A rare case of primary rectal choriocarcinoma and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Primary choriocarcinoma of the colon is an extremely rare neoplasm which has a poor prognosis. Only 18 cases have been previously reported in English medical literature. Here we present a case of primary rectal choriocarcinoma with a good response to chemotherapy and review the literature on this uncommon tumor. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging revealed 6.9 × 5.3 × 6.4 cm hypervascular mass posterior to uterus very close to rectum. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) level was markedly elevated. Low anterior resection of the rectum with lymph node dissection and total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed. Pathologic diagnosis was reported as colonic choriocarcinoma with a focal component of adenocarcinoma. Post-operative magnetic resonance imaging detected multiple metastatic lesions throughout the liver. The patient was treated with systemic chemotherapy using bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP protocol). After three cycles, ß-hCG level decreased to normal and magnetic resonance imaging showed regression of liver metastasis. However, the patient died of respiratory failure due to bleomycin toxicity and pneumonia accompanied by rapid disease progression. DISCUSSION: This is an extremely rare case of primary rectal choriocarcinoma. Due to poor prognosis of the disease, it seems very important to start prompt treatment to improve patient's survival.

Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index on dose-limiting toxicity and survival in locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first-line sunitinib or pazopanib.

BACKGROUND: Anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sunitinib and pazopanib, have proven efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma, with specific adverse events occurring during treatment process. Comorbidities can reflect functional status and have prognostic value in oncology patients. We aimed to assess the association of the Charlson Comorbidity Index with severe toxicities and mortality in renal cell carcinoma cases treated with front-line sunitinib or pazopanib. METHODS: Files of locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who received first-line sunitinib or pazopanib were retrospectively examined. Charlson Comorbidity Index of each patient was calculated. Patients were also stratified into Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk groups. Predictors of dose-limiting toxicity were evaluated with binomial logistic regression analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were utilized to determine prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: The study included 102 patients, 64 were treated with first-line sunitinib and 38 with pazopanib. In 42 patients (41.9%), Charlson Comorbidity Index was 9 or more. Dose-limiting toxicities were significantly more frequent in Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥9 group (69% vs. 40%, p = 0.004), and Charlson Comorbidity Index independently predicted dose-limiting toxicity (Hazard ratio (HR) = 4.30, p = 0.002). After adjusting for other variables, a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥9 is also a significant prognostic factor for progression-free (HR = 1.76, p = 0.02) and overall survival (HR = 1.75, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Charlson Comorbidity Index may be a valuable method to estimate prognosis and optimize therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line sunitinib or pazopanib.

Prognostic value of Gustave Roussy immune score in operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Background: The Gustave Roussy immune score (GRIm score) is a laboratory index developed to predict survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy and has shown that the pretreatment value is an independent prognostic factor for survival. In this study, we aimed to determine prognostic significance of GRIm score for pancreatic adenocarcinoma that have not been determined in the literature for pancreatic cancer before. The reason for choosing this scoring is to show that the immune scoring system works as a prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer known as immune-desert tumor via immune properties of microenvironment. Methods: Medical records of patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, who were treated and followed up between December 2007 and July 2019 at our clinic, were reviewed retrospectively. GRIm scores of each patient were calculated at the time of diagnosis. Survival analysis were performed according to risk groups. Results: A total of 138 patients were included in the study. While 111 (80.4%) patients were in the low-risk group; 27 (19.6%) were in high-risk group according to GRIm score. Median OS was 36.9 months (95% Confidence interval (CI): 25.42-48.56) in lower GRIm scores, and it was 11.1 months (95% CI: 6.83-15.44) in higher GRIm scores (P = 0.002). One-two-three-year OS rates were 85% versus 47%, 64% versus 39%, 53% versus 27% for low versus high GRIm scores, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that high GRIm score was an independent poor prognostic factor. Conclusion: GRIm can be used as a noninvasive, easily applicable, practical prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients.

Evaluation of Predictive and Prognostic Importance of Lung Immune Prognostic Index in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is known as an important factor associated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression, and can be reflected by inflammatory markers. One of the markers that reflect this is the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI). It is based on a derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. We aimed to investigate the significance of LIPI in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we stratified the patients according to LIPI score as good LIPI and intermediate (int)/poor LIPI. According to pathological response to NACRT, we divided the patients into two groups as those with complete response (CR) or near-CR, and those with partial response (PR) or poor/no response. We classified CR and near-CR as good response. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic significance of LIPI for NACRT response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We included 137 patients in the results, with 72 (52.6%) having good LIPI and 65 (47.4%) having int/poor LIPI. The median follow-up period was 44.7 months (range: 10-105 months). Thirteen patients (18.0%) in the good LIPI group and 22 patients (34.0%) in the int/poor LIPI group achieved good response. In multivariate analysis, we found only the LIPI score as an independent risk factor (hazard ratio (HR): 2.4, p = 0.04) for NACRT response. Median DFS was 89.2 months (95% CI: 11.4-167.0) in the int/poor LIPI group; however, the DFS of all study populations and patients in the good LIPI group did not reach the median value. In multivariate analysis for DFS, we identified abdominoperineal resection (APR) (HR: 2.21, p = 0.02), presence of tumor deposit (HR: 2.96, p = 0.003), and int/poor LIPI score (HR: 2.07, p = 0.02) as separate risk variables. OS of all study populations and the patients in the LIPI groups did not reach the median value. In multivariate analysis for OS, we identified APR (HR: 2.74, p = 0.02), surgical margin positivity (HR: 12.94, p < 0.001), and adjuvant CT (HR: 0.20, p = 0.002) as separate risk variables for OS. CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the predictive and prognostic significance of LIPI in LARC patients treated with NACRT. The results revealed that int/poor LIPI was associated with a higher rate of good response but shorter DFS compared to good LIPI. The baseline LIPI score serves as an easily accessible and useful prognostic index, and it has significant potential for making appropriate treatment decisions in LARC.