The automatic activity of abdominal muscles during stable and unstable standing postural tasks in older adults with and without low back pain- A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The postural control and abdominal muscles' automatic activity were found to be impaired in subjects with low back pain (LBP) during static activities. However, the studies are predominantly conducted on younger adults and a limited number of studies have evaluated abdominal muscles' automatic activity during dynamic standing activities in subjects with LBP. The present study investigated the automatic activity of abdominal muscles during stable and unstable standing postural tasks in older adults with and without LBP. METHODS: Twenty subjects with and 20 subjects without LBP were included. The thickness of the transversus abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), and external oblique (EO) muscles was measured during rest (in supine), static, and dynamic standing postural tasks. To estimate automatic muscle activity, each muscle's thickness during a standing task was normalized to its thickness during the rest. Standing postural tasks were performed using the Biodex Balance System. RESULTS: The mixed-model analysis of variance revealed that task dynamicity significantly affected thickness change only in the TrA muscle (P = 0.02), but the main effect for the group and the interaction were not significantly different (P > 0.05). There were no significant main effects of the group, task dynamicity, or their interaction for the IO and EO muscles (P > 0.05). During dynamic standing, only the TrA muscle in the control group showed greater thickness changes than during the static standing task (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Standing on a dynamic level increased the automatic activity of the TrA muscle in participants without LBP compared to standing on a static level. Further research is required to investigate the effects of TrA muscle training during standing on dynamic surfaces for the treatment of older adults with LBP.

The effectiveness of neurodynamic techniques in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial.

Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). DPN is the primary risk factor for diabetic foot ulcers that can cause amputation. Although several observational studies have investigated the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of peripheral nerves in DPN, interventional studies regarding the effectiveness of neurodynamic techniques (NDT) in DPN patients are confined to a handful. The effects of NDT on neuropathy severity, nerve conduction parameters, quality of life (QoL), and mechanosensitivity have not been explored yet in this population. Materials and Methods: Forty type 2 DPN (T2DPN) patients, diagnosed based on an electrodiagnosis study, will be recruited into two groups. The experimental group will receive the tibial nerve's real proximal and distal slider techniques in addition to DPN standard treatment as a basic treatment, and the control group will receive the tibial nerve's sham proximal and distal slider techniques along with the basic treatment for eight sessions twice a week. Baseline and post-intervention assessments will be based on the Michigan diabetic neuropathy score (MDNS) (primary outcome), tibial nerve conduction parameters, neuropathy-specific quality of life (Neuro QoL) questionnaire, and straight leg raising range of motion (SLR ROM) (secondary outcomes). Results: This study is expected to last approximately seven months, depending on recruitment. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusions: The present study will evaluate the efficacy of NDT on the primary and secondary outcome measurements in DPN patients.

Importance of lumbar instability in the study of associations between muscle morphology, pain, and disability in chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the relationship between lumbar extensor muscle morphology, with pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and (2) compare these relationships in subgroup of CLBP with and without lumbar structural segmental instability. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 183 patients with CLBP. Standing lateral lumbar flexion/extension radiographs were used to assess lumbar structural segmental instability. Lumbar multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), and psoas major (PM) morphology were determined from axial magnetic resonance imaging. Associations between lumbar muscle morphologies and patient pain and disability were evaluated in two groups with and without lumbar instability. RESULTS: Patients' disability was negatively associated with PM total cross-sectional area (beta = -22.82, 95%CI = -37.05 to -8.59) and functional cross-sectional area (beta = -23.45, 95%CI = -37.81 to -9.09). MF morphology was negatively associated with disability in the lumbar instability group. Pain intensity was only associated to PM total cross-sectional area (Beta = -3.33, 95%CI = -6.43 to -2.24) and functional cross-sectional area (Beta = -3.22, 95%CI = -6.40 to -0.05) only in the lumbar instability group. CONCLUSION: PM atrophy was associated with greater disability and pain in CLBP, but MF atrophy was associated with greater disability in CLBP patients with lumbar structural segmental instability.