Development of a Communication Tool between Patients and Physicians for Recognizing COPD Exacerbations in Japan.

In Japan, exacerbations are underreported compared with other countries, possibly due in part to a failure to recognize them. This study aimed to create a simple chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Exacerbation Recognition Tool (CERT-J) specifically for Japanese patients. Patients ≥40 years with confirmed COPD or asthma-COPD overlap were included. Focus groups were held to identify words and phrases used by patients to describe symptoms associated with an exacerbation, resulting in candidate items being identified. Following cognitive debriefing, the items were refined based on item frequency, level of endorsement and effect of demographic factors. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then performed to inform an expert panel's choice of items to form the new tool. A total of 41 patients were included in the focus groups and nine patients performed the cognitive debrief. Following this, the expert panel identified 26 items for testing in a further 100 patients (mean age 72 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 54.8% predicted and 1.8 exacerbations in the preceding 12 months). Eleven items were associated with breathlessness or activity limitation and seven of these were the most frequently endorsed. EFA identified four factors, with one (breathlessness) being dominant. The expert panel recommended that the CERT-J should include six items: breathlessness and activity limitation (3 items), cough (1 item) and phlegm (2 items). The final CERT-J should benefit patients with COPD by providing them with an increased understanding and recognition of exacerbations.Clinical Trial Registration: GSK K.K (jRCT1080224526).

A targeted literature review of the burden of illness for spine-related neuropathic pain in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP) is pain provoked by damage or disease in the nervous system and about one in three Japanese patients with spinal disorders are highly likely to have NeP. The humanistic and economic burden of illness (BOI) of spine-related NeP represents unmet medical needs that should be addressed. The purpose of this targeted literature review was to synthesize the available evidence on the BOI of spine-related NeP in Japanese patients. METHODS: PubMed and ICHUSHI were searched for relevant studies published between January 2010 and December 2020, in English or Japanese. The population included patients with one or more of prespecified spinal disorders and NeP, and outcomes of interest were data related to humanistic or economic burden. RESULTS: Out of 32 studies that assessed the BOI of spine-related disorders in Japan, only six specifically assessed spine-related NeP. Among these studies, five different validated questionnaires were used to measure humanistic burden. Spine-related NeP was consistently shown to be related with a poorer health-related quality of life and higher levels of anxiety and depression compared to the general population as well as patients with nociceptive pain. No articles directly evaluating economic burden were identified in this search, so an exploratory analysis was conducted. Reduction in work productivity by people experiencing spine-related NeP in the whole of Japan were estimated to total JPY 172,266,780,480 per year. CONCLUSIONS: The humanistic burden of spine-related NeP on Japanese patients is considerable, not only physically but also mentally. Exploratory analysis of the economic burden illustrates the possibility of substantial societal costs associated with NeP. In order to better understand the depth of BOI and the unmet medical need caused by spine-related NeP, further studies on real-world outcomes are recommended.

Systematic review of survival outcomes for relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) is a mature T-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasm caused by human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 infection. There is no standard treatment for relapsed or refractory (r/r) ATL, and clinical outcomes are poor. This systematic review examined the survival outcomes for r/r ATL treated with various systemic therapies. METHODS: EMBASE and PubMed were searched for studies on r/r ATL, published between January 2010 and January 2020. The main outcome of interest was overall survival (OS). Median OS and an exploratory 30% OS time were assessed based on published data and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: There were 21 unique treatment subgroups (from 14 studies), that met the eligibility criteria. Nine subgroups were mogamulizumab treatment, two were mogamulizumab prior to allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), five were allo-HSCT, and five were other chemotherapy. Respectively, the median OS and 30% OS varied considerably in range for mogamulizumab treatment (2.2-17.6 months and 8.7-27.1 months), allo-HSCT (3.8-6.2 months and 7.5-19.8 months), and other chemotherapy arms (4.1-20.3 months and 7.1-17.0 months). CONCLUSION: Mogamulizumab was the most frequently studied treatment regimen and can potentially provide longer survival compared with chemotherapy alone. Future comparisons with synthetic or historical control arms may enable clearer insights into treatment efficacy.

Real-world assessment of myelodysplastic syndrome: Japanese claims data analysis.

Aim: To describe the treatment landscape and associated economic burden for myelodysplastic syndrome in Japan. Methods: We studied nationwide retrospective claims data from 2008 to 2019. The study cohort was categorized into patients receiving transfusion, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent + transfusion, azacitidine, azacitidine + transfusion and others. Results: Our study found that the azacitidine + transfusion group had the highest medical cost and severity of disease compared with the other groups. In those patients, healthcare resource utilization and the costs of transfusions, including iron chelation therapy, increased medical costs. Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis provides a current snapshot of real-world treatment patterns and associated incremental economic costs of iron chelation therapy with the presence of transfusions that drive an increase in total costs.

Family caregiver burden of patients with osteoporotic fracture in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic fractures are the most common serious consequence of osteoporosis. Patients who suffer such fractures often require caregiver assistance afterwards. This study characterized the humanistic burden experienced by family caregivers of patients with osteoporotic fractures in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Family caregivers were defined as individuals who provided non-professional care to an osteoporotic fracture patient (> 50 years old). Caregivers were asked through an online survey panel about their caregiving situation, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work impairment, and the health status of their patient. The Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI-22), 8-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Caregiver version (WPAI-CG) were used to better understand the impact of osteoporotic fracture caregiving. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 309) were family caregivers who were employed (81.6%) and cared for a parent (71.5%). Over 75% of caregivers had HRQoL physical and mental component scores below 50 on SF-8. Although most patients received welfare services (78.3%), the mean ZBI-22 score was 42.2 and 57.0% of caregivers perceived their burden to be moderate or severe (ZBI-22 score ≥ 41). Over half of caregivers changed their employment status due to their caregiving responsibilities and experienced 61.4% overall work impairment. The mean productivity loss for caregivers was estimated to be over 43,000 JPY per week. CONCLUSION: The substantial humanistic and financial burden of caregiving by family members to osteoporotic fracture patients should be considered when evaluating the impact of fragility fractures, disease management and support systems for osteoporosis.

Economic burden in treated Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Aim: To understand the economic burden of relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients in Japan treated with salvage chemotherapy. Patients & methods: Patients who received systemic therapy after first-line treatment were analyzed to assess its associated cost and resource use using a retrospective claims database. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed separately. Results & conclusion: This study identified 2927 and 1085 patients in the second- (2L) and third-line (3L) cohorts. The median ages for the 2L and 3L cohorts were 71 and 70 years, respectively, with Charlson Comorbidity Score of 3. A majority of the patients had limited stem cell transplant due to advanced age. Median lengths of inpatient stay for the 2L and 3L cohorts were 118 and 116 days, respectively. The majority of costs were attributed to inpatient costs, and limited COVID-19 impact was observed in this study.

Comparative effectiveness study of chemotherapy in follicular lymphoma patients in the rituximab era: a Japanese claims database study.

Aim: To evaluate comparative effectiveness of rituximub (R)-based versus non-R-based therapies for follicular lymphoma patients in Japan, where limited studies have been reported. Materials & methods: Patients who received R-based index regimens were propensity score matched to those who did not receive R, based on patient baseline attributes and clinical characteristics using Japanese retrospective claims database to assess clinical and economic outcomes. Results & conclusion: A total of 1947 patients remained in the overall follicular lymphoma cohorts: 1294 receiving an R-based and 653 a non-R-based regimen. Patients on R-based therapy underwent fewer hospitalizations and had a shorter length of stay, but had higher costs during the first year of intensive R-based therapy. Improved clinical outcomes were associated with patients who were younger, female and chose R-based regimens in first index line.

Identification, Review, and Use of Health State Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Models: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report.

Cost-effectiveness models that present results in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year for health technologies are used to inform policy decisions in many parts of the world. Health state utilities (HSUs) are required to calculate the quality-adjusted life-years. Even when clinical studies assessing the effectiveness of health technologies collect data on HSUs to populate a cost-effectiveness model, which rarely happens, analysts typically need to identify at least some additional HSUs from alternative sources. When possible, HSUs are identified by a systematic review of the literature, but, again, this rarely happens. In 2014, ISPOR established a Good Practices for Outcome Research Task Force to address the use of HSUs in cost-effectiveness models. This task force report provides recommendations for researchers who identify, review, and synthesize HSUs for use in cost-effectiveness models; analysts who use the results in models; and reviewers who critically appraise the suitability and validity of the HSUs selected for use in models. The associated Minimum Reporting Standards of Systematic Review of Utilities for Cost-Effectiveness checklist created by the task force provides criteria to judge the appropriateness of the HSUs selected for use in cost-effectiveness models and is suitable for use in different international settings.

The development of the ICIQ-UAB: A patient reported outcome measure for underactive bladder.

AIMS: To present the development of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-underactive bladder (ICIQ-UAB) as the first patient reported outcome measure for the assessment of the symptoms and impact on the health-related quality of life of UAB developed in-line with the Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry. METHODS: Draft items were developed following 44 semi-structured concept elicitation interviews in the UK and refined using 36 cognitive interviews. A pilot study was designed to assess the draft ICIQ-UAB's initial psychometric properties with 54 patients recruited from European hospitals. Further concept elicitation interviews were also carried out with 11 patients in the US and 10 patients in Japan. All participants had a prior urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor underactivity. RESULTS: The cognitive interviews confirmed the initial items to be understood and interpreted as intended. Pilot testing showed that both internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.85) and test-retest reliability (stable patients; intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.88) were high. The interviews in the US and Japan elicited symptoms and impacts that support previous findings in the UK and provided further insight into the experiences of patients in those countries. The developmental ICIQ-UAB was refined using the evidence from all substudies. CONCLUSIONS: The validity and reliability of the ICIQ-UAB were supported in a pilot study setting and the wider cultural applicability by the additional interviews in the US and Japan. Following further validation in future clinical trials, the developmental ICIQ-UAB is envisaged as an important tool for the monitoring of future UAB treatment strategies.

Neuropathic pain: A patient-centred approach to measuring outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a complex, chronic pain state initiated by a primary lesion or dysfunction of the nervous system and presents as a variety of symptoms across multiple disease states. OBJECTIVE: To develop a patient-centred conceptual model of symptoms and impacts in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) or post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) that can inform the measurement strategy in clinical trials. METHOD: Thirty subjects with DPN or PHN participated in in-person interviews which were performed until saturation was achieved. Transcripts were analysed in ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with DPN subjects (United States, n = 10; Japan, n = 10) and PHN subjects (United States, n = 5; Japan, n = 5). Numbness and tingling were frequently reported symptoms in the DPN population while itchiness and hypersensitivity were predominant in PHN. Both populations experienced burning and ache/soreness with similar frequency. DPN subjects experienced pain primarily in their lower extremity (eg feet, ankles), while PHN subjects experienced pain primarily in the chest and back. Impacts reported by DPN subjects included difficulty walking, sleep disturbance and climbing stairs. Impacts in PHN subjects included sleep disturbance, avoidance of physical contact, being angry/frustrated and being sad/depressed. Overall, concepts in Japan were not qualitatively different from the United States. Conceptual models of NP were generated based on the concepts elicited. CONCLUSIONS: This research highlights core concepts to measure from the patient's perspective. Moreover, it enables the assessment of existing measures, the possible modification of these measures, or if a new NP measure with improved sensitivity and responsiveness is merited.

Mapping to Estimate Health-State Utility from Non-Preference-Based Outcome Measures: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report.

Economic evaluation conducted in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) provides information that decision makers find useful in many parts of the world. Ideally, clinical studies designed to assess the effectiveness of health technologies would include outcome measures that are directly linked to health utility to calculate QALYs. Often this does not happen, and even when it does, clinical studies may be insufficient for a cost-utility assessment. Mapping can solve this problem. It uses an additional data set to estimate the relationship between outcomes measured in clinical studies and health utility. This bridges the evidence gap between available evidence on the effect of a health technology in one metric and the requirement for decision makers to express it in a different one (QALYs). In 2014, ISPOR established a Good Practices for Outcome Research Task Force for mapping studies. This task force report provides recommendations to analysts undertaking mapping studies, those that use the results in cost-utility analysis, and those that need to critically review such studies. The recommendations cover all areas of mapping practice: the selection of data sets for the mapping estimation, model selection and performance assessment, reporting standards, and the use of results including the appropriate reflection of variability and uncertainty. This report is unique because it takes an international perspective, is comprehensive in its coverage of the aspects of mapping practice, and reflects the current state of the art.

Utilization patterns of insulin therapy and healthcare services among Japanese insulin initiators during their first year: a descriptive analysis of administrative hospital data.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes poses an increasing healthcare burden in Japan. Although insulin treatment has diversified in recent years, the literature on the utilization of healthcare services among patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing different insulin therapy regimens is scarce. The current study aimed to characterize the real-world insulin treatment patterns and associated utilization of healthcare services among patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated insulin therapy during the study period. METHODS: We examined data from a hospital-based database consisting of administrative and laboratory data from 121 acute-phase hospitals throughout Japan from April 2008 to August 2012. Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and receiving continuous insulin therapy, defined by three insulin claims or more, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2,145 insulin initiators, at initiation 46.5% received rapid-acting insulin alone, 36.6% received an intensive regimen, 11.4% received long-acting insulin alone, and 5.5% received pre-mixed insulin alone. Patients treated with rapid-acting insulin alone were older, experienced more comorbid conditions, had lower HbA1c, and more often had initiated their insulin treatment at inpatient admission, compared to patients treated with other types of insulin. Inpatient admission was more common and longer for patients taking rapid-acting insulin and an intensive regimen than those taking long-acting or pre-mixed insulin, and most were readmitted within 1 year. Utilization of outpatient clinics was approximately once per month, and emergency department visits were observed to be rare. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective observational descriptive study found varied treatment and healthcare service utilization patterns, as well as disparities in patient characteristics across insulin regimens. Future research should assess the basis for these various utilization patterns associated with insulin to conduct robust analyses of clinical and economic outcomes.

WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR LUNG CANCER TREATMENT: PATIENT VERSUS GENERAL PUBLIC VALUES.

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer has been the most common cancer since 1985, accounting for 12-13 percent of cancer cases worldwide. Newer targeted therapies with potential increased survival benefits may not be affordable to patients. Many countries use arbitrary thresholds to determine whether a medical intervention is cost-effective. As such, many effective, albeit expensive, therapies are not being reimbursed. To understand the value placed on effective therapies, this study evaluates the patient and public willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for lung cancer treatments using Thailand as an example. METHODS: A total of 300 subjects responded to hypothetical lung cancer health states, described by three levels of severity and two levels of side effects, and provided their valuation of the level of quality of life and their WTP to improve from one state to another. RESULTS: The patients with the lowest income and general public were willing to pay more than twice the threshold for acceptability in Thailand (US Dollar 5,123/QALY [Thai Baht 160,000/QALY]). This increased significantly by wealth category. Patients' WTP was associated with quality of life, financial difficulties, health insurance, diarrhea, and wealth. CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights the value patients and general public place on effective lung cancer therapies.

Clinical implementation and error sensitivity of a 3D quality assurance protocol for prostate and thoracic IMRT.

This work aims at three goals: first, to define a set of statistical parameters and plan structures for a 3D pretreatment thoracic and prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) protocol; secondly, to test if the 3D QA protocol is able to detect certain clinical errors; and third, to compare the 3D QA method with QA performed with single ion chamber and 2D gamma test in detecting those errors. The 3D QA protocol measurements were performed on 13 prostate and 25 thoracic IMRT patients using IBA's COMPASS system. For each treatment planning structure included in the protocol, the following statistical parameters were evaluated: average absolute dose difference (AADD), percent structure volume with absolute dose difference greater than 6% (ADD6), and 3D gamma test. To test the 3D QA protocol error sensitivity, two prostate and two thoracic step-and-shoot IMRT patients were investigated. Errors introduced to each of the treatment plans included energy switched from 6 MV to 10 MV, multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf errors, linac jaws errors, monitor unit (MU) errors, MLC and gantry angle errors, and detector shift errors. QA was performed on each plan using a single ion chamber and 2D array of ion chambers for 2D and 3D QA. Based on the measurements performed, we established a uniform set of tolerance levels to determine if QA passes for each IMRT treatment plan structure: maximum allowed AADD is 6%; maximum 4% of any structure volume can be with ADD6 greater than 6%, and maximum 4% of any structure volume may fail 3D gamma test with test parameters 3%/3 mm DTA. Out of the three QA methods tested the single ion chamber performed the worst by detecting 4 out of 18 introduced errors, 2D QA detected 11 out of 18 errors, and 3D QA detected 14 out of 18 errors.

Validation of a COPD screening questionnaire and establishment of diagnostic cut-points in a Japanese general population: the Hisayama study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is highly prevalent worldwide. COPD is a treatable disease and it is important to identify COPD subjects, highlighting the need for an efficient screening measure. Although the COPD screening questionnaire (COPD Population Screener, COPD-PS) was developed as a screening tool, its validity is not clear in population-based studies. This study determines the validity of the COPD-PS in the general Japanese population. METHODS: All registered residents living in the town of Hisayama aged above 40 were solicited to participate in a health check-up in 2012. All subjects aged 40-79 without physician-diagnosed asthma or lung resection were recruited, and 2357 subjects with the COPD-PS recorded and valid spirometry measurements were analyzed. Persistent airflow obstruction (AO) was defined by post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7. The sensitivity and specificity of the COPD-PS score for identifying AO was assessed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of AO in this population was 6.5%. The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the continuous COPD-PS score was 0.748. A cut-point of 4-points is recommended, resulting in a sensitivity of 67.1% and specificity of 72.9% with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70. The positive predictive value was 14.6% and negative predictive value was 97.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The COPD-PS appears to be an adequate measure for large scale screening of possible airflow obstruction requiring further testing with spirometry.

A discrete choice experiment on oral and injection treatment preferences among moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients in Japan.

Long-term psoriasis (PsO) management remains challenging. With growing variation in treatment efficacy, cost, and modes of administration, patient preferences for different treatment characteristics are not well understood. A discrete choice experiment (DCE), informed by qualitative patient interviews, was conducted to assess patient preferences for different attributes of PsO treatments; 222 adult patients with moderate-to-severe PsO receiving systemic therapy participated in the DCE web survey. Better long-term efficacy and lower cost were preferred (preference weights p < 0.05). Long-term efficacy had the highest relative importance (RI) and mode of administration was as important as the outcome attributes (efficacy and safety). Patients also preferred oral to injectable administration. In subgroup analyses by disease severity, residence, psoriatic arthritis as a comorbidity, and gender, the trends for each subgroup were the same as the overall population although the extent of RI for administration mode varied. Mode of administration was more important for patients with moderate versus severe disease, or rural versus urban residence. This DCE utilized attributes related to both oral and injectable treatment as well as a broad study population of systemic treatment users. Preferences were further stratified by patient characteristics to explore trends in different subgroups. Understanding the RI of treatment attributes and the attribute trade-offs acceptable to patients helps inform moderate-to-severe PsO systemic treatments decisions.

Cost drivers associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Japan: A structural equation model (SEM) analysis.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of increasing prevalence in Japan. However, patients with relapsed or refractory disease to first line treatment (rrDLBCL) have been found to shoulder greater economic burden and have poor survival with subsequent lines of therapy. The relative impact of individual patient attributes on total medical cost among patients with rrDLBCL receiving second or third line (2L/3L) therapy was assessed. Structural equation modelling was used to identify potential cost drivers of total medical costs incurred by treatment and procedures in a Japanese retrospective claims database. From the database, rrDLBCL patients on 2L or 3L of treatment were grouped into respective cohorts. The mean [median] (SD) total medical cost of care for the 2L cohort was 73,296.40 [58,223.11] (58,409.79) US dollars (USD) and 75,238.35 [60,477.31] (59,583.66) USD for the 3L cohort. The largest total effect on medical cost in both cohorts was length of hospital stay (LOS) (ß: 0.750 [95%CI: 0.728, 0.772] vs ß: 0.762 [95%CI: 0.729, 0.794]). Length of hospital stay and potential heart disease complications due to line of treatment were the primary drivers of total cost for patients who had received at least 2L or 3L therapy for rrDLBCL.

Medical Costs Associated with Insomnia Treatment with Suvorexant Monotherapy in Japan: Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Large-Scale Claims Database.

BACKGROUND: The association of insomnia treatment with medical costs is not well characterized in Japan, despite the high economic burden of insomnia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of suvorexant, the first dual orexin receptor antagonist, on direct medical costs in insomnia patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study, conducted using a large-scale claims database, included Japanese patients with diagnosed insomnia receiving suvorexant who were treatment naïve or treatment switchers (pre-treated with a different hypnotic and switched to suvorexant). Total medical costs were estimated for 1 year before and after suvorexant initiation; p-values were calculated for the difference in costs. RESULTS: Of the 1730 patients included, 1116 were treatment naïve and 614 were treatment switchers. Switching to suvorexant did not change the total treatment cost (US$4693-US$4692; p = 0.9964). Although treatment-naïve patients on average incurred US$3259 after suvorexant initiation, much of the additional cost was attributed to drugs other than hypnotics in the outpatient setting (US$332; p < 0.0001). While ~ 10% of the additional medical costs in the outpatient setting were attributable to hypnotics in both groups (treatment naïve: US$106, p < 0.0001; treatment switchers: US$115, p < 0.0001), no difference was observed in the inpatient setting. CONCLUSION: Suvorexant as an initial insomnia treatment was associated with higher total medical costs, given the additional burden of initiating treatment and monitoring costs associated with a new insomnia diagnosis. However, despite a switch from another hypnotic, suvorexant did not increase the incremental economic burden. The hypnotic cost remained proportionately low, demonstrating that suvorexant initiation did not raise the cost of insomnia treatment.

Characteristics of 2-drug regimen users living with HIV-1 in a real-world setting: A large-scale medical claim database analysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Regimen simplification to 2-drug antiretroviral therapy (2-ART) may address potential tolerability issues, increase adherence, and reduce toxicity and potential drug-drug-interactions among people living with HIV-1 (PLWH). However, real-world treatment patterns and characteristics of 2-ART users are unclear. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study employed a large-scale medical claim database of Japanese hospitals to extract data on 4,293 PLWH aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of HIV and treated with any ART regimens between April 2008 and April 2019. A 2-ART cohort was compared with a 3-drug antiretroviral therapy (3-ART) cohort in terms of population characteristics, comorbid conditions, and treatment patterns. Treatment switching rates were calculated for each cohort followed by sensitivity analysis to confirm the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: There were 94 individuals identified in the 2-ART cohort. Compared to the standard 3-ART cohort (n = 3,993), the 2-ART cohort was older (median age 53 [IQR 44-64] vs 42 years [IQR 35-50]), with a lower proportion of males (87.2% vs 93.8%), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (median score 6 [IQR 5-8] vs 5 [IQR 4-6]), more co-medications (median 6 [IQR 4-11] vs 3 [IQR 2-7]), and a higher percentage of AIDS-defining conditions (66.0% vs 42.8%). The most common 2-ART were protease inhibitor (PI) + integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) + INSTI (33.0% and 31.9%, respectively). Overall, most of the regimens were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing (71.3%), with a decreasing trend over time (76.2% to 70.2%). ART regimen switch occurred more often in the 2-ART cohort than in the 3-ART cohort (33.0% vs 21.2%). CONCLUSION: The profiles of individuals on 2-ART in Japan were demonstrated to be complex. Most were treated with NRTI-sparing regimens which may reflect an effort to reduce treatment-related toxicities.

MEdical Database AnaLysIS of Japanese multiple myeloma patienTs with apheresis #2 (MEDALIST-2): the impact of plerixafor use on costs and healthcare resources during mobilization and stem cell transplantation.

Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) can involve apheresis to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for later autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which can become costly over time. This retrospective claims database study examined healthcare resource use and medical costs associated with plerixafor, a selective CXCR4 inhibitor that mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells and minimizes apheresis times. Medical data were sampled from Japanese MM patients between April 2017 and September 2019, after the Japanese launch of plerixafor. The study population (190 plerixafor users and 180 non-users) was identified from the Medical Data Vision database, and further stratified into those using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in monotherapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide to trigger apheresis. A descriptive comparison of patient characteristics, healthcare resource use, and medical costs across the mobilization and ASCT phases indicated plerixafor is associated with higher average total medical costs. However, plerixafor-treated patients received fewer concomitant medications and spent less time in apheresis than non-users. A comparison of non-users with a similar analysis conducted pre-plerixafor launch (2013-2017) showed general improvements to treatment independent of plerixafor. The results of this research can inform guidelines for the role of plerixafor in balancing cost-effectiveness and drug efficacy in MM treatment.