Does Medialization Improve Swallowing Function in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis? A Systematic Review.

Glottal incompetence caused by unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) is a common cause of dysphagia and aspiration. Treatments targeted at reducing glottal incompetence by injection augmentation or medialization thyroplasty are well established at improving voice outcomes, but improvements in swallowing function are less clear. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the impact of vocal fold medialization on dysphagia outcomes. Six electronic bibliographic databases and one clinical trial registry were searched on 3/13/2020. Our patient population were adult patients with verified UVFP that underwent vocal fold medialization. We limited review to prospective studies that had formal dysphagia assessment both before and after medialization. Nine studies met selection criteria (7 prospective case series and 2 prospective cohort studies) totaling 157 patients. The most common etiology of UVFP was iatrogenic (74/157; 47%). The majority of patients underwent injection augmentation (92/157; 59%), and the remaining underwent medialization thyroplasty. A variety of methods were used to assess changes in dysphagia including patient-reported outcome measures, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, videofluoroscopic swallow study, and high-resolution manometry. 7/9 studies demonstrated clinically significant improvement in swallowing function following medialization; 4/9 studies demonstrated statistically significant improvement, and three studies did not show statistically significant improvement after intervention. Study participants and outcome measures evaluating swallowing function in this review were heterogeneous. Moreover, the reviewed studies are concerning for multiple risks of bias impacting their conclusions. Taken together, this systematic review demonstrates limited evidence that injection augmentation and medialization thyroplasty improve swallowing function and/or safety.

Demographic Differences in Clinical Presentation of Pediatric Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion (PVFM).

OBJECTIVES: Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is involuntary closure of the vocal folds during inspiration, often presenting in children and young adults. Although common symptoms and triggers are known, differences in clinical presentation based on patient demographics are unknown. This study characterizes differences in clinical presentation of pediatric PVFM based on age, sex, and race/ethnicity. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records of patients 0-21 years old with PVFM based on ICD codes from 2009 to 2019 within a tertiary academic health system. Demographics, symptoms, triggers, concurrent diagnoses, and laryngoscopy findings were abstracted. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 96 individuals the mean age was 10.6 years (standard deviation ±6.5) and 66 (69%) were female. In comparison to 13-21 year olds, those 0-2 years more often had PVFM observed on laryngoscopy (OR = 17.84, 95% CI: 3.14-101.51) and had less shortness of breath (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.09). Those 3-12 years had more asthma (OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.07-8.81) and cough (OR = 6.12, 95% CI: 1.77-21.13). Both 0-2 (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.24) and 3-12 year olds (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.40) presented less with activity as a trigger. Racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to present with pharyngeal findings (eg mucosal inflammation, adenotonsillar hypertrophy) on laryngoscopy (OR = 4.58, 95% CI: 1.45-15.37) compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Differences in clinical presentation by sex were not observed. CONCLUSION: We identified several differences in symptoms, triggers, and laryngoscopy findings in pediatric PVFM based on age and race/ethnicity. Associations between sex and clinical presentation were not observed.