Age- and Gender-Based Differences in Anorectal Function, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Constipation-Specific Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Constipation.

BACKGROUND: The effect of age and gender differences on anorectal function, symptoms severity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic constipation (CC) is not well studied. This study examines the impact of age and gender on anorectal function testing (AFT) characteristics, symptoms burden, and QoL in patients with CC. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2550 adults with CC who completed AFT. Collected data include demographics, sphincter response to simulated defecation during anorectal manometry (ARM), balloon expulsion testing (BET), and validated surveys assessing constipation symptoms and QoL. DD was defined as both the inability to relax the anal sphincter during simulated defecation and an abnormal BET. RESULTS: 2550 subjects were included in the analysis (mean age = 48.6 years). Most patients were female (81.6%) and Caucasian (82%). 73% were < 60 years old (mean = 41) vs. 27% ≥ 60 years old (mean = 69). The prevalence of impaired anal sphincter relaxation on ARM, abnormal BET, and DD in patients with CC was 48%, 42.1%, and 22.9%, respectively. Patients who were older and male were significantly more frequently diagnosed with DD and more frequently had impaired anal sphincter relaxation on ARM, compared to patients who were younger and female (p < 0.05). Conversely, CC patients who were younger and female reported greater constipation symptoms severity and more impaired QoL (p ≤ 0.004). CONCLUSION: Among patients with CC referred for anorectal function testing, men and those older than 60 are more likely to have dyssynergic defecation, but women and patients younger than 60 experience worse constipation symptoms and QoL.

How the North American Consensus Protocol Affects the Performance of Glucose Breath Testing for Bacterial Overgrowth Versus a Traditional Method.

INTRODUCTION: The North American Consensus guidelines for glucose breath testing (GBT) for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) incorporated changes in glucose dosing and diagnostic cutoffs. We compared GBT positivity based on hydrogen and methane excretion and quantified symptoms during performance of the North American vs older modified Rome Consensus protocols. METHODS: GBT was performed using the North American protocol (75 g glucose, cutoffs >20 parts per million [ppm] hydrogen increase after glucose and >10 ppm methane anytime) in 3,102 patients vs modified Rome protocol (50 g glucose, >12 ppm hydrogen and methane increases after glucose) in 3,193 patients with suspected SIBO. RESULTS: Positive GBT were more common with the North American vs modified Rome protocol (39.5% vs 29.7%, P < 0.001). Overall percentages with GBT positivity using methane criteria were greater and hydrogen criteria lower with the North American protocol (P < 0.001). Peak methane levels were higher for the North American protocol (P < 0.001). Times to peak hydrogen and methane production were not different between protocols. With the North American protocol, gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms were more prevalent after glucose with both positive and negative GBT (P < 0.04) and greater numbers of symptoms (P < 0.001) were reported. DISCUSSION: GBT performed using the North American Consensus protocol was more often positive for SIBO vs the modified Rome protocol because of more prevalent positive methane excretion. Symptoms during testing were greater with the North American protocol. Implications of these observations on determining breath test positivity and antibiotic decisions for SIBO await future prospective testing.

Is Dyssynergic Defecation an Unrecognized Cause of Chronic Constipation in Patients Using Opioids?

OBJECTIVES: The impact of opioids on anorectal function is poorly understood but potentially relevant to the pathogenesis of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). To evaluate anorectal function testing (AFT) characteristics, symptom burden, and quality of life in chronically constipated patients prescribed an opioid (OIC) in comparison with constipated patients who are not on an opioid (NOIC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 3,452 (OIC = 588 and NOIC = 2,864) chronically constipated patients (Rome 3) who completed AFT. AFT variables included anal sphincter pressure and response during simulated defecation, balloon expulsion test (BET), and rectal sensation. Dyssynergic defecation (DD) was defined as an inability to relax the anal sphincter during simulated defecation and an abnormal BET. Patients completed Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 49 years. Most patients were women (82%) and whites (83%). Patients with OIC were older than NOIC patients (50.7 vs 48.3, P = 0.001). OIC patients were significantly more likely to have DD (28.6% vs 21.4%, P < 0.001), an abnormal simulated defecation response on anorectal manometry (59% vs 43.8%, P < 0.001), and an abnormal BET (48% vs 42.5%, P = 0.02) than NOIC patients. OIC patients reported more severe constipation symptoms (P < 0.02) and worse quality of life (P < 0.05) than NOIC patients. DISCUSSION: Chronically constipated patients who use opioids are more likely to have DD and more severe constipation symptoms than NOIC.

The Varying Roles of Nurses During Interfacility Care Transitions.

This study explored health care professionals' perceptions and experiences associated with the role of point-of-care nurses during care transitions from an acute care hospital to a rehabilitation setting to being discharged home. We used a qualitative exploratory design and semistructured interviews. Content analysis revealed 3 themes that point to the ambiguity related to the roles that nurses enact with older patients during care transitions. We suggest ways to better support nurses to engage in quality care transitions.

Therapists' Perception on Quality of Provider Communication While Wearing a Mask: Impact of a Pandemic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established infection prevention recommendations, resulting in hospital systems adopting universal mask-wearing. Mask-wearing and its impact on patient-provider communication have been highlighted, yet have not been systematically studied to date. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of mask-wearing on provider communication during wheelchair education. Allied health professionals (65 physical and occupational therapists and 1 other) completed a 24-item, online self-report survey on the impact of provider mask-wearing on communication with patients and/or their caregivers during wheelchair education. This survey contained questions, graded on 5-point Likert-like scales, regarding the perceived impact of mask-wearing on the quality of communication efficiency and effectiveness, the types and frequency of communication strategies used to enhance communication during breakdowns, knowledge/confidence in implementing communication strategies, and preferences for additional training. Results indicated that mask-wearing impacted communication, yet clinicians made adaptations of various verbal and nonverbal communication strategies to avoid disruptions in providing education. Clinicians identified training preferences for additional support with provider communication. As the pandemic continues, patient-provider communication can be supported through targeted training in communication strategies.

A normative study of the Nine Hole Peg Test in Bangladesh.

BACKGROUND: The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) is a simple, quick assessment often used by occupational therapists to assess finger dexterity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to standardize the NHPT in Bangladesh so Bangladeshi therapists can administer and interpret this test with relevant cultural norms. METHOD: This study includes an inter-rater reliability (IRR) study and a normative study with Bangladeshi participants. RESULTS: In the IRR study, four raters were placed into 6 teams of two to establish reliability between individuals in each team. Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) results showed a high inter-rater reliability with ICC average ratings of 0.882-0.998 between individual raters of each team. Culturally relevant norms were developed for the NHPT using a sample of 180 participants (females, n=90 and males, n=90) ranging in age from 18 to 60 years. The data from the 1st trials were analyzed between age categories of both 5 and 10-year increments. Normative data was found to be clinically significant across collapsed age groups: 18-39, 40-49, and 50-60 years of age for each gender. CONCLUSION: These age categories were used to standardize the NHPT in Bangladesh, making it a culturally relevant finger dexterity test for the Bangladeshi population.