Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(4): 495-503, 2019.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314216

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of medical schools (FEM) by analyzing the results of their applicants in the Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five performance criteria, two official and three created on purpose, were calculated from the ENARM-2016 and -2017 official databases to assess FEM performance. RESULTS: In 2016 and 2017, applicants registered from 112 and 115 FEM, respectively. Depending on the performance criteria, the FEM in the first place obtained 5 to 20 points more than the one placed second, and 23 to 98 points more than the FEM in the last place. Approximately 25% applicants were classified as "knowledge-deficient," and about 80% of these originated from less than one third of the FEM. CONCLUSIONS: The ENARM results provide information on the performance of the FEM. Approximately one of every four applicants obtained scores lower than the approval threshold of any specialty.


OBJECTIVE: Evaluar el desempeño de las facultades y escuelas de medicina (FEM) utilizando como subrogado los resultados del Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Se analizaron las bases de datos oficiales del ENARM 2016 y 2017, empleando cinco criterios de desempeño (CD) por cada FEM: dos oficiales y tres creados exprofeso. RESULTS: En 2016 y 2017 se registraron sustentantes de 112 y 115 FEM, respectivamente. Dependiendo del CD, la FEM que quedó clasificada en el primer lugar obtuvo entre 5 y 20 puntos más que la del segundo lugar, y entre 23 y 98 puntos más que la FEM ubicada en el último lugar. Aproximadamente 25% de los sustentantes fueron calificados como "deficientes en conocimientos" y aproximadamente 80% de éstos provenían de menos de un tercio de las FEM. CONCLUSIONS: El ENARM arroja información sobre el desempeño de las FEM. Aproximadamente uno de cada cuatro sustentantes obtuvo puntajes menores al aprobatorio en cualquier especialidad.


Assuntos
Desempenho Acadêmico/normas , Internato e Residência , Faculdades de Medicina/normas , Desempenho Acadêmico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Feminino , Medicina Geral/educação , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , México , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais
2.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(2): 125-135, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30958955

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the assumption of 'equity' of Mexico's resident-selection assessment tool, the Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Official ENARM-2016 and -2017 databases were analyzed. Differences in the absolute number of correct answers (multivariable linear regression) and the number of applicants reaching their specialty minimum score (SMS) per test day (odds ratio [OR]) were calculated. Applicants affected by test-day inequity were estimated. RESULTS: There were 36 114 applicants in 2016, and 38 380 in 2017. In 2016, day-2 applicants had significantly higher scores and more reached the SMS than on days 1-3-4 (OR 1.55), and 5 (OR 3.8); 3 565 non-passing applicants were affected by inequity (equivalent to 44.64% of those selected). In 2017, day-1 and -2 applicants had significantly higher scores and more reached the SMS than on days 3-4 (OR 1.85), and 5 (OR 4.04); 3,155 non-passing applicants were affected by inequity (37.2% of those selected). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of official ENARM databases does not support the official attribution of equity, suggesting the test should be redesigned.


OBJETIVO: Evaluar el atributo de "equidad" asignado al Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron las bases de datos oficiales del ENARM 2016 y 2017. Se compararon las diferencias inter-día de respuestas correctas (regresión linear multivariable) y de sustentantes que alcanzaron el puntaje mínimo de su especialidad (PME) (razón de momios [RM]). Se estimó a los afectados por la inequidad. RESULTADOS: Hubo 36 114 sustentantes en 2016 y 38 380 en 2017.Los días 2 (ENARM-2016) y 1-2 (ENARM-2017) registraronpuntajes significativamente más altos, y más sustentantes alcanzaron el PME que en los días 1-3-4 (RM .55) y 5 (RM 3.8) en 2016, y los días 3-4 (RM 1.85) y 5 (RM 4.04) en 2017. Se estimó que cuatro de cada diez sustentantes que aprobaron el ENARM no lo hubieran hecho si el examen fuera equitativo. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados sugieren que el atributo de equidad del ENARM está en duda.


Assuntos
Avaliação Educacional/normas , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Desempenho Acadêmico/normas , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , México , Razão de Chances
3.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(5): 609-618, 2019.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661738

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare consumers' objec- tive understanding of five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), Warning Symbol] in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1 001 Mexican consumers were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products according to their nutritional quality, via a survey. Upon completion of this task, participants were randomized to one of five FoPL condi- tions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Change in ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks was assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Nutri-Score and MTL performed best, followed Warning Symbol, HSR and RIs. CONCLUSIONS: Nutri-Score and MTL appear as efficient schemes to inform consumers on the nutritional quality of foods, in particular in Mexico, where it would be a helpful tool for consumers in purchasing situations.


OBJETIVO: Evaluar la comprensión objetiva de cinco tipos de etiquetados frontales de paquetes (EFP) (Sistema de Clasifi- cación de Estrellas de Salud, Semáforo Múltiple, Nutri-Score, Ingestas de Referencia y Símbolo de Advertencia) en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se reclutaron 1 001 consumidores mexicanos para clasificar tres productos de tres categorías de alimentos sin EFP, según su calidad nutricional. Se les asignó al azar uno de los cinco EFP para clasificar los mismos productos, esta vez con un EFP en el empaque. El cambio en la capacidad para clasificar correctamente los productos en las dos tareas fue evaluado por EFP, utilizando un modelo de regresión logística ordinal. RESULTADOS: Nutri-Score y Semáforo Múltiple obtuvieron un mejor desempeño, seguidos del Símbolo de Advertencia, Sistema de Clasificación de Estrellas de Salud e Ingestas de Referencia. CONCLUSIONES: Nutri-Score y el Semáforo Múltiple surgen como esquemas eficientes para informar a los consumidores sobre la calidad nutricional de los alimentos en México, donde podrían ser una herramienta útil para los consumidores en situación de compra.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Rotulagem de Alimentos/métodos , Alimentos/classificação , Valor Nutritivo , Adulto , Feminino , Rotulagem de Alimentos/classificação , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necessidades Nutricionais , Distribuição Aleatória , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
4.
N Engl J Med ; 361(7): 680-9, 2009 Aug 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19564631

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In late March 2009, an outbreak of a respiratory illness later proved to be caused by novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus (S-OIV) was identified in Mexico. We describe the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of persons hospitalized for pneumonia at the national tertiary hospital for respiratory illnesses in Mexico City who had laboratory-confirmed S-OIV infection, also known as swine flu. METHODS: We used retrospective medical chart reviews to collect data on the hospitalized patients. S-OIV infection was confirmed in specimens with the use of a real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay. RESULTS: From March 24 through April 24, 2009, a total of 18 cases of pneumonia and confirmed S-OIV infection were identified among 98 patients hospitalized for acute respiratory illness at the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases in Mexico City. More than half of the 18 case patients were between 13 and 47 years of age, and only 8 had preexisting medical conditions. For 16 of the 18 patients, this was the first hospitalization for their illness; the other 2 patients were referred from other hospitals. All patients had fever, cough, dyspnea or respiratory distress, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, and bilateral patchy pneumonia. Other common findings were an increased creatine kinase level (in 62% of patients) and lymphopenia (in 61%). Twelve patients required mechanical ventilation, and seven died. Within 7 days after contact with the initial case patients, a mild or moderate influenza-like illness developed in 22 health care workers; they were treated with oseltamivir, and none were hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: S-OIV infection can cause severe illness, the acute respiratory distress syndrome, and death in previously healthy persons who are young to middle-aged. None of the secondary infections among health care workers were severe.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , APACHE , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/classificação , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/terapia , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/patologia , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Viral/etiologia , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/patologia , Radiografia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 17(2): 283-6, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21291607
6.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 12(3): 204-10, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21308531

RESUMO

Influenza pandemics are complex events that have occurred frequently throughout human history, three during the past century alone. Now the world is facing the first 21st century pandemic, and the comparison among them is essential to identify common epidemiologic patterns, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. The evolution of medicine, including diagnostic and treatment options, the critical care advances, and global responses are new interventions that could modify the general outcome of the pandemic. Learning from past and current events could lead to a plan for prompt and efficient response in future pandemics and may be help us to predict the unpredictable.

7.
Salud Publica Mex ; 51(5): 361-71, 2009.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19936549

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To carry out the epidemiological analysis of 122 influenza A (H1N1) deaths confirmed by laboratory and help to improve the diagnosis and timely managing of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 122 clinical records were analyzed of patients with confirmed influenza A (H1N1) virus infection who died. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were female and 49% were male. A total of 45.l% who died were between 20 and 39 years old. Overall fatality was 2.2% and ranged between 0.3% for the l0 to l9 year-old group to 6.3% for the 50 to 59 year-old group. Forty-three percent of deaths were concentrated in only two of the thirty-two states and 5l% received medical attention in social security institutions. Only l7% received hospital attention within 72 hours and 42% died within 72 hours of hospital attention. DISCUSSION: Novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus produces higher mortality in young people whereas seasonal influenza has a greater impact on young children and older people. Delay in medical care and the associated morbidity were relevant factors for death.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
8.
Cir Cir ; 86(1): 38-43, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30951037

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The inability to identify, express feelings, and not distinguish between emotions and bodily sensations, is known as alexithymia. In 1988, it developed The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), consists of 20 items and three factors: a) difficulty of identifying feelings and differences between feelings and bodily sensations; b) difficulty of describing feelings; and c) externally oriented thinking. It's considered that people with eating disorders have specific deficits in identify and communicate their feelings. OBJECTIVE: The present study has as purpose to the instrument validation. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study and psychometric character design of a single sample, formed of 435 persons suffering eating disorder (ED), with an age range of 12-68 years, of which 91% were women and 9% were men. To obtain the reliability of the instrument, applies internal consistency test, which resulted in an alpha of 0.89, then applied a factor analysis of principals components with oblimin rotation. RESULTS: According to statistical analysis, were eliminated six items, so the scale finished with 14 items, and to analyze it observed that these items correspond with the two main factors of the original scale. The ED patients present alexithymia. DISCUSSION: The scale satisfies the criteria of validity necessary for use in this population.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La incapacidad para identificar y expresar sentimientos, y no distinguir entre las emociones y las sensaciones corporales, se conoce como alexitimia. En 1988 se desarrolló la Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-20), que está conformada por 20 reactivos y tres factores: a) dificultad para identificar los sentimientos y las diferencias entre sentimientos y sensaciones corporales; b) dificultad para describir sentimientos; y c) pensamiento orientado externamente. Se considera que las personas con trastornos de la conducta alimentaria (TCA) tienen déficits específicos en la identificación y la comunicación de sus sentimientos. OBJETIVO: Realizar la validación de dicho instrumento. MÉTODO: Estudio de tipo transversal y de carácter psicométrico con diseño de una sola muestra, conformada por 435 personas con diagnóstico de TCA, con un rango de edad de 12 a 68 años, de las cuales el 91% eran mujeres y el 9% eran hombres. Para obtener la confiabilidad del instrumento se aplicó una prueba de consistencia interna, que dio como resultado un alfa de 0.89; posteriormente se hizo un análisis factorial de componentes principales con rotación oblimin. RESULTADOS: De acuerdo con el análisis estadístico, se eliminaron seis reactivos, de tal forma que la escala finalizó con 14 reactivos, y al analizarlos se observó que concordaban con los dos factores principales de la escala original. Las pacientes con TCA presentan alexitimia. DISCUSIÓN: La escala satisface los criterios de validez necesarios para ser utilizada en dicha población.


Assuntos
Sintomas Afetivos/complicações , Sintomas Afetivos/epidemiologia , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Sintomas Afetivos/diagnóstico , Idoso , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Adulto Jovem
9.
Salud Publica Mex ; 50 Suppl 3: S309-14, 2008.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18604351

RESUMO

Adverse health effects from smoking have been widely known for a long time. Nevertheless, tobacco use does not appear to decrease, and with it the inevitable consequences on morbidity and mortality for millions of people continue. This year alone, the WHO calculates that five million people will die from tobacco use. In Mexico, 26.2% of the population between the ages of 15 and 65 smoke regularly and consumption increases among youth and women. The WHO adopted the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, ratified by Mexico, which brought about the General Law for Tobacco Control, an important milestone in Mexican sanitary policy. This law will soon be in force and is expected to have a notable effect on containing the smoking epidemic in the country.


Assuntos
Cooperação Internacional , Política Pública , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , México , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência
10.
Salud Publica Mex ; 50(5): 419-27, 2008.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18852939

RESUMO

The federal government has implemented several strategies to reduce mortality caused by chronic non-communicable diseases (CNTD). One example is the development of medical units specialized in the care of CNTD (i.e. overweight, obesity, cardiovascular risk and diabetes), named UNEMES (from its Spanish initials). These units--consisting of an ad-hoc, trained, multi-disciplinary team--will provide patient education, help in the resolution of obstacles limiting treatment adherence, and involve the family in patient care. Treatment will be provided using standardized protocols. The efficacy of the intervention will be regularly measured using pre-specified outcomes. We expect that these UNEMES will result in significant savings. In summary, our health care system is developing better treatment strategies for CNTD. Evaluating the performance of the UNEMES will generate valuable information for the design of future preventive actions.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Doença Crônica/economia , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Doença Crônica/terapia , Redução de Custos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiologia , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Relações Interinstitucionais , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , México/epidemiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Prevalência , Prevenção Primária/organização & administração , Fatores de Risco
11.
Cir Cir ; 86(1): 43-49, 2018.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29681643

RESUMO

Introduction: The inability to identify, express feelings, and not distinguish between emotions and bodily sensations, is known as alexithymia. In 1988, it developed The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), consists of 20 items and three factors: a) difficulty of identifying feelings and differences between feelings and bodily sensations; b) difficulty of describing feelings; and c) externally oriented thinking. It's considered that people with eating disorders have specific deficits in identify and communicate their feelings. Objective: The present study has as purpose to the instrument validation. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study and psychometric character design of a single sample, formed of 435 persons suffering eating disorder (ED), with an age range of 12-68 years, of which 91% were women and 9% were men. To obtain the reliability of the instrument, applies internal consistency test, which resulted in an alpha of 0.89, then applied a factor analysis of principals components with oblimin rotation. Results: According to statistical analysis, were eliminated six items, so the scale finished with 14 items, and to analyze it observed that these items correspond with the two main factors of the original scale. The ED patients present alexithymia. Discussion: The scale satisfies the criteria of validity necessary for use in this population.


Introducción: La incapacidad para identificar y expresar sentimientos, y no distinguir entre las emociones y las sensaciones corporales, se conoce como alexitimia. En 1988 se desarrolló la Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-20), que está conformada por 20 reactivos y tres factores: a) dificultad para identificar los sentimientos y las diferencias entre sentimientos y sensaciones corporales; b) dificultad para describir sentimientos; y c) pensamiento orientado externamente. Se considera que las personas con trastornos de la conducta alimentaria (TCA) tienen déficits específicos en la identificación y la comunicación de sus sentimientos. Objetivo: Realizar la validación de dicho instrumento. Método: Estudio de tipo transversal y de carácter psicométrico con diseño de una sola muestra, conformada por 435 personas con diagnóstico de TCA, con un rango de edad de 12 a 68 años, de las cuales el 91% eran mujeres y el 9% eran hombres. Para obtener la confiabilidad del instrumento se aplicó una prueba de consistencia interna, que dio como resultado un alfa de 0.89; posteriormente se hizo un análisis factorial de componentes principales con rotación oblimin. Resultados: De acuerdo con el análisis estadístico, se eliminaron seis reactivos, de tal forma que la escala finalizó con 14 reactivos, y al analizarlos se observó que concordaban con los dos factores principales de la escala original. Las pacientes con TCA presentan alexitimia. Discusión: La escala satisface los criterios de validez necesarios para ser utilizada en dicha población.


Assuntos
Sintomas Afetivos/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Barreiras de Comunicação , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Análise de Componente Principal , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
12.
Gac Med Mex ; 145(2): 175-7, 2009.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19518027

Assuntos
Medicina , México
13.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(4): 495-503, Jul.-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1099326

RESUMO

Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar el desempeño de las facultades y escuelas de medicina (FEM) utilizando como subrogado los resultados del Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). Material y métodos: Se analizaron las bases de datos oficiales del ENARM 2016 y 2017, empleando cinco criterios de desempeño (CD) por cada FEM: dos oficiales y tres creados exprofeso. Resultados. En 2016 y 2017 se registraron sustentantes de 112 y 115 FEM, respectivamente. Dependiendo del CD, la FEM que quedó clasificada en el primer lugar obtuvo entre 5 y 20 puntos más que la del segundo lugar, y entre 23 y 98 puntos más que la FEM ubicada en el último lugar. Aproximadamente 25% de los sustentantes fueron calificados como "deficientes en conocimientos" y aproximadamente 80% de éstos provenían de menos de un tercio de las FEM. Conclusiones: El ENARM arroja información sobre el desempeño de las FEM. Aproximadamente uno de cada cuatro sustentantes obtuvo puntajes menores al aprobatorio en cualquier especialidad.


Abstract: Objective: To assess the performance of medical schools (FEM) by analyzing the results of their applicants in the Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). Materials and methods: Five performance criteria, two official and three created on purpose, were calculated from the ENARM-2016 and -2017 official databases to assess FEM performance. Results: In 2016 and 2017, applicants registered from 112 and 115 FEM, respectively. Depending on the performance criteria, the FEM in the first place obtained 5 to 20 points more than the one placed second, and 23 to 98 points more than the FEM in the last place. Approximately 25% applicants were classified as "knowledge-deficient," and about 80% of these originated from less than one third of the FEM. Conclusion: The ENARM results provide information on the performance of the FEM. Approximately one of every four applicants obtained scores lower than the approval threshold of any specialty.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Faculdades de Medicina/normas , Desempenho Acadêmico/normas , Internato e Residência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Fatores Sexuais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Medicina Geral/educação , Desempenho Acadêmico/estatística & dados numéricos , México
14.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(2): 125-135, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058965

RESUMO

Abstract: Objective: To assess the assumption of 'equity' of Mexico's resident-selection assessment tool, the Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). Materials and methods: Official ENARM-2016 and -2017 databases were analyzed. Differences in the absolute number of correct answers (multivariable linear regression) and the number of applicants reaching their specialty minimum score (SMS) per test day (odds ratio [OR]) were calculated. Applicants affected by test-day inequity were estimated. Results: There were 36 114 applicants in 2016, and 38 380 in 2017. In 2016, day-2 applicants had significantly higher scores and more reached the SMS than on days 1-3-4 (OR 1.55), and 5 (OR 3.8); 3 565 non-passing applicants were affected by inequity (equivalent to 44.64% of those selected). In 2017, day-1 and -2 applicants had significantly higher scores and more reached the SMS than on days 3-4 (OR 1.85), and 5 (OR 4.04); 3,155 non-passing applicants were affected by inequity (37.2% of those selected). Conclusion: Analysis of official ENARM databases does not support the official attribution of equity, suggesting the test should be redesigned.


Resumen_ Objetivo: Evaluar el atributo de "equidad" asignado al Examen Nacional para Aspirantes a Residencias Médicas (ENARM). Material y métodos: Se analizaron las bases de datos oficiales del ENARM 2016 y 2017. Se compararon las diferencias inter-día de respuestas correctas (regresión linear multivariable) y de sustentantes que alcanzaron el puntaje mínimo de su especialidad (PME) (razón de momios [RM]). Se estimó a los afectados por la inequidad. Resultados: Hubo 36 114 sustentantes en 2016 y 38 380 en 2017. Los días 2 (ENARM-2016) y 1-2 (ENARM-2017) registraron puntajes significativamente más altos, y más sustentantes alcanzaron el PME que en los días 1-3-4 (RM 1.55) y 5 (RM 3.8) en 2016, y los días 3-4 (RM 1.85) y 5 (RM 4.04) en 2017. Se estimó que cuatro de cada diez sustentantes que aprobaron el ENARM no lo hubieran hecho si el examen fuera equitativo. Conclusión: Los resultados sugieren que el atributo de equidad del ENARM está en duda.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Seleção de Pessoal/normas , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Razão de Chances , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desempenho Acadêmico/normas , México
15.
Salud pública Méx ; 61(5): 609-618, sep.-oct. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1127324

RESUMO

Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar la comprensión objetiva de cinco tipos de etiquetados frontales de paquetes (EFP) (Sistema de Clasificación de Estrellas de Salud, Semáforo Múltiple, Nutri-Score, Ingestas de Referencia y Símbolo de Advertencia) en México. Material y métodos: Se reclutaron 1 001 consumidores mexicanos para clasificar tres productos de tres categorías de alimentos sin EFP, según su calidad nutricional. Se les asignó al azar uno de los cinco EFP para clasificar los mismos productos, esta vez con un EFP en el empaque. El cambio en la capacidad para clasificar correctamente los productos en las dos tareas fue evaluado por EFP, utilizando un modelo de regresión logística ordinal. Resultados: Nutri-Score y Semáforo Múltiple obtuvieron un mejor desempeño, seguidos del Símbolo de Advertencia, Sistema de Clasificación de Estrellas de Salud e Ingestas de Referencia. Conclusión: Nutri-Score y el Semáforo Múltiple surgen como esquemas eficientes para informar a los consumidores sobre la calidad nutricional de los alimentos en México, donde podrían ser una herramienta útil para los consumidores en situación de compra.


Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to compare consumers' objective understanding of five FoPLs [Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL), Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs), Warning Symbol] in Mexico. Materials and methods: 1 001 Mexican consumers were recruited and asked to rank three sets of label-free products according to their nutritional quality, via a survey. Upon completion of this task, participants were randomized to one of five FoPL conditions and were again asked to rank the same sets of products, this time with a FoPL displayed on pack. Change in ability to correctly rank products across the two tasks was assessed by FoPL using ordinal logistic regression. Results: Nutri-Score and MTL performed best, followed Warning Symbol, HSR and RIs. Conclusion: Nutri-Score and MTL appear as efficient schemes to inform consumers on the nutritional quality of foods, in particular in Mexico, where it would be a helpful tool for consumers in purchasing situations.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Comportamento do Consumidor , Rotulagem de Alimentos/métodos , Valor Nutritivo , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Distribuição Aleatória , Modelos Logísticos , Alimentos/classificação , Rotulagem de Alimentos/classificação , México , Necessidades Nutricionais
20.
Salud pública Méx ; 51(5): 361-371, Sept.-Oct. 2009. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-531226

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Efectuar el análisis epidemiológico de 122 defunciones por influenza A (H1N1) confirmadas por laboratorio y contribuir a mejorar el diagnóstico y atención oportuna de casos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se Analizaron 122 expedientes de pacientes fallecidos por influenza A (H1N1). RESULTADOS: Una proporción de 51 por ciento correspondió a mujeres y 49 por ciento a varones. Hasta 45.1 por ciento ocurrió entre los 20 y 39 años. La letalidad general fue de 2.2 por ciento y varió entre 0.3 por ciento en el grupo de 10 a 19 años y 6.3 por ciento en el de 50 a 59. Una cifra de 43 por ciento de las defunciones se concentró en dos de las 32 entidades federativas y 5l por ciento se atendió en instituciones de seguridad social. Sólo 17 por ciento recibió atención hospitalaria en las primeras 72 horas y 42 por ciento falleció en las primeras 72 horas de hospitalización. En 58.2 por ciento de los fallecidos había algún padecimiento asociado. DISCUSIÓN: El Nuevo virus A (H1N1) produce mayor mortalidad en personas jóvenes, al contrario de lo que sucede con la influenza estacional que muestra un mayor impacto en niños pequeños y personas de edad avanzada. El retraso de la atención médica y la morbilidad asociada fueron factores relevantes del fallecimiento.


OBJECTIVE: To carry out the epidemiological analysis of 122 influenza A (H1N1) deaths confirmed by laboratory and help to improve the diagnosis and timely managing of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 122 clinical records were analyzed of patients with confirmed influenza A (H1N1) virus infection who died. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were female and 49 percent were male. A total of 45.l percent who died were between 20 and 39 years old. Overall fatality was 2.2 percent and ranged between 0.3 percent for the l0 to l9 year-old group to 6.3 percent for the 50 to 59 year-old group. Forty-three percent of deaths were concentrated in only two of the thirty-two states and 5l percent received medical attention in social security institutions. Only l7 percent received hospital attention within 72 hours and 42 percent died within 72 hours of hospital attention. DISCUSSION: Novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus produces higher mortality in young people whereas seasonal influenza has a greater impact on young children and older people. Delay in medical care and the associated morbidity were relevant factors for death.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , México/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA