Lymphocyte-Specific Protein-1 Suppresses Xenobiotic-Induced Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Subsequent Yes-Associated Protein-Activated Hepatocyte Proliferation.

Activation of constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) transcription factor by xenobiotics promotes hepatocellular proliferation, promotes hypertrophy without liver injury, and induces drug metabolism genes. Previous work demonstrated that lymphocyte-specific protein-1 (LSP1), an F-actin binding protein and gene involved in human hepatocellular carcinoma, suppresses hepatocellular proliferation after partial hepatectomy. The current study investigated the role of LSP1 in liver enlargement induced by chemical mitogens, a regenerative process independent of tissue loss. 1,4-Bis [2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)] benzene (TCPOBOP), a direct CAR ligand and strong chemical mitogen, was administered to global Lsp1 knockout and hepatocyte-specific Lsp1 transgenic (TG) mice and measured cell proliferation, hypertrophy, and expression of CAR-dependent drug metabolism genes. TG livers displayed a significant decrease in Ki-67 labeling and liver/body weight ratios compared with wild type on day 2. Surprisingly, this was reversed by day 5, due to hepatocyte hypertrophy. There was no difference in CAR-regulated drug metabolism genes between wild type and TG. TG livers displayed increased Yes-associated protein (YAP) phosphorylation, decreased nuclear YAP, and direct interaction between LSP1 and YAP, suggesting LSP1 suppresses TCPOBOP-driven hepatocellular proliferation, but not hepatocyte volume, through YAP. Conversely, loss of LSP1 led to increased hepatocellular proliferation on days 2, 5, and 7. LSP1 selectively suppresses CAR-induced hepatocellular proliferation, but not drug metabolism, through the interaction of LSP1 with YAP, supporting the role of LSP1 as a selective growth suppressor.

Hepatocyte-specific EGFR deletion promotes fibrosis but has no effect on steatosis in fast food diet model of MASLD.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: MASLD has become the most prevalent chronic liver disorder, with no approved treatment. Our previous work demonstrated the efficacy of a pan-ErbB inhibitor, Canertinib, in reducing steatosis and fibrosis in a murine fast-food diet (FFD) model of MASLD. The current study explores the effects of hepatocyte-specific ErbB1 (i.e. EGFR) deletion in the FFD model. METHODS: EGFRflox/flox mice, treated with AAV8-TBG-CRE to delete EGFR specifically in hepatocytes (EGFR-KO), were fed either a chow-diet or FFD for 2 or 5-months. RESULTS: Hepatocyte-specific EGFR deletion reduced serum triglyceride levels but did not prevent steatosis. Surprisingly, hepatic fibrosis was increased in EGFR-KO mice in the long-term study, which correlated with activation of TGFß1/fibrosis signaling pathways. Further, nuclear levels of some of the major MASLD regulating transcription factors (SREBP1, PPARγ, PPARα, and HNF4α) were altered in FFD-fed EGFR-KO mice. Transcriptomic analysis revealed significant alteration of lipid metabolism pathways in EGFR-KO mice with changes in several relevant genes, including downregulation of fatty-acid synthase and induction of lipolysis gene, Pnpla2, without impacting overall steatosis. Interestingly, EGFR downstream signaling mediators, including AKT, remain activated in EGFR-KO mice, which correlated with increased activity pattern of other receptor tyrosine kinases, including ErbB3/MET, in transcriptomic analysis. Lastly, Canertinib treatment in EGFR-KO mice, which inhibits all ErbB receptors, successfully reduced steatosis, suggesting the compensatory roles of other ErbB receptors in supporting MASLD without EGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatocyte-specific EGFR-KO did not impact steatosis, but enhanced fibrosis in the FFD model of MASLD. Gene-networks associated with lipid metabolism were greatly altered in EGFR-KO, but phenotypic effects might be compensated by alternate signaling-pathways.