RESUMO
Atheroembolic renal disease can be defined as renal failure due to occlusion of the renal arterioles by cholesterol crystal emboli usually dislodged from ulcerated atherosclerotic plaques of the aorta. Atheroembolic renal disease is part of multisystem disease, since the embolization usually involves other organ systems such as the gastrointestinal system, central nervous system, and lower extremities. The kidney is frequently involved because of the proximity of the renal arteries to the abdominal aorta, where erosion of atheromatous plaques is most likely to occur. Embolization may occur spontaneously or after angiographic procedures, vascular surgery, and anticoagulation. In the last decade, atheroembolic renal disease has become a recognizable cause of renal disease. An ante-mortem diagnosis of the disease is possible in a significant proportion of cases as long as the level of diagnostic suspicion is high. The disease can severely affect kidney and patient survival. Although no specific treatment has been proven efficacious, use of statins may be justifiable and such therapy would be a reasonable choice for future treatment trials.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose/complicações , Embolia/complicações , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/complicações , Insuficiência Renal/etiologia , Trombose/complicações , Causalidade , Humanos , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/diagnóstico , Obstrução da Artéria Renal/terapia , Insuficiência Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal/terapiaRESUMO
Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) commonly presents with nephrotic syndrome. Spontaneous remission is rare and persistent nephrotic syndrome is a marker of poor prognosis. For this reason, obtaining remission using drugs with minimal side effects is desirable. The treatment of FSGS, however, represents a challenge. Not only is there a lack of prospective controlled trials, but FSGS is a syndrome of unknown pathophysiology, generally treated with drugs having a mechanism of action that is poorly understood in this setting, the use of which has often drawn criticism because it is based on empirical assumptions rather than pathogenetic evidence. At present, corticosteroids are the standard first-line approach in patients with idiopathic FSGS. Cytotoxic agents and cyclosporin A constitute a good therapeutic option for steroid-dependent patients or frequent relapsers. Mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and plasmapheresis should be used as rescue treatment because further studies are required to determine their safety and efficacy. Clearly, real progress in FSGS treatment can only be obtained by research focused on the pathophysiology of this disease, so that a therapeutic approach can be defined that is based on reason rather than chance.
Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Nefrótica/tratamento farmacológico , Algoritmos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/complicações , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Nefrótica/complicações , Plasmaferese , Rituximab , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) is a heterogeneous disease from a clinical, etiological and clinical point of view. FSGS may be idiopathic, usually associated with nephrotic syndrome, which requires an ''etiological'' treatment approach. In addition, hereditary and secondary forms of FSGS have been described. The response to therapy, including steroids, cytotoxic drugs and calcineurin inhibitors, is considered the best clinical indicator of outcome. Many uncertainties exist regarding the best therapeutic approach to FSGS in patients presenting with chronic renal failure. In this setting, before planning any treatment, the physician should always assess the presence of superimposed functional renal insufficiency and evaluate the severity of the renal impairment, the histological picture, previous immunosuppressive treatments, and the individual patient's risk for side effects. Keeping in mind these considerations and in the absence of appropriate studies, we can formulate the following suggestions: 1. there is no absolute contraindication to the use of full-dose prednisone as initial therapy, although the likelihood of a good response is low; 2. the use of cytotoxic drugs is not recommended unless the patient presents with a steroid-responsive form of the disease; 3. in patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 40 mL/min, the use of calcineurin inhibitors should be avoided.