for early GDM, but randomised controlled trial (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of such treatment have not been undertaken. The Treatment Of Booking Gestational diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) study is a multi-centre RCT examining whether diagnosing and treating GDM diagnosed at booking improves pregnancy outcomes. Methods and analysis: 4000 adult pregnant women (< 20 weeks' gestation) at risk of ODIP will be recruited from 12 hospital antenatal booking clinics and referred for an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). 800 women with hyperglycaemia (ie, booking GDM) according to the 2014 Australasian Diabetes-in-Pregnancy Society criteria for pregnant women at 24-28 weeks' gestation will be randomised to immediate treatment for GDM (intervention) or to no treatment (control), pending the results of a second OGTT at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Antenatal and GDM care will otherwise follow local guidelines. Randomisation will be stratified by site and OGTT glycaemic risk strata. The primary pregnancy outcome is a composite of respiratory distress, phototherapy, birth trauma, birth before 37 weeks' gestation, stillbirth or death, shoulder dystocia, and birthweight ≥ 4.5 kg. The primary neonatal outcome is neonatal lean body mass. The primary maternal outcome is pre-eclampsia. Ethics approval: South Western Sydney Local Health District Research and Ethics Office (reference, 15/LPOOL/551). Dissemination of results: Peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings, collaboration with research groups undertaking comparable studies, discussions with guideline groups and policy makers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000924459.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/terapia , Idade Gestacional , Hiperglicemia/terapia , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Adulto , Austrália , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Feminino , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Resultado da Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
14.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 58(5): 553-559, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The adoption of the International Association of Diabetes Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Australia has been controversial. Obesity in pregnancy is also a growing concern. AIMS: To assess the impact of IADPSG criteria on the incidence of GDM and pregnancy outcomes, and to compare this to the effect of obesity, particularly among women who would not have GDM by the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society 1998 criteria (ADIPS1998). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study linking results of 75 g glucose tolerance tests with demographic and pregnancy data was conducted. RESULTS: In our cohort of 6175 pregnancies, GDM was present in 926 (15%) women by the ADIPS1998 criteria; it increased to 1098 (17.8%) women by the IADPSG criteria. Among the 5248 pregnancies which did not meet the ADIPS1998 criteria and were not treated for GDM, women with IADPSG GDM had increased risk of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, induction of labour (IOL), primary caesarean section (PCS) and large for gestational age (LGA) compared to women without GDM (all P < 0.05), whereas obese women had increased risk of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, IOL, PCS, small for gestational age (SGA) and shoulder dystocia compared to women of normal weight (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, IADPSG GDM was an independent risk factor only for IOL (P = 0.04) and LGA (<0.001). Obesity was an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, IOL, PCS, shoulder dystocia and SGA (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within our population, of women who are not currently treated for GDM, obesity is associated with greater pregnancy risk than GDM diagnosed by IADPSG criteria.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Distocia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Macrossomia Fetal/epidemiologia , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Humanos , Hipertensão Induzida pela Gravidez/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Heart Lung Circ ; 27(11): 1381-1387, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30278913

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) services are hospital co-located cardiologist-led outpatient clinics providing prompt assessment and management of chest pain. This service model is part of chest pain management in the United Kingdom. However, little data exists on RAC services in Australia. Our aim was to describe the introduction of RAC services to an Australian tertiary centre (utility, safety, and acceptability). METHODS: Referrals were accepted for low-intermediate risk chest pain. Referrer and patient clinical data was collected prospectively in the first year of RAC - 4 February 2015 to 4 February 2016. Data was linked to hospital presentations/admissions to identify readmissions/mortality data. RESULTS: Among 520 patients (55.0% male, mean age 55.2 years), 87.6% were referred from emergency and 68.4% assessed within 5 days. The final diagnosis was new coronary artery disease (CAD) in 7.9%, and 81.3% had ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, overweight/obesity, smoker, pre-existing CAD, and chronic renal failure). On average, 0.8 cardiac tests were ordered per person. In total, 35 (6.7%) had invasive coronary angiograms, with 51.4% having obstructive CAD. Patients reported in surveys (82.8% response rate) that 93.0% "strongly agreed" RAC services were useful to the community. Referrers were also "very satisfied" with RAC (7/17) or "satisfied" (9/17). Furthermore, of 336 referrals, referrers reported without RAC they would admit the patient in 11.3% of cases. There were 4.8% (25/520) unplanned cardiovascular readmissions and 0.6% (3/520) of these were for acute coronary syndromes and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient RAC services are an accepted, effective and safe pathway for management of low-intermediate risk chest pain.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Humanos
16.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 16(1): 157, 2017 Dec 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated whether complications after AMI are associated with absolute or relative glycemia. METHODS: A total of 192 patients with AMI were randomized to intensive or conventional insulin therapy. Absolute glycemia was defined as mean blood glucose level (BGL) during the first 24 h following randomization. Relative glycemia was defined by the stress hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR), calculated as mean BGL divided by average glucose concentration over the prior 3 months estimated from glycosylated haemoglobin. The primary endpoint was a "complicated AMI", defined as an AMI complicated by death, congestive cardiac failure, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, reinfarction, cardiogenic shock, inotrope use or emergency revascularization. RESULTS: There was not a significant association between mean BGL and complicated AMI (odds ratio (OR) 1.05 per mmol/L glucose increment, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.93-1.19). In contrast, SHR was positively associated with a complicated myocardial infarction (OR 1.22 per 0.1 SHR increment, 95% CI 1.06-1.42), and individual complications of death (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14-2.11), congestive cardiac failure (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54), arrhythmia (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12-1.54) and cardiogenic shock (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03-1.97). The relationship between SHR and a complicated AMI was independent of diabetic status, intensive insulin therapy, sex and hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Relative, but not absolute, glycemia during insulin treatment is independently associated with complications after an AMI. Future studies should investigate whether basing therapeutic glycaemic targets on relative glycemia improves patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Glicemia/metabolismo , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hiperglicemia/complicações , Hiperglicemia/mortalidade , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Revascularização Miocárdica , Razão de Chances , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Diabetologia ; 59(12): 2507-2509, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27677766

RESUMO

Steroid-induced hyperglycaemia is a common problem faced by endocrinologists in hospital wards. In this issue of Diabetologia, Popovic and colleagues (DOI 10.1007/s00125-016-4091-4 ) have conducted a subanalysis within a randomised controlled trial of prednisone therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. The authors found that the presence of diabetes or hyperglycaemia related to steroid therapy did not attenuate the clinical benefits of steroid therapy. The relevance and possible implications of these findings are discussed.


Assuntos
Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hiperglicemia/etiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
19.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 56(4): 352-7, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26852894

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about expected insulin requirements during pregnancy, in women with pre-existing diabetes may assist clinicians to effectively respond to gestation-specific changes in glycemic pattern. Few studies have examined differences between type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). AIMS: To compare patterns of insulin requirements in pregnancy for women with pre-existing T1DM and T2DM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 222 pregnancies was conducted in women with pre-existing diabetes, (67 with T1DM, 155 with T2DM). Total daily insulin dose (TID) at the end of each trimester, recorded as units and units per kilogram (median, 25th-75th percentile) as well as percentage increase in insulin dose per trimester were compared. RESULTS: Women with T1DM had higher insulin requirements in the first two trimesters than those with T2DM (0.69 (0.58-0.85) vs 0.36 (0.0-0.7) units/kg in first trimester; 0.80 (0.62-0.95) vs 0.61 (0.27-0.95) units/kg, P < 0.005) in second trimester), but requirements in late pregnancy were similar (0.97 (0.69-1.29) vs 0.95 (0.53-1.32) units/kg, P = 0.54). Women with T2DM needed much greater increases in insulin per trimester compared to T1DM (P < 0.001). Women with T1DM had a net fall in insulin requirements (3.7% in the first trimester and 4.1% in the late third trimester) while those with T2DM did not. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest comparison study of insulin requirements in women with pre-existing diabetes, highlighting important trimester-specific differences between T1DM and T2DM to guide insulin titration during pregnancy. Our findings suggest a differential effect of pregnancy-mediated insulin resistance by type of diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Trimestres da Gravidez/fisiologia , Gravidez em Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Resistência à Insulina , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA