RESUMO
PURPOSE: Tumor next-generation sequencing reports typically generate trial recommendations for patients based on their diagnosis and genomic profile. However, these require additional refinement and prescreening, which can add to physician burden. We wanted to use human prescreening efforts to efficiently refine these trial options and also elucidate the high-value parameters that have a major impact on efficient trial matching. METHODS: Clinical trial recommendations were generated based on diagnosis and biomarker criteria using an informatics platform and were further refined by manual prescreening. The refined results were then compared with the initial trial recommendations and the reasons for false-positive matches were evaluated. RESULTS: Manual prescreening significantly reduced the number of false positives from the informatics generated trial recommendations, as expected. We found that trial-specific criteria, especially recruiting status for individual trial arms, were a high value parameter and led to the largest number of automated false-positive matches. CONCLUSION: Reflex clinical trial matching approaches that refine trial recommendations based on the clinical details as well as trial-specific criteria have the potential to help alleviate physician burden for selecting the most appropriate trial for their patient. Investing in publicly available resources that capture the recruiting status of a trial at the cohort or arm level would, therefore, allow us to make meaningful contributions to increase the clinical trial enrollments by eliminating false positives.
Assuntos
Oncologia , Neoplasias , Estudos de Coortes , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMO
In this work, we present a conceptual framework to support clinical trial optimization and enrollment workflows and review the current state, limitations, and future trends in this space. This framework includes knowledge representation of clinical trials, clinical trial optimization, clinical trial design, enrollment workflows for prospective clinical trial matching, waitlist management, and, finally, evaluation strategies for assessing improvement.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Informática Médica/métodos , Algoritmos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Projetos de Pesquisa , Software , Fluxo de TrabalhoRESUMO
The authors will demonstrate Quill (QUestions and Information Logically Linked), a comprehensive structured reporting environment for ambulatory care that was developed at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. A notes capture tool was sought with the immediate hope of decreasing or eliminating transcription costs (currently around $6M/yr) and paper based processing while providing a foundation for decision support and research in the future.