In a Pandemic That Limits Contact, Can Videoconferencing Enable Interdisciplinary Persistent Pain Services and What Are the Patient's Perspectives?

OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' thoughts and satisfaction with using videoconferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study aimed to gather (1) patient feedback and satisfaction with videoconferencing across all health professions as well as divided into a subgroup for each profession, (2) patient preferences for either videoconference or face-to-face consultations during the pandemic lockdown, and (3) whether patients would consider using videoconferencing once face-to-face appointments were available. DESIGN: An observational cross-sectional, mixed methods study design. SETTING: Tertiary-level persistent pain center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five patients aged 18 to 85 years with persistent pain lasting more than 12 months. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected using a patient survey. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings from 5-point Likert scales. Qualitative analysis was guided by content analysis to organize and categorize the open-ended survey response text. RESULTS: Videoconferencing platform features including audiovisual, usability, and privacy worked well for most patients (≥90%). Two-thirds of those surveyed reported the videoconferencing sessions as equal to face-to-face attendance (68%). In the context of the pandemic, almost as many preferred videoconferencing (65%), whereas 26% preferred face-to-face attendance and 9% were unsure. Preferences for videoconferencing over face-to-face in context to the pandemic varied depending on the health discipline involved: pharmacy (83%), occupational therapy (78%), psychology (61%), pain specialist physician (59%), and physiotherapy (53%). Even outside of a pandemic situation, 80% would consider using videoconferencing in the future. Qualitative analysis on an open-ended question asking patients for any further comments regarding their experience with the videoconference consultation, found 3 main categories: (1) overall satisfaction with videoconferencing, (2) technology qualities and (3) clinical interaction. CONCLUSION: In the context of a pandemic, videoconferencing for interdisciplinary persistent pain management services was effective and preferred, and most patients would continue its use into the future. Alternative or mixed modes of support may be needed for the 26% who currently prefer onsite attendance, when that mode of delivery is not available.

Postural Control Performance on the Functional Reach Test: Validity of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) Criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the validity of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) clinical criteria for the Functional Reach Test (FRT) forward and lateral with laboratory measures of postural control in children with cerebral palsy (CP). DESIGN: Psychometric study of face, concurrent, and content validity. SETTING: Clinical laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Children (N=58) aged 7-18 years (ambulant CP n=17, typically developing [TD] n=41). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stability limits in standing were assessed using the Kids-BESTest items for FRT forwards (FRTFORWARD), FRT lateral preferred (FRTLATERAL(P)), and FRT lateral nonpreferred (FRTLATERAL(NP)). Force platforms and kinematic markers were used to collect information on center of pressure (CoP) and joint movement during reach. Analyses included face validity (Kids-BESTest scores compared between CP and TD groups), concurrent validity (agreement between Kids-BESTest scores and digitally derived scores), and content validity (relations between Kids-BESTest scores with kinematic and CoP data). RESULTS: Face validity of Kids-BESTest criteria was demonstrated with lower scores for CP compared to TD groups for FRTFORWARD (P<.001) and FRTLATERAL(NP) (P=.03) and equal scores for FRTLATERAL(P) (P=.12). For concurrent validity, agreement between Kids-BESTest scores and digitally derived scores was good to excellent for FRTLATERAL(both P/NP) (88%-100%) and good for FRTFORWARD (86%-88%) for both groups. For content validity, the CP group Kids-BESTest scores were correlated with CoP-RangeFORWARD during FRTFORWARD (ρ=0.68) and CoP-RangeLATERAL during FRTLATERAL(NP) (ρ=0.57). For kinematic data, correlations were moderate-high between Kids-BESTest scores and range of hip flexion (ρ=0.51) and ankle plantar flexion (ρ=0.75) during FRTFORWARD, and trunk lateral flexion (ρ=0.66) during FRTLATERAL(NP). CONCLUSION: The FRTFORWARD demonstrated face, concurrent, and content validity. The FRTLATERAL(P/NP) demonstrated concurrent validity, but partial face and content validity. To improve validity of Kids-BESTest FRT criteria, additional descriptors have been added under the scoring criteria to enable clinicians to quantify observed reach strategies.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review.

PURPOSE: There has been a recent shift toward the analysis of the pathoanatomical variation of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) spine with the three dimensions, and research of level-wise vertebral body morphology in single anatomical planes is now replete within the field. In addition to providing a precise description of the osseous structures that are the focus of instrumented surgical interventions, understanding the anatomical variation between vertebral bodies will elucidate possible pathoaetiological mechanisms of the onset of scoliotic deformity. METHODS: This review aimed to discuss the current landscape of AIS segmental vertebral morphology research and provide a comprehensive report of the typical patterns observed at the individual vertebral level. RESULTS: We have detailed how these vertebrae are typically characterised by lateral wedging to the convexity, have a marked degree of anterior overgrowth, are rotated towards the convexity, have inherent gyratory mechanical torsion created within them and are associated with pedicles on the concave side being narrower, longer and more laterally angled. For the most part, these findings are most pronounced at and around the apex of a scoliotic curve, with these deformations reducing towards junctional vertebrae. We have also summarised a nomenclature defined by the Scoliosis Research Society, highlighting the need for more consistent reporting of these level-wise dimensional anatomical changes. CONCLUSION: Finally, we emphasised how a marked degree of heterogeneity exists between the included investigations, namely in scoliotic curve-type inclusion, imaging modality and timepoint of analysis within scoliosis' longitudinal development, and how improvement in these study design characteristics will enhance ongoing research.

Reproducibility of the Kids-BESTest and the Kids-Mini-BESTest for Children With Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility, including reliability and agreement, of the Kids Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) and the short form of Kids-BESTest (Kids-Mini-BESTest) for measuring postural control in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: Psychometric study of intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability and agreement. SETTING: Clinical laboratory and home. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of children (N=18) aged 8 to 17 years with ambulant cerebral palsy (CP) (Gross Motor Function Classification System I-II) with spastic or ataxic motor type. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postural control was assessed using the Kids-BESTest and the Kids-Mini-BESTest. An experienced physiotherapist assessed all children in real time and the testing session was videotaped. The same physiotherapist viewed and scored the video twice, at least 2 weeks apart, to assess intrarater reproducibility. Another experienced physiotherapist scored the same video to determine interrater reproducibility. Thirteen children returned for a repeat assessment with the first physiotherapist within 6 weeks and their test-retest performance was rated in real time and with video. RESULTS: Excellent reliability was observed for both the Kids-BESTest (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.96-0.99) and Kids-Mini-BESTest (ICC 0.79-0.98). The smallest detectable change was good to excellent for all Kids-BESTest agreement analyses (5%-9%), but poor to good for Kids-Mini-BESTest analyses (9%-16%). CONCLUSION: The Kids-BESTest shows an excellent ability to discriminate postural control abilities of school-aged children with CP and it has a low smallest detectable change, suitable for use as a preintervention and postintervention outcome measure. Although the Kids-Mini-BESTest is 5 to 10 minutes shorter to administer, it has poorer reproducibility and focuses only on falls-related balance, which excludes 2 domains of postural control.

Perspectives on Postural Control Dysfunction to Inform Future Research: A Delphi Study for Children With Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether consensus can be achieved in how clinicians and researchers define, describe, assess, and treat postural control dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy (CP). DESIGN: Delphi study with 3 iterative rounds. SETTING: Electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: Researchers and/or clinicians (N=43) from 7 countries with a mean ± SD of 20±11 years of experience working with children with CP participated. Participants included authors of published works on postural control in CP (identified from a recent systematic review), members of the Australasian Academy of CP and Developmental Medicine, and 2 major Australian rehabilitation providers. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Delphi study consisted of 3 iterative rounds of surveys. In Round 1, respondents answered open-ended questions regarding their views on (1) definition items for postural control, (2) theoretical frameworks, (3) methods for assessment, and (4) interventions for postural control dysfunction in children with CP. Rounds 2 and 3 were made up of items generated by participants in Round 1 and combined with items identified from the literature. Participants indicated their level of agreement for each item on a 7-point Likert scale. Threshold for consensus was ≥85% agreement. RESULTS: Of 306 items generated, 174 reached consensus by Round 3. Most postural control definition items (90%) achieved consensus. Two theoretical frameworks (14%) reached consensus. Less than half (42%) of assessment items reached consensus. More individual assessment items (89%) reached consensus than multi-item tools (4%). Just over half (61%) of the items generated for interventions reached consensus. CONCLUSION: Consensus was achieved for a postural control definition. However, substantial research is needed to establish a comprehensive, postural control-specific framework and suite of assessments. These would provide a foundation to improve intervention selection and dosage.

Segmental deformity markers offer novel indicators of deformity progression risk in deformity-matched adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

PURPOSE: Identification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with mild curvatures who pose significant risk of progressing to severe levels of curvatures is of paramount importance for clinical care. This study aimed to compare segmental deformity changes in AIS sub-cohorts that are dichotomised by progression status. METHODS: Thirty-six female participants with Lenke 1 AIS curves were investigated with sequential MRIs during growth. Scans were reformatted to measure orthogonal segmental parameters, including sagittal/coronal wedging angles and axial rotation angles. Participants were dichotomised by progression. Two-tailed, independent sample t-tests were used to compare sub-cohort multi-segmental and segmental deformity parameters. Measurements were compared at each scan number and variable rates of change were determined using actual time between measures. RESULTS: AIS progression status sub-cohorts were comparable at scan 1 for multi-segmental deformity parameters (e.g. major thoracic curve angle, rib hump, kyphosis) (P > 0.05). However, apical measures of coronal IVD wedging, axial IVD rotation and axial vertebral rotation were segmental parameters at scan 1 which were larger for participants whose AIS would later go on to clinically progress (all P < 0.05). Measures of segmental hypokyphosis were comparable between groups. As development was tracked at each subsequent scan, coronal and axial plane differences between groups increased in both magnitude and number of differences. CONCLUSION: Initial disparity and then subsequent increasing magnitude of change of axial rotation may indicate a higher propensity to clinically progress in the future. This knowledge hopes to provide useful management information for AIS care providers and prognostic education for patients alike. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Quantifying Typical Progression of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Longitudinal Three-Dimensional MRI Measures of Disk and Vertebral Deformities.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Detail typical three-dimensional segmental deformities and their rates of change that occur within developing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) spines over multiple timepoints. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AIS is a potentially progressive deforming condition that occurs in three dimensions of the scoliotic spine during periods of growth. However, there remains a gap for multiple timepoint segmental deformity analysis in AIS cohorts during development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six female patients with Lenke 1 AIS curves underwent two to six sequential magnetic resonance images. Scans were reformatted to produce images in orthogonal dimensions. Wedging angles and rotatory values were measured for segmental elements within the major curve. Two-tailed, paired t tests compared morphologic differences between sequential scans. Rates of change were calculated for variables given the actual time between successive scans. Pearson correlation coefficients were determined for multidimensional deformity measurements. RESULTS: Vertebral bodies were typically coronally convexly wedged, locally lordotic, convexly axially rotated, and demonstrated evidence of local mechanical torsion. Between the first and final scans, apical measures of coronal wedging and axial rotation were all greater in both vertebral and intervertebral disk morphology than nonapical regions (all reaching differences where P <0.05). No measures of sagittal deformity demonstrated a statistically significant change between scans. Cross-planar correlations were predominantly apparent between coronal and axial planes, with sagittal plane parameters rarely correlating across dimensions. Rates of segmental deformity changes between earlier scans were characterized by coronal plane convex wedging and convexly directed axial rotation. The major locally lordotic deformity changes that did occur in the sagittal plane were static between scans. CONCLUSIONS: This novel investigation documented a three-dimensional characterization of segmental elements of the growing AIS spine and reported these changes across multiple timepoints. Segmental elements are typically deformed from initial presentation, and subsequent changes occur in separate orthogonal planes at unique times.

Evaluating validity of the Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (CTSIB) criteria to categorise stance postural control of ambulant children with CP.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the validity of the Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (CTSIB) scored using Kids-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Kids-BESTest) criteria compared to laboratory measures of postural control. METHOD: Participants were 58 children, 7-18 years, 17 with ambulant cerebral palsy (CP) (GMFCS I-II), and 41 typically developing (TD). Postural control in standing was assessed using CTSIB items firm and foam surfaces, eyes open (EO) then closed (EC). Face validity was evaluated comparing clinical Kids-BESTest scores between groups. Correlating force plate centre-of-pressure (CoP) data and clinical scores allowed evaluation of concurrent and content validity. RESULTS: Face validity: TD children scored higher for all CTSIB conditions when compared to children with CP. Concurrent validity: the agreement between clinical and CoP derived scores was poor to excellent (Firm-EO = 76%, Firm-EC = 76%, Foam-EO = 59%, Foam-EC = 94%). Clinical scores of "2-unstable" and "3-stable" were not distinguished reliably by force plate measures. Content validity: significant correlations were found between clinical scores and CoP data for the two intermediate conditions (Firm-EC: rs -0.40 to -0.72; Foam-EO: rs -0.12 to -0.50), but not the easier (Firm-EO: rs -0.41 to -0.36) or harder conditions (Foam-EC: rs -0.25 to -0.27). CONCLUSION: Face validity of Kids-BESTest CTSIB criteria was supported. Content and concurrent validity were partially supported. Improved Kids-BESTest scoring terms were recommended to describe postural characteristics of "2-unstable."IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONFace validity of the Kids-BESTest criteria for the CTSIB was confirmed.The Kids-BESTest criteria for the CTSIB can identify children with atypical postural control.Concurrent validity and content validity were partially supported, since children with CP resorted to a range of different balance strategies when "unstable."To improve CTSIB Kids-BESTest criteria, new terms were recommended to better describe postural characteristics of "2-unstable."

Low back pain websites do not meet the needs of consumers: A study of online resources at three time points.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of the Internet as a source of health-related information for low back pain (LBP) is growing. Although research has evaluated information quality in health-related websites, few studies have considered whether content and presentation match consumer preferences. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether LBP website content and presentation matched preferences of consumers with LBP, whether matching preference of consumers changed over 8 years as recognition of people-centred healthcare has developed and whether this differs between countries of Internet searching. METHOD: The most prominent and top 20 LBP websites were identified using common search engines in 2010, 2015 and 2018. Websites identified in the top 20 in 2010 were followed up if not identified in 2015 and 2018. Two reviewers independently evaluated websites with a 16-item checklist developed from research of consumer preferences. In 2015, websites were identified using searches conducted using IP addresses from Australia, the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom and Canada. After removal of duplicates, 55 websites were evaluated in 2010. In 2015 and 2018, 33 and 28 new sites, respectively, were identified, and 37 previous websites were re-evaluated. RESULTS: In 2010 and 2015, websites predominantly originated from USA and were sponsored by "for-profit" organisations. In 2018, most websites originated from Australian "not-for-profit" organisations. None of the websites provided information on all content areas. At least 55% of websites were rated as poor or fair. No site rated as excellent overall. There was some worsening over time. Country of search did not affect results. CONCLUSION: Websites retrieved using typical searches did not meet information and presentation preferences of people with LBP.

Different ways to balance the spine in sitting: Muscle activity in specific postures differs between individuals with and without a history of back pain in sitting.

BACKGROUND: Previous research explored muscle activity in four distinct sitting postures with fine-wire electromyography, and found that lumbar multifidus muscle activity increased incrementally between sitting with flat thoracolumbar and lumbar regions, long thoracolumbar lordosis, or short lordosis confined to the lumbar region. This study used similar methods to explore whether people with a history of low back pain provoked by prolonged sitting used different patterns of trunk muscle activity in specific postures. METHODS: Fine-wire electromyography electrodes were inserted into the right lumbar multifidus (deep and superficial), iliocostalis (lateral and medial), longissimus thoracis and transversus abdominis muscles. Superficial abdominal muscle activity was recorded with surface or fine-wire electrodes. Electromyography amplitude was compared between postures for the back pain group and observations were contrasted with the changes previously reported for pain-free controls. For comparison between groups normalised and non-normalised electromyography amplitudes were compared. FINDINGS: Individuals with a history of back pain demonstrated greater activity of the longissimus thoracis muscle in the long lordosis compared with the flat posture [mean difference (95% CI): 46.6 (17.5-75.7)%, normalised to sitting posture peak activity], but pain-free participants did not [mean difference: 7.7 (minus 12-27.6)%]. Pain-free participants modulated lumbar multifidus activity with changes in lumbar curve, but people with a history of pain in prolonged sitting did not change multifidus activity between the long and short lordotic postures. INTERPRETATION: In clinical ergonomic interventions that modify spinal curves and sagittal balance in sitting, the muscle activity used in those postures may differ between people with and without a history of back pain.

Interpreting Pain Symptoms and How Pain Affects Neuromuscular Control in Dancers: If I'm in Pain, How Should I Train?

This review draws from leading research on pain neuroscience and control of posture and movement to help inform rehabilitation approaches and when it may or may not be prudent to "dance through" pain. Control of posture and movement is frequently distorted by pain perception, and that may not be altered even when the pain is resolved. It is important to exclude serious systemic disease or major tissue injury with severe, unremitting, or persistent symptoms before focusing on movement-based rehabilitation. Both specific exercises (contraction of specific muscles and use of movement techniques) and general exercises which promote strength, power, endurance, and flexibility) can help to manage individuals with persistent pain problems. Training control of posture and movement can improve motor skills and tissue integrity and also normalize perception of sensory stimuli from the peripheral nervous system. A framework for planning such training can be considered in terms of progression of load, complexity, and context.

Thoracic and lumbar posture behaviour in sitting tasks and standing: Progressing the biomechanics from observations to measurements.

Few studies quantify spinal posture behaviour at both the thoracolumbar and lumbar spinal regions. This study compared spontaneous spinal posture in 50 asymptomatic participants (21 males) during three conditions: 10-min computer task in sitting (participants naïve to the measure), during their perceived 'correct' sitting posture, and standing. Three-dimensional optical tracking quantified surface spinal angles at the thoracolumbar and lumbar regions, and spinal orientation with respect to the vertical. Despite popular belief that lordotic lumbar angles are 'correct' for sitting, this was rarely adopted for 10-min sitting. In 10-min sitting, spinal angles flexed 24(7-9)deg at lumbar and 12(6-8)deg at thoracolumbar regions relative to standing (P < 0.001). When participants 'corrected' their sitting posture, their thoracolumbar angle -2(7)deg was similar to the angle in standing -1(6)deg (P = 1.00). Males were flexed at the lumbar angle relative to females for 10-min sitting, 'correct' sitting and standing, but showed no difference at the thoracolumbar region.

A new method for sudden mechanical perturbation with axial load, to assess postural control in sitting and standing.

Sudden application of load along a sagittal or coronal axis has been used to study trunk stiffness, but not axial (vertical) load. This study introduces a new method for sudden-release axial load perturbation. Prima facie validity was supported by comparison with standard mechanical systems. We report the response of the human body to axial perturbation in sitting and standing and within-day repeatability of measures. Load of 20% of body weight was released from light contact onto the shoulders of 22 healthy participants (10 males). Force input was measured via force transducers at shoulders, output via a force plate below the participant, and kinematics via 3-D motion capture. System identification was used to fit data from the time of load release to time of peak load-displacement, fitting with a 2nd-order mass-spring-damper system with a delay term. At peak load-displacement, the mean (SD) effective stiffness measured with this device for participants in sitting was 12.0(3.4)N/mm, and in standing was 13.3(4.2)N/mm. Peak force output exceeded input by 44.8 (10.0)% in sitting and by 30.4(7.9)% in standing. Intra-class correlation coefficients for within-day repeatability of axial stiffness were 0.58 (CI: -0.03 to 0.83) in sitting and 0.82(0.57-0.93) in standing. Despite greater degrees of freedom in standing than sitting, standing involved lesser time, downward displacement, peak output force and was more repeatable in defending upright postural control against the same axial loads. This method provides a foundation for future studies of neuromuscular control with axial perturbation.

Is 'ideal' sitting posture real? Measurement of spinal curves in four sitting postures.

There is a lack of quantitative evidence for spinal postures that are advocated as 'ideal' in clinical ergonomics for sitting. This study quantified surface spinal curves and examined whether subjects could imitate clinically 'ideal' directions of spinal curve at thoraco-lumbar and lumbar regions: (i) flat - at both regions (ii) long lordosis - lordotic at both regions (iii) short lordosis - thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Ten healthy male subjects had 3-D motion sensors adhered to the skin so that sagittal spinal curves were represented by angles at thoracic (lines between T1-T5 and T5-T10), thoraco-lumbar (T5-T10 and T10-L3) and lumbar regions (T10-L3 and L3-S2). Subjects attempted to imitate pictures of spinal curves for the flat, long lordosis, short lordosis and a slumped posture, and were then given feedback/manual facilitation to achieve the postures. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare spinal angles between posture and facilitation conditions. Results show that although subjects imitated postures with the same curve direction at thoraco-lumbar and lumbar regions (slumped, flat or long lordosis), they required feedback/manual facilitation to differentiate the regional curves for the short lordosis posture. Further study is needed to determine whether the clinically proposed 'ideal' postures provide clinical advantages.

Different ways to balance the spine: subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity.

STUDY DESIGN: Exploratory study of regional muscle activity in different postures. OBJECTIVE: To detail the relationship between spinal curves and regional muscle activity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sagittal balanced spinal posture (C7 above S1 in the sagittal plane) is a goal for spinal surgery and conservative ergonomics. Three combinations of thoracolumbar and lumbar spinal curves can be considered sagittal balanced postures: (i) flat-at both regions, (ii) long lordosis-lordotic at both regions, and (iii) short lordosis-thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. This study compares regional muscle activity between these 3 sagittal balanced postures in sitting, as well as a slump posture. METHODS: Fine-wire electromyography (EMG) electrodes were inserted into the lumbar multifidus (deep and superficial), iliocostalis (lateral and medial), longissimus thoracis, and transversus abdominis in 14 healthy male volunteers. Fine-wire or surface EMG electrodes were also used to record activity of the obliquus internus, obliquus externus, and rectus abdominis muscles. Root mean square EMG amplitude in the flat, long lordosis, short lordosis, and slump sitting postures were normalized to maximal voluntary contraction, and also to the peak activity across the sitting postures. Muscle activity was compared between postures with a linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: Of the extensor muscles, it was most notable that activity of the deep and superficial fibers of lumbar multifidus increased incrementally in the 3 sagittal balanced postures; flat, long lordosis, and short lordosis (P < 0.05). Of the abdominal muscles, obliquus internus was more active in short lordosis than the other postures (P < 0.05). Comparing the sagittal balanced postures, the flat posture showed the least muscle activity (similar to the slump posture at most muscles examined). CONCLUSION: Discrete combinations of muscle activity supported the 3 different sagittal balanced postures in sitting, providing new detail for surgeons, researchers, and therapists to distinguish between different sagittal balanced postures.