A Patient-Specific correspondence model to track tumor location in thorax during radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: We present a patient-specific model to estimate tumor location in the thorax during radiation therapy using chest surface displacement as the surrogate signal. METHODS: Two types of data are used for model construction: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) images of the patient and the displacement of two points on the patient's skin on the thoracic area. Principal component analysis is used to fit the correspondence model. This model incorporates the recorded surrogate signals during radiation delivery as input and delivers the 3D trajectory of the tumor as output. We evaluated the accuracy of the proposed model on a respiratory phantom and five lung cancer patients. RESULTS: For the respiratory phantom, the location of the center of the sphere during treatment was calculated in three directions: Left-Right (LR), Anterior-Posterior (AP) and, Superior-Inferior (SI). The error of localization was less than 1 mm in the LR and AP directions and less than 2 mm in the SI direction. The location of the tumor center for two of the patients, and the location of the apex of the diaphragm for the other three, was calculated in three directions. For all patients, the localization error in the LR and AP directions was less than 1.1 mm for two fractions and the maximum localization error in the SI direction was 6.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This work presents a feasibility study of utilizing surface displacement data to locate the tumor in the thorax during radiation treatment. Future work will validate the model on a larger patient population.

Phase I dose-escalation study of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with hepatic metastases.

PURPOSE: To identify a tolerable and effective dose for 5-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatic metastases. METHODS: Patients were enrolled onto three dose-escalation cohorts: 30 Gy in 3 fractions, 50 Gy in 5 fractions, and 60 Gy in 5 fractions. Eligible patients had one to five hepatic metastases, ability to spare a critical hepatic volume (volume receiving <21 Gy) of 700 ml, adequate baseline hepatic function, no concurrent antineoplastic therapy, and a Karnofsky performance score of ≥60. Dose-limiting toxicity included treatment-related grade 3 toxicity in the gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary/pancreas, and metabolic/laboratory categories. Any grade 4 or 5 event attributable to therapy was defined as a dose-limiting toxicity. Local control (LC) and complete plus partial response rates were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, 9 in each cohort, with 37 lesions were enrolled and treated: 17 men and 11 women; median age 62 (range 48-86) years; most common site of primary disease, colorectal (44.4%). Median follow-up was 20 (range 4-53) months. There was no grade 4 or 5 toxicity or treatment-related grade 3 toxicity. Actuarial 24-month LC rates for the 30-, 50-, and 60-Gy cohorts were 56%, 89%, and 100%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference for LC between the 60- and 30-Gy cohorts (P = 0.009) but not between the 60- and 50-Gy cohorts (P = 0.56) or the 50- and 30-Gy cohorts (P = 0.091). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 60 Gy in 5 fractions can be safely delivered to selected patients with hepatic metastases as long as the critical liver volume is respected. A dose of 60 Gy in 5 fractions yields an excellent level of LC.

Management of Unplanned Excision for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma With Preoperative Radiotherapy Followed by Definitive Resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes after preoperative radiotherapy and definitive surgery for patients who initially had inadvertent excision for sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment records of 44 consecutive patients, who initially underwent unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma between January 2004 and January 2012, were reviewed. All patients had clinically localized disease before treatment and received preoperative external-beam radiotherapy followed by definitive oncologic surgery at our institution. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36 months. Residual tumor after preoperative radiotherapy and wound bed excision was identified in 39% (17/44) of the cases. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-year local control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival are 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80-99), 86% (95% CI, 69-94), and 94% (95% CI, 79-99) respectively. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 25% of patients (11/44.) All patients with perioperative wound complications had lower extremity sarcomas. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal management for unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma is unknown. Our institution has adopted the approach of preoperative radiotherapy, followed by definitive surgery. In our series of 44 patients, local control was excellent at 95%, with perioperative complications seen only in patients with lower extremity sarcomas, suggesting that this is a reasonable approach to manage inadvertently resected sarcoma.

Extracranial stereotactic radiation delivery.

Extracranial stereotactic radiation delivery, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), involves delivering very potent doses of radiation to well-demarcated tumors in the neck, spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Beyond just stereotactic targeting, it represents a formalism of treatment planning and conduct that facilitates the delivery of the most potent dose fractionation schedules ever considered in the field of radiation oncology. In doing so, it uses the most modern technologies to simultaneously hit the target and avoid normal innocent tissues. Clinical results already show that SBRT constitutes a new paradigm in cancer treatment that deserves careful implementation and assessment for the improvement in patient outcomes.