Social media use and health promotion among cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Social media is becoming recognized as an effective platform for cancer health promotion, education, care, and support. However, its utility as a health promotion tool remains relatively unexplored. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey, we evaluated health-related usage of social media among cancer survivors and individuals without a history of cancer. We also examined the participant characteristics associated with social media usage and evaluated the relationship between social media use and positive health behaviors among the cancer survivors. RESULTS: Overall, cancer survivors (n = 2579) were as likely as individuals without a history of cancer to use social media for health promotion. Males [OR 0.65; 95% CI (0.45, 0.93)] and older adults (>60 years old) [OR 0.27; 95% CI(0.10, 0.77)] were less likely to use social media, while higher income [OR 2.27; 95% CI (1.05, 4.92) middle income; OR 1.90; 95% CI (1.17, 3.09) high income] and educational levels [OR 3.29; 95% CI (1.85, 5.84) some college; OR 2.36; 95% CI (1.30, 4.28) college graduate or more] were associated with more health-related social media use among survivors. Cancer survivors used social media for online support groups more than other individuals, and those who used at least one form of social media for health-related purposes increasingly meet national recommendations for strength training compared to non-users [OR 2.15; 95% CI (1.48, 3.13)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the potential utility of social media to promote positive health behaviors among cancer survivors. Further research is needed to describe the efficacy of social media-based interventions for improving health behaviors in diverse cancer populations.

Barriers to the assessment and recommendation of HPV vaccination among healthcare providers in Texas.

Background: Healthcare providers (HCPs) recommendations for HPV vaccination plays a critical role in increasing vaccination uptake. This study assesses the prevalence of reported barriers to HPV vaccination assessment and recommendation among HCPs in Texas. Methods: Study data were obtained from a population-based survey of HCPs currently practicing in Texas. Participants were asked about their HPV vaccination assessment and recommendation practices and the reasons for not assessing or recommending the vaccine. Barriers were stratified by HCP characteristics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, location of practice, provider type, and type of facility. Results: Among the 826 HCPs included in this study, 47.3 % never, 49.6 % sometimes, and 3.0 % often/always assessed a patient's HPV vaccination status. Similarly, 36.0 % never, 36.2 % sometimes, and 27.9 % often/always recommended HPV vaccination. The most frequently reported barriers to assessment and recommendation of HPV vaccination were time constraints (22.9 %), delegating the task to others (15.0 %), lack of effective tools and information to give patients (12.0 %), and requiring additional training (9.2 %). HCPs who were female, less than 35 years old, non-Hispanic black, and nonphysician HCPs (Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner) most frequently reported lacking effective tools and information and a need for additional training. Conclusion: The assessment and recommendation for HPV vaccination among HCPs in Texas is suboptimal. Barriers reported varied based on the provider's characteristics. Addressing these barriers, such as by providing more effective tools and information and offering additional training to HCPs, could potentially increase HPV vaccination rates in Texas. The findings also suggest that interventions should be tailored to specific demographic groups.

Using Geospatial Analysis to Identify Priority Communities for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Texas.

Introduction: Despite being almost entirely preventable, cervical cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Cervical cancer incidence suggests missed opportunities for prevention. Geospatial analysis could strategically guide public health interventions. This study aimed to identify geographic clusters of cervical cancer incidence in Texas, a state with higher than national rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality. Methods: In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors analyzed incident cervical cancer data among Texas women aged 30-64 years, from 2014 to 2018. The authors conducted a purely spatial Poisson-based analysis function in SaTScan to examine geographic clusters of higher-than-expected proportions of cervical cancer incidence (i.e., hot spots) and adjusted for age. Results: A total of 5,060 women aged 30-64 years with incident cervical cancer diagnosis (mean age: 45.7 years, SD=9.6), including 1,840 (36.4%) Hispanic, 591 (11.7%) non-Hispanic Black, 2,397 (47.4%) non-Hispanic White, and 232 (4.6%) other races, were analyzed. Spatial scan analysis detected 7 significant hot spots of cervical cancer incidence. Hot spots were identified in the South Texas Plains (near Mexico border), Gulf Coast (Houston), Prairies and Lakes (North Texas), Panhandle Plains (Northwest Texas), and Piney Woods (Southeast Texas) regions of Texas. Hot spots, compared with the rest of Texas, had higher proportions of Hispanic population and individuals with socioeconomic disadvantages. Conclusions: This study found spatial variation in cervical cancer incidence in Texas. The hot spot areas can benefit from targeted, novel, scalable, and cost-effective interventions to increase human papillomavirus vaccination and screening and early detection and treatment of precancerous cervical lesions.

Change in Trust in US Government Health Agencies for Cancer Information in the COVID-19 Era.

This cross-sectional study assesses changes in levels of public trust in US government health agencies providing cancer information.