Evolution of open aneurysmorrhaphy for management of sac expansion after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the perioperative and mid-term clinical outcomes of open aneurysmorrhaphy (OA) for the treatment of sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: OA involves sac exposure without dissection of the proximal or distal neck, sacotomy and ligation of back-bleeding vessels, preservation of the prior stent graft, and tight closure of the sac around the stent graft. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had undergone OA for nonruptured sac expansion after standard EVAR at our institution between January 2015 and June 2021. The primary end points were 30-day mortality and aneurysm-related death. The secondary end points were postoperative complications, overall survival, freedom from reintervention, and sac regrowth rate. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients had undergone OA. Their mean age was 76.9 ± 6.7 years. The median sac diameter at OA was 79 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 76-92 mm). The median duration from the index EVAR to OA was 82 months (IQR, 72-104 months). Preoperative computed tomography angiography confirmed a type II endoleak (EL) in 20 patients, 1 of whom had had a coexisting type Ia EL; a type IIIb EL was identified in 1 patient. Concomitant endovascular procedures had been performed in six patients to treat a type I or III EL or reinforce the proximal and distal seals. The OA technique has been modified since 2017, with the addition of more aggressive dissection of the sac and complete removal of the mural thrombus to further decrease the sac diameter. Postoperative complications occurred in two patients and included abdominal lymphorrhea and failed hemostasis of the common femoral artery requiring surgical repair in one patient each. The 30-day mortality was 0%. During the median follow-up of 36 months (IQR, 14-51 months), the overall survival was 92.7% and 86.9% at 12 and 36 months, respectively, without any aneurysm-related death. In the late (2017-2021) treatment group, the median sac diameter immediately after OA was smaller than that in the early (2015-2016) treatment group (early group: median, 50 mm; IQR, 39-57 mm; vs later group: median, 41 mm; IQR, 32-47 mm; P = .083). Furthermore, in the late group, the sac regrowth rate was lower (early group: median, 0.36 mm/mo; IQR, 0.23-0.83 mm/mo; vs late group: median, 0 mm/mo; IQR, 0-0.11 mm/mo; P = .0075) and the freedom from reintervention rate was higher (late group: 94.7% at both 12 and 36 months, respectively; early group: 71.4% and 53.6% at 12 and 36 months, respectively; log-rank P = .070). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that OA for the management of post-EVAR sac expansion is feasible with acceptable mid-term outcomes. Aggressive dissection and tight plication of the sac might be imperative for better mid-term outcomes after OA.

Hybrid Surgery for Multiple Visceral Artery Aneurysms: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: We present a case with multiple visceral artery aneurysms that were treated with a hybrid approach involving both surgical and endovascular treatment. CASE REPORT: The patient was a 48-year-old female. She was diagnosed with multiple visceral artery aneurysms including 2 splenic artery aneurysms, celiac artery aneurysm, and bilateral renal artery aneurysms during an examination for loss of appetite. With regard to 2 splenic artery aneurysms, the proximal aneurysm was treated surgically, whereas the peripheral aneurysm that was located deeply in the abdomen was treated with coil embolization. The celiac artery aneurysm located at the bifurcation of the common hepatic artery and splenic artery, an intracranial aneurysm clip was used. The left and right renal aneurysms were resected and renal arteries were reconstructed surgically. The postoperative course was uneventful. The pathological diagnosis of all aneurysms was segmental arterial mediolysis. The reconstructed vessels were patent without stenosis or recurrence at 1 year after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid treatment involving surgical resection, endovascular coil embolization, and obliteration with clips was useful in the treatment of multiple visceral artery aneurysms.

Evaluation of heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts for forearm loop vascular access: Comparison between Gore® PROPATEN vascular graft and ACUSEAL vascular graft.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluates the clinical outcomes of two heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, PROPATEN and ACUSEAL (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA), for forearm loop vascular access. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 60 patients who had undergone arteriovenous graft of the forearm loop type between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary endpoints were graft primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates. Secondary endpoints were time to first cannulation and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 36 patients in the PROPATEN group (Group P) and 24 in the ACUSEAL group (Group A). All procedures were successful without any 30-day mortality. The median times to first cannulation were 16.5 days and 3 days in Groups P and A, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean follow-up periods were 13.4 ± 14.5 and 17.3 ± 9.3 months, respectively. Primary patency rates were 81% and 64%, respectively, at 6 months, and 60% and 40%, respectively, at 12 months (p = 0.008). Assisted primary patency rates were 96% and 83% at 6 months, 91% and 73% at 12 months, and 81% and 35% at 24 months (p = 0.044). Secondary patency rates were 96% and 81% at 12 months, and 87% and 62% at 24 months (p = 0.207). As a remote-period complication, disruption of the luminal layer of the graft was observed in two patients (4.2%) in Group A due to puncture and thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ACUSEAL graft offers the advantage of early cannulation, its primary and assisted primary patency outcomes were inferior to those of the PROPATEN graft. It is important for physicians to be aware of the different characteristics of each graft to select the best option for each patient.