Viabahn stent for hemodialysis shunt: efficacy, long segment recanalization and prognostic factors for reintervention.

INTRODUCTION: The study evaluated the Heparin Bioactive Surface (HBS) Viabahn Stent (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona) efficacy in the maintenance or re-establishment of hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty HBS Viabahn stents deployed in 37 consecutive patients with hemodialysis dysfunction from January 2008 to May 2016 were evaluated in a single-institution retrospective review. Outcomes were stent patency intended as primary circuit patency (PP), assisted primary patency (APP), target lesion primary patency (TLPP) and secondary patency (SP). Moreover, the risk factor analysis for hemodialysis dysfunction that required reintervention was performed. A subgroup analysis was conducted to assess patency of Viabahn stent to treat peripheral venous long segment obstruction (LSO). RESULTS: Overall Kaplan-Meyer PPs were 60% at 12 months and 42% at 24 months. Overall TLPP estimated rates were 68% and 49% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The corresponding SP rates were 85% and 78% at the same period. Estimated PP rates at 12 and 24 months for stent placement after peripheral venous long segment recanalization procedure were 53% and 31%, respectively. Corresponding SP rates were 82% and 68%, respectively. The APP rates were 79% at 12 months and 61% at 24 months. Female sex, access age and thrombosis were associated with reduced primary patency. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the high rates of PP, TLPP, APP and SP, Viabahn stents have been proven effective in maintaining or re-establishing the hemodialysis access. Moreover, stent placement after recanalization of LSO of venous out-flow represented a valid approach to rescue a dysfunctional fistula that would otherwise be abandoned.

Pemetrexed-induced acute kidney failure following irreversible renal damage: two case reports and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed (PEM) is a new-generation multitargeted antifolate agent with a demonstrated broad-spectrum activity in several types of human cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma. Major side effects include dose-limiting hematologic toxicities. PEM nephrotoxicity is well known; however, its frequency is considered to be low. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report two cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) related to PEM administration (500 mg/m2) in patients with NSCLC. The first patient required hemodialysis treatment and was submitted to renal biopsy which showed acute tubular damage and interstitial edema without acute tubular necrosis. No other potential nephrotoxic agents were identified. The second patient developed AKI, not proven by biopsy and did not require renal replacement therapy. Both patients, on regular supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B12, concomitantly developed myelosuppression and even several months after PEM withdrawal, showed only a modest improvement of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: PEM is an antifolate antineoplastic agent with a broad-spectrum activity in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. It has been shown that PEM allows longer survival. The risk of acute or chronic kidney disease may be one of the prices to be paid for this success.

Pemetrexed induced acute kidney injury in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: reversible and chronic renal damage.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed (Alimta(®)) (PEM) is an antifolate antineoplastic agent effective in several tumor types, such as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma, among others. It is almost exclusively excreted by the kidney and an eGFR lower 45 mL/min is a contraindication for its use: above this level PEM administration is considered safe and dose adjustment is not required. Although there are some reported cases of PEM-induced renal injury, its incidence and the negative effects on patients' outcome has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: We report a retrospective evaluation on the incidence of PEM-induced renal injury in patients affected by NSCLC. Between June 2010 and March 2012 a total of 38 NSCLC patients were treated at our hospital. In 29 of them other possible cause of renal injury were excluded and thus they were eligible to be analysed. RESULTS: Although by protocol all of them had eGFR >45 mL/min at baseline, six patients (average eGFR 56.2 ± 11.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) developed AKI (21 %). In these six patients PEM-induced myelosuppression was more severe and hospitalization was longer. Kidney function completely recovered in four patients whereas in the other two deterioration of renal function was irreversible. The number of patients with baseline eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was higher (4/6) in the group that developed AKI as compared to those who did not (6/23) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear cut eGFR above which PEM may be used without potential risks of renal toxicity. If PEM has to be used, all the coexisting risk factors for AKI should be possibly corrected.

Rosuvastatin-induced acute interstitial nephritis.

We report a case of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), most likely induced by rosuvastatin, in an 83-year-old male patient. The patient underwent angioplasty of the left internal carotid artery, after which he began a regimen of rosuvastatin (20 mg/day). After 3 weeks the patient was admitted to our unit for acute renal failure with mild proteinuria with negligible urinary sediment. A left kidney biopsy showed dense interstitial infiltrates, mainly composed of lymphocytes with evident tubulitis. Rosuvastatin withdrawal plus prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) treatment, which was slowly tapered over a period of 4 weeks, allowed for a complete recovery of renal function. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of rosuvastatin-induced AIN. Acute renal failure is associated with a clear increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality. Moreover, since statins are among the most widely prescribed drugs in Western countries, we think that the risk of AIN should be taken into account as a possible side effect of rosuvastatin.