Toward More Accessible Fully Automated 3D Volumetric MRI Decision Trees for the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy, Related Disorders, and Age-Matched Healthy Subjects.

Differentiating multiple system atrophy (MSA) from related neurodegenerative movement disorders (NMD) is challenging. MRI is widely available and automated decision-tree analysis is simple, transparent, and resistant to overfitting. Using a retrospective cohort of heterogeneous clinical MRIs broadly sourced from a tertiary hospital system, we aimed to develop readily translatable and fully automated volumetric diagnostic decision-trees to facilitate early and accurate differential diagnosis of NMDs. 3DT1 MRI from 171 NMD patients (72 MSA, 49 PSP, 50 PD) and 171 matched healthy subjects were automatically segmented using Freesurfer6.0 with brainstem module. Decision trees employing substructure volumes and a novel volumetric pons-to-midbrain ratio (3D-PMR) were produced and tenfold cross-validation performed. The optimal tree separating NMD from healthy subjects selected cerebellar white matter, thalamus, putamen, striatum, and midbrain volumes as nodes. Its sensitivity was 84%, specificity 94%, accuracy 84%, and kappa 0.69 in cross-validation. The optimal tree restricted to NMD patients selected 3D-PMR, thalamus, superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP), midbrain, pons, and putamen as nodes. It yielded sensitivities/specificities of 94/84% for MSA, 72/96% for PSP, and 73/92% PD, with 79% accuracy and 0.62 kappa. There was correct classification of 16/17 MSA, 5/8 PSP, 6/8 PD autopsy-confirmed patients, and 6/8 MRIs that preceded motor symptom onset. Fully automated decision trees utilizing volumetric MRI data distinguished NMD patients from healthy subjects and MSA from other NMDs with promising accuracy, including autopsy-confirmed and pre-symptomatic subsets. Our open-source methodology is well-suited for widespread clinical translation. Assessment in even more heterogeneous retrospective and prospective cohorts is indicated.

Higher urate in LRRK2 mutation carriers resistant to Parkinson disease.

OBJECTIVE: LRRK2 mutations, the most common genetic cause of Parkinson disease (PD), display incomplete penetrance, indicating the importance of other genetic and environmental influences on disease pathogenesis in LRRK2 mutation carriers. The present study investigates whether urate, an antioxidant, Nrf2 activator, and inverse risk factor for idiopathic PD, is one such candidate biomarker of PD risk modulation in pathogenic LRRK2 mutation carriers. METHODS: Banked plasma samples or urate levels were obtained for 3 cohorts of age- and sex-matched subjects with and without a known LRRK2 mutation in PD and unaffected controls to conduct a pilot study of 192 subjects from the LRRK2 Cohort Consortium (LCC) and 2 validation studies of 380 additional subjects from the LCC and 922 subjects from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative. Urate levels were compared by multiple regression between subjects with and without a PD diagnosis conditional on LRRK2 status, controlling for age and sex. RESULTS: Nonmanifesting LRRK2 mutation carriers had significantly higher levels of urate than those who developed PD in each of the 3 independent cohorts. A meta-analysis demonstrated an adjusted mean difference of 0.62 mg/dL (p < 0.001), with similar results for separate assessments of women (p < 0.02) and men (p < 0.001). A 2 mg/dL increment in urate concentration decreased the odds of having PD by approximately 50% (odds ratio = 0.48, p = 0.004). INTERPRETATION: These findings identify and substantiate urate as a biomarker of resistance to PD among LRRK2 mutation carriers. Ann Neurol 2019;85:593-599.

Ocular motor manifestations of movement disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Impaired eye movements are frequently seen in ophthalmic and neurologic clinical practice, especially in individuals with movement disorders. Identification of the abnormal movement can aid initial diagnosis and improve understanding of the underlying disease pathophysiology. The present article reviews the ocular motor manifestations and recent research on them in common movement disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Ocular motor manifestations and their pathophysiologic correlates are being defined. In particular, study of eye movements can help clarify the changing clinicopathologic spectrum of atypical parkinsonian disorders. The pathophysiology and natural history of blepharospasm are being elucidated. Recent research focuses on high-resolution imaging and other technological advances to improve the sensitivity of the ocular motility exam. Eye movements are being studied as biomarkers for diagnosis and progression in clinical care and trials. SUMMARY: The current review summarizes ocular motor manifestations in common movement disorders, and presents recent research investigating their cause and treatment.

Learning from history: Lord Brain and Hashimoto's encephalopathy.

We present two historic cases of severe encephalopathy associated with antithyroid antibodies. The first was published by Lord Brain of Eynsham, and the second was from our department's archives. Although both cases are from archival sources, they continue to inform current clinical care. We briefly review the poorly defined entity, Hashimoto's encephalopathy, and discuss diagnostic advances for autoimmune encephalopathy and for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. We advocate for giving a trial of corticosteroids to patients with 'encephalopathy, not otherwise specified' while awaiting antibody results or more definitive testing. Our case, initially diagnosed as having Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, responded remarkably (with video evidence) to a trial of corticosteroids.

Designing the First Trials for Parkinson's Prevention.

For decades the greatest goal of Parkinson's disease (PD) research has often been distilled to the discovery of treatments that prevent the disease or its progression. However, until recently only the latter has been realistically pursued through randomized clinical trials of candidate disease-modifying therapy (DMT) conducted on individuals after they received traditional clinical diagnosis of PD (i.e., tertiary prevention trials). Now, in light of major advances in our understanding of the prodromal stages of PD, as well as its genetics and biomarkers, the first secondary prevention trials for PD are beginning. In this review, we take stock of DMT trials to date, summarize the breakthroughs that allow the identification of cohorts at high risk of developing a traditional diagnosis of PD, and describe key design elements of secondary prevention trials and how they depend on the prodromal stage being targeted. These elements address whom to enroll, what interventions to test, and how to measure secondary prevention (i.e., slowed progression during the prodromal stages of PD). Although these design strategies, along with the biological definition, subtype classification, and staging of the disease are evolving, all are driven by continued progress in the underlying science and integrated by a broad motivated community of stakeholders. While considerable methodological challenges remain, opportunities to move clinical trials of DMT to earlier points in the disease process than ever before have begun to unfold, and the prospects for PD prevention are nowtangible.

Short-term lipopolysaccharide treatment leads to astrocyte activation in LRRK2 G2019S knock-in mice without loss of dopaminergic neurons.

Background: The G2019S mutation of LRRK2, which enhances kinase activity of the protein, confers a substantial risk of developing Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the mutation demonstrates incomplete penetrance, suggesting the involvement of other genetic or environmental modulating factors. Here, we investigated whether LRRK2 G2019S knock-in (KI) mice treated with the inflammogen lipopolysaccharide (LPS) could model LRRK2 PD. Results: We found that short-term (2 weeks) treatment with LPS did not result in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in either LRRK2 G2019S KI or wild-type (WT) mice. Compared with WT mice, LRRK2 G2019S-KI mice showed incomplete recovery from LPS-induced weight loss. In LRRK2 G2019S KI mice, LPS treatment led to upregulated phosphorylation of LRRK2 at the autophosphorylation site Serine 1292, which is known as a direct readout of LRRK2 kinase activity. LPS treatment caused a greater increase in the activated astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in the striatum and substantia nigra of LRRK2 G2019S mice than in those of WT mice. The administration of caffeine, which was recently identified as a biomarker of resistance to developing PD in individuals with LRRK2 mutations, attenuated LPS-induced astrocyte activation specifically in LRRK2 G2019S KI mice. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that 2 weeks of exposure to LPS is not sufficient to cause dopaminergic neuronal loss in LRRK2 G2019S KI mice but rather results in increased astrocyte activation, which can be ameliorated by caffeine.

Perspectives of People At-Risk on Parkinson's Prevention Research.

 The movement toward prevention trials in people at-risk for Parkinson's disease (PD) is rapidly becoming a reality. The authors of this article include a genetically at-risk advocate with the LRRK2 G2019 S variant and two patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD), one of whom has now been diagnosed with PD. These authors participated as speakers, panelists, and moderators in the "Planning for Prevention of Parkinson's: A Trial Design Forum" hosted by Massachusetts General Hospital in 2021 and 2022. Other authors include a young onset person with Parkinson's (PwP) and retired family physician, an expert in patient engagement in Parkinson's, and early career and veteran movement disorders clinician researchers. Several themes emerged from the at-risk participant voice concerning the importance of early intervention, the legitimacy of their input in decision-making, and the desire for transparent communication and feedback throughout the entire research study process. Challenges and opportunities in the current environment include lack of awareness among primary care physicians and general neurologists about PD risk, legal and psychological implications of risk disclosure, limited return of individual research study results, and undefined engagement and integration of individuals at-risk into the broader Parkinson's community. Incorporating the perspectives of individuals at-risk as well as those living with PD at this early stage of prevention trial development is crucial to success.

What to Test in Parkinson Disease Prevention Trials? Repurposed, Low-Risk, and Gene-Targeted Drugs.

Despite the sound epidemiologic and basic science rationales underpinning numerous "disease modification" trials in manifest Parkinson disease (PD), none has convincingly demonstrated that a treatment slows progression. Rapidly expanding knowledge of the genetic determinants and prodromal features of PD now allows realistic planning of prevention trials with initiation of putatively neuroprotective therapies earlier in the disease. In this article, we outline the principles of drug selection for PD prevention trials, focused on proof-of-concept opportunities that will help establish a methodological foundation for this fledgling field. We describe prototypical, relatively low-risk drug candidates for such trials (e.g., albuterol, ambroxol, caffeine, ibuprofen), tailored to specific at-risk populations ranging from pathogenic LRRK2 or GBA gene variant carriers to those defined by prodromal PD and α-synucleinopathy. Finally, we review gene-targeted approaches currently in development targeting clinically manifest PD for their potential in future prevention trials.

Path to Parkinson Disease Prevention: Conclusion and Outlook.

Tremendous progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of the prodromal phase of Parkinson disease (PD) offers a unique opportunity to start therapeutic interventions as early as possible to slow or even stop the progression to clinically manifest motor PD. A Parkinson's Prevention Conference, "Planning for Prevention of Parkinson's: A trial design symposium and workshop" was convened to discuss all issues that need to be addressed before the launch of the first PD prevention study. In this review, we summarize the major opportunities and challenges in designing prevention trials in PD, organized by the following critical trial design questions: Who (should be enrolled)? What (to test)? How (to measure prevention)? and the pivotal question, When during the prodromal disease (should we start these trials)? We outline the implications of these questions and their meaning for a responsible, sustainable, and fruitful further planning for prevention trials. Despite the great progress that has been made, it needs to be acknowledged that several queries remain to be carefully considered and addressed because prevention trials are being planned and become a reality.