RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the main problems in almost all patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy (RT). Owning to the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of curcumin, the effect of both oral and topical formulations of curcumin was assessed on radiation-induced OM (ROM) in this study. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of curcumin mouthwash 0.1% (w/v) and curcumin-nanocapsule were evaluated in ameliorating severity and pain/burning associated with OM during RT. The current randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 37 patients with head and neck cancers. Patients with grades 1 to 3 of ROM were randomized to receive one of the three interventions: curcumin mouthwash (0.1% w/v); Sinacurcumin soft gel containing 40 mg curcuminoids as nano-micelles (SinaCurcumin®40); or placebo mouthwash with a similar transparent appearance to curcumin mouthwash for 1 min three times daily during RT. Study evaluations were conducted at baseline and weekly thereafter for up to 3 weeks using the Numeric rating scale (NRS) and world health organization (WHO) scale. RESULTS: Among the 45 patients randomized, 37 (mean (SD) age of 53.36 (15.99) years; 14 [37.8%] women) completed the treatment according to the protocol. Patients treated with either oral or topical curcumin showed a significantly reduced severity and burning related to OM during the first 3 weeks after administration (P-Value < 0.001) as compared with the placebo. At study termination, more than 33% of subjects utilizing curcumin mouthwash and 15% of patients utilizing curcumin-nanocapsule remained ulcer free while all of the placebo-receiving subjects had OM. The reduction of NRS and WHO scale between curcumin groups was comparable without significant differences. CONCLUSION: Both curcumin mouthwash and nanocapsule were effective, safe, and well-tolerated in the treatment of radiation-induced OM. Higher doses of curcumin and larger sample sizes can be used for further investigation in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://irct.ir/ IRCT20190810044500N17 (13/08/2021).
Assuntos
Curcumina , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Nanocápsulas , Estomatite , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Curcumina/farmacologia , Curcumina/uso terapêutico , Antissépticos Bucais/efeitos adversos , Nanocápsulas/efeitos adversos , Estomatite/etiologia , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has replaced open pyeloplasty as the new standard of care and we, among others, have even proven its applicability to redo surgery. The focus is now on limiting morbidity. One technical modification to this end is transmesocolic (TM) exposure of the PUJ. This randomized study pinpoints the objective benefits of TM exposure of the PUJ compared with standard colon reflection, and its results showed a 23% conservation in operating time. OBJECTIVE: ⢠To compare the efficacy and safety of colon-reflecting (CR) and transmesocolic (TM) laparoscopic pyeloplasty approaches in a prospective randomized non-selective setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ⢠Excluding only those patients with a history of abdominal surgery, all consenting patients scheduled for laparoscopic pyeloplasty of left-sided pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction between December 2004 and November 2007 were randomized into one of two groups: laparoscopic pyeloplasty using the standard CR approach or laparoscopic pyeloplasty through the TM aperture. ⢠All patients underwent dismembered repair by a single expert and were followed by diuretic renogram and urography at 4 months postoperatively and by annual diuretic renogram thereafter. ⢠Four discrete task phases were timed for comparison: trochar to PUJ, dismembering and spatulation, stenting and anastomosis. RESULTS: ⢠Sixty-four patients were randomized into two groups, TM or CR, with 32 patients in each. ⢠The groups were similar, with no significant difference in sex, age, initial renal function or body mass index. Forty-seven patients were ≤ 15 years old. ⢠The mean (sd) operating time was 23% shorter in the TM group, owing mostly to the much shorter trochar to PUJ phase (5.0 [3.2] min in the TM group vs 35.8 [10.3] in the CR group; P < 0.001). The mean hospitalization time was shorter in the TM group than in the CR group (2.9 vs 3.6 days; P < 0.001). ⢠Thirty-one of 32 patients in each group (96.9%) achieved a durable cure. CONCLUSION: ⢠Transmesocolic exposure of left-sided PUJ obstruction is superior to standard CR exposure, in that it saves anaesthesia time, hospitalization time and has lower morbidity with no compromise in efficiency, and could be considered as the new standard approach.
Assuntos
Nefropatias/cirurgia , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Rim/anormalidades , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgia , Idoso , Colo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Short messaging system (SMS) works as one of the most popular strategies for physicians' behavior change via sending feedback and reminder messages. One of the areas in which SMS feedback can be effective on physicians' behavior is CT scan ordering. This study investigates the effect of mobile phone SMS feedback on residents' head CT scan ordering at a general teaching hospital in Iran. Through a three-month before-after experimental study, an intervention was conducted, and the CT scans ordered by an individual resident were evaluated every two weeks. Consequently, personal SMS-based feedback was provided to the residents, and the rate of CT per patient in the two phases of the study was analyzed. The mean CT scan ordered per patient decreased from 1.98 ± 1.09 to 1.74 ± 1.45, and this decrease was insignificant (P = 0.106). SMS-based feedback can reduce head CT scan ordering among residents; whereas this decline was not significant further studies are required to investigate its effectiveness.
Assuntos
Telefone Celular , Neurologia , Neurocirurgia , Médicos , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Retroalimentação , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00662.].
RESUMO
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with cognitive dysfunction. Evidence indicates that gut microbiota is altered in the AD and, hence, modifying the gut flora may affect the disease. In the previous clinical research we evaluated the effect of a probiotic combination on the cognitive abilities of AD patients. Since, in addition to pathological disorders, the AD is associated with changes in oxidant/antioxidant and inflammatory/anti-inflammatory biomarkers, the present work was designed to evaluate responsiveness of the inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers to the probiotic treatment. The control (CON) and probiotic (PRO) AD patients were treated for 12 weeks by the placebo and probiotic supplementation, respectively. The patients were cognitively assessed by Test Your Memory (TYM = 50 scores). Also serum concentrations of nitric oxide (NO), glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), 8-hydroxy-2' -deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and cytokines (TNF-a, IL-6, and IL-10) were measured. The cognitive test and the serum biomarkers were assessed pre- and post-treatment. According to TYM test 83.5% of the patients showed severe AD. The CON (12.86% ± 8.33) and PRO (-9.35% ± 16.83) groups not differently scored the cognitive test. Not pronounced change percent was found in the serum level of TNF-α (1.67% ± 1.33 vs. -0.15% ± 0.27), IL-6 (0.35% ± 0.17 vs. 2.18% ± 0.15), IL-10 (0.05% ± 0.10 vs. -0.70% ± 0.73), TAC (0.07% ± 0.07 and -0.06% ± 0.03), GSH (0.08% ± 0.05 and 0.04% ± 0.03) NO (0.11% ± 0.06 and 0.05% ± 0.09), MDA (-0.11% ± 0.03 and -0.17% ± 0.03), 8-OHdG (43.25% ± 3.01 and 42.70% ± 3.27) in the CON and PRO groups, respectively. We concluded that the cognitive and biochemical indications in the patients with severe AD are insensitive to the probiotic supplementation. Therefore, in addition to formulation and dosage of probiotic bacteria, severity of disease and time of administration deeply affects results of treatment.